Online gambling and betting advertising is non-compliant with Gambling Act — minister
Minister of Trade, Industry and Competition, Parks Tau, has confirmed in parliament that the advertising for online gambling and betting does not comply with the National Gambling Act, but emphasised that a crack-down is coming.
He was responding to a question from Makashule Gana, an MP for Rise Mzansi, whether the recent advertising and marketing campaigns of gambling and betting companies comply with the National Gambling Act and related regulations and policies.
Tau said in his reply that the National Gambling Board reviewed recent gambling and betting advertising campaigns to see if they comply with the National Gambling Act and National Gambling Regulations.
'The findings indicate that a number of gambling operators' current advertising and marketing practices do not fully comply with the legislative and regulatory framework, particularly regarding responsible gambling messaging and protection of minors.
ALSO READ: Did you know online gambling is illegal in SA? Here are plans to stop it
Online gambling and betting skipping statutory warnings
Tau said online gambling operators are contravening regulation 3(2) of the National Gambling Regulations about the inadequate display of responsible gambling warnings, which requires that any advertisement must include a clear and prominent statement warning against the dangers of addictive and compulsive gambling.
In a video or television advertisement, this message must incorporate at a minimum the name, toll-free number and slogan of the National Responsible Gambling Programme, and it must be published in visual format so that each slogan appears in a legible and noticeable format for at least three seconds.
'The responsible gambling message was barely visible and appeared only briefly, which undermines the intent of the regulation.'
ALSO READ: R1.1 trillion worth of online bets in a year: Does SA need to rein in digital gambling?
Children exposed to online gambling and betting advertising
He said online gambling operators also contravened regulation 3(1)(i)(i) of the National Gambling Regulations in these ways:
Exposure to minors: prohibits placing gambling advertisements in media primarily directed at children under the age of eighteen, but the Board noticed that advertisements are frequently aired during family viewing times, including during popular shows, such as MasterChef and Junior MasterChef, as well as during sports matches where the audience is likely to include minors. Tau says this is contrary to the Act, which prohibits gambling for individuals under 18. Advertising during these time slots also increases the risk of normalising gambling behaviour among young viewers.
Targeted online and streaming advertising: Tau said gambling advertisements were observed on radio streaming websites and platforms such as YouTube, often without responsible gambling disclaimers. These platforms do not adequately verify the age of users, allowing easy access to gambling content by minors. 'This raises serious concerns regarding the enticement of underage children to participate in gambling activities,' he said.
Sponsorship and product placement: the sponsorship of family-friendly programmes by major bookmakers results in increased visibility and frequency of gambling advertisements during television content widely consumed by minors and families. Tau said this form of marketing bypasses regulatory intentions to protect vulnerable groups from gambling influence.
Tau said the board engaged the provincial gambling boards about the contraventions and intends to advise the National Gambling Policy Council Meeting of the matter for resolution. 'Therefore, the department and the board will focus on implementing corrective measures in the next cycle.'
ALSO READ: 'Let's make gambling safer': New bill targets unfair online gambling practices
National Gambling Policy Council stepping up soon
Gana also wanted to know whether Tau found that the lack of National Gambling Policy Council meetings since March 2018 contributed to the gambling crisis and lack of accountability in the gambling and betting sector.
Tau said he will convene the National Gambling Policy Council soon. 'Gambling is a functional area of concurrent competence between national and provincial government in terms of the constitution, and therefore requires intergovernmental cooperation.
'The statutory mandate of the Council in terms of section 62 of the National Gambling Act includes consulting on the determination and establishment of the national gambling policy and laws, including the promotion of uniform national and provincial laws about gambling norms and standards, as well as any matter concerning gambling.'
The Council enables provinces and national government to debate and deliberate on policy and ensure alignment of policy and enforcement interventions across the country.
Tau said that with the gambling environment evolving, there has been a growth in the industry, which also paved the way for illegal activities, such as online gambling, to thrive. 'In addition, the inability to meet affects uniformity and harmonisation of gambling policy and legislation, which leads to fragmentation in the gambling regulation in the country.'
NOW READ: WATCH: Women and pensioners among 'vulnerable' groups, says Gauteng Gambling Board
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
an hour ago
- Daily Maverick
Aligned Afrikaner men who claim Trump's ear – the who's who of SA's ‘white plight delegations'
Another group of white Afrikaner men from South Africa last week announced their visit to the US to discuss issues including farm attacks in this country and land expropriation. The various men visiting there are interconnected and seem to be creating echoes in US chambers. It has become something of a strange trend – photographs of smiling white Afrikaner men from South Africa, some who refer to themselves as 'delegations' on 'diplomatic missions,' standing in or near significant US buildings. Accompanying the photographs, which are posted on social media, are words about US officials, farm murders and attacks in South Africa and land expropriation without compensation. There is a characteristic lack of reference to many other issues deeply impacting South Africans – including how decades after black residents were forced from land, many still live in poorer areas that the apartheid government callously assigned to them. In terms of farm attacks, which have contributed to the false idea of a 'white genocide' in South Africa, Police Minister Senzo Mchunu announced in May that there were six murders linked to farms in this country in the first quarter of this year — and of those killed, five were black. Back to the photographs of the Afrikaner men and their accompanying posts. These have been surfacing on different social media accounts and websites, and so it may get confusing as to who exactly has been vying for influential US ears. Similarities and connections And such confusion is justifiable because the different Afrikaner groups and representatives who have been visiting the US are interlinked. Together the overall group involves an expansive mix, including a political party, an employers' association, and an agriculture network, and has links to media platforms. While the various groups making it up have different websites, and the individuals involved have separate social media accounts from which to publicise their messages, they have overlapping agendas. In the latest on this front, a trio of Afrikaner group representatives last week, on 26 June 2025, issued a joint statement on their US visit which they said involved 'senior White House officials'. Their visit, though, did not represent official state relations. The group consisted of leaders from the Freedom Front Plus, the Southern African Agri Initiative (Saai), and the National Employers' Association of South Africa (Neasa). Some institutions/officials whom we meet in Washington also met with @afriforum and @solidariteit, others not. Investigating them for high treason says everything the world needs to know about the @MYANC, it's leadership, modus operandi and mentality, they say. Pure intimidation — Theo de Jager (@TheoDJager) June 25, 2025 They ticked what have now become self-created Afrikaner 'diplomatic mission' boxes – they called themselves a 'delegation' and posted photographs of themselves in and outside US buildings. It was claimed in their statement that US officials, who were not named, wanted certain conditions met so that relations between their country and South Africa could normalise. The statement claimed the conditions included 'the classification of farm attacks as a priority crime' and 'no land expropriation without fair market compensation'. Identical itineraries These issues are roughly the same that have emerged in America from a very particular stance – that of disgruntled white Afrikaners from South Africa who do not publicly acknowledge the irreparable harm the racist pro-white apartheid regime inflicted on black people in this country. Such warped and one-sided views appear to have contributed to US President Donald Trump in February signing an executive order cutting off aid to this country and offering refugee status to Afrikaners 'who are victims of unjust racial discrimination'. The order also claimed the expropriation law was 'to enable the government of South Africa to seize ethnic minority Afrikaners' agricultural property without compensation'. In reaction at the time, the South African government had hit back, saying: 'It is of great concern that the foundational premise of this order lacks factual accuracy and fails to recognize South Africa's profound and painful history of colonialism and apartheid. 'We are concerned by what seems to be a campaign of misinformation and propaganda aimed at misrepresenting our great nation.' Echo chamber? Last month, President Cyril Ramaphosa travelled to the US to meet Trump to 'focus specifically on reframing bilateral, economic and commercial relations.' The joint Afrikaner group who publicised their US trip last week have therefore gone to that country after Ramaphosa's official South African state visit. They appear to be meddling in foreign affairs – or they seem to be trying to create the impression that they are stoking this arena, via promoting the same or similar messaging their counterparts who previously visited America have. This suggests that they are adding their voices to an echo chamber. This is a breakdown of the main interconnected Afrikaner groups that have been to the US: AfriForum It describes itself as 'a non-profit civil rights organisation' established in March 2006 and headed by Kallie Kriel. Its website says: 'The organisation was created to call up Afrikaners to participate in public debate and actions outside of the sphere of party politics.' In 2018 Kriel visited The Heritage Foundation, a think-tank described on its website as 'America's powerhouse of conservative ideas' which Trump's administration appears to strongly draw from. Kriel had posted on X that he and an associate had spent about two hours with a senior delegation from the foundation and discussed issues including expropriation without compensation and farm killings. About three months later, Trump had stated on X that he asked the Secretary of State to 'closely study the South Africa land and farm seizures and expropriations and the large scale killing of farmers'. Ons het vandag 'n konstruktiewe vergadering by die Huis van Verteenwoordigers se Buitelandse Sake-komitee gehad. Ons het ook @afriforum, @solidariteit en die Solidariteit Beweging se Washington-memorandum, wat druk op ANC-leiers bepleit, aan hulle oorhandig. Jý kan ook die… — Kallie Kriel (@kalliekriel) February 26, 2025 In February this year, Kriel and others were again in the US. This time he posted on X that they had spent the day meeting with 'senior members of the House of Representatives' committee on foreign affairs'. Freedom Front Plus A political party, with roots stretching back to around 1994, when South Africa became a democracy. Corné Mulder heads it. Its website says: 'The Freedom Front Plus is committed to group rights, against affirmative action and towards a better SA for all.' Another section of its website focuses on Afrikaners. #AfrikanerDelegationWashingonDC Today was a good day with a series of excellent meetings at US Congress @Netwerk24 @IOL — Corné_Mulder (@MulderCorn) June 25, 2025 It explains: 'The Freedom Front Plus is irrevocably committed to the realisation of communities', in particular the Afrikaner's, internationally recognised right to self-determination, territorial or otherwise; the maintenance, protection and promotion of their rights and interests; as well as the promotion of the right of self-determination of any other community, bound by a common language and cultural heritage in South Africa.' Together with the head of Saai and of Neasa, Mulder was in the US in June 2025. National Employers' Association of South Africa (Neasa) An employers' association established in 1996 under the guidance of Gerhard Papenfus, who still heads it. Its website says: 'As a pioneering employers' association and a major player in collective bargaining, Neasa is a staunch defender of employers' rights, actively engaging in forums, including Parliament and the media.' A simpler description on its X account describes at as 'the leading advocate of employers' interests in #SouthAfrica, supporting a prosperous economy for all'. Neasa's vast management team appears to consist of mostly white individuals. White House states pre-conditions for US/SA relationship. — NEASA (@NeasaNews) June 26, 2025 Neasa, AfriForum and Saai see eye-to-eye, especially when it comes to issues like rural safety. In 2023 it was announced they were among various groups who 'pledged to work more closely together to form a united front against rural crime'. Papenfus visited the US in June 2025, along with the heads of Saai and the Freedom Front Plus. Southern African Agri Initiative (Saai) A network and organisation focused on agriculture interests headed by Theo de Jager. Its website says it 'was established by farmers for farmers and that is committed to protecting and promoting the rights, values, ideals and needs of the family farmers in the primary production sector… 'A family farmer is not old or young, big or small, white or black, poor or rich. A family farmer is a member or members of a family (including those employed by this family) who own or manage an agricultural business.' Met die besoek aan die USA Department of State, amptenare wat werk op SA, SADC en Afrika, is ons formele program in Washington afgehandel. — Theo de Jager (@TheoDJager) June 27, 2025 Last year Saai and AfriForum announced that they wanted the international police organisation Interpol to crack down on stock theft between South Africa and Lesotha. De Jager was part of the US visit with the heads of Neasa and the Freedom Front Plus in June 2025. Solidarity A trade union with roots apparently dating back to 1902 and headed by Dirk Hermann. Its website says: 'Solidarity's goal is that everyone who wants to work, must be able to work well and reach their full potential.' (The page on which its 'goal' is detailed happens to show only people who appear to be white.) Another part of the site says: 'Solidarity members, through their monthly payment of membership fees, can enjoy a range of benefits. Solidarity's offer is subject to terms and conditions.' Vandag is nog 'n groot dag. Ons ontmoet lede van die senaat en huis van verteenwoordigers. Dit was na gister se groot sukses by die Withuis. Ons praat weer oor die Washington-memorandum. Erkenning en hulp aan Afrikaners en druk op die regering vir beleidsverandering. Gee gerus… — Dirk Hermann (@SolidariDirk) February 26, 2025 It has various campaigns one can get involved in, like taking on the ANC and racial laws. Solidarity says this is because: 'We want to ensure that Afrikaners can live and work freely, safely and prosperously in South Africa.' Earlier this year, Solidarity representatives visited the White House with AfriForum and Solidarity Movement counterparts. Solidarity Movement Flip Buys chairs this umbrella body, consisting of various organisations, and which has origins dating back to 1998. It includes Solidarity, AfriForum, which is described as its civil rights wing, the Federasie van Afrikaanse Kultuurvereniginge, and online news publication Maroela Media. Its two 'independent partners,' according to its website, are Saai and Pretoria FM. 𝗦𝗼𝗹𝗶𝗱𝗮𝗿𝗶𝘁𝗲𝗶𝘁 𝗕𝗲𝘄𝗲𝗴𝗶𝗻𝗴-𝗮𝗳𝘃𝗮𝗮𝗿𝗱𝗶𝗴𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗴𝗮𝗱𝗲𝗿 𝗶𝗻 𝗪𝗶𝘁𝗵𝘂𝗶𝘀 𝗺𝗲𝘁 𝗧𝗿𝘂𝗺𝗽-𝗮𝗱𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘀𝗶𝗲 Lees hier: — Solidariteit Beweging / Solidarity Movement (@SBeweging) February 25, 2025 Its website says: 'The Solidarity Movement is a family of community organisations with more than 500 000 members who, together with their families, represent around two million people. 'It is an Afrikaans, Afrikaner and South African network of self-help organisations. Our foundation is Christian-Democratic, and we strive for mutual recognition of, and respect between race groups. We reject leftist and rightist extremism.' Solidarity Movement representatives visited the US earlier this year. Daily Maverick reported in February that the Solidarity Movement had also stated that 'during the past few years, the movement has been in contact with various US politicians to ensure that South Africa's relations with the US do not run aground'. At that stage, the Solidarity Movement also planned to spread its stance on South Africa in Europe – representatives had planned to visit places including Germany, Italy, France and the Netherlands. DM
TimesLIVE
5 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
SA's illegal alcohol trade costs R16bn in lost tax revenue
South Africa's illicit alcohol market has grown by 55% over the past seven years, outpacing growth of the legal alcohol market, and is now worth R25.1bn. This has prompted a call from the Drinks Federation of SA (DF-SA) for collaboration between the government and the private sector to fight the growth of illicit trade in alcohol which has cost the government R16.5bn in lost tax revenue. Benjamin Rideout, research consultant at Euromonitor International, said nearly one in five alcoholic drinks sold in SA is illegal. 'Unlike some countries where home brews are the issue, SA is facing large-scale counterfeiting. The situation demands better control over production inputs like ethanol and much stronger enforcement.' The chair of DF-SA and CEO of SAB, Richard Rivett-Carnac, said illicit alcohol distorts the market and undermines trust in legitimate brands. 'In a tough macroeconomic environment, consumers are looking for bang for buck, goods that are affordable and the price gap of between 37% and 70% between illicit and legal alcohol makes illicit products more appealing, especially in low-income communities. He said 67% of surveyed consumers in the Euromonitor study, for instance, said they would knowingly buy illicit alcohol due to the lower price.' Moreover, he said illegal alcohol is a growing threat to South Africa's economy and public health. 'It drains billions from public funds, threatens jobs, and weakens the formal legal, taxed alcohol industry. Understanding the drivers of illicit alcohol growth and its magnitude is a step in the Right direction but we need stronger collaboration with the industry and government to really start removing the incentives that allow for the illicit market to thrive and intensifying enforcement.' During a panel discussion, Dr Shamal Ramesar, head of research at DF-SA, said 'communities are at risk, and the economy is the biggest loser when we delve into the pervasiveness of illicit alcohol. Recent testing with the University of KwaZulu-Natal found that many illegal products contain dangerous substances like methanol, which can cause serious harm. Unless we shut down illegal producers and educate consumers, lives will continue to be at risk.' DF-SA also announced a new national awareness campaign to help South Africans recognise illegal alcohol and understand the risks. The campaign will include tools for traders and consumers, tips on spotting fake products, and information on how to report them.
The Citizen
15 hours ago
- The Citizen
Malatji laments the actions of ANC members allegedly involved in Magaqa's murder
Questions have been raised about the involvement of ANC politicians in Magaqa's death. Magaqa was shot in July 2017 and succumbed to his injuries after spending time in the hospital. ANC Youth League (ANCYL) president Collen Malatji says he is concerned about the alleged involvement of ANC leaders in the killing of the youth league's former secretary-general, Sindiso Magaqa. Malatji was at the Pietermaritzburg High Court on Monday, where the court was expected to sentence Sibusiso Ncengwa, one of the hitmen involved in Magaqa's murder. Despite much interest in the matter, the sentencing was postponed. Ncengwa admitted to killing Magaqa in 2017. Malatji told The Citizen that he is concerned that one of the hitmen had indicated that politicians are involved in the death of the former ANC leader. 'The acts of these individuals do not represent what the ANC stands for, which is to build a safe and secure community, where airing out your views about wrongdoing does not lead to you being murdered. 'The implicated individuals in their actions proved that they were not ANC and certainly not leaders, and they must face the harshest sentencing by the court; in fact, they deserve a life sentence, because Cde Sindiso Magaqa will never come back,' he said. Big fish involved Malatji said he believes that there are more serious players behind Magaqa's murder. He said the men who have been arrested for Magaqa's murder are simply hired guns. 'We know that he (Sibusiso) did not work alone; we know that he was a hired gun. The real people we want are those who issued the order that our SG must be killed. ALSO READ: 'Hijacked' by the ANC? Maimane issues National Dialogue warning 'That one there in prison is a small fish; we want the big fish, those ones that worked with everyone and the police to kill our SG,' he said. A former mayor of the uMzimkhulu municipality and a municipal manager had been arrested in connection with Magaqa's murder, but they were later released due to insufficient evidence. Why was Magaqa killed? Meanwhile, Malatji said Magaqa died fighting for the interests of South Africans. This stems from a belief that Magaqa was in possession of a dossier on corrupt activities at the uMzimkhulu municipality, 'We are expecting nothing but a life sentence because that criminal is a murderer. He does not belong among our people; he is an animal that must rot in jail. If there was still that sentence to kill people, then he must be the first to get killed.' He said he was outraged by the manner in which Magaqa was gunned down. 'If we could break the law, we could kill him ourselves, but because we are law-abiding citizens, we are saying that this law must make sure that he rots and dies in jail,' he said. On the other hand, Ncengwa appealed for a lenient sentence in court; one of his reasons for this is that he has apologised to the Magaqa family for their loss. The court also heard that Magaqa's family are still struggling to raise the children he left behind. NOW READ: ANC Youth League SG Sindiso Magaqa's killer pleads guilty
