logo
Sona shareholders give overwhelming thumbs up to Sanjay Kaupur's wife as director amid family feud

Sona shareholders give overwhelming thumbs up to Sanjay Kaupur's wife as director amid family feud

Time of India4 days ago
Rani Kapur
, mother of the late
Sanjay Kapur
, asked
Sona BLW Precision
last week to postpone its scheduled Annual General Meeting on July 25, alleging several irregularities in the way the Kapur family's interests were being represented in the business after her son's sudden demise last month.
Kapur was the Chairman of Sona and he passed away after an alleged bee attack while playing polo. But Sona did not heed Rani's request, the AGM went ahead as scheduled and among other decisions, the company's shareholders overwhelmingly supported the appointment of Sanjay's wife
Priya Sachdev Kapur
as a non-executive director. Priya's appointment is for five years.
It is interesting to see that amid all the whispers of a family feud and innuendos about Priya's nomination - which is believed to be one of the reasons behind Rani Kapur's request to postpone the AGM though the matriarch has not said this publicly - an overwhelming 99.4 per cent of the shareholders who were present and voting cast their votes in Priya's favour.
Also Read: Sunjay's mom challenges wife's posting as Sona Comstar director
In fact, of the four director-level appointments for which voting was conducted on the AGM day, only the reappointment of MD and CEO Vivek Vikram Singh as a director received slightly higher vote share, making it clear that at least as far as shareholders were concerned, the appointment of Priya was given a thumbs up.
At the AGM, the appointment of Jeffery Mark Overly as chairman was also approved; Overly succeeded Sanjay.
Sona was promoted by Rani's husband, the late Surinder Kapur. As of March 31 this year, however, the promoter shareholding of 28.02 per cent in Sona was held by Aureus Investment Private Limited, a company in which Priya is a director while Rani may not hold any stake at all in Aureus.
As per Sona's annual report for 2024-25, Rani Kapur held just 72 shares in it as on March 31, 2005. And in a regulatory filing, Sona has said that in May 2019, it received a declaration of significant beneficial ownership 'identifying Shri Sunjay Kapur as the sole beneficial owner of RK Family Trust, a significant shareholder of AIPL (Aureus). As per company records, Mrs. Rani Kapur has not been a shareholder of the company since at least 2019'.
Meanwhile, the annual report also sheds some more light on the process of appointment of Priya as a non-executive director. First of all, her appointment is dated June 23 and is, thus, not a recent development.
Also Read: Sona Comstar rejects Rani Kapur's call to defer AGM, cites compliance, governance norms
Second, her appointment was done after the recommendation of the Nomination and Remuneration Committee of the board of directors and upon receipt of her nomination from one of the members in writing.
Third, the appointment was subject to approval by the shareholders, which is now in place. Fourth, Priya is showcased as a highly talented individual with a diverse set of skills and vast business experience.
A double masters in Mathematics and Business Management, Priya is a former investment banker and 'luxury retail pioneer'. She began her professional life with Credit Suisse First Boston in London and as per the Sona annual report, Priya has led ventures in automotive retail, insurance and high fashion.
Among the board level skills listed against her name are: Strategic planning, thinking and management; global exposure; accounting and legal; and regulatory compliance. Subsequent to her appointment on the board, Priya has also been made the chairperson of Sona's CSR committee.
The feud:
Rani Kapur has raised questions about the ownership structure of Aureus, the company through which the Kapur family owns 28.02 per cent stake in Sona BLW Precision. Reports have suggested that the matriarch has alleged she was made to sign several documents without knowing their content and that she was suspicious of the cause of death of Sanjay.
Though nothing has been said about any opposition to Priya's appointment as a director in Sona after Sanjay's demise, the very fact that Aureus' shareholding is being questioned automatically brings the spotlight on to the late Chairman's wife and her role at Sona. Vaibhav Gaggar, the lawyer representing Rani Kapur, meanwhile sought more time to respond to questions over the entire dispute.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What Sunjay Kapur's Children Samaira, Kiaan And Azarius Will Inherit From His Rs 30,000 Crore Estate
What Sunjay Kapur's Children Samaira, Kiaan And Azarius Will Inherit From His Rs 30,000 Crore Estate

NDTV

time8 hours ago

  • NDTV

What Sunjay Kapur's Children Samaira, Kiaan And Azarius Will Inherit From His Rs 30,000 Crore Estate

New Delhi: Karisma Kapoor's ex-husband and billionaire businessman Sunjay Kapur died on June 12 after suffering a heart attack during a polo match in London. Kapur's sudden death created a mini-crisis of succession at Sona Comstar, one of the world's leading auto component manufacturers. He took over the company after the death of his father, Dr Surinder Kapur, in 2015 and spearheaded its expansion into new markets. Bloomberg reported that Sona Comstar has a market cap of Rs 31,000 crore (nearly $4 billion). Following his death, the company's shares fell by 7% as speculation over succession intensified. Sona Comstar addressed Sunjay Kapur's death in a statement that read, "His vision, values, and dedication to excellence have left a lasting legacy for the company. We assure our customers, business partners, employees, and shareholders that our operations and prospects remain unchanged as we honour his legacy." While there is no official confirmation yet on who will take over the reins of the company, a report by stated that Sunjay's sisters may step into management roles for now. The existing board is currently exercising its powers. Days after Sunjay's death, the board appointed Jeffrey Mark Overly as chairman. The Succession Feud Sunjay Kapur's death has triggered a bitter feud within the Kapur family. Rani Kapur, the widow of Sona Group founder Dr Surinder Kapur and Sunjay's mother, alleged that she was excluded from key decisions made during her period of mourning. In a letter to SEBI and company shareholders, she wrote: "I was emotionally shattered and coerced into signing documents I hadn't seen. This AGM is a betrayal of the family legacy." She further accused the board of undermining the family legacy by swiftly appointing Priya Sachdev Kapur, Sunjay's wife, as a non-executive director without family consultation. Rani also raised concerns over unauthorised individuals claiming to represent the family. However, the company refuted these allegations in an official statement, noting, "Rani Kapur has not held shares in the company since 2019. No documents were signed or collected from her after Sunjay's death. All board decisions, including Priya's appointment, followed due process and shareholder approval. The AGM notice was issued on July 1; her request to delay came only on July 24." Who Inherits What? According to Forbes, Sunjay Kapur had a net worth of $1.2 billion (Rs 10,300 crore) at the time of his death. His peak wealth was valued at $1.6 billion (Rs 13,000 crore) in 2022 and 2024. Sunjay was the sole beneficiary of the RK Family Trust, which holds the promoter stake in Sona Comstar via Aureus Investments Pvt Ltd. As per law, the management of his estate and wealth now passes on to his wife, Priya Sachdev Kapur. However, his two children with Karisma Kapoor, Samaira (20) and Kiaan (14), have also been provided for. As part of legacy planning, Sunjay had gifted bonds worth Rs 14 crore to the two children and ensured a monthly income of Rs 10 lakh each, according to reports. During the asset allotment, Karisma was also given ownership of a house owned by Sunjay Kapur's father. Background Sunjay married Bollywood actress Karisma Kapoor in 2003. The couple became parents to daughter Samaira in 2005 and son Kiaan in 2011. They filed for divorce through mutual consent in 2014, and the divorce was finalised in 2016. Custody of the children was given to Karisma, while Sunjay was granted visitation rights. Post-divorce, Sunjay married Priya Sachdev, who already had a daughter from a previous marriage. The couple later had a son together named Azarius, who is now 6. About Sunjay Kapur's Death According to sources close to him, Sanjay Kapur was playing polo at the Guards Polo Club when he felt suffocated. He requested to stop the game and then left the ground. Thereafter, he suffered a heart attack and died. The sources further said, Sunjay Kapur apparently swallowed a bee, and the sting in his throat caused a heart attack. Sunjay was running a polo team, Aureus, of which he was the patron. He was playing against Sujan, a team run by hotelier Jaisal Singh, when the tragic incident occurred.

Family feuds that shook Indian business: Sona Comstar, Sun TV, Yes Bank
Family feuds that shook Indian business: Sona Comstar, Sun TV, Yes Bank

Mint

time12 hours ago

  • Mint

Family feuds that shook Indian business: Sona Comstar, Sun TV, Yes Bank

Two-thirds of all businesses worldwide are family-owned. In India, that number is significantly higher at 85%. These businesses are often seen not just as assets, but as the glue that binds families together. The attachment runs deeper than a regular job. This is likely why the Edelman Trust Barometer finds trust in family-led businesses 12 percentage points higher than in their professionally managed peers. The ideal scenario is one where the business is nurtured by the family and passed down to the next generation, which then takes the legacy forward. But this is easier said than done. According to PwC's 11th India Family Business Survey, such enterprises often face a lack of trust, accountability, and governance. Things get especially fraught when the question of "who gets what" raises ownership disputes. Here are three cases where succession battles have split apart not just families but businesses as well. Sona Comstar – An emerging EV player derailed by rifts in the family? Sona Comstar is the latest entrant to the growing list of family feuds. Just over a month ago, on 23 June, Sunjay Kapur, the company's chairman and non-executive director, passed away. The automotive systems and components manufacturer, previously known as Sona BLW Precision Forgings, had been steadily shifting focus toward battery electric vehicles (BEV). Its revenue from BEVs has grown six-fold since FY21, raising their share of the overall business from 14% to 36%. With an order book of ₹24,200 crore against FY25 revenue of ₹3,554 crore, the company boasts seven years' worth of revenue visibility. Nearly 80% of this order book is tied to EVs. That explains how, despite a broader auto sector slowdown, the company rode the EV tailwinds to deliver an impressive 19% CAGR in revenue between FY22 and FY25. In its FY25 investor presentation, the company also announced plans to enter the humanoid robot market. With overlapping components such as motors, gears, and sensors, this segment is seen as a natural diversification avenue for auto component firms. So, when Sona announced its venture into China's EV market on 20 July, less than a month after Kapur's passing, it signalled business continuity and commitment to long-term strategy. But just four days later, when Kapur's wife was appointed as a non-executive director, tensions erupted. The family's matriarch, Rani Kapur, wrote to shareholders objecting to the appointment. She alleged that while the family was still mourning Sunjay's sudden demise, some individuals had taken advantage of the situation to seize control of the business. Investors were still processing the chairman's death and the company's bold China push when the family feud came to light. The stock has since corrected over 8% in under a week. The outcome of the China venture remains uncertain, but it would be a setback if leadership uncertainty clouds the company's promising EV pivot. Sun TV – Family feud exacerbates fundamental troubles A politically charged family dispute dating back decades resurfaced a couple of months ago. On 10 June, Dayanidhi Maran, a former Member of Parliament from Tamil Nadu's ruling party Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK), accused his brother, Kalanithi Maran, of fraudulently taking control of Sun TV back in 2003. Once again, the death of a business leader allegedly triggered a scramble for ownership. In his legal notice, Dayanidhi claimed that after their father's death in 2003, Kalanithi exploited the family's vulnerable emotional state to gain control of the company. He has sought to restore the business to its pre-2003 ownership structure. If successful, this would eliminate chairman Kalanithi's current stake, estimated to be worth ₹18,000 crore, and transfer the business to Dayanidhi, their cousin M.K. Stalin (the chief minister of Tamil Nadu), and their siblings. This leadership uncertainty could prove to be the final blow to a company already struggling. Sun TV is one of India's largest media conglomerates, reaching 10% of the country's population. Its brand once dominated the southern market. It also owns the IPL team Sunrisers Hyderabad. But the company has been steadily losing ground. As industry consolidation picks up and viewer preferences shift, competition has intensified, and Sun TV has failed to keep pace. Northern players like Zee have made inroads into the southern market, while Sun's own Hindi channel failed to gain traction. Its OTT platform, Sun NXT, has largely pushed conventional content online instead of building exclusive rights or originals, limiting audience appeal. Its DTH arm, Sun Direct, has struggled to revive performance. The result: stagnant revenues and profits for over half a decade. Now, with a politically sensitive legal battle brewing at the top, the company faces yet another headwind. The stock has declined 10% since the dispute surfaced, continuing a long streak of underperformance relative to the broader market. Yes Bank – When a fight for legacy opened a can of worms A family dispute that shook an entire industry played out at Yes Bank. The rift, which began in 2009, ultimately altered the bank's trajectory. When co-founder and non-executive chairman Ashok Kapur died in the 2008 Mumbai terror attacks, his wife, Madhu Kapur, was left to fight for his legacy. After multiple failed requests to nominate their daughter, Shagun Gogia, to the bank's board, the matter reached the courts. The long-drawn legal battle that followed opened up a can of worms. Amid court proceedings, the surviving co-founder, Rana Kapoor, could not appoint a successor, and the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) refused to grant him an extension on his tenure. Soon after, several board members resigned, citing governance concerns. Kapoor, who sought to erase Ashok Kapur's contributions from the bank's history, was later found to be laundering money and involved in multiple cases of bank fraud. The regulator also uncovered hidden bad loans and forced his resignation. The stock plummeted, lenders offloaded pledged shares, and the freefall intensified. For more such analyses, read Profit Pulse. With the leadership in limbo and the stock battered, the bank couldn't raise capital. The RBI was forced to impose a moratorium, capping withdrawals due to financial instability. Rana Kapoor was jailed. Though Madhu Kapur won the legal battle against him, she and her family ultimately lost the war for Yes Bank. They stepped down as promoters and agreed to be reclassified as public shareholders. A consortium led by the State Bank of India eventually rescued the bank in 2020. Under new leadership appointed by the regulator, Yes Bank has since found its footing. Rana Kapoor was granted bail last year. But the entire episode still leaves one wondering: what might have been. Ananya Roy is the founder of Credibull Capital, a Sebi-registered investment adviser. X: @ananyaroycfa Disclosure: The author does not hold shares of the companies discussed. The views expressed are for informational purposes only and should not be considered investment advice. Readers are encouraged to conduct their own research and consult a financial professional before making any investment decisions.

Maruti, Marico to Eicher Motors: 10 key stocks to trade ex-dividend today, 1 August 2025
Maruti, Marico to Eicher Motors: 10 key stocks to trade ex-dividend today, 1 August 2025

Mint

time14 hours ago

  • Mint

Maruti, Marico to Eicher Motors: 10 key stocks to trade ex-dividend today, 1 August 2025

Dividend Stocks 2025: Maruti Suzuki, Marico, Eicher Motors, United Spirits, Bata India, Galaxy Surfactants, Chennai Petroleum Corporation, Cholamandalam Financial Holdings, Balaji Amines, and Andhra Paper are 10 key companies to trade ex-dividend today, 1 August. These companies, along with many others, have set August 1, 2025, as the record date for identifying and approving a list of eligible shareholders for dividends. To be included on the list of eligible shareholders for dividends under the T+1 settlement method, investors should have purchased the stock of these companies at least one day prior to the record date. Maruti Suzuki India Ltd— The Board recommends a dividend of ₹ 135 per share (nominal value ₹ 5 per share). The dividend on equity shares for the year ending March 31, 2025, if approved, at the upcoming Annual General Meeting, will be paid to Members. The dividend payout date is September 3rd, 2025. Marico Ltd—The company recommended a final equity dividend for 2024-25 of ₹ 7/- per equity share (face value of ₹ 1), subject to shareholder approval at the 37th Annual General Meeting ("AGM"). If approved by shareholders, the dividend will be paid by Sunday, September 7, 2025. Galaxy Surfactants—Galaxy Surfactants had recommended a final dividend of ₹ 4.0 per equity share. Bata India— Bata India's Board recommended a final dividend of ₹ 9/- (180%) per fully paid-up equity share of ₹ 5/- for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2025. Eicher Motors—A dividend of ₹ 70/- per equity share of face value of ₹ 1/- each was recommended by the Board of Directors of Eicher Motors for the financial year 2024-25. United Spirits Ltd— The company had recommended a final dividend of ₹ 8 per equity share (face value ₹ 2 each) for the financial year ending 31st March 2025. Chennai Petroleum Corporation — The company had recommended a final dividend of ₹ 5 per share. Cholamandalam Financial Holdings — The company had recommended a final dividend of Rs. 1.30 per equity share of face value of Rs. 1/- each for the year ended March 31, 2025 Balaji Amines — The company had recommended a final dividend of ₹ 11.00 per equity share, i.e., 550% on the face value of ₹ 2/- per share Andhra Paper — The company had recommended a final Dividend of ₹ 1.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store