NST Leader: Why are road bullies being let off easy?
A July 17 incident in Klang shows why. A video of the incident shows a Toyota Hilux driver getting out of his vehicle, kicking and punching the window of a Perdua Myvi after failing to open the car's door.
What irked people was what followed moments later. A policeman tried to stop him, but struggled, especially when the road bully's friend joined in and threw punches at the policeman.
Another law broken by two men gone berserk: stopping a police officer from discharging his duty.
Yet no attempt was made by the policeman to record the registration number of the Hilux as it sped away.
The response by other road users was pathetic, to say the least. They chose to watch the policeman struggle to stop the Hilux occupants instead of going to the law enforcer's help. We shouldn't be surprised. Apathy is a known Malaysian malady.
To people who have seen the video, the conclusion was inevitable. The aggressors were handled with kid gloves when an all-point bulletin should have been sent out to arrest them for at least any one of the multiple offences committed.
Yes, the policeman was overpowered. Other motorists were of no help. Now the bullies are roaming free, only to interpret their freedom as a licence to roam the nation's roads to display their rage as they please.
More dangerously, the kid-glove treatment is also a signal to other road bullies that they, too, would be similarly treated.
Such people who so easily go berserk behind the wheel are a danger to other road users.
Those with long recall will remember a road rage incident that caused death on the North-South Expressway in 2019.
he driver was sentenced to 16 years in jail. While road users are comforted that they will be spared the rage of the berserk driver for that many years, there are others out there with uncontrolled rage, as the July 17 incident shows.
The police only know this too well, and they must act accordingly.
The public-police relationship is one of mutual dependence, best expressed by the police's motto: the police and the community are inseparable.
The public looks to the police to deliver certain standards of service, and the police in turn rely on public trust and support. But public trust and support have to be earned.
Actions and behaviour of the police are the "earners", so to speak. The top management of the police has repeatedly made this clear to the police force.
Incidents such as the kid-glove treatment of the Hilux duo by the police would certainly erode them, if social media comments are anything to go by.
We must certainly applaud the policeman for stopping the aggressive driver and his accomplice. If not for his intervention, the incident could have turned nastier for the Myvi driver.
But that is where our applause stops. The police must throw the statute book at the Hilux duo and others out there for the applause to return.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
4 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Japanese tourist arrested for driving naked through Hat Yai streets
KOTA BARU: Barely two months after 10 Malaysian tourists were fined in Hat Yai, Thailand, for illegal street racing and traffic violations, another foreigner was fined yesterday for driving naked in the popular tourist destination. The 56-year-old Japanese male tourist was apprehended after driving naked through the streets of Hat Yai about 5.30pm (Thai time). In a Facebook posting, Hat Yai Tourist Police chief Superintendent Sakdanan Kamsai said the man was arrested in a joint operation between Hat Yai Tourist Police and local police. "Several video clips and images of a man driving nude in public areas across the city drew widespread public outrage and condemnation on social media. "Following this, our investigators managed to locate the suspect. He was later identified as a 56-year-old Japanese national," he said. Upon questioning, he said the suspect admitted to being the person seen in the viral footage. Police subsequently charged him under Section 388 of the Thai Criminal Code for committing indecent acts in public, which includes exposing oneself or performing lewd behaviour in public places. He was issued a maximum fine of 5,000 baht (RM655). The tourist was then taken to the Hat Yai police station for further action. The officers also issued a stern warning, stating that such behaviour is illegal, inappropriate, and tarnishes Thailand's tourism image while offending local cultural sensitivities. The suspect acknowledged his wrongdoing and issued an apology for his actions. On May 17, 10 Malaysian tourists were fined in Hat Yai for illegal street racing and traffic violations. They were caught obstructing traffic and causing excessive noise near the Greenway Night Market. The group, aged between 21 and 25, were also cited for illegal vehicle modifications and incomplete vehicle equipment. In addition to the fines, they were required to issue a public apology.
New Straits Times
5 hours ago
- New Straits Times
NST Leader: Why are road bullies being let off easy?
Road bullying is becoming an uncontrolled menace. A July 17 incident in Klang shows why. A video of the incident shows a Toyota Hilux driver getting out of his vehicle, kicking and punching the window of a Perdua Myvi after failing to open the car's door. What irked people was what followed moments later. A policeman tried to stop him, but struggled, especially when the road bully's friend joined in and threw punches at the policeman. Another law broken by two men gone berserk: stopping a police officer from discharging his duty. Yet no attempt was made by the policeman to record the registration number of the Hilux as it sped away. The response by other road users was pathetic, to say the least. They chose to watch the policeman struggle to stop the Hilux occupants instead of going to the law enforcer's help. We shouldn't be surprised. Apathy is a known Malaysian malady. To people who have seen the video, the conclusion was inevitable. The aggressors were handled with kid gloves when an all-point bulletin should have been sent out to arrest them for at least any one of the multiple offences committed. Yes, the policeman was overpowered. Other motorists were of no help. Now the bullies are roaming free, only to interpret their freedom as a licence to roam the nation's roads to display their rage as they please. More dangerously, the kid-glove treatment is also a signal to other road bullies that they, too, would be similarly treated. Such people who so easily go berserk behind the wheel are a danger to other road users. Those with long recall will remember a road rage incident that caused death on the North-South Expressway in 2019. he driver was sentenced to 16 years in jail. While road users are comforted that they will be spared the rage of the berserk driver for that many years, there are others out there with uncontrolled rage, as the July 17 incident shows. The police only know this too well, and they must act accordingly. The public-police relationship is one of mutual dependence, best expressed by the police's motto: the police and the community are inseparable. The public looks to the police to deliver certain standards of service, and the police in turn rely on public trust and support. But public trust and support have to be earned. Actions and behaviour of the police are the "earners", so to speak. The top management of the police has repeatedly made this clear to the police force. Incidents such as the kid-glove treatment of the Hilux duo by the police would certainly erode them, if social media comments are anything to go by. We must certainly applaud the policeman for stopping the aggressive driver and his accomplice. If not for his intervention, the incident could have turned nastier for the Myvi driver. But that is where our applause stops. The police must throw the statute book at the Hilux duo and others out there for the applause to return.
Focus Malaysia
8 hours ago
- Focus Malaysia
AI and ethics can help stop online harassment
Letter to Editor FROM school halls to digital spaces, moral and civic education teaches us to be helpful, considerate, and kind members of society. Yet, despite these teachings, various forms of harm continue to plague both physical and online worlds. One such issue is online harassment—also commonly referred to as cyberbullying. Online harassment has become a distressingly common experience for many internet users. It involves acts of aggression, intimidation, or abuse carried out across digital platforms. According to researchers like Leduc and colleagues in Computers in Human Behavior, it can take many forms—disinformation, name-calling, threats, sexual harassment, and public humiliation. This digital abuse can affect people from all walks of life, although certain demographic factors such as ethnicity, age, and gender may influence how likely someone is to experience it. Pew Research Center reports by Monica Anderson in 2018 and more recent updates by Atske in 2024 highlight how widespread and persistent the issue is, particularly among teens. Similarly, a Malaysian-based study published in BMJ Open by Samsudin and colleagues in 2023 found that young adults experiencing cyberbullying often also report psychological distress and strained family dynamics. In Malaysia, researchers Kee, Anwar, and Vranjes pointed out in 2024 that online harassment is a risk factor for suicidal thoughts among youth. Often, the abuse stems from prejudice—negative stereotypes based on religion, ethnicity, gender, or even personal interests can quickly snowball into digital attacks. Victims may receive a barrage of cruel messages, mockery, or hate comments targeting their identity. Cultural norms can also fuel the problem. When mocking or humiliating others is treated as entertainment, especially in online communities, abusers feel emboldened. The anonymity of the internet offers a protective mask that emboldens people to say what they would never say face-to-face. Combined with the misuse of free speech, this creates a digital culture that tolerates—even encourages—harmful behaviour. The effects of online harassment are not limited to bruised egos. Victims often face serious mental health challenges. Studies by Dr Cheryl Nixon in 2014 reveal how victims may suffer from depression, anxiety, disrupted sleep patterns, appetite loss, and even suicidal ideation. These psychological effects can lead to social withdrawal, strained relationships, and a deep sense of helplessness. Embarrassment, fear, and self-blame are common emotional responses. Many victims, especially teens and young adults, avoid telling friends or family about their experiences, which only amplifies their isolation. A landmark case in Canada, R. v. Elliott in 2016, highlighted the legal implications of online abuse. The case was connected to Rehtaeh Parsons, a 17-year-old girl who took her life after a photo of her sexual assault was widely shared online, followed by relentless digital harassment. Although initial investigations failed to yield justice, public outcry prompted a renewed effort that led to charges under Canada's Cyberbullying Prevention Act—also known as Bill C-13. This tragic case led to legislative reform. Nova Scotia passed 'Rehtaeh's Law,' the first of its kind in Canada, which broadened the legal definition of cyberbullying and provided new tools for law enforcement to act. Writing in Crime, Media, Culture, researcher Alice Dodge in 2023 emphasised how the case shifted public perception of cyberbullying—from a social issue to a serious crime requiring legal intervention. Can ethics and AI offer solutions? As technology evolves, so do our opportunities to address online harassment in smarter ways. Media ethics plays a key role here. Researchers like Milosevic and colleagues in 2022, writing in the International Journal of Bullying Prevention, argue that media platforms must uphold ethical standards that prioritise harm reduction. This includes creating clear content guidelines, efficient reporting mechanisms, and psychological support systems for those affected. Media outlets should portray victims with dignity and avoid sensationalising abuse, while ensuring perpetrators are held accountable. Technology, particularly artificial intelligence, could also help stem the tide. AI-powered moderation tools, if designed ethically, can assist in identifying abusive content and preventing its spread. But these systems must prioritise fairness, transparency, and accountability. Many current algorithms are geared toward boosting engagement—even if that means promoting provocative or harmful content. Instead, platforms need to redesign algorithms to avoid amplifying negativity. As highlighted by Zubiaga in the International Review of Information Ethics in 2021, tech companies must also be transparent about how moderation decisions are made and offer clear ways for users to report abuse. Ultimately, it's not just up to lawmakers, media companies, or AI developers. All internet users share the responsibility to create a culture of empathy, respect, and mutual accountability. By standing against online harassment, speaking up for victims, and supporting efforts for ethical technology, we can help make digital spaces safer for everyone. —July 20, 2025 The authors are from the Department of Science and Technology Studies, Faculty of Science, Universiti Malaya The views expressed are solely of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Focus Malaysia. Main image: Kaspersky
