Anti-MPRP group considering legal response to PSEG court order filing for land access
The Public Service Enterprise Group (PSEG), an energy company based in New Jersey, announced Wednesday its intention to file a court order asking for access to properties on or near the route of the Maryland Piedmont Reliability Project (MPRP).
The MPRP is a proposed 500,000-volt transmission line that could cut through northern Baltimore County, central Carroll County and southern Frederick County, ending at the Doubs substation.
PSEG has a contract with PJM Interconnection, the company that coordinates the movement of electricity in 13 states and Washington, D.C., to build the MPRP to address anticipated power demand on the regional grid.
PJM has predicted a significant increase in power demand partially due to new data centers to be sited in Maryland and Virginia, which could require up to 7,500 megawatts of power.
Additionally, more than 11,000 megawatts of power generation have been recently deactivated, meaning less power is being created as the demand rises.
PSEG said it needs access to the hundreds of properties along the route to conduct environmental studies and field surveys to move the MPRP forward.
In order to obtain a certificate from Maryland authorizing the company to build the MPRP, the state is requiring PSEG to conduct these studies to verify the scope of the project's environmental and socioeconomic impacts.
PSEG plans to file a court order on Tuesday asking for temporary access to about 90 properties to conduct these surveys. This could be the first of many filings if PSEG can't successfully negotiate voluntary rights-of-entry with other property owners.
Jason Kalwa, the project's director, said in an interview that gaining temporary access to properties through a court order would not be the same as PSEG using eminent domain.
Eminent domain is a governmental power to seize private property for public use with just compensation.
PSEG will not have access to the properties anymore after completing the field surveys. A judge would decide how much time to grant the company access.
"The property owners are not giving up any other rights. This is temporary access. This is effectively to allow our experts, environmental and otherwise, to walk on the property, take an assessment of what they see there,' Kalwa said.
"... It's not eminent domain. It gives us no permanent rights to the property. It merely gives us access to the property to conduct surveys, which are necessary for many types of permits out there."
PJM has set a deadline of June 1, 2027, for PSEG to finish the MPRP and start operating it.
'We're going to stand together'
Since the project was announced in June, thousands of residents have joined to form a fierce wave of opposition to the project.
At public meetings, they've yelled at PSEG representatives and expressed frustration and fear of how the MPRP cutting through private properties could destroy businesses or drive people out of their homes.
Stop MPRP, which has members from all three counties the MPRP would be in, was formed for the purpose of stopping the project and advocating on behalf of people who will be affected by the transmission line.
Its website, stopmprp.com, includes resources like how to access the proposed route map and what actions people can take to oppose the project.
It also sells items like shirts, bumper stickers and yard signs so people can show their opposition to the project.
When cars drive on areas where the MPRP would go in Frederick County, several properties may have yard signs stuck at the edge of their properties.
They say "No eminent domain for corporate gain" and "Stop Maryland Piedmont Reliability Project," next to a picture of a power line tower being crossed out.
Stop MPRP also has a Facebook group, which had about 10,300 members as of Wednesday afternoon.
After PSEG announced the MPRP's final path in October, it sent out about 800 letters in the fall to the owners of about 600 tracts of property who will be impacted by the route. Some of the land parcels have multiple owners.
Joanne Frederick, president of Stop MPRP's Board of Directors, sent a statement after the final route announcement that said the organization's members are committed to stopping the project completely, regardless of the proposed route.
Land agents on behalf of PSEG have been reaching out to affected property owners to discuss rights-of-entry to properties.
Some owners have been offered compensation of $1,000 for a temporary right-of-entry. Most people have either not responded or denied PSEG's requests.
When Frederick learned about the news of the requested court order Wednesday morning, she said, she wasn't surprised.
Although Stop MPRP doesn't know yet what specific legal response it may pursue — they need to see PSEG's court order filing first — she said the organization "won't sit idly by" and does plan to respond.
She questioned a court's ability to compel people to give up land rights and said PSEG has acted aggressively, now "threatening to take land owners to court," she said.
"These people are scared," Frederick said. "... We're going to stand together."
Frederick County spokesperson Vivian Laxton said the county's stance on the MPRP is still the same in light of news of the court order filing, such as that PSEG should've had a more transparent public engagement process before moving forward with the project.
In September, County Executive Jessica Fitzwater and the Frederick County Council signed a letter urging the state to reject any certificate application from PSEG for the MPRP.
The letter criticized PSEG and PJM for not providing enough information or prior notice of the project to the public. It also said the MPRP "will directly and negatively impact current homes, businesses and farms ... historical preservation sites, and will diminish the property values of thousands of Frederick County residents.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
2 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Electricity Prices Are Soaring Under Donald Trump
Electricity prices across the United States have been climbing in 2025, despite President Donald Trump's repeated pledges to reduce energy costs. Ahead of last year's election, Trump said in an opinion piece for Newsweek that his administration would "cut energy and electricity prices in half within 12 months" for both businesses and American families. He has blamed former President Joe Biden's administration for contributing to energy price hikes. Newsweek reached out to the White House for comment via email on Wednesday. According to U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) data, the average price of electricity per kilowatt-hour has risen from $0.179 in January to $0.190 as of June-an increase of around 6 percent. Between January and February, prices remained steady, according to BLS data. But between February and April, prices rose slightly to $0.181, and then marginally again in May to $0.182. According to the BLS's data, prices then jumped noticeably in June to $0.190. Analysts previously indicated that a spike in natural-gas prices, surging loads from artificial intelligence-driven data centers triggering multibillion-dollar capacity charges, and an aging, congested grid were among the reasons Americans could see higher energy and electricity prices this summer. Analysis by Reuters noted that household energy costs have risen at a rate more than twice that of overall consumer price inflation between June 2024 and 2025. The Financial Times reported that electricity costs in the U.S.'s largest power market are set to hit a record high, driven by surging demand for AI data centers and delays in new power plant construction. Grid operator PJM reported a 22 percent increase in procurement costs to $329.17 per megawatt-day, totaling $16.1 billion for the period from June 2026 to May 2027, representing a 10 percent annual rise, it said. Consumers may see their energy bills increase by one to five percent, depending on how utilities and states pass on the costs, theFinancial Times reported. "Economic growth is driving a massive uptick in electricity demand. Existing supply has been leaving the system due primarily to state and federal decarbonization policies and some economics," a spokesperson for PJM told Newsweek. "As to new supply, PJM has studied and approved 46,000 MW (enough to power about 40 million homes) that have been slow to construct due to reasons outside of PJM's control, including global supply chain, state/federal permitting and financing challenges. "As of June 2025, there are approximately 63,000 MW in projects that will be studied and approved over the next 18 months that we hope will actually construct. In any market, when demand is up and supply is down, there will be an increase in pricing. PJM has been warning of this eventuality for several years now, specifically as it relates to the impact of these supply/demand fundamentals on our ability to reliably operate the power grid." President Donald Trump, in a Newsweek opinion piece published October 1, 2024: "We will cut energy and electricity prices in half within 12 months-not just for businesses but for all Americans and their families, and we will quickly double our electricity capacity, which we need to do to compete with China and other countries on Artificial Intelligence. With the lowest energy prices on earth, we will attract energy-hungry industries from all over the planet and millions of blue-collar jobs." January 2026 will mark the first anniversary of Trump's second term as president. Whether energy and electricity prices fall dramatically by then remains to be seen. Related Articles Five Things Causing Electricity Prices to SpikeWorld's Largest Power Station Could Provide Energy for Half of US HomesEmerald AI Has a New Approach to Meeting AI's Energy DemandGOP Budget Could Increase Energy Bills for Millions of Americans 2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.
Chicago Tribune
5 hours ago
- Chicago Tribune
Editorial: Soaring ComEd bills have us all on edge. Springfield must confront our electricity woes head-on.
The politics of energy in Illinois are hot this summer. And they're only going to get hotter. Residents throughout the Chicago area only now are opening their electric bills and seeing the effect of our sweltering June, combined with substantially higher electricity rates, on their household budgets. With inflation top of mind for everyone, you can add the cost of keeping the lights on and the air conditioners humming to food, insurance, housing, health care and more items making it harder for ordinary folks simply to pay their bills every month. A spike in the cost of energy that took effect June 1 along with higher usage in one of the hottest Junes Chicago has experienced resulted in a $67.28 increase in the average June 30 household electric bill, according to Commonwealth Edison. So far, July has been no picnic either in terms of heat and humidity, so next month's bills aren't likely to provide relief. And, adding to the electric-bill angst, there was news Tuesday that next summer's electric bills will see more upward pressure after the results of a power auction just completed by PJM Interconnection, the power-grid manager for a multistate territory running from northern Illinois east to the mid-Atlantic. The details of that auction are somewhat technical; PJM solicits bids from power generators and others for what the industry calls 'capacity' and what effectively are promises from those power-plant operators to produce energy during high-demand periods over a year. The amount paid to those selected operators for those promises comes from power consumers throughout the PJM region — that is, virtually all households and businesses — and is embedded in the overall price they pay utilities or other suppliers for energy. Much of the reason for this summer's increase in ComEd rates is due to a spike in the current cost of capacity. That capacity cost will rise another 22% in the year beginning in June 2026 after PJM's latest auction. ComEd says that change by itself will hike ComEd rates another 2%, raising the average residential bill by $2.50 per month. Politicians and environmental groups, among others, are castigating PJM for the increases and blaming the grid operator for being too sluggish in approving high-voltage connections of renewable power sources such as wind farms to population centers. PJM, an organization that has operated largely in obscurity for many years despite its centrality to ensuring power is available when most needed, has become a convenient scapegoat for governors across the PJM footprint, including JB Pritzker and Pennsylvania's Josh Shapiro. But at least in Illinois, where Pritzker spearheaded the 2021 Climate & Equitable Jobs Act (CEJA), the governor owns these electricity woes whether he likes it or not and whether it's entirely fair. He and fellow Democrats in Springfield (with some GOP backing) undertook a monumental reordering of the state's power industry, preserving existing nuclear plants through ratepayer subsidies and phasing out all carbon-emitting sources such as coal and natural gas no later than 2050. Environmentalists insisted that a large chunk of those gas-fired plants — which for years have been critical to meeting demand during intense heat waves — shutter by 2030. CEJA in short was an audacious bid by a governor with presidential ambitions to boast the nation's most progressive clean-energy statute. Now, CEJA's mandates appear overly inflexible in light of legitimate concerns about whether enough power will be available during heat waves and cold snaps, especially once more of the many planned data centers — intensely power-hungry facilities — are built in Illinois. PJM's capacity prices aren't soaring for no reason. When demand begins to outstrip supply, prices go up. We warned in September that state policymakers seemed asleep at the switch in the face of a coming electricity crisis. If we're still not quite at a crisis point, we're considerably closer now than we were even nine months ago. Environmental groups and others in the spring pushed for substantial new energy legislation meant in part to address the growing concerns over cost and reliability. No action was taken. Speaking earlier this week at a climate conference in Chicago, Pritzker said, 'We've got legislation that's teed up. … When we get to the new legislature, I'm committed to getting this passed. It includes energy storage, it includes expanding the opportunity within solar and wind, and there are ways we can tweak the already really, really great CEJA bill.' We will have more to say in the future on that bill, which likely will further increase costs for ratepayers in order to incentivize favored energy technologies. If by 'tweaking' CEJA, the governor means making the existing law more flexible in order to confront the growing challenge of reliably furnishing reasonably priced power, we're glad. We're not sure that what he means, though, given that his closest and most influential allies on energy matters — environmental groups — are staunchly opposed to any changes that could be perceived as 'backsliding' on CEJA's mandates. We'll see when debate begins in earnest. Here's another warning for Springfield: The growing public dismay over power bills should be a sign to policymakers that now is not the time for litmus tests and winning plaudits from activists. It's a time for hardheaded pragmatism. Nothing will erode public support for groundbreaking clean-energy policies faster than rolling blackouts and punishing electric bills.
Newsweek
6 hours ago
- Newsweek
Electricity Prices Are Soaring Under Donald Trump
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Electricity prices across the United States have been climbing in 2025, despite President Donald Trump's repeated pledges to reduce energy costs. Why It Matters Ahead of last year's election, Trump said in an opinion piece for Newsweek that his administration would "cut energy and electricity prices in half within 12 months" for both businesses and American families. He has blamed former President Joe Biden's administration for contributing to energy price hikes. Newsweek reached out to the White House for comment via email on Wednesday. What To Know According to U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) data, the average price of electricity per kilowatt-hour has risen from $0.179 in January to $0.190 as of June—an increase of around 6 percent. Between January and February, prices remained steady, according to BLS data. But between February and April, prices rose slightly to $0.181, and then marginally again in May to $0.182. According to the BLS's data, prices then jumped noticeably in June to $0.190. Analysts previously indicated that a spike in natural-gas prices, surging loads from artificial intelligence-driven data centers triggering multibillion-dollar capacity charges, and an aging, congested grid were among the reasons Americans could see higher energy and electricity prices this summer. Analysis by Reuters noted that household energy costs have risen at a rate more than twice that of overall consumer price inflation between June 2024 and 2025. The Financial Times reported that electricity costs in the U.S.'s largest power market are set to hit a record high, driven by surging demand for AI data centers and delays in new power plant construction. Grid operator PJM reported a 22 percent increase in procurement costs to $329.17 per megawatt-day, totaling $16.1 billion for the period from June 2026 to May 2027, representing a 10 percent annual rise, it said. Consumers may see their energy bills increase by one to five percent, depending on how utilities and states pass on the costs, the Financial Times reported. "Economic growth is driving a massive uptick in electricity demand. Existing supply has been leaving the system due primarily to state and federal decarbonization policies and some economics," a spokesperson for PJM told Newsweek. "As to new supply, PJM has studied and approved 46,000 MW (enough to power about 40 million homes) that have been slow to construct due to reasons outside of PJM's control, including global supply chain, state/federal permitting and financing challenges. "As of June 2025, there are approximately 63,000 MW in projects that will be studied and approved over the next 18 months that we hope will actually construct. In any market, when demand is up and supply is down, there will be an increase in pricing. PJM has been warning of this eventuality for several years now, specifically as it relates to the impact of these supply/demand fundamentals on our ability to reliably operate the power grid." Electricity transmission equipment at the Hoover Dam in Boulder City, Nevada, as seen on July 19, 2021. Electricity transmission equipment at the Hoover Dam in Boulder City, Nevada, as seen on July 19, 2021. Patrick T. Fallon/AFP via Getty Images What People Are Saying President Donald Trump, in a Newsweek opinion piece published October 1, 2024: "We will cut energy and electricity prices in half within 12 months—not just for businesses but for all Americans and their families, and we will quickly double our electricity capacity, which we need to do to compete with China and other countries on Artificial Intelligence. With the lowest energy prices on earth, we will attract energy-hungry industries from all over the planet and millions of blue-collar jobs." What Happens Next January 2026 will mark the first anniversary of Trump's second term as president. Whether energy and electricity prices fall dramatically by then remains to be seen.
