logo
Cancelling Colbert, bribery, an $8bn deal: what's going on at Paramount?

Cancelling Colbert, bribery, an $8bn deal: what's going on at Paramount?

The Guardiana day ago
For a decade the comedian Stephen Colbert has mocked, ridiculed and eviscerated Donald Trump from every conceivable angle. On Thursday Colbert told his audience at the Ed Sullivan Theater in New York that his popular late night TV show is being cancelled. 'Yeah, I share your feelings,' he said in response to a chorus of boos.
The CBS network insisted that it had made 'a purely financial decision' to wind up The Late Show next year. But others are not so sure. Adam Schiff, a Democratic senator who was a guest on Thursday's show, tweeted: 'If Paramount and CBS ended the Late Show for political reasons, the public deserves to know. And deserves better.'
There are reasonable grounds for suspicion. Earlier this month CBS's owner, Paramount Global, reached a $16m settlement with Trump over an interview on its current affairs strand 60 Minutes, removing a potential obstacle to the company's $8bn sale to the Hollywood studio Skydance Media.
If the mega-merger goes ahead, a friend and ally of the US president, the billionaire Larry Ellison, could wield huge influence over the CBS news division as well as programmes ranging from South Park to Star Trek. The Late Show is sure to be seen by some as an example of obeying in advance.
Among those sounding the alarm is Marvin Kalb, the last correspondent personally hired at CBS by Edward R Murrow, a giant of broadcast journalism whose defiance of McCarthyism was recounted in the film and play Good Night, and Good Luck. Now 95, Kalb perceives the Skydance takeover as a threat to CBS's journalistic independence and moral integrity – and fears that this time it will buckle.
Speaking by phone from his home near Washington, Kalb said: 'In my judgment it means that CBS, starting with 60 Minutes, will be under a tighter editorial control than it has ever been. The idea that 60 Minutes will be able to continue to do virile, unafraid reporting on Trump may be coming to an end.'
The Murrow protege, who spent 24 years at CBS News, warns that the network could drift in the direction of Rupert Murdoch's Fox News, which often parrots Trump's talking points. 'I'm afraid that CBS News will become a little Fox, that it will begin to be timid in the way in which it approaches any possibly critical story about the president.
'Just as you rarely see or hear anything on Fox that is critical of Trump, likewise it may very well end up that CBS will be essentially in the same position, and that is huge loss for those who still favour freedom of the press and who still favour a vigorous, unafraid press.'
Speaking on Tuesday, before the news about The Late Show broke, Kalb expressed concern about the future of the late-night comedians whose caustic, bullshit-detector political satire has earned Trump's wrath in the past. Jon Stewart, whose current contract expires in December, and Colberthave both mercilessly skewered Paramount for caving in to Trump.
'My gut feeling would be that Colbert's contract, when it comes up, will simply not be renewed, and they will find a humourist who is pro-Trump,' Kalb said presciently. 'Those are the kinds of programmes that, in a humorous way, tend to either criticise or make fun of Trump – and he doesn't like that.'
The former host of NBC's Meet the Press who is Edward R Murrow professor of practice, emeritus at the Harvard Kennedy School continued: 'He has already taken action against the press, starting from his first term with 'fake news' and 'fake media'. He has already gone a long way toward diminishing the once virile press – I keep using that word because I'm thinking about people who are not afraid, people who are open minded, fair-minded journalists who are simply covering the news.
'If the news happens to be unfavourable with respect to the president, so be it. But if the president doesn't like it, he's going to make his views known. I think if there were a serious study done even up to this point on the last five or six months, I believe you would see an initial, perhaps reluctant timidity come into the coverage of news concerning Trump.'
Trump filed a $10bn lawsuit against CBS last October, alleging that the network deceptively edited an interview that aired on 60 Minutes with the then vice-president and presidential candidate Kamala Harris to 'tip the scales in favor of the Democratic party' in the election.
In an amended complaint filed in February, Trump bumped his claim for damages to $20bn. CBS initially called the lawsuit 'completely without merit', a view shared by many legal experts, and sought to have it dismissed.
But then the company entered into mediation in an attempt to placate Trump as Paramount's controlling shareholder, Shari Redstone, sought to close the $8bn merger with Skydance, which needs federal government approval. The CBS News head, Wendy McMahon, and 60 Minutes executive producer Bill Owens quit over Paramount's handling of the showdown.
When Paramount reached the out-of-court settlement, it insisted that the $16m would go towards Trump's future presidential library, rather than to him personally, and it would not be issuing an apology. But critics saw it as the starkest example yet of Trump's ability to intimidate major institutions including the media.
Rome Hartman, one of the producers of the Harris segment, who retired from CBS News and 60 Minutes last month for unrelated reasons, said in a phone interview: 'The motive of this lawsuit was clearly harassment and intimidation and the decision by Paramount's leaders to succumb to that harassment and intimidation was an absolute betrayal. It's a shameful betrayal of the hardworking people at 60 Minutes and at CBS News.'
Despite Trump's pressure campaign, 60 Minutes has continued to produce unflinching reports on his administration's immigration crackdown, assault on federal government departments and other issues. Now its staff are bracing for a change of ownership and potentially different approach.
Hartman continues: 'Now everyone is hoping that the new corporate parents will allow 60 Minutes to operate with the independence that it has always enjoyed. That's not a just-because-we-want-it sort of thing; that's because the independence and editorial voice of 60 Minutes is one of the reasons it has lasted as long as it has and it has the amazing reputation that it has for over half a century. We were betrayed by one corporate parent and they hope that will not be repeated by the new folks.
'We are living in a moment of real peril for free voices and independent journalism, even independent commentary, as would be the case with Stewart and Colbert. These guys are businessmen in the end, and I hope they see that to maintain longstanding principles of independence and free speech is not just in their interest morally but in their interest economically.'
Skydance was founded in 2010 by Larry Ellison's son David. According to its website, David, who is a pilot, came up with the name as a reference to flying aerobatics known as 'skydancing' and its promise of limitless possibilities. It has produced films including the Tom Cruise vehicles Top Gun: Maverick and the Mission: Impossible franchise.
But although David is the public face of Skydance, his father Larry will be the power behind the throne at Paramount, according to an organisational chart obtained by the New York Times last year. The co-founder of software company Oracle is one of the world's wealthiest men and a friend of Trump, who has touted Ellison as a potential buyer of TikTok.
Bill Carter, the author of four books about television, says: 'Both of the Ellisons seem to be close to Trump, and Trump will basically use any leverage he can. That's what he does, and he has been given the power to do it pretty much across the board here.
'The speculation is that they'll install somebody who is at least somewhat willing to take his side in a future controversy, which means there's very likely to be some kind of chilling effect on the news division, and especially at 60 Minutes, because they have basically defied him even after this.'
Last week the New York Times reported that David Ellison had held talks about acquiring the Free Press, an online publication co-founded by Bari Weiss and noted for its 'anti-woke' politics. Discussions include Weiss 'taking on an influential role in shaping the editorial sensibilities of CBS News', the paper added, though probably not in a managerial capacity.
Journalist Mehdi Hasan responded to the report about Weiss by tweeting: 'RIP CBS News.' Paul Farhi, a former media reporter at the Washington Post, said: 'She's an opinion journalist and always has been, and that's not the person you want running a news division or having a prominent role in the news division. You want someone who actually knows or upholds the tradition of straight-up reporting that CBS has stood for its entire existence.'
Farhi added: 'I suspect at the end of it he'll discover that CBS News wouldn't be too crazy about having her, but it'll be a real test of his intentions, if he has any intentions at all, for CBS News. If he brings in someone like her, it will signal a direction and will be a sign of we're not going to do things the way we've done in the past.
'But I think it's more likely that he won't do anything that's going to be radical in terms of CBS News. For one thing, CBS News is a very small part of the overall Paramount enterprise that she's buying. It's not a big profit centre. At the end of the day I suspect we won't be talking about this topic once the merger is done, simply because CBS News is not out of control.'
But other parts of the Paramount forest are already in revolt. Trey Parker and Matt Stone, co-creators of the long-running animated sitcom South Park, have accused the incoming Paramount president, Jeff Shell, of meddling in contract negotiations for streaming rights to the show, allegedly to benefit Paramount+ at their expense.
This has caused disruption to production schedules including a delay for South Park's 27th season. Parker and Stone wrote on social media earlier this month: 'This merger is a shitshow and it's fucking up South Park. We are at the studio working on new episodes and we hope the fans get to see them somehow.'
Stewart and Colbert have also been pushing back. Stewart used a Daily Show monologue to tear into Paramount's settlement, interrupted by a spoof ad for the fast-food chain Arby's that said: 'For when you want a sandwich commensurate with your company's shame.' Colbert called it a 'big fat bribe' and even alluded to speculation about his own job security, pointing to a moustache he grew on holiday and quipping: 'OK, OK, but how are they going to put pressure on Stephen Colbert if they can't find him?'
The timing of the decision to axe him raised eyebrows in Washington. Senator Elizabeth Warren said on Thursday: 'CBS canceled Colbert's show just three days after Colbert called out CBS owner Paramount for its $16m settlement with Trump – a deal that looks like bribery. America deserves to know if his show was canceled for political reasons.'
Speaking before the announcement, Carter, author of The Late Shift and executive producer of the CNN docuseries The Story of Late Night, said: 'It would be pretty obvious to anybody looking at this situation if they decided to eliminate those guys that it would be for political reasons because they're obviously outspoken and have a big audience listening to them and it gets under Trump's skin.
'But it's scary to think that's something that could happen in America, that a president could basically eliminate a voice of protest against him. It would be like [President Richard] Nixon getting rid of the editorial cartoonists who were criticising him over Watergate. I would not put it past Trump to try to do it.
'I do think that if you're David Ellison, it's a terrible look. If you're in Ellison's shoes, you have to know this will brand you as another person who's basically giving the knee to Donald Trump. A lot of these guys don't care because they have other agendas. But it is a thing to live with if you're going to be branding yourself that way.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Senior Pentagon adviser, who alleged colleague called the cops on him, fired by Pete Hegseth
Senior Pentagon adviser, who alleged colleague called the cops on him, fired by Pete Hegseth

The Independent

time21 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Senior Pentagon adviser, who alleged colleague called the cops on him, fired by Pete Hegseth

A senior Pentagon staffer and adviser to Pete Hegseth has been ousted, marking at least the sixth person under the Defense Secretary to quit within his first six months in office, according to reports. Justin Fulcher, who recently made headlines after accusing a colleague of calling the Pentagon police on him, will no longer serve as a senior adviser to Hegseth, three sources told CBS News Saturday. Fulcher began at the Defense Department working under Elon Musk's DOGE before he was promoted in April to serve as a senior adviser to Hegseth, the Washington Post reported. At the time, Fulcher, along with several other aides to Hegseth, joined a new Defense Department leadership team created in the wake of Signalgate, where top officials gave The Atlantic editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg a front-row seat as they discussed impending strikes on Houthi terrorists in Yemen. Fulcher made headlines earlier this month, after a Washington Post report revealed he allegedly stormed out of a meeting and complained to his boss, Hegseth, that Yinon Weiss, Elon Musk's pick to lead DOGE, had reported him to the Pentagon Force Protection Agency. Since January, at least six of Hegseth's top advisers have left the department, according to the Post. The former Fox News personality entered the role with little prior experience and has drawn criticism for his early missteps. Meanwhile, Fulcher, who previously ran a telehealth startup that went bankrupt, seemingly overstated his credentials before he was hired to work at DOGE, including claiming a doctorate in international relations and affairs from Johns Hopkins, according to a Forbes report from earlier this year. In a statement to the Post, chief Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell said it was 'not fair' to characterize Fulcher's departure as a firing and called him a 'great guy.' The Defense Department released a statement on behalf of Fulcher that read: "As planned, I've completed 6 months of service in government to my country. Working alongside the dedicated men and women of the Department of Defense has been incredibly inspiring. "Revitalizing the warrior ethos, rebuilding the military, and reestablishing deterrence are just some of the historic accomplishments I'm proud to have witnessed. Still, this is just the beginning. "None of this could have happened without Secretary Hegseth's decisive leadership or President Trump's continued confidence in our team. "I'm grateful to both, and to the extraordinary civilians and service members who turn vision into action every day. "I will continue to champion American warfighters in all future endeavors and remain impressed by the work of the Department of Defense." In a text message to the Post, Fulcher reiterated that his departure was 'perfectly amicable' and that he had only planned to work there for six months.

Trump's team wanted Kilmar Abrego Garcia to face ‘American justice.' He could be deported again before trial
Trump's team wanted Kilmar Abrego Garcia to face ‘American justice.' He could be deported again before trial

The Independent

time21 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Trump's team wanted Kilmar Abrego Garcia to face ‘American justice.' He could be deported again before trial

Donald Trump's White House is doing everything it can to make sure Kilmar Abrego Garcia never steps foot on U.S. soil as a free man – even if that means setting him free in another country while he faces criminal charges in this one. Federal prosecutors want to bring his smuggling case to trial as soon as possible. But if he's released from pretrial detention, immigration officials intend to arrest and deport him before a trial even begins, according to government lawyers. Abrego Garcia has pleaded not guilty, and his trial is set to begin January 27, 2026. He could be in another country by then. The administration spent weeks insisting Abrego Garcia would never be allowed back to the country after admitting he was wrongfully deported in March. Yet he was abruptly flown back to the United States from El Salvador last month to face a criminal indictment in Tennessee. At a press conference announcing his return, Attorney General Pam Bondi said Abrego Garcia would face 'American justice.' In recent court hearings in two different states, where judges are presiding over a criminal case and his wrongful removal lawsuit, Justice Department lawyers said they would only move forward with his criminal prosecution if he remains in custody while awaiting trial. If he is released on bail, they would let Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents arrest him and send him out of the country, again. Maryland District Judge Paula Xinis hauled Trump administration officials to court this month to understand what, if anything, the government intends to do with Abrego Garcia when he's released from pretrial custody. Department of Homeland Security officials admitted that ICE intends to arrest him, but they don't yet know where he will be deported. Government attorneys had previously announced plans to deport him to a 'third country' instead of his native El Salvador. 'There's been no decision made, as he is not in ICE custody,' Thomas Giles, assistant director for ICE enforcement and removal operations, testified last week. ICE intends to take custody of Abrego Garcia 'as soon as possible,' Giles said. Where he will await his removal from the country will depend on available space in immigration detention centers, according to Giles. Last month, Magistrate Judge Barbara Holmes determined there is no legal basis to keep him in pretrial detention. She set potential conditions for his release, including wearing an ankle bracelet and living with his brother in Maryland. The federal judge overseeing his criminal case will decide next week whether to uphold that ruling. On July 16, Tennessee District Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw Jr. said his decision will not be determined by what ICE wants to do. 'Frankly we don't know what is going to happen to him in that regard,' the judge said. But he said he was 'having a hard time understanding' arguments from federal prosecutors that there were no conditions under which Abrego Garcia — who does not have a criminal record — could be out of jail while awaiting trial. Holmes also appeared to reject the government's characterization of Abrego Garcia as a dangerous MS-13 gang member, human trafficker and serial abuser following claims from administration officials and government attorneys that 'defy common sense.' Under cross examination from defense attorney Sean Hecker, Homeland Security Investigations Special Agent Peter Joseph admitted that he did not know that one of the government's central informants in the case gave conflicting statements about Abrego Garcia's alleged gang ties in several interviews with federal agents. He also testified that he didn't know that the informants were in contact with other potential cooperators — at least three of whom sought deals with the government to legally remain in the United States in exchange for their testimony. Three of the witnesses are related, and Joseph admitted it was 'always a possibility' that they coordinated their stories to secure a better deal for themselves. 'They're family,' Crenshaw shot back. 'Family talk.' But it won't be Crenshaw's decision that decides whether Abrego Garcia walks free. That will be up to Judge Xinis in Maryland. She is expected to decide whether to block the Trump administration from deporting him a second time. Xinis has signaled that she will order the government to give him at least two days' notice, should the judge overseeing his criminal case release him from pretrial custody. Abrego Garcia was 16 years old when he fled gang violence in El Salvador and illegally entered the United States in 2011. Abrego Garcia, now 29, was living and working in Maryland with his wife and child, both American citizens, and two children from a previous marriage, when ICE agents arrested him in March. After government lawyers admitted in court documents that he was removed from the country due to a procedural error, federal judges and a unanimous Supreme Court ordered the Trump administration to 'facilitate' his return. A 2019 order from an immigration judge had blocked his removal to El Salvador over humanitarian concerns, and Supreme Court justices unanimously agreed the Trump administration had 'illegally' defied that order. Still, the government spent weeks battling court orders while officials publicly said he would never step foot in the United States as they characterized him as a serial abuser and criminal gang member. But emails and text messages provided to members of Congress appear to show Trump administration and government lawyers were sympathetic to his wrongful removal and made efforts to get him out of El Salvador before the case made headlines causing major headaches for the White House. Erez Reuveni, a 15-year veteran of the Justice Department who was working in the Office of Immigration Litigation, was closely involved with several high-profile immigration cases in the first months of Donald Trump's presidency when he was fired in April. He supplied members of the Senate Judiciary Committee with a massive trove of internal messages showing the lengths the administration was taking to label Abrego Garcia a member of MS-13 as they tried to figure out if they were violating court orders by keeping him in El Salvador. Before the case exploded into a national story at the center of the president's anti-immigration agenda, administration officials spent several days discussing the feasibility of returning Abrego Garcia or ensuring that he would be protected from the gang violence he fled as a teenager. The messages also revealed simmering tensions between Justice Department attorneys who worked the cases in court and lawyers for Homeland Security who were directed to advance the president's agenda, regardless of legal risks. Meanwhile, Abrego Garcia was , according to his legal team. His attorneys alleged he experienced 'severe beatings, severe sleep deprivation, inadequate nutrition, and psychological torture' while locked up inside. 'Last time they put Kilmar Abrego Garcia on a plane, he didn't know where that plane was going until it landed at the airport in El Salvador,' his attorney Simon Sandoval-Moshenberg told reporters last week. 'That's more or less what they want to do again, and that's what we're here to stop.'

The REAL reason the Epstein 'client list' is never getting released
The REAL reason the Epstein 'client list' is never getting released

Daily Mail​

time21 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

The REAL reason the Epstein 'client list' is never getting released

Jeffry Epstein's rumored 'client list' will never be released to the public by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), according to a former agent. John Kiriakou, an ex-CIA officer who was jailed for nearly two years in 2012 for sharing the agency's interrogation techniques to the press, shared his views on the controversial pedophile - including his opinion on the alleged list of clients. Kiriakou, who sat down for an episode of Patrick Bet-David's podcast, told the media personality that he believes the alleged list will not see the light of day because it holds incredibly valuable intelligence information that the CIA would never hand over simply because the public demanded to see it. The CIA whistleblower specifically said he believes that Epstein, 66, was employed by Israel's intelligence service, Mossad - and that is why the list will not come out. 'I believe that he was a Mossad access agent. It makes perfect sense to me,' Kiriakou said. It has never been established that Epstein had ties to Mossad. 'Jeffry Epstein, in my view, is a textbook case of an access agent. I've said this before, but I think it's important and it bears repeating,' he told Bet-David. 'If you are a foreign intelligence service and you want information from Bill Clinton, or Bill Gates, or Alan Dershowitz, or important people, you want secret information from them—you're not going to recruit them. 'They don't need anything from you. They don't have any financial vulnerabilities. So you do the next best thing: you recruit someone who has access to them, and you finance this person... he has a private island.' He went on to mention Virginia Giuffre, who led the fight to bring Epstein to justice and claimed she was trafficked to have sex with Prince Andrew. Giuffre died by suicide at the age of 41 in April. In response to Bet-David's question on who Kiriakou thinks has seen the alleged list, the former agent replied: 'I think it's actually more than most people realize.' 'Virginia Giuffre and five other young women in their statements, in their lawsuit, told us there were rooms with banks of monitors... monitoring every room and every bathroom,' he continued. 'So if there were clients—and I believe there were—and they were having sex with minors—and I believe they were—every single person who was hired to monitor those screens would have known. 'I believe there was a list, a client list. There had to have been. We know there was a black book—it sold at Sotheby's for heaven's sake. So where is it? Was it destroyed? And even if it was, why didn't Ghislaine Maxwell try to use it to save herself?' In recent weeks, Donald Trump 's administration has faced increasing scrutiny for their handling of the 'list' and the release of videos from inside New York's Metropolitan Correctional Center, where Epstein was housed until his death in 2019. The scandal and alleged 'cover up', has prompted a rebellion in the MAGA world, as many of Trump's loyal supporters believe Attorney General Pam Bondi should be fired after promising to release all Epstein-related files. Bondi came under fire a couple weeks ago after the Department of Justice said Epstein's 'client list' never existed. She also squashed speculation that Epstein's 2019 jail cell death was anything other than a suicide. Following the memo from his DOJ, which sparked a MAGA civil war, Trump became irate and said during a cabinet meeting that everyone should move on. He has now called his supporters 'weaklings' for believing a Democrat-run 'hoax.' When asked about the president going back and forth on the issue, Kiriakou said he does not believe the rumor that the administration is holding the files back because the president is implicated in them. 'I don't believe that for a second,' he said. Kiriakou isn't the only one who believes Epstein allegedly worked for Mossad, as Tucker Carlson made the same claim earlier this month. The former Fox News host issued the conspiracy theory that Epstein was an Israeli agent who blackmailed US politicians. 'The real question is, why was he doing this, on whose behalf, and where did the money come from?' Tucker asked about Epstein's mysterious fortune while speaking to a crowd of young voters in Florida. 'And those are the questions that need to be answered. And I think it's entirely fair to ask them.' Carlson denounced the DOJ's findings, going on to share his own theory about Epstein's sinister scheme. Carlson questioned where all of the billionaire's wealth came from, going from a math teacher to 'having multiple airplanes, a private island, and the largest residential house in Manhattan.' 'And no one has ever gotten to the bottom of that because no one has ever tried. And moreover, it's extremely obvious to anyone who watches, that this guy had direct connections to a foreign government,' he claimed. He said the reason Epstein's connection to the Middle Eastern nation is not discussed publicly was because 'we have been somehow cowed into thinking that's naughty.' 'There is nothing wrong with saying that. There is nothing hateful about saying that. There's nothing anti-Semitic about saying that. There's nothing even anti-Israel about saying that,' Tucker asserted. 'And the effect of making that off-limits has been to create a lot of resentment and I'll say it, hate online, where people feel like they can't just say, 'What the hell is this? You have the former Israeli prime minister living in your house?"' Carlson was likely referring to Epstein's close ties with the former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak. Barak met with him dozens of times - and even allegedly stayed over at Epstein's place - starting in 2013. 'You have all this contact with a foreign government. Were you working on behalf of them? Were you running a blackmail operation on behalf of a foreign government?' he asked the stunned listeners. Carlson also claimed that 'every single person in Washington DC' shares his sentiment, and none of them 'hate Israel.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store