Pentagon releases jaw-dropping footage showing how 30,000-pound bunker-buster bombs work
Don't miss out on the headlines from Innovation. Followed categories will be added to My News.
The Pentagon released stunning footage on Thursday showcasing exactly how 30,000-pound heavy-duty bunker-buster bombs work such as the ones used against Iran's nuclear sites demolished fortified targets deep underground.
The video showed a GBU-57 series MOP (Massive Ordnance Penetrator) crashing into a target and kicking up a massive plume of dust moments before a blinding inferno appeared in a shaft during a test detonation.
A GBU-57 series Massive Ordnance Penetrator is seen crashing into a target. Picture: Department of Defense
The 30,000-pound bunker-buster bombs demolish fortified targets deep underground. Picture: Department of Defense
Pilots who dropped the MOPs on Iran called the blast 'the brightest explosion' they ever saw, saying, 'it literally looked like daylight'.
The MOPs used in the strike — which can only be dropped by a B-2 Stealth Bomber — were developed in 2009 after the US learned of the existence of the Fordow uranium enrichment plant.
The bunker buster bombs do not leave craters like traditional bombs. Picture: Department of Defense
A US Air Force B-2 Spirit landing after supporting Operation 'Midnight Hammer'. Picture: US Air Force/AFP
'Unlike a normal surface bomb, you won't see an impact crater because they're designed to deeply bury and then function,' Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Lt. Gen. Dan Caine explained to reporters during a press briefing on Thursday.
'Five [weapons] were tasked to enter the main shaft moved down into the complex at greater than a thousand feet per second, and explode in the mission space … All six weapons at each vent at Fordow [uranium enrichment plant] went exactly where they were intended to go.'
Another angle displayed during the briefing showed an MOP hitting a target in slow motion and cutting through the arched interior of a second ventilation shaft without detonating as it moved its way deeper through the test facility.
'A bomb has three effects that causes damage: blast, fragmentation and overpressure,' he explained. 'In this case, the primary kill mechanisms in the mission space was a mix of overpressure and blast.
'Imagine what this looks like six times over.'
Unidentified pilots inside a B-2 cockpit. Picture: US Air Force
How the US bomber pilots reacted
Lt. Gen. Caine explained that the heroic pilots who helped drop the bombs on three of Iran's nuclear facilities in a super-secret mission over the weekend were awed by the explosive power of the devices.
'We know that the trailing jets saw the first weapons function and the pilots stated, 'This was the brightest explosion that I've ever seen. It literally looked like daylight,'' he said.
He also emphasised that the MOPs don't leave 'impact' craters — shooting down scepticism that the mission wasn't successful.
Satellite images released after the mission show six holes where the deep-diving bombs appeared to have penetrated the mountain above Iran's Fordow nuclear plant.
The press conference was seemingly intended to disabuse reporting on a leaked 'low confidence' Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) assessment that Iran's nuclear program may have only been set back months, Lt. Gen. Caine played jaw-dropping footage of a MOP attack.
A poster of the Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant is displayed. Picture:/AFP
Prior to developing the GBU-57, the military had assessed that it didn't have a 'weapon that could adequately strike and kill this target'.
'The crews that attacked Fordow were from the active duty Air Force and the Missouri Air National Guard,' Lt. Gen. Caine said of the pilots.
'The crews ranked from captain to colonel, and most were graduates of the Air Force weapons school headquartered at Nellis Air Force Base in Nevada. I will state for the record that there is no beach volleyball or football at the Air Force weapons school,' he added, making a Top Gun reference.
Lt. Gen. Caine had a video call with the crews recently and noted that there were both men and women involved in the daring attack.
'This felt like the Super Bowl, the thousands of scientists, airmen and maintainers all coming together,' he remarked.
'One last story about people. When the crews went to work on Friday, they kissed their loved ones goodbye, not knowing when or if they'd be home.
Pete Hegseth, left, with the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Picture:/AFP
'Late on Saturday night, their families became aware of what was happening, and on Sunday, when those jets returned … their families were there, flags flying and tears flowing. I have chills, literally talking about this.'
The country's highest-ranking military officer underscored that 'our forces remain on a high state of readiness in the region, prepared to defend themselves'.
'Our adversaries around the world should know that there are other DTRA [Defense Threat Reduction Agency] team members out there studying targets for the same amount of time, and we'll continue to do so,' he said of the group that developed the MOPs to use against Fordow.
At one point during the briefing, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who raged at the press repeatedly, was pressed about why he congratulated the 'boys' for the successful mission.
'I'm very proud of that female pilot, just like I'm very proud of those male pilots — and I don't care if it's a male or female in that cockpit, and the American people don't care,' Mr Hegseth clapped back. 'We don't play your little games.'
This article originally appeared on NY Post and was reproduced with permission
Originally published as Pentagon releases jaw-dropping footage showing how 30,000-pound bunker-buster bombs work
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
2 hours ago
- ABC News
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's problems not going away after Iran war
Deep in the throes of battle with Iran, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu made a rare public appearance at a falafel stand near a missile impact site just south of Tel Aviv. It's something seldom seen outside of election campaigns. Supporters lined the streets to get a glimpse of their leader, and as he appeared, they started chanting: "Bibi; King of Israel." It stood in stark contrast to the months of public vitriol Netanyahu copped from millions of Israeli citizens, who'd been frustrated with the country's lingering war in Gaza and the fact 50 hostages remained there. For a moment, it appeared the PM's popularity was about to surge. As soon as Israel launched its air strikes on Iran, there was overwhelming support for the attack amongst Jewish Israelis and bipartisan backing across the political divide. A survey by the Israel Democracy Institute found 82 per cent of Jewish Israelis supported the attack on Iran. On the streets, Israelis were quick to explain why they backed the attack. They highlighted the Iranian regime's stated desire to destroy Israel, and how they viewed the strikes as a turning point in their country's history. There was also a sense that Israel was taking on Iran on behalf of the world — that they were doing something their allies could not, or would not, do. "This is a time of miracles and we will win," one Israeli told me. Another was more direct, saying: "We will f*** the bastards and, after that, no-one will think about starting even a small thing with Israel." During the war with Iran, Netanyahu has been on the optics front line, making several appearances at missile impact sites in Tel Aviv and at a hospital struck in the country's south, reiterating his message that launching the attack has been for Israel's greater good. Few people from the political echelon, and elsewhere around the country, spoke out against him. And now the war is over, Israelis I've spoken with still seem to believe the short-lived conflict was necessary, and they achieved massive successes in cutting down a regime that'd presented an existential threat for decades. Among all the encouragement and praise for the war amongst the Israeli public, you could be forgiven for thinking the same wave of support would flow through to "King Bibi". But Israeli politics is rarely that simple. Instead, polling released during and after the war suggests the country's left and right-wing voter base hasn't really shifted in its views. Netanyahu's Likud Party has received a modest bump, but at the expense of other groups within his ruling coalition. It means, if an election were held in Israel today, it's likely Mr Netanyahu would struggle to form government, which would end his reign. Netanyahu might be Israel's longest-serving leader in history, but his coalition is tenuous — held together by six separate political parties, some of which routinely threaten to pull the pin on their support if they don't agree with his policies, including how to end the war in Gaza. So why hasn't the perceived success of the Iranian attack extended as praise for the prime minister behind it? The Netanyahu camp could have believed Operation Rising Lion — as it was officially named — would erase painful and controversial memories for Israelis, including the security failures of October 7 and the ongoing war in Gaza, where 50 hostages remain held captive, including at least 20 known to be alive. While Netanyahu's assault on Iran is considered locally impressive, and the victories made remarkable, the prime minister is facing a major problem. On Saturday night, protesters were back on the streets in Tel Aviv, gathering in anger over what they described as a "festering wound" for Netanyahu. They're talking about the fact there's no ceasefire in the Israel-Gaza war. That ongoing campaign, in which it is estimated by Gazan health authorities that more than 50,000 Palestinians in the besieged territory have been killed, is becoming increasingly unpopular in Israel, particularly because of the plight of the hostages — some of whom are alive, some of whom are not. Polling released in March by Israel's popular Channel 12 found 69 per cent of Israelis supported ending the Gaza war in return for an agreement which saw all hostages released. Even among voters of Netanyahu's right-wing coalition, 54 per cent backed that equation. As one Israeli put it to me: "Bibi might have thought another war would distract us from Gaza, but we haven't forgotten the hostages." Until that wound is closed, it's likely Netanyahu's approval, and chances of re-election next year, will continue to dissolve.
ABC News
2 hours ago
- ABC News
Zohran Mamdani defeats New York Democratic rivals and claims victory for party's progressives
It was a fierce and at times nasty battle that pitted competing visions and ambitions for the future of the Democratic Party against one another. In the end, the New York progressives emerged victorious, and they now believe they have the momentum to change their party. The race to determine who would be the Democratic candidate for New York City mayor had two distinct sides. On one was the Democratic establishment — Andrew Cuomo, the former governor of the State of New York and scion of one of the country's most powerful political families. On the other, the progressive insurgency — Zohran Mamdani, a 33-year-old Muslim and self-declared "Democratic socialist" and critic of capitalism who was promising to hike taxes on the rich. In the end, New York City voted for the younger and far less experienced Mamdani to be its Democratic candidate for mayor, shocking the party establishment and lighting a fire under the progressives who are ready to march further to the left. From the position of president, down to school boards in some local counties, Americans get to vote on who they want to hold power, but they also get to vote on the candidates that end up on the ballot via primaries. While Donald Trump and his MAGA movement have ascended and now reign supreme over the Republican Party, there is a battle going on inside the opposition. Since the defeat of Kamala Harris in November, the Democratic Party has been in the throes of an identity crisis. Some believe future electoral success lies in embracing the left fringe of the party, others want the centre to hold. Now progressives have had a major win. With 43.5 per cent of the vote in the first round, Mamdani is now poised to run as the party's candidate for mayor of New York at the general election on November 4. Mamdani ran a slick social media heavy campaign, and with liberal uses of celebrities, built a grassroots effort that propelled him to victory. "This is not just about New York, this is about the Democratic Party. It's about the hope that we have … that people can win elections, not just money," said celebrity Emily Ratajkowski as she endorsed Mamdani. Voters opted for the man with the shorter resume over someone with a problematic one. Cuomo had been backed by billionaires and as a former governor Cuomo had name recognition, but New Yorkers also could not forget the sexual harassment allegations levelled at him. Mamdani's victory has energised the progressive wing of the Democratic Party. They've seized on his success as evidence that a bold left-wing platform can be electorally successful. But that narrative is already being contested by centrist and moderate members of the party who argue a campaign like Mamdani's might work in inner cities, but will not translate to the suburbs of middle America which determine elections. Either way, Mamdani's win does a few things. It gives progressives momentum, rattles the party establishment and presents an opportunity to Donald Trump and his Republican army. A few short months ago, you would have struggled to find anyone who had heard of Zohran Mamdani outside of local politics and now he is being lionised and pilloried by some of America's biggest political players. His life story became a big part of his campaign. He was born in Kampala in Uganda to a family of Indian ancestry before he moved to New York at age seven. His mother, Mira Nair, is a well-known film director and his father is Mahmood Mamdani, is a professor at Columbia University, specialising in the study of colonialism. Mamdani is married to artist and ceramicist Rama Duwaji who was attacked online by right-wing trolls throughout the campaign. The couple met on Hinge. If the people of New York back Mamdani at the general election, he'd be the first South Asian and first Muslim mayor. He would also be an anti-capitalism mayor in a city that was arguably the birthplace of the United States free market-loving economy. Before his political career, Mamdani worked in film and as a writer. He even had his own short-lived hip hop career as Mr Cardamom, with lyrics like: "I'm your boss, I'm your f**king Nani. Got a doctorate bitch, so don't f**king try me." Mamdani ran on a hyper progressive agenda. He has been promising free buses, rent freezes, tripling the production of rent stabilised housing and to develop a chain of city-owned grocery stores to bring down the prices of basics. But perhaps the most contentious issue in this campaign was his position on Israel and Palestine, despite the New York mayor not having any foreign policy responsibilities. Mamdani's long standing activism on behalf of Palestinians and staunch criticism of Israel was seized upon by his opponents. Mamdani has accused Israel of committing genocide in Gaza and practising apartheid. He's even said he'd arrest Benjamin Netanyahu, if the Israeli prime minister was to visit New York while he was mayor. New York City, with an estimated 1.5 to 2 million Jews, is often considered to be the second largest Jewish city in the world, after Tel Aviv. The conventional political view has been, until now, that to be successful in New York, a candidate needed to be pro-Israel. That was the track Cuomo was running, describing himself as a "hyper supporter of Israel and proud of it". Andrew Cuomo came to this race with heavy baggage, which weighed down his popularity. He stood down as governor of New York state in 2021 after being accused of sexual harassment by multiple women. The Justice Department found Cuomo had repeatedly subjected women in his office to non-consensual sexual contact. Cuomo continues to deny he did anything illegal. But Cuomo was well supported by the Democratic establishment. And he was backed by billionaires like former mayor Michael Bloomberg and investor Bill Ackman. Bill Clinton also backed Cuomo, who'd once served as his secretary of housing urban development, with the former president saying: "It is imperative that New York chooses a mayor who has the ability, talent, and experience to do the job." While Cuomo's campaign did its best to paint Mamdani as ill-equipped for the job of running a city with a $115 billion budget and that employs about 300,000 workers, the voters were not swayed. Republicans seem to think Mamdani's win and the Democrats that delivered it have handed them a major advantage in other races. They are doing their best to elevate Mamdani to national prominence. Vice President JD Vance has been calling him "the new leader of the Democratic Party". While President Trump has been calling Mamdani a "100% Communist Lunatic". The National Republican Congressional Committee labelled him as an "antisemitic socialist radical". While Mamdani rejects any claim he's an antisemite, he embraces the term socialist. Basil Smikle, a political analyst and professor at Columbia University's School of Professional Studies, said heavy-handed attacks on Mamdani could backfire by energising "a lot of the Democratic voters to want to push more against Trump". Mamdani has paid credit to another high-profile "Democratic socialist", Vermont senator and former presidential candidate Bernie Sanders, calling him "the single most influential political figure" in his life. Sanders said Mamdani's victory was due to a "brilliant campaign" and claims Kamala Harris would be president today if she had followed the Mamdani playbook. In addition to Sanders, perhaps Mamdani's most important endorsement came from Congressional representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez , more commonly known as AOC. She threw her weight behind his bid in the final weeks of the campaign. "Assemblymember Mamdani has demonstrated a real ability on the ground to put together a coalition of working-class New Yorkers that is strongest to lead the pack," she said. AOC is the most high-profile member of the progressive wing of the party. She's been suggested as potential president candidate in 2028 or may launch a bid to unseat the long serving senator Chuck Schumer. But while the progressive wing is basking in the glow of the unexpected New York victory, the party is split on what the win means. Democratic strategist Tim Lim told Politico: "For moderates and wealthy Democratic donors, the reaction is, this is horrible and it's going to ruin us." "For centre-line Democrats who don't necessarily support Mamdani's policies, the reaction is, this is a rejection of the Democratic establishment and Mamdani ran a great campaign against a sex offender. "And for progressives, they believe this is what happens when you listen to voters." For his part, Mamdani seemed ready to embrace any role as a party leader, telling supporters in his victory speech that he would govern the city "as a model for the Democratic Party – a party where we fight for working people with no apology". He vowed to use his mayoral power to "reject Donald Trump's fascism". Mamdani will go to the general election in the mayoral race this November. Next November, the United States will vote in midterm elections, which will be the first real test of national sentiment towards the second Trump presidency. By November 2028, the Democratic Party will have to have figured out how to defeat whoever takes over the MAGA mission. While Mamdani's primary victory was a seismic shock to the party, it will be but a blip if he doesn't become mayor in November and that is by no means a lock. It's a crowded field. He'll be facing the current Mayor Eric Adams who previously won as a Democrat before leaving the party when it was clear he would not win the primary. Andrew Cuomo is also leaving the door open to a run as an independent and there will also be a Republican flag-bearer. It is also likely to be a well-financed contest. Billionaire Bill Ackman has already promised to bankroll a rival. He has claimed he and his allies are willing to spend "hundreds of millions of dollars" to ensure Mamdani does not emerge victorious. While Mamdani's pledges to hike taxes and expand services won over New York's Democrats, it might be a different matter once Republicans and independents are given their chance to make a pledge to voters. The ranked choice system New York uses for its elections, which is similar to Australia's preferential system, also rewards moderation so it is possible it will work against him when there are more centrist candidates competing. But win or lose in November, Mamdani has delivered a message to the party's most powerful at a time when there is a vacuum of strategy and direction. By running on a platform that represents, not the top 1 per cent, but the other 99, Mamdani pulled off a monumental political upset. "Cost of living is the issue of our time," Neera Tanden, the chief executive of Democratic think tank Center for American Progress wrote on X in response to Mamdani's win. ABC/Reuters
News.com.au
4 hours ago
- News.com.au
Trump warns against ‘ultimate betrayal' as voting begins to pass his megabill
US President Donald Trump has warned Senate Republicans that refusing to support his 'big beautiful bill' would represent the 'ultimate betrayal'. 'With its passage, Americans will keep more of their hard-earned money while taking home much bigger paychecks,' according to a White House statement obtained by NewsNation on Saturday local time. 'Failure to pass this bill would be the ultimate betrayal.' The warning shot was fired as Senate members later Saturday prepared to take a procedural vote to kick off debate on the revised, 940-page multi trillion-dollar bill that makes Mr Trump's 2017 tax cuts permanent, ends taxation on tips and overtime, boosts border security funding and scraps green-energy tax credits passed during the Biden administration. The megabill is expected to raise the debt ceiling by roughly $5 trillion in order to cram all the provisions in. It could be a make or break moment for the Republican Party – which has invested much of its political capital on Mr Trump's signature domestic policy plan. At its core, the legislation would make permanent many of the tax breaks from Mr Trump's first term that would otherwise expire by year's end if Congress fails to act, resulting in a potential tax increase on Americans. The bill would add new breaks, including no taxes on tips, and commit $350 billion to national security, including for Mr Trump's mass deportation agenda. The Senate will work through the weekend to try and pass Mr Trump's bill by his July 4 deadline. With a 53-47 majority in the upper chamber, the GOP can only afford to lose three votes and still pass the package with a tie-breaking ballot cast by Vice President JD Vance, The NY Post reports. A version of it passed the House by a single vote May 22. But the lower chamber will have to vote on the bill again after the Senate finalises its changes to it. Senator Thom Tillis, R-N. C., said he is concerned about the fundamentals of the package and will not support the procedural motion to begin debate. 'I'm voting no on the motion to proceed,' he said. Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer of New York said Republicans are rushing to finish the bill before the public fully knows what's in it. 'There's no good reason for Republicans to chase a silly deadline,' he added. Mr Trump had been hoping the bill would pass both chambers and reach his desk for signing by July 4. 'The Great Republicans in the U.S. Senate are working all weekend to finish our 'ONE, BIG, BEAUTIFUL BILL,'' the president posted on his Truth Social on Friday.
