Most Americans can no longer afford even a ‘minimal quality of life,' depressing new study finds
Most US citizens no longer enjoy 'a minimal quality of life' due to skyrocketing costs, a depressing new study has uncovered.
Ludwig Institute for Shared Economic Prosperity conducted research into the economic well-being of the country's residents, defining 'minimal quality of life' as the ability to pay for a 'basket of American dream essentials': housing, food, transportation, clothing, medical costs and basic leisure expenses.
The leisure expenses included access to cable TV and streaming services, as well as the ability to pay for six movie tickets and two baseball tickets per year.
The Minimal Quality of Life index goes 'beyond traditional cost-of-living measures to provide a more comprehensive understanding of what it takes to secure a foothold on the bottom rung of the American dream ladder and have a real opportunity to climb it over time,' the authors wrote.
The bottom 60% of American households by income fell well short of that threshold, the researchers damningly determined.
The bottom 60% of American households by income fell well short of that threshold, the researchers damningly determined.
The bottom 60% of American households by income fell well short of that threshold, the researchers damningly determined.
'The MQL reveals the harsh reality that the American dream, with its promises of well-being, social connection, and advancement, is out of reach for many,' the authors concluded. 'Rising costs in essential areas like housing, healthcare, and education significantly outpace wage growth, leaving millions struggling to attain even a minimal quality of life.'
An average American couple with two children would need to spend $120,302 per year to cover the minimum quality of life expenses, the researchers determined.
Skyrocketing costs over the past two decades are to blame, with medical premiums rising 301% from 2001 to 2023.
Transportation, groceries and childcare have all increased in price by more than 50% on average across that same period.
Transportation, groceries and childcare have all increased in price by more than 50% between 2001 and 2023.
'I get tired of the 'Stop your Starbucks latte habit' [advice], because in reality it's not people's fault,' financial planner Laura Lynch told CNBC in relation to the study. 'The structures around us have created an expectation of a lifestyle that is increasingly becoming unreachable for folks.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) Is Benefiting From Domestic Production, Says Jim Cramer
We recently published . First Solar, Inc. (NASDAQ:FSLR) is one of the stocks Jim Cramer recently discussed. First Solar, Inc. (NASDAQ:FSLR) is an American solar energy company that makes and sells solar panels. The firm's shares have experienced significant volatility in 2025 and are flat year-to-date. First Solar, Inc. (NASDAQ:FSLR)'s stock gained an unbelievable 52% in May after a House panel surprised investors and left a lot of tax credits in place for solar energy. However, the shares sank by 18% in June after a Senate committee proposed ending credits for solar firms in 2028. Yet, the shares have gained 29% since late June, which Cramer believes might be influenced due to the firm's domestic manufacturing exposure: 'First Solar, which was up a lot yesterday because they make it here.' A solar panel farm with an orange sky illuminating the vast landscape. The CNBC TV host had last discussed First Solar, Inc. (NASDAQ:FSLR) in January. Here's what he said: 'It is a very inexpensive stock. I'm telling you, I'm still reeling from the fact that NXT, Nextracker… actually reported an upside surprise tonight. And… when I look into that and it says that it's good for solar, I will tell people who belong to the Charitable Trust, to CNBC Investing Club, whether it's time to get a little more aggressive on solar.' While we acknowledge the potential of FSLR as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 20 Best AI Stocks To Buy Now and 30 Best Stocks to Buy Now According to Billionaires. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) Could Benefit From Shifting Power Sources, Says Jim Cramer
We recently published . GE Vernova Inc. (NYSE:GEV) is one of the stocks Jim Cramer recently discussed. GE Vernova Inc. (NYSE:GEV) is a former General Electric business that has prospered on the stock market in today's AI wave. This is because of the firm's exposure to nuclear energy as it manufactures turbines and other equipment. GE Vernova Inc. (NYSE:GEV) is one of Cramer's top nuclear power stocks. The CNBC host is typically dismissive of nuclear energy stocks as he believes that the returns from nuclear power projects typically take years to materialize. In his recent remarks, Cramer discussed by GE Vernova Inc. (NYSE:GEV)'s shares recently soared: 'And then GE Vernova. Which you know yesterday there was an article in the Times about how windmills are going to get hurt in the Republican bill. GE Vernova was up nine again. A lot of it has to do parts where they're made and they're fabled for making American stuff. I would think that if you banned Chinese parts or you make them pay, that people would be willing to, that they might shift from one kind of power to another. But wind power is very very cheap.' Later, Cramer discussed how GE Vernova Inc. (NYSE:GEV) can benefit from President Trump's trade discussions: 'Second, as Vernova CEO, Scott Strazik told us when he came on the show in late April, his company could see some real benefits from trade tensions. Just like Boeing's planes, GE Vernova's turbines are big-ticket items. They cost tens of millions of dollars each. People say they're about $50 million on average. The Trump administration wants a lot of countries to reduce their trade surpluses with the United States, and buying a bunch of natural gas turbines is an easy way to make that happen. I've liked GE Vernova since before it was spun out of GE, and I see no reason to turn bearish now. Sure, the stock's expensive, trading at roughly 72 times this year's earnings estimates, which is why a couple of analysts have downgraded it, from Buy to Hold in recent weeks. But the scale of the opportunities is enormous, and the story seems almost tailor-made for this moment. Look, over time, I bet GE Vernova can continue to grind higher. Count me as a buyer for the trust.' While we acknowledge the potential of GEV as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 20 Best AI Stocks To Buy Now and 30 Best Stocks to Buy Now According to Billionaires. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Sign in to access your portfolio
Boston Globe
4 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Elon Musk says he will start a new political party
Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Musk has spoken with friends in recent days about his plan for a political party and what it would take to accomplish it, according to a person briefed on those conversations. The discussions have been more conceptual than pragmatic, the person said. Advertisement Even as Musk has proved that he is willing to use his resources to move quickly and dramatically, he also has a long history of not following through on promises. Musk, who helped slash government programs and funding by leading the Department of Government Efficiency before publicly feuding with Trump, had grown incensed by the president's sweeping domestic policy bill. Last month, on social media, he called it a 'disgusting abomination,' adding that it would 'massively increase the already gigantic budget deficit' and that 'Congress is making America bankrupt.' Advertisement For weeks, Musk teased that he would start a new political party if the legislation passed, but he had not explicitly stated his intention to do so until Saturday. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The two-party system has been a defining feature of modern American politics, and plenty of moderate billionaires have dreamed of a successful third-party effort for decades. But the barriers to creating a new, influential political party are plentiful, including heavily gerrymandered districts, deep political polarization and onerous state laws, some of which require expensive and complicated ballot-qualification procedures that would most likely challenge even Musk. Musk donated nearly $300 million to Republican candidates in the 2024 election, and his super political action committee led Trump's get-out-the-vote operation in battleground states. But the tech billionaire failed to deliver the GOP a Wisconsin Supreme Court seat this year, even after putting over $20 million into that race. On Friday, Musk wrote on X that an initial approach could be to back America Party candidates in just two or three Senate races and between eight and 10 congressional races in next year's midterm elections. He reiterated a version of that plan Saturday, saying on X that he would 'crack the uniparty system' through 'extremely concentrated force at a precise location on the battlefield.' This article originally appeared in The New York Times.
