Laurence Fox appeal LIVE: Actor arrives at court to appeal £180k ‘paedophile' row fine
Mental health campaigner Simon Blake, Drag star Crystal, and actress Nicola Thorp began legal proceedings against actor-turned-activist on 1 April, 2021.
The claimants allege Mr Fox defamed them on Twitter in October 2020. The comments have since been deleted.
Mr Fox defended his comments, claiming the term "paedophiles" was a "meaningless and baseless" insult. He said: "Free speech. You throw meaningless and baseless insults at someone you get a meaningless and baseless insult in return."
He added: "People can call me whatever they want."
Fox is now appealing against libel judgments after he was ordered to pay £180,000 in damages to Simon Blake and Drag star Crystal.
After losing the High Court case last year, Fox vowed to appeal the ruling and suggested £2 million had been spent on the legal battle.
At the time he said: "Today a judge in the High Court has ruled I didn't suffer any serious harm through the allegation of racism made against me, which is strange because at the same time she also declined to define the meaning of the word racist."
Of the appeal, he said: "That's another million quid we are going to have to spend to find out the meaning of a word every single person in this country knows."
11:35KEY EVENT
Laurence Fox puffs on cigarette as he arrives at Royal Court of Justice
Fox was pictured arriving at the Royal Court of Justice on Monday as he walked hand-in-hand with his wife Elizabeth Barker.
The wannabe politician stood outside the courts to finish his cigarette as he told photographs that he would not turn his back away from the cameras to pose for a picture ahead of the appeal.
Fox wore a white shirt and a pair of blue jeans as he arrived at the court. He also wore a pair of sunglasses and wore a pair of spectacles on his shirt.
When asked by a photgrapher if he could turn around and look at the camera, Fox replied: "No! Why would I want to look at you guys?"
09:07Susan Knox
Fox ordered to pay £180,000 in libel damages
Fox was ordered to pay £90,000 in damages two of the people he referred to as "paedophiles" in October 2020.
The actor-turned-politician lost a High Court libel case with former Stonewall trustee Simon Blake and drag artist Crystal.
In a post after the ruling, Mr Fox said he intended to appeal and today he is doing it at The Royal Courts of Justice.
In January, the court ruled in favour of Mr Blake and former RuPaul's Drag Race contestant Crystal, whose real name is Colin Seymour, and dismissed Mr Fox's counter-claims.
Mrs Justice Collins Rice said in her written ruling: "By calling Mr Blake and Mr Seymour paedophiles, Mr Fox subjected them to a wholly undeserved public ordeal.
"It was a gross, groundless and indefensible libel, with distressing and harmful real-world consequences for them.
"They are entitled by law to an award of money, to compensate them for those damaging effects, and to ensure that they can put this matter behind them, vindicated and confident that no-one can sensibly doubt their blamelessness of that disgusting slur and that they were seriously wronged by it."
The judge said there was "no element" of punishment for Mr Fox in the judgement, with the damages due "purely compensatory".
She said Mr Fox could be found guilty of contempt of court if he repeated the allegations against Mr Blake and Mr Seymour.
09:02Susan Knox
What did Fox say in his tweets to Simon Blake, Nicola Thorp, and drag artist Crystal?
The fall out started in October 2020 when Mr Fox announced on the social media platform he was boycotting Sainsbury's supermarket over their support of Black History Month and former Coronation Street actress Thorpe, Stonewall Trustee Blake, and drag queen Crystal criticised his tweet and accused him of racism – Laurence then responded in three separate tweets calling each of the trio "peadophiles".
After Fox shared his message about no longer shopping at the supermarket, Blake, CEO of Mental Health First Aid England and chair of Stonewall UK – who campaign for the equality of lesbian, gay, bi and trans people across Britain and abroad – retweeted his tweet and penned: "What a mess. What a racist t**t."
In response, Fox tweeted alongside Blake's message: "Pretty rich coming from a paedophile." Simon then replied: "Hi @LozzaFox - please would you remove this tweet as you know it to be untrue. Thanks." And Laurence used the same slur towards Nicola and Crystal as they embarked on an online debate.
Nicole also criticised the actor's post and wrote in one tweet: "Any company giving future employment to Laurence Fox, or providing him with a platform, does so with the complete knowledge that he is unequivocally, publicly and undeniably a racist. And they should probably re-read their own statements of 'solidarity' with the black community."
Laurence re-posted the message and typed: "Hey @nicolathorp_ Any company giving future employment to Nicola Thorpe or providing her with a platform does so with the complete knowledge that she is unequivocally, publicly and undeniably a paedophile."
Drag queen Crystal also replied to Fox, tweeting: "Imagine being this proud of being a racist. So cringe. Total snowflake behaviour." Fox, 42, responded to the star - real name Colin Munro - writing: "Says the paedophile", in a tweet that has since been deleted.
09:00Susan Knox
Why is Laurence Fox in court today?
Laurence Fox is appealling against libel judgments after calling two people 'paedophiles' in a bitter social media row.
Fox is challenging two High Court rulings after he was ordered to pay a total of £180,000 in damages to two people he was found to have libelled when he referred to them as paedophiles on social media.
Mental health campaigner Simon Blake, Drag star Crystal, and actress Nicola Thorp began legal proceedings against actor-turned-activist on 1 April, 2021.
The claimants allege Mr Fox defamed them on Twitter in October 2020. The comments have since been deleted.
Mr Fox defended his comments, claiming the term "paedophiles" was a "meaningless and baseless" insult. He said: "Free speech. You throw meaningless and baseless insults at someone you get a meaningless and baseless insult in return."
He added: "People can call me whatever they want."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
an hour ago
- Scottish Sun
Vile Scots paedophile filmed himself raping girl, 12, & set up hidden cameras to spy on her
He pleaded guilty to a total of 12 charges FIEND CAGED Vile Scots paedophile filmed himself raping girl, 12, & set up hidden cameras to spy on her Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A SEX attacker who filmed himself raping a young girl has been jailed for 12 years. Matthew James also rigged up hidden cameras to spy on the child during the grooming and abuse. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 1 Matthew James was sentenced to 12 years today at Glasgow High Court Credit: SPINDRIFT The sick 47-year-old later claimed the youngster never said 'no' as he preyed on her. A woman also suffered repeated physical and sexual violence at his hands. James was today sentenced at the High Court in Glasgow. He had been due to stand trial, but instead pleaded guilty to a total of 12 charges, including raping both victims. The crimes occurred in a number of locations including Gourock in Inverclyde between 2015 and 2022. James, of Fort William in the Highlands, raped the child which also involved him taking photos and making video recordings of attacks. He further abused her while she was asleep. The court heard James even concealed cameras in rooms capturing the unwitting youngster as she was getting dressed. The woman meantime was the victim of a similar horror ordeal. This included raping her after forcing her over the bonnet of a car. US state becomes first to impose surgical CASTRATION on child rapists & only the 4th place in the world with punishment She was also preyed upon while sleeping. Judge David Young KC said a background assessment had concluded James was a "dangerous individual" who continued to pose a risk to others. He told James: "Both victims have lodged impact statements - it is plain your actions had an effect on their lives which can be described as devastating. "The girl spoke of closing down, feeling helpless and hopeless. The ability to form relationships has been fractured. "The woman has had her life torn apart. "You accept the offences against the child, but are not able to explain the behaviour. "You report that she never said 'no', but this comment about a child raises concerns in itself. "Although you have pled guilty, you say the behaviour against the woman was consensual." James was further put on the sex offenders list. He has also been banned from approaching or contacting the victims - both for an indefinite period. James will also be supervised for a further four years on his release.
Scotsman
an hour ago
- Scotsman
Figures in Extinction: the EIF dance show tackling climate change
Simon McBurney and Crystal Pite conclude their stunning triptych with Nederlands Dans Theatre with panache and pathos, writes Kelly Apter Sign up to our Arts and Culture newsletter, get the latest news and reviews from our specialist arts writers Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Exiting a theatre after a contemporary dance performance, it's not uncommon to overhear versions of the following: 'Well I loved it, but I've got no idea what it was about.' Watching Figures in Extinction is a slightly different proposition. Firstly, there is nothing ambiguous about the subject matter underpinning this stunning triptych. It's a beautiful, sensitive, emotional and deeply troubling look at the impact of climate change, and how human beings relate to each other and the world around us. Figures in Extinction [1.0] Secondly, the show's creators share their thoughts throughout, using recorded conversations to convey the creative process. Which would be fascinating in any circumstance, but when those creators are Complicité founder Simon McBurney and choreographer Crystal Pite you definitely want to sit up and listen. Over the past four years, the duo have been working with the talented dancers of Nederlands Dans Theater (NDT) to create three new works. Figures in Extinction [1.0] premiered in 2022, part two in 2024, and the final instalment earlier this year, with all three being delivered in one performance at this year's EIF. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad While the voiceover captures the musings of McBurney and Pite, they are in no way telling us what to think or how to act as a consequence of seeing the show. 'It's fragmentary recordings of our own lives, and we also recorded everything we said to each other in the rehearsal studio,' explains McBurney. 'Because we wanted to make it clear to people that Crystal and I were making these pieces step by step, moment by moment, and that neither of us had any fixed ideas about what conclusions people should draw.' Figures in Extinction [1.0] At the start of their journey, McBurney and Pite had a rough sketch in place, but everything was up for debate. 'What happened between Crystal and I was a dialogue,' explains McBurney. 'We knew it would be in three parts, and decided that for the first one I would provoke Crystal and she would choose the structure. Then for the second one Crystal would provoke me, and then we would work on the third one together. But of course, like all propositions, it developed, shifted and altered. And the incredible thing about Crystal, and what's beautiful about her name, is that she crystallises ideas within movement with an astonishing clarity and precision. It was an enormous privilege to work with her.' One of the provocations McBurney sent Pite was eventually shaped into a list of animals, plants and bodies of water that no longer exist. During Figures in Extinction [1.0], the names of these former lifeforms are projected onto a screen, along with a number. As the numbers grow, so does our understanding of the scale of the problem. Meanwhile, dancers embody the animal experience, moving as one in a flock or herd, and depicting a small frog caught under the burning sun. Yet remarkably, it never strays into mimicry. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Figures in Extinction [2.0] 'I think Crystal was very aware of that when we were making it,' says NDT dancer Nicole Ward. 'And just as she can really evoke human emotions with small gestures, it was about trying to find that same thing through an animal. So not trying to perfectly shape the animal or move like a bird in an obvious way, but instead finding the human inside the animal to help the audience connect with it more. The movement of the frog under the light looks a bit amphibian but it's more about heat and exhaustion. So it was about trying to find a link – what would that heat do to a human? And what does it also do to an animal?' Figures in Extinction [2.0], on the other hand, is all about us. Dressed in identical suits, the dancers depict the worst form of humanity. Disconnected, disinterested, self-serving, with the natural world of part one long forgotten. 'The first piece is about our separation from what people call nature,' says McBurney. 'But I feel that term leaves us a bit removed, as if it's something outside of us, when we're all part of nature. In the second piece, it's almost a separation from ourselves, from one person to another.' Simon McBurney By the time we get to Figures in Extinction [3.0], there's an acknowledgment that one thing unifies every living creature on this planet: death. So here we find a series of tableaux taking place around a hospital bed. The personnel may change, the language and culture vary, but the outcome is always the same. 'The image of the bed became very important to us,' says McBurney, 'because my mother died in bed, as did my father. I've had the privilege to participate in quite a few deaths, and so the bed itself is an extraordinary place. And we examined the prone, horizontal body and what that's like for dancers who are largely vertical and sometimes even airborne.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Crystal Pite To demonstrate that we are all citizens of the world, the dancers share information about their ancestry, building a rich tapestry on stage of the names and birthplaces of their grandparents. For Ward and the other dancers, it was an unusual but illuminating experience. 'I've never been in a process where you're asked to share those parts of your background,' she says. 'And it was quite exposing, but also really beautiful to realise that you didn't know this about your colleagues. It was kind of scary to really open up but it also felt like a gift.' Figures in Extinction [3.0] Working with one of the world's finest dance companies was also received as a gift by McBurney, who looked on in awe and admiration at the self-sacrifice of these young people. 'I felt incredibly humbled,' he says. 'These dancers have denied themselves a careless youth in order to achieve what they're able to do. They have to take such care of their bodies, it really is the most extraordinary monk-like dedication to their art. And they're all imaginative artists, so they don't just blindly follow a piece of choreography. You can give them an idea, ask them to work on it, and they'll produce something. So it was all an exchange.'
Daily Mirror
2 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Conor McGregor LOSES his appeal against sexual assault verdict
Conor McGregor lost his appeal following a civil ruling that the former dual-weight UFC champion sexually assaulted Nikita Hand after a night out in December 2018 Conor McGregor has LOST his appeal against a High Court jury's finding that he sexually assaulted Nikita Hand. Ms Hand, 35, launches a civil case against the former dual-weight UFC champion over allegations he 'brutally raped and battered' her in a penthouse at the Beacon Hotel. During a three-week case at the High Court in Dublin last November, the Irishman told the court he had consensual sex with Hand - a former hairdresser. After over six hours of deliberating, the jury found McGregor civilly liable for assault. Ms Hand was awarded £206,000 in damages - with McGregor ordered by a judge to pay £85,000. Ms Hand, 35, lost her case against James Lawrence - whom she accused of assaulting her by allegedly having sex without her consent at the same hotel. Since then, McGregor has sought an appeal which was initially expected to include new evidence. However, earlier this month, the Irishman's legal team withdrew a bid to introduce new evidence in his appeal against a decision in the civil case. On Thursday, the Court of Appeal gave its decision on an appeal by the UFC fighter, dismissing it in its entirety. More to follow... When is Conor McGregor's next fight? Recently, US President Donald Trump announced his plans to host a historic UFC event at the White House in July 2026. Following this announcement, numerous fighters expressed their eagerness to participate in the historic card, including McGregor. The 37-year-old took to social media and posted: "Happy 4th of July, USA. Excited with President Trump announcing a UFC fight event at the White House! I would be honoured! Count me in!!" UFC boss Dana White also appears to support the idea after McGregor shared a conversation with him. The Irishman sent the UFC chief several voice notes, seemingly related to the proposed White House event, to which White responded: "I love it!" McGregor later reiterated his comments during a recent BKFC event, stating: "It's looking like I'm headed to the Oval Office again. That's where I'm headed next." The 37-year-old has not fought since losing to Dustin Poirier back in 2021. He was due to make a stunning comeback last year against Michael Chandler, but withdrew from the contest after picking up an injury in training.
