Supremex (TSE:SXP) shareholders have earned a 13% CAGR over the last five years
So let's investigate and see if the longer term performance of the company has been in line with the underlying business' progress.
View our latest analysis for Supremex
In his essay The Superinvestors of Graham-and-Doddsville Warren Buffett described how share prices do not always rationally reflect the value of a business. One imperfect but simple way to consider how the market perception of a company has shifted is to compare the change in the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price movement.
Supremex has made a profit in the past. On the other hand, it reported a trailing twelve months loss, suggesting it isn't reliably profitable. So it might be better to look at other metrics to try to understand the share price.
We note that the dividend has not increased, so that doesn't seem to explain the increase, either. It could be that the revenue growth of 11% per year is viewed as evidence that Supremex is growing. In that case, the company may be sacrificing current earnings per share to drive growth.
The graphic below depicts how earnings and revenue have changed over time (unveil the exact values by clicking on the image).
You can see how its balance sheet has strengthened (or weakened) over time in this free interactive graphic.
It is important to consider the total shareholder return, as well as the share price return, for any given stock. Whereas the share price return only reflects the change in the share price, the TSR includes the value of dividends (assuming they were reinvested) and the benefit of any discounted capital raising or spin-off. So for companies that pay a generous dividend, the TSR is often a lot higher than the share price return. In the case of Supremex, it has a TSR of 83% for the last 5 years. That exceeds its share price return that we previously mentioned. This is largely a result of its dividend payments!
Investors in Supremex had a tough year, with a total loss of 11% (including dividends), against a market gain of about 20%. However, keep in mind that even the best stocks will sometimes underperform the market over a twelve month period. On the bright side, long term shareholders have made money, with a gain of 13% per year over half a decade. If the fundamental data continues to indicate long term sustainable growth, the current sell-off could be an opportunity worth considering. I find it very interesting to look at share price over the long term as a proxy for business performance. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 3 warning signs for Supremex (1 shouldn't be ignored!) that you should be aware of before investing here.
Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of companies we expect will grow earnings.
Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on Canadian exchanges.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Berkshire-owned BNSF taps bankers for its own rail acquisition
The Scoop BNSF, the railroad giant owned by Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway, is working with Goldman Sachs to explore a takeover of a rival, according to people familiar with the matter. Its interest comes as its chief rival, Union Pacific, pursues a takeover of Norfolk Southern, Semafor reported Thursday, which would create the country's only coast-to-coast railroad and leave BNSF at a disadvantage. (Both Union Pacific and Berkshire are headquartered in Omaha, Nebraska.) BNSF recently hired bankers from Goldman, which four years ago helped broker the industry's last big merger, between Canadian Pacific and Kansas City Southern. It wasn't immediately clear whether BNSF has its eye on Norfolk or the other East Coast carrier, CSX. But its interest would set off a free-for-all among large railroads and pose a test of the Trump administration's enthusiasm for industrial consolidation. A spokesperson for BSNF, which was acquired by Berkshire in 2010, did not respond to a request for comment. A spokesperson for Goldman Sachs declined to comment. Know More On paper, Norfolk Southern is a better fit for BNSF, which has underperformed its rival Class I railroads over the last few years. Both companies have a healthy share of intermodal transport (handing off goods to trucking companies) and their networks fit more neatly into each other, according to industry analysts and investors. Similarly, CSX and Union Pacific have more complementary tracks. But Union Pacific CEO Jim Vena doesn't see CSX as open to a deal, Semafor has previously reported. That was one of the factors that has narrowed Union Pacific's discussions with Norfolk, which are early but active. Step Back Berkshire Hathaway is sitting on a $347 billion cash pile, so could afford to pay up for Norfolk ($62 billion) or CSX ($65 billion). But Buffett, who will step back as CEO later this year, has historically bought best-in-class businesses and let them be, rather than growing them through subsequent acquisitions. The outlier is another industrial business overseen, as BNSF is, by Buffett's successor, Greg Abel. Berkshire Hathaway Energy has bought out joint-venture partners and has even gotten into bidding wars for assets.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Warren Buffett's successor has big shoes to fill. This is what Berkshire Hathaway gurus expect from the new boss, Greg Abel.
Greg Abel is poised to succeed Warren Buffett as Berkshire Hathaway's CEO at the start of January. BI spoke to five Berkshire gurus about Abel's potential and how Berkshire might change under him. They expect a more hands-on management style, more focus on deals, and maybe even a dividend. Greg Abel has a big task ahead of him — and the stock market knows it. The head of Berkshire Hathaway's non-insurance operations will be taking over from a titan of American business when he succeeds Warren Buffett as CEO. Buffett, a legendary investor and philanthropist, has transformed Berkshire from a failing textile mill into a $1 trillion conglomerate during his 60 years in charge. He's widely regarded as a master delegator, talent spotter, capital allocator, and dealmaker who acquired scores of businesses. Berkshire shares were up 19% year-to-date before Buffett's shock announcement in early May. They've since slumped 12%, while the benchmark S&P 500 has jumped 11%. The company did not respond to a request for comment from Business Insider. Despite the stock's struggles, the five Berkshire gurus Business Insider spoke to are mostly positive about Abel's prospects. A change in management style Larry Cunningham, the author of several books about Buffett and the director of the University of Delaware's Weinberg Center, predicted a change in management style. "Greg Abel is an operator at heart — he'll engage more directly with underperforming subsidiaries, unlike Buffett, who was famously hands-off," Cunningham said. "Berkshire will become known for 'intelligent autonomy.'" Steven Check, the head of Check Capital Management and a longtime Berkshire shareholder, anticipated a similar shift. Berkshire "may actually be managed better" by Abel as he's "more of a hands-on people manager than Buffett, whose number one interest was capital allocation," he said. Check also nodded to Charlie Munger's 2014 shareholder letter, in which Buffett's late business partner hailed Abel and Ajit Jain, the boss of Berkshire's insurance operations, as "world-leading," and said that "in some important ways, each is a better business executive than Buffett." Bill Smead, the founder of Smead Capital Management and a Berkshire investor for more than 30 years, championed Abel as a skilled business acquirer. He said Berkshire's "strength will probably be in buying whole companies because that will be Greg Abel's strength." Berkshire has acquired many companies during Buffett's tenure, including National Indemnity in 1967, See's Candies in 1972, Nebraska Furniture Mart in 1983, Geico in 1996, BNSF Railway in 2010, Precision Castparts in 2016, Alleghany in 2022, and Pilot Travel Centers over a series of transactions in 2017, 2023, and 2024. Berkshire generated $371 billion in revenue and $47 billion in operating profits last year. It's become so big that there are very few companies it could acquire that would materially boost its bottom line. Buffett's biggest acquisition to date was buying Precision for more than $32 billion nearly a decade ago. He said at this year's meeting that he would happily shell out $100 billion for the right target. Abel is set to receive support from Jain along with Berkshire's investment managers, Todd Combs and Ted Weschler, who each manage chunks of Berkshire's roughly $300 billion stock portfolio. The company's biggest holdings include American Express, Apple, Bank of America, Coca-Cola, and Chevron. Smead said Berkshire's "biggest mistake" was not publicly touting Combs and Weschler's track records as investors more often, as this could have reassured shareholders about the post-Buffett era and tempered the recent stock decline, he added. John Longo — a finance professor, investment chief, and author of "Buffett's Tips" — echoed Smead in predicting Abel would be more active in striking deals. Longo said he "would not be shocked" to see Berkshire begin paying a small dividend given its "enormous cash balance and strong free cash flow." That could help "attract a new class of investors" and fuel a stock rally, Longo added. Brett Gardner, an analyst and the author of "Buffett's Early Investments," said that Buffett plans to remain chairman and can "help if needed." He also praised the company's core assets and board, and described Abel as "immensely talented." He said Buffett was "irreplaceable" but added that, with Abel, "Berkshire is still in superb hands." Read the original article on Business Insider Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Warren Buffett-led Berkshire Hathaway Has 22% of Its $290 Billion Portfolio Invested in 1 Stock That's Up 749% in 9 Years
Key Points Warren Buffett has an unrivaled track record allocating capital, but maybe the best dollar gain occurred with a decision made just in the past decade. This business, which remains Berkshire's top holding, has numerous traits showcasing its high quality. Investors shouldn't blindly follow Buffett. 10 stocks we like better than Apple › Since 1965, Berkshire Hathaway has compounded shareholder capital at a nearly 20% annualized rate. That unbelievable performance was under the stewardship of Warren Buffett, arguably the best investor ever. The Oracle of Omaha's most lucrative idea might have happened in the past decade, though. Shares of this consumer-facing enterprise have soared 749% in the last nine years (as of July 15), producing a huge dollar gain for Berkshire. Despite numerous stock sales over a four-quarter stretch from the fourth quarter of 2023 through the third quarter of 2024, this company still represents 22% of the conglomerate's $290 billion portfolio, making it the biggest position. This is a wonderful business, but should investors buy the stock? Passing Buffett's filter is a valuable endorsement During the first quarter of 2016, Buffett and Berkshire initiated a position in Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL). Based on the percentage return mentioned above, this turned out to be an investing masterstroke. Looking back at the decision, investors can gain valuable insights as to how Apple passed Buffett's filter. Berkshire's portfolio is full of businesses that possess strong brands. There might be none more powerful than Apple, which has a global customer base that's loyal to the company's products and services, constantly waiting for what will be launched next. Apple positions itself at the premium end of the consumer electronics industry, but its intense focus on innovation has won over consumers. This also allows for pricing power, a trait that Buffett loves. Apple's share of the smartphone industry's profits is significantly higher than its share of unit sales, which reveals the financial success of the iPhone. Buffett likes to own companies in pristine financial shape. Apple generates copious amounts of free cash flow each quarter. And in the past five years, the operating margin has averaged a breathtaking 30%. Of course, a great company doesn't always make for a worthwhile investment opportunity. Here's where valuation comes into focus. During the first quarter of 2016, Apple shares traded at an average price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 10.6. Viewing this multiple with the company's brand, pricing power, and profits, buying Apple more than nine years ago looks like a no-brainer decision for Buffett with the benefit of hindsight. Is Apple stock a buy now? As of March 31, Berkshire Hathaway owned 300 million Apple shares. If Buffett and his team weren't still bullish on Apple, then they wouldn't have such a huge position in the stock. But should individual investors buy shares now? To come to an informed answer requires a fresh perspective. Some of the favorable traits still hold true, like the powerful brand and the monster profits. However, there's reason to believe that this "Magnificent Seven" stock will struggle to outperform the market over the next five or 10 years. Apple's growth is nothing to write home about. The analyst community sees revenue increasing at a compound annual rate of 5.3% between fiscal 2024 and fiscal 2027. Apple's lack of progress with artificial intelligence (AI) initiatives also continues to receive criticism. Updates to the Siri voice assistant that integrate AI aren't coming until next year. And Apple has relied on partnerships to bring AI capabilities to its operating system. At the end of the day, these aren't driving meaningful growth. Investors also certainly won't be pleased with the fact that the stock currently trades at a P/E ratio of 32.9. At a valuation three times what Buffett first paid, Apple stock isn't a buy right now. Should you invest $1,000 in Apple right now? Before you buy stock in Apple, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Apple wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $652,133!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,056,790!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,048% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 180% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 15, 2025 Neil Patel has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Apple and Berkshire Hathaway. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Warren Buffett-led Berkshire Hathaway Has 22% of Its $290 Billion Portfolio Invested in 1 Stock That's Up 749% in 9 Years was originally published by The Motley Fool Sign in to access your portfolio
