Lifting amnesty for Troubles veterans ‘will lead to witch hunt'
The 2023 Legacy Act put an end to fresh historical inquests into deaths that occurred in Northern Ireland during the Troubles, as well as civil actions.
It created the Independent Commission for Reconciliation and Information Recovery, which would review deaths and serious injuries that occurred during the conflict.
However, Labour pledged in its manifesto to scrap the legislation, which it said was unpopular with Irish political parties and victims' groups as well as being incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights.
Sir David, a senior Tory MP, said that allowing inquests to restart would cause concern among soldiers as it would set a precedent for servicemen facing legal action.
Speaking at a debate in Westminster on Monday, the former minister said: 'Getting this right is not just a matter of historical justice, the legal witch hunt won't end in Northern Ireland.
'It will cast a shadow over every future conflict that our Armed Forces engage in and undermine their abilities to defend us'.
He added: 'Our soldiers have been held to the highest standards of law and yet our Government is rewarding this by effectively threatening them in their retirement. That is not a proper reflection of their human rights'.
Mark Francois, the shadow Armed Forces minister, said that to repeal the Act to allow fresh inquests would be 'not just morally but operationally mad'.
He told MPs: 'It would be an act of sheer folly and indeed aid to our enemies to continue with this act of military self-harm so that to put it bluntly even fewer people will join the Army and even more will leave.'
All three Armed Forces branches are struggling to maintain their numbers, with more than 14,500 service members leaving in 2024 while only 12,850 new recruits joined.
Mr Francois added: 'This government-sanctioned form of lawfare is self-evidently a case of two-tier justice at its worst and that is why on these benches we are utterly against it.'
One of the most controversial elements of the 1998 Good Friday Agreement saw paramilitary prisoners released from jail as part of securing an end to the conflict.
Sarah Pochin, the Reform UK MP for Runcorn and Helsby, said: 'These courageous men should be enjoying their hard-earned retirement, not facing prosecution for defending the British people from IRA terrorists.'
Ms Pochin, whose father served in Northern Ireland during the Troubles, added: 'The same British people who value these soldiers are outraged at the unfair and unjust action of this British Government.'
Meanwhile unionist MPs warned that reversing the law could lead to prosecutions being used to relitigate the conflict.
Gavin Robinson, the former leader of the Democratic Unionist Party, said: 'Our responsibility as parliamentarians from across the United Kingdom is to say no, we will not assist your quest to rewrite the history of the past, nor will we assist in the IRA's pursuit to try and attain some sort of honour toward their retirement.
'They tried to destroy this country through war and they failed. Let's not create the conditions for them to try and destroy the reputation of this country through peace.'
Hilary Benn, the Northern Ireland Secretary, insisted that the Legacy Act must be repealed but said that all MPs were in agreement that 'there can be no rewriting of history'.
He told MPs: 'We can't have any more false promises or undeliverable pledges, pledges that our courts have found to be unlawful.
'And that is why we will fix the mess we inherited from the previous government, whatever its intentions were, and we will protect our veterans as we do so.'
Mr Benn admitted that 'legacy is hard' to get right, adding: 'This is the unfinished business of the Good Friday Agreement and that is why, as well as listening carefully to veterans which we are doing, we also need to listen to the many families who lost loved ones, including the families of British personnel who served so bravely.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Green energy tycoon and top Labour donor calls for 'climate denial' to be made a criminal offence... as Ed Miliband brands Tories and Reform 'unpatriotic' for failing to back Net Zero goals
A leading Labour donor yesterday called for climate denial to be a criminal offence because it causes 'incredible harm'. Green energy tycoon Dale Vince tweeted in support of Energy Secretary Ed Miliband, who branded the Conservatives and Reform 'unpatriotic' for not backing Net Zero goals. It came as Mr Miliband gave an urgent statement in Parliament on the state of the climate crisis, telling The Guardian he wanted it to be an 'annual exercise in radical truth-telling'. Mr Vince, who donated £5million to Labour in the run-up to the general election, posted: 'Good move from Ed, it's time to tell it like it is. I'd make climate denial a criminal offence – given the incredible harm it will cause, even by slowing down progress to Net Zero.' Speaking to MPs yesterday, Mr Miliband referenced a Met Office report warning that the UK is getting hotter and wetter with more 'extreme events'. 'The central England temperature series shows recent warmth has far exceeded any temperatures observed in at least 300 years,' he said. He also warned that Britain was one of the most nature-depleted countries in the world, and said heatwaves had led to 10,000 excess deaths in England during the past four years. Facing down his critics, he added: 'To those who say Britain cannot make a difference. I say you are wrong. Stop talking our country down. British leadership matters.' But Tory energy spokesman Andrew Bowie said it was 'ridiculous' to accuse opponents of Net Zero of being unpatriotic. 'We need to bring back a sense of rationality, of proportion to this debate,' he said, adding that 'language like this is alienating more and more people'. And Mr Bowie said it was 'shameful' of Mr Miliband to use the Met Office report as an excuse to attack his opponents, while also warning that Labour's climate policies in the race to Net Zero threaten to 'impoverish' the British people. 'It is rather shameful that the Secretary should be using this [Met Office] report as cover, whilst ratcheting up the language, whilst increasing the shrill criticism of all those who question the department and its policies, all to distract from the fact that the plans mean that Britain will be poorer and that no one, no one looking at how we are decarbonised, could ever claim that this is a model to follow,' he told MPs. 'We are proud to have been a world leader, but it isn't a race if nobody else is running. 'If we are leading the way, we need to make sure there's a path others will follow. We must decarbonise in a way that creates energy security and prosperity rather than forcing industry abroad and impoverishing the British people.' Mr Miliband also suggested that the Government-owned GB Energy could fund solar panels on religious buildings, such as churches and mosques.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
'It's one rule for us and another for the terrorist', one furious veteran tells ROBERT HARDMAN
The blazers, berets and regimental ties were out in force, including contingents of old boys from the Fusiliers, the Royal Artillery and, outnumbering all the rest, the Parachute Regiment. More intriguing were those with no tie, no insignia, no medals – nothing, in fact, to suggest a military connection. 'Just look for the scruffiest buggers you can find,' was the advice of George Simm, former Regimental Sergeant Major of the Special Air Service when I asked him to point me towards bona fide alumni of his old regiment yesterday. Veterans of all stripes were in Parliament Square to support the public petition demanding that the Government stops peeling away the legal protections for Northern Ireland veterans by repealing the Legacy Act. Many of those are now facing historic claims and vexatious 'lawfare' under human rights laws which never existed at the time when these men were simply doing their duty. So many people have now signed the petition – with more still signing it every day – that the Government was forced to hold a debate on the subject yesterday in Westminster Hall. The petition is running in parallel to the Mail's 'Stop The SAS Betrayal' campaign, which seeks to stop the terrorists and their supporters from rewriting the history of the Troubles in order to paint our Special Forces not as heroes who defeated the IRA and their ilk but as criminals. Hence the presence of many SAS veterans yesterday. Some had never attended a demonstration before and were not entirely comfortable being at this one, with lots of pesky journalists like me milling around with photographers. So many people have now signed the petition – with more still signing it every day – that the Government was forced to hold a debate on the subject yesterday in Westminster Hall 'I'm not sure I should even be talking to you,' said one who gave his name as Ian. Dressed in shorts and trainers, his only military insignia was the small black insect (a tick, it transpired) printed on his sports shirt, the unofficial badge of A Squadron of the SAS. He had turned up because he is fed up with 'two tier' justice which grants terrorists immunity thanks to 'comfort letters' from Tony Blair but no such comfort for veterans who were simply obeying orders of the state. 'It's one rule for us and another for the terrorist,' he explained. He is furious that the SAS are now being framed as rogue operators, when they had to abide by the same code of conduct and strict rules of engagement – known as the 'yellow card' – as every other branch of the military serving in Northern Ireland. Take the day a well-known IRA terrorist sprayed petrol over the hedge in which the SAS man was hiding, having rumbled that he was under surveillance. The terrorist then sent his young son forward with matches to ignite the petrol, knowing the SAS would not shoot a child. Sure enough, the SAS men ended up in hospital being treated for burns instead. I bumped into Colonel Tim Collins, famous for his stirring address to the Royal Irish Regiment on the eve of the 2003 invasion of Iraq. He was here wearing his previous hat as an SAS commander. 'All this lawfare is because the Government wants to garner plaudits from the international legal establishment and because republican lawyers know they can divert vast public funds and attack the old enemy using his own money,' he told me. There were plenty of Conservative MPs on parade, many with military backgrounds such as Lincoln Jopp MC, late of the Scots Guards and a four-tour veteran of Northern Ireland. He clearly remembered the strict training on rules of engagement, but also the maxim that soldiers could safely take decisions on the basis that 'it's better to be tried by 12 men than carried home by six'. He added: 'Sadly, that is no longer the case.' Perhaps the boldest man present was a gent standing on the edge of the throng. He was a Chelsea Pensioner in the full, splendid scarlet uniform of the Royal Hospital, who politely explained he could not comment or give his name. Everyone knew he would be in almighty trouble just for being there. Another Chelsea pensioner (in plain clothes) explained that our man had seen so many friends killed or maimed in Northern Ireland that he felt he had to come and was not going to dress down. The blazers, berets and regimental ties were out in force, including contingents of old boys from the Fusiliers, the Royal Artillery and, outnumbering all the rest, the Parachute Regiment 'Just look for the scruffiest buggers you can find,' was the advice of George Simm, former Regimental Sergeant Major of the Special Air Service when I asked him to point me towards bona fide alumni of his old regiment yesterday He received a throaty 'three cheers' from the 200 or so members of Rolling Thunder, the band of biker veterans who hold regular rallies in support of better legal protections for old soldiers. They had secured official permission from the police to form their hardware up alongside the Cenotaph yesterday. As the debate kicked off inside Westminster, they spent an hour driving round Parliament Square and along the Embankment, growling, parping and waving their flags. One of their number, an alumnus of the Military Police who would only identify himself as Rob from Brentford, had an odd-looking passenger on the back of his Harley-Davidson. On closer inspection it was a skeleton wearing a T-shirt saying 'Labour Loves A Terrorist.' And not a Palestinian flag in sight.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Schools to teach anti-misogyny lessons in bid to tackle ‘manosphere'
Children will be taught how to combat misogyny and resist so-called incel culture under new guidance for schools published on Tuesday. The guidance on relationships, sex and health education (RSHE) focuses on helping boys find positive role models amid the increasing spread of sexist online content from 'manosphere' influencers such as Andrew Tate. It also stresses the need to avoid 'stigmatising boys for being boys'. As well as lessons on so-called incel (involuntary celibate) culture, secondary schools will be required to provide young people with greater awareness of AI, deepfakes and links between pornography and misogyny. The guidance comes as the Department for Education (DfE) warned that misogynistic attitudes had reached 'epidemic scale' among young people, with 54% of those aged 11-19 saying they had witnessed misogynist comments. Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson said: 'Before I was elected to Parliament, I managed a refuge for women and children fleeing domestic violence, so I have seen first-hand the devastating impact when we don't foster healthy attitudes from the youngest age. 'I want our children to be equipped to defy the malign forces that exist online. Schools and parents alike have a vital role to play, helping children identify positive role models and resist the manipulation too often used online to groom impressionable young minds.' In its manifesto last year, Labour pledged to halve the rate of violence against women and girls in 10 years. And earlier in 2025, Sir Keir Starmer praised the Netflix drama Adolescence for highlighting how misogyny had 'taken on a different form' and said he wanted a discussion on what could be done to stop young boys 'being dragged into this whirlpool of hatred and misogyny'. Margaret Mulholland, of the Association of School and College Leaders, welcomed the new guidance and its focus on finding positive male role models for boys, saying it was 'important that we don't simply tell boys what is wrong'. The previous Conservative government proposed changing the guidance on RSHE in May last year, with then-prime minister Rishi Sunak expressing concern children were being exposed to 'inappropriate' content. The draft guidance, which was open to a nine-week consultation, proposed clear age limits on the teaching of certain topics to ensure children were not 'exposed to too much too soon'. It said sex education should be taught no earlier than Year 5, when pupils are aged nine to 10, and that what is described as the 'contested topic of gender identity' should not be taught at all. The proposed guidance said schools should 'at minimum' show parents a representative sample of teaching resources they plan to use and that schools 'should respond positively to requests from parents to see material that has not already been shared'. While Tuesday's revised guidance includes the requirement to provide parents with teaching materials, the new Government has scrapped the proposal to prescribe specific ages at which individual topics are taught. The DfE said there would be a 'strong new emphasis on age-appropriate' teaching, and a 'clear dividing line' between primary and secondary school. But the guidance would allow teachers to 'sensitively respond to topics that children might have seen online or heard from their friends', with research suggesting 22% of primary school-aged girls had seen 'rude images online'. Tuesday's guidance also includes requirements on helping children with their mental health, including working with mental health professionals to discuss suicide prevention 'in an age-appropriate way'. Children will be taught the importance of 'grit and resilience' in order to help them 'feel able to take on challenges and risks'. Andy Airey, Mike Palmer and Tim Owen – who founded suicide prevention charity 3 Dads Walking in memory of their daughters – said: 'Giving schools permission to talk about suicide prevention means more young people can be supported to open up about difficult feelings and know where to find help. 'We know, from painful personal experience, how much this matters. This change will save lives.' Schools will be able to implement the guidance from September this year, and must follow it from September 2026.
