
As more Australians save, banks are cutting interest rates for deposits faster than the RBA's offical cash rate
ANZ on Friday cut the full rate on its progress saver account from 3.5% per year to 3.4% despite the RBA leaving its target rate unchanged a week earlier in a shock move.
Westpac dropped its reward saver rate by 0.05% in June, taking the bank's total cuts to the rate to 0.65% since February. The RBA has only cut its target rate by 0.5% over that period.
Both banks have also cut rates on their alternative savings products over the year, in line with the Reserve Bank.
Ubank has slashed its rate by a much greater 0.9% over 2025. On Tuesday, Ubank cut its savings rate to just 4.6%, while adding a temporary bonus for new customers and a higher threshold on account balances.
Bendigo Bank dropped its EasySaver rate by 0.1% in July, according to Canstar tracking.
Major lenders have cut the rates offered to savers faster than the RBA has cut its own key interest rate since the start of 2024 – narrowing returns paid to customers and boosting bank profits.
Rates have fallen further for standard or online accounts, which have no conditions, though conditional bonus account rates are also sliding as banks cut their losses. Only four banks are now offering widely accessible accounts with interest rates of 5% or more, Canstar's database shows.
The slide is a sign banks are taking advantage of Australians' high demand for savings accounts instead of competing for deposits, according to Sally Tindall, the data insights director at Canstar.
'Money in the bank is at a record high, so banks aren't having to compete for people's deposits,' she said.
'Australians are absolutely focused on putting their funds away for a rainy day [so] the banks are flush with cash.'
Guardian Australia has previously asked major banks about their decisions to trim unconditional savings rates, pushing customers towards conditional rates, before cutting the conditional rates as well.
A Westpac spokesperson in June said interest rates were affected by market pressures.
Sign up to Afternoon Update
Our Australian afternoon update breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
'In making interest rate decisions, we consider a range of factors including the cost of funds and the broader market environment, balancing the needs of both borrowers and savers,' the spokesperson said.
Lenders have enjoyed increased freedom to cut rewards for savers as the volume of savings rises, with workers setting aside a rising proportion of their incomes as cost-of-living pressures ease.
National data released in May showed the proportion of household income saved rather than spent had risen to its highest level since 2022.
The rising share of income dedicated to saving has seen households' deposits in banks soar to a record $1.62tn in 2025, rising by $24bn over the five months to May, data from the banking regulator shows.
The Reserve Bank is expected to cut interest rates in August despite surprising markets in July, with economists predicting the cash rate will fall 0.25%.
That would see further cuts to interest rates, which would benefit mortgage holders but likely wipe out the handful of savings accounts still offering a 5% annual return, according to Tindall.
'Cash rate cuts are a double-edged sword and we so often see banks [pass] that cut on to savers faster than they do to their mortgage rate customers,' she said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Beam Mobility and Neuron to Merge, Solidifying APAC E-Scooter Leadership
SINGAPORE, July 21, 2025 (EZ Newswire) -- Leading international e-scooter operators Beam Mobility, opens new tab and Neuron Mobility, opens new tab have signed a preliminary agreement, opens new tab as they work towards a merger that will solidify their micromobility leadership in Asia Pacific. The merger of the two Singapore-headquartered companies will bring together strong industry expertise, laying a solid foundation for profitability, scalable growth, and long-term success. Completion of the transaction is expected within 60 days, subject to customary closing conditions. The combined company will operate in over 100 cities and will retain both the Beam and Neuron brands, deploying each in their strongest markets. Neuron is a market leader in Australia and Canada, while Beam's strong presence in South Korea, Southeast Asia, and Turkey, as well as their recent launch in the U.S., unlocks exciting new opportunities. Neuron Mobility's co-founder and CEO, Zachary Wang, will lead the combined company as chairman and global CEO. He will be supported by Beam Mobility's CEO and co-founder, Alan Jiang, who will become the CEO of Asia. Beam's president, and fellow co-founder, Deb Gangopadhyay, will become a strategic advisor while shaping the industry with groups like the Open Mobility Foundation. Further leadership appointments will be announced in due course. The new company will be headquartered in Singapore. Zachary Wang, opens new tab, CEO of Neuron Mobility, said: "We are excited to share our plans to bring together the strengths of both companies, creating a truly global e-scooter operator with a clear path to profitability. The combined company will leverage Neuron's leadership in Australia and Canada, along with Beam's strong presence in South Korea, Southeast Asia, and Turkey, while also unlocking new opportunities for growth.' Alan Jiang, opens new tab, CEO of Beam Mobility, said: "The deal unlocks a wealth of exciting opportunities, allowing us to leverage the best of both companies. As well as strengthening our position in Australia and New Zealand, Beam's large vehicle fleet and expertise in permit-based and emerging markets, combined with Neuron's strong track record in tender-based markets, will provide a solid foundation for sustainable growth and international expansion." Deb Gangopadhyay, opens new tab, president of Beam Mobility, said: 'I'm incredibly proud of what we've built at Beam over the past seven years. This merger unites two of the most innovative companies, and I'm excited to support the combined company as a strategic advisor. I'm also looking forward to shaping the future of our industry through leadership and collaboration with key organisations such as the Open Mobility Foundation.' Existing Neuron Mobility investors, including Square Peg Capital and GSR Ventures, along with Beam Mobility's investors, including Affirma Capital, Hana Ventures, and Peak XV Partners, will all take a stake in the new company. Media Contact Beam Mobilitypress@ ### SOURCE: Beam Mobility Copyright 2025 EZ Newswire See release on EZ Newswire


The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Pensions aren't working – Labour is right to grasp the nettle
Put simply, unless we act, tomorrow's pensioners will be poorer than today's, because people who are saving aren't saving enough for their retirement. And crucially, because almost half of the working-age population isn't saving anything for their retirement at all.' It's fair to say that the secretary of state for work and pensions, Liz Kendall, has had a challenging time of it since she took her first ministerial job a little more than a year ago. But that doesn't mean that everything she says is wrong – or that every initiative she takes should be doomed. On pensions, she seems determined to make sure she's not forced by the Treasury into another precipitate and politically disastrous move before first winning the arguments on reform, not least within her own party. State and private pensions are ripe for further restructuring, as is the wider social security system, and the country cannot afford another debacle on the scale of the recent welfare reform bill. Neither can Ms Kendall, or her impatient colleague, the chancellor. Fortunately for the government, much of the background work was completed some years ago, and the machinery to reshape policy is available 'off the shelf'. The Pensions Commission, which last reported in 2006, was a rare success in that many of its recommendations were actually implemented and proved to be highly successful. Now, for example, some 88 per cent of workers are auto-enrolled into a private pension, with at least 3 per cent of their salary paid by their employer into an approved scheme. The result is a widespread, but still inadequate, building-up of private pension provision. Not enough is being put aside for old age and infirmity, particularly by younger workers – who, tragically, have the most time on their side to make their savings grow – and the self-employed. The UK, post-Brexit and in a more unstable world, is hampered by low investment, sluggish productivity growth, an expensive national debt, and a seemingly intractable cost-of-living crisis. As Ms Kendall points out, the triple lock – which guarantees that the state pension rises in line with inflation, or wage increases, or by 2.5 per cent, whichever is the greatest – costs some £31bn a year; even if this figure stabilises as inflation subsides, an ageing population, living longer but in poorer health, will push the overall cost of state retirement age benefits well beyond the current figure of about £140bn a year, or 5 per cent of GDP. Given that these benefits constitute by far the largest component of the total social security bill, welfare reform is impossible without some way of putting them on a more sustainable footing. To the dismay of some, Ms Kendall has taken one immediate step in that direction by bringing forward the next statutory review of the state retirement age, which has already been raised by successive governments. While natural justice and practicalities will protect many who are now in their sixties, for those currently in their forties and fifties, facing further postponements in their state pension eligibility is akin to chasing the proverbial pot of gold at the end of the rainbow (and it's not that golden, either). It is true that life expectancy nowadays is far higher than when the Liberal chancellor David Lloyd George established the state pension in 1908 – it now stands at 82 years, against 52 in the Edwardian era – but no one can make sensible provision for their retirement if their state entitlement keeps disappearing over the horizon. If it is to be raised – perhaps to 70 or so – to take account of (sometimes expensive) advances in healthcare and a changing society, then it should be kept there permanently. There is, therefore, much for Ms Kendall and the Pensions Commission to do – especially in making the country, and particularly the parliamentary Labour Party, face up to those 'tough choices' that politicians themselves so often talk about but ultimately duck. Policy must be evidence based, and thus persuasive, and the commission will help with that. One thing that would be highly perverse in this context would be for the chancellor to attack savings, and tax pension pots, in her next Budget. Rachel Reeves herself has spoken of the imperative to increase investment by pension funds in productive infrastructure schemes. It would hardly be sensible, then, to start taxing them even more heavily, or to force them into unsuitable or risky pet infrastructure projects that will leave pensioners shortchanged. The updated strategy for pensions, both state and private, will also need to be meshed with whatever reforms to the way we pay for social care eventually emerge from the Casey Review, commissioned by Wes Streeting. Younger folk have more than enough to deal with today, and find saving difficult. Yet one distant day, when they are too old or sick to work – unlikely as it may seem now – they might be grateful that Ms Kendall, otherwise long forgotten, put provisions in place to make their lives a little easier.


Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Spain's BBVA says expects acceptance period for Sabadell bid to start in September
MADRID, July 21 (Reuters) - Spain's BBVA ( opens new tab expects the acceptance period for its takeover bid for smaller rival Sabadell ( opens new tab to start in early September, rather than at the end of July as initially planned, a spokesperson for BBVA said on Monday. The spokesperson for BBVA said this would allow the bank to include the most up-to-date information in its takeover prospectus such as the outcome of Sabadell's extraordinary meetings on August 6. Sabadell shareholders are summoned to vote on the agreed sale of its British unit TSB to Santander ( opens new tab and also on the extraordinary 2.5 billion euros ($2.92 billion) cash dividend it plans to distribute among shareholders thanks to the proceeds of the divestment. The decision to dispose of TSB offers Sabadell a potential defensive play as it seeks to stop BBVA's over 13 billion euro takeover approach, aimed at creating Spain's second-biggest bank by credit volume after Caixabank ( opens new tab. A spokesperson for the Spanish stock market supervisor said that it considered as "adequate the proposal put forward by BBVA so that shareholders of Sabadell can have all the information" before deciding whether to tender their shares. In Spain, legislation requires the governing bodies of a company targeted in a takeover bid to request shareholder approval before promoting or taking any action that might prevent an acquisition from succeeding. BBVA decided to proceed with the Sabadell bid despite the Spanish government blocking it from fully merging with its smaller rival for at least three years as one of the conditions imposed on the planned transaction. The takeover prospectus is expected to be approved before the acceptance period, spokespeople for BBVA and the CNMV said. ($1 = 0.8555 euros)