Ban on Palestine Action clears Parliament but faces legal challenge
A short time before, a so-called regret motion proposed by a Green Party peer criticising the measure was rejected by 144 votes to 16, majority 128.
The ministerial order, which has already been approved by MPs, will make it a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison to be a member of the direct action group or to support it.
However, it is unclear when the ban, which needs final sign-off by the Home Secretary, will come into force as the group is mounting a court challenge to try to temporarily block the move with a hearing scheduled on Friday, pending further proceedings.
The Government crackdown comes after two planes were vandalised at RAF Brize Norton on June 20 causing £7 million worth of damage, in an action claimed by Palestine Action.
Four people have been charged by counter-terrorism police in connection with the incident and were remanded in custody following a court appearance.
Home Office minister Lord Hanson of Flint said: 'I will always defend the right of British people to engage in legitimate and peaceful protest and to stand up for the causes in which they believe.
'But essential as these rights are, they do not provide a blank cheque for this particular group to seriously damage property or subject members of the public to fear and violence.'
He added: 'We would not tolerate this activity from organisations if they were motivated by Islamist or extreme right-wing ideology, and therefore I cannot tolerate it from Palestine Action.
'By implementing this measure, we will remove Palestine Action's veil of legitimacy, tackle its financial support, degrade its efforts to recruit and radicalise people into committing terrorist activity in its name.'
But ministers have faced criticism over the decision to outlaw Palestine Action, with opponents branding the move as 'draconian overreach' and comparing the group to the Suffragettes.
The United Nations has also warned against the ban, with experts concerned at the 'unjustified labelling of a political protest movement as 'terrorist''.
In the Lords, Green Party peer Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb opposed the proscription of Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation.
Her regret motion argued the ban undermined civil liberties, constituted a misuse of anti-terror legislation, suppressed dissent against the UK's policy on Israel, and criminalised support for a protest group, causing 'a chilling effect on freedom of expression'.
The legislation approved by the Lords also bans two white supremacist groups, Maniacs Murder Cult and Russian Imperial Movement, including its paramilitary arm Russian Imperial Legion.
The Home Office describes the Maniacs Murder Cult as a neo-Nazi transnational and online organisation which has claimed a number of violent attacks around the world.
The Russian Imperial Movement is an ethno-nationalist group which aims to create a new Russian imperial state.
Its paramilitary unit fought alongside Russian forces in the invasion of Ukraine to advance its ideological cause.
It also runs a paramilitary training programme to support attendees to carry out terror attacks, the Home Office added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Politicians should leave cautious savers and ISAs alone
Showing a talent for U-turns that would shame Torvill and Dean, this is an administration that doesn't have a clue about how to govern or balance the books. Thanks to a disastrous week at Westminster, the cost of welfare, far from being reduced, will now be even higher. So how is the Chancellor going to fill the yawning financial hole that has opened up beneath the country's feet? Doubtless there will be a smorgasbord of unpalatable solutions, among them higher taxation and spending cuts. Thus, within 12 months of coming to power, a party already struggling for authority and respect appears doomed to losing the confidence of a large swathe of the electorate. Read more Rosemary Goring: While Rachel Reeves considers how to approach the autumn budget – I'd bet splitting the atom was easier – one option, mooted even before MPs voted on the welfare reform bill, is to reduce the £20,000 limit on cash ISAs. Some will recall that the Chancellor was making noises about taking this step earlier in the year, but appears to have been dissuaded after listening to advice from building societies and consumer groups. Well done to those canny millions who, in response, took out £14 billion-worth of cash ISAs at the start of the new tax year in April, the highest number since they first appeared in 1999. Shouldn't that tell the government something? Clearly, it isn't in the mood to listen. Assuming she is still in post, it is widely predicted that in her Mansion House speech on July 15, Reeves will be coming for cautious savers with renewed determination. That this is a government agenda, not merely a pet project, is evident. It's safe to assume that whoever is in charge of the Treasury will press for the same reform. Should speculation prove correct, the people in the government's sights are mainly those approaching or in retirement: prudent life-time savers who want to secure their hard-earned money in a tax-free account. They might not be the backbone of British banking, and they are certainly not adventurous. What they are is predictable and numerous, preferring to tuck their cash safely away, confident that the interest rate promised on opening their account will be delivered when it matures. As yet, nobody knows what level of cash ISA limit the Chancellor will opt for, although some believe it could be as low as £4000. Such a reduction is intended to encourage the risk-averse, such as me, to invest instead in stocks and shares. In theory, these offer greater returns over the long-term, while also boosting the British economy. The theory is fine for those versed in the money markets, who have nerves of steel as well as youth and a good income on their side. Sadly, many of us with savings we'll one day need to call upon are neither fiscally sophisticated nor able to take a far-sighted perspective that would allow us to weather stock markets wobbles. Donald Trump sent the stock exchange into turmoil with his announcement. (Image: Getty) Early in April, I bumped into a friend in her seventies, who was in rueful mood. Donald Trump's announcement of global trade tariffs had just sent the stock exchange into turmoil. With the stock markets suffering their sharpest drop since 2020, she had watched in horror as her stocks and shares investments plummeted like gannets nose-diving off the Bass Rock. 'I've said goodbye to my holiday in Bermuda,' she grumped. A younger friend also checked on his accounts. 'You didn't look, did you?' his partner asked, when he broke the news of his greatly diminished nest-egg. She had the right idea. With any investment susceptible to the vagaries of the international economy, it's best not to watch its fluctuations. That way lies headaches or cardiac arrest. Read more: Yet, whenever news of market volatility dominates the headlines, and doomsters announce that trillions have been wiped off their value, who wouldn't want to see how much they'd lost overnight? Even if the markets recover, as they did after April's slump, it is impossible to predict when – not if – there'll be another slump. Investing in this way is no different from gambling. Just look at the small print of every stocks and shares product, warning that 'investment value can go up or down and you could get back less than you invest'. For savers who were born without the gung-ho gene, the problem is that confidence in those who run the country is low. We can be pretty sure that, with the NHS in its current state, at some point we'll have to fork out for knee and hip operations ourselves. And that's before considering care requirements in old age! Those with a cushion of money to fall back on are the lucky ones, that goes without saying. Many cash ISA savers, however, are far from wealthy, and have simply been sensibly putting something aside for decades. The truly well-off, by comparison, can not only afford riskier investments, but have accountants to help them avoid paying too much tax on their gains. If there was more faith in the way Britain was governed, and a greater sense of security about what lies ahead, some savers would be spending as well as squirrelling, thereby helping to fill the nation's coffers. But it's been a long time since many of us trusted those in power to run the economy. Instead, we've been in a brace position. I'm not saying that the diminution of cash ISAs counts as a calamity. Nevertheless, by penalising the less well-off but thrifty, Labour is hurting those it should be taking care of. By any calculation, that's not good. Rosemary Goring is a columnist and author of history books and novels. Her latest work is Exile: The Captive Years of Mary, Queen of Scots.
Wales Online
2 hours ago
- Wales Online
Rassie Erasmus makes shock Wales spying accusation as he tells Warren Gatland 'stop now'
Rassie Erasmus makes shock Wales spying accusation as he tells Warren Gatland 'stop now' The former Wales coach has once again spoken about accusations of spying by the Springboks during the 2021 Lions tour Former Wales head coach Warren Gatland and South Africa's Rassie Erasmus (Image: Getty Images) ) Rassie Erasmus has strongly denied allegations made by Warren Gatland that the Springboks spied on the British and Irish Lions during their 2021 tour of South Africa, labelling the claims as baseless and calling for an end to what he described as 'misinformation". Speaking after South Africa's 42-24 win over Italy at Loftus Versfeld on Saturday, Erasmus, who also went on to accuse Wales themselves of spying in 2021, expressed his frustration over Gatland's accusations, which were detailed in the former Lions boss's latest column for The Telegraph. Gatland alleged that the Springbok camp rented a property overlooking the Lions' training facility and used a long-lens camera to film their preparations. He said suspicions within the Lions setup were confirmed when Lukhanyo Am produced a perfectly-timed hit on Elliot Daly during the opening Test. The former Wales coach also claimed Erasmus was seen on the pitch during a match, disguised as a water carrier, holding a sheet that appeared to include the Lions' attacking plays. 'One of the photographers captured a shot of him holding the paper next to Faf de Klerk,' Gatland wrote. Sign up to Inside Welsh rugby on Substack for the exclusive five-week tour diary from Japan and Australia. Article continues below 'We enlarged the image after the game and it looked like some of our moves and calls were on that sheet.' Gatland said the Lions were so concerned they relocated training sessions indoors to avoid being watched. 'We just didn't know how they could have so much information on us,' he added. Erasmus initially responded with sarcastic posts on social media, but after the win over Italy, he addressed the issue directly and called on Gatland to put an end to the claims. 'It must stop now,' Erasmus said. 'If we're going to go through every bizarre and unlikely story, there'll be a lot more of these kinds of tales. 'I don't want people thinking this kind of thing actually happens in rugby. "There are always strange rumours around training sessions and coaches trying to outsmart each other, but this is different. To make such a serious claim in a newspaper based purely on hearsay is irresponsible. "It just creates unnecessary tension. I'd like us to move on and stop discussing it all together.' Erasmus actually went on to accuse Wales of spying in the autumn of 2021, however Gatland was not head coach at that time. Article continues below The Springboks were forced to evacuate their Cardiff hotel twice overnight before playing Wales and Erasmus has now claimed information had been taken when they returned. Responding to a WalesOnline social media post, Erasmus said: 'I hear from a source from within the Wales [sic] camp that whilst we were evacuated all our notes and plans were photographed and the white board sheets taken. 'We were again forced at around 06h00 for [sic] another evacuation!!'
Leader Live
2 hours ago
- Leader Live
Islamic and right-wing extremism remain UK's ‘biggest threats', says Cooper
On July 7 2005, four suicide bombers targeted the capital's transport network, killing 52 people and injuring more than 770 on three London Underground trains and a bus. A series of attempted bombings followed the attacks, and in the subsequent manhunt for suspects, police shot dead innocent man Jean Charles de Menezes, at a tube station. Writing in the Sunday Mirror, Ms Cooper recalled how news of the attacks had emerged as she headed to a local government conference in her then-role as a junior minister. 'The anti-radicalisation programme Prevent became more important than ever,' Ms Cooper said. 'And communities across the nation were determined that hatred would not win. 'The work done at that time has endured and evolved. Islamist extremist terrorism remains the greatest threat, followed by extreme right-wing terrorism. 'But we also face threats from hostile states, serious organised crime, cyber criminals, and a rise in individuals radicalised online.' Ms Cooper referenced how the approach to tackling terrorism had continued to evolve in the wake of the tragedy. In April, legislation providing greater protection to help prevent and reduce the harm of terror attacks at event venues officially became law. The Terrorism (Protection of Premises) Act 2025, known as Martyn's Law, compels all UK venues expecting 200 or more people to be on site to prepare for the event of a terror attack. Larger premises expected to host 800 people or more also have to take steps to reduce their vulnerability to an assault, such as CCTV, bag searches or vehicle checks. Figen Murray campaigned for the law change in memory of her 29-year-old son Martyn Hett, who was killed in the Manchester Arena bombing at the end of an Ariana Grande concert in May 2017. Speaking when the Bill was signed into law, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said: 'Today is a landmark moment for our security as my Government delivers on its promise to introduce Martyn's Law and better protect the public from terrorism. 'Figen's courage and determination in the face of such unimaginable loss is truly humbling, and it is thanks to her campaigning that Martyn's Law means her son's legacy will live on forever.'
