Puerto Rico's government sues private power company as chronic outages damage appliances
The civil lawsuit by the consumer affairs department says the Luma company, which oversees power transmission and distribution in Puerto Rico, was 'negligent' and is responsible for damages caused to consumer appliances by outages and power fluctuations.
It said the department has the authority to take cases to court to protect those affected by the company's 'inefficiency and lack of adequate service.'
The action was filed against the company as a whole since the law exempts Luma's employees and contractors from claims filed by customers under an immunity granted in 2021 by Puerto Rico's Energy Bureau.
The suit cited a recent Luma statement at a public hearing that the company has rejected 1,828 claims. 'It's time for Luma to be fully accountable to Puerto Rican consumers,' it said.
Luma said in a brief statement that it would treat the lawsuit with the seriousness and responsibility it deserves.
'Our commitment is to continue working for the benefit of our customers, despite the significant challenges we face in operating a fragile and deteriorating electrical system, which for years has lacked the necessary maintenance and investment,' it said.
The outages have damaged thousands of appliances ranging from air conditioners to refrigerators on the island of 3.2 million people with a 40% poverty rate.
The lawsuit comes months after Puerto Rico's governor promised to cancel Luma's contract, warning it would be a long and complex process.
Anger against Luma has been growing ever since it signed a contract with Puerto Rico's government in 2020.
Outages remain common after Hurricane Maria razed Puerto Rico's electric grid when it hit the island as a powerful Category 4 storm in September 2017. But the grid was already frail following a lack of investment and maintenance for decades by Puerto Rico's Electric Power Authority, which is struggling to restructure $9 billion in debt.
Two island-wide blackouts hit the island in recent months, including on New Year's Eve and during Easter Week.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
5 hours ago
- Reuters
Amazon faces UK lawsuits worth up to $5.4 bln from retailers, consumers
LONDON, July 24 (Reuters) - Amazon (AMZN.O), opens new tab faces two mass lawsuits from retailers and consumers worth up to 4 billion pounds ($5.4 billion) for allegedly abusing its dominant position, after a London tribunal on Thursday certified the cases could proceed. Andreas Stephan, a competition law academic, is bringing one of the cases on behalf of over 200,000 third-party retailers, worth up to 2.7 billion pounds. His lawyers allege that Amazon manipulates the "Buy Box" feature on its website to its own advantage and favours products that use Amazon's own logistics centres and delivery network. Consumer advocate Robert Hammond is separately bringing a case valued at up to 1.3 billion pounds on behalf of millions of Amazon customers for similar alleged abuses of dominance. Amazon argued that the Competition Appeal Tribunal should certify the cases to proceed, an early step in the proceedings, including because the economic methodology for proving the cases was flawed. But the tribunal certified both cases on an opt-out basis, meaning members of the claimant class will be part of the case unless they decide otherwise. An Amazon spokesperson said: "These claims are without merit and we're confident that will become clear through the legal process. "Amazon has always focused on supporting the 100,000 businesses that sell their products on our UK store, and more than half of all physical product sales on our UK store are from independent selling partners."
Reuters
6 hours ago
- Reuters
Trafigura letter to Prateek Gupta's company warned about nickel cargoes, court document says
LONDON, July 24 (Reuters) - A letter sent by Trafigura to Prateek Gupta's company warning it not to raise suspicions at financing bank Citi about nickel cargoes provides evidence that the commodity trader was aware of fraud, Gupta alleged in a court document. This is the latest twist in a long-running case in which Geneva-based Trafigura filed a lawsuit against Indian businessman Gupta in February 2023, alleging it had been the victim of a $600-million fraud involving nickel cargoes. Gupta has previously said in his defence that Trafigura staff devised the scheme at the centre of the case. The new letter appeared in an amended defence document, filed last week and released by the court, in which Gupta's lawyers sought to add weight to his case. Trafigura, a major industrial metals and oil trader, has consistently denied that its employees knew about the alleged fraud in which low-value materials such as scrap were substituted for high-grade nickel. Trafigura declined to comment on Thursday. Geneva-based Trafigura booked an impairment charge in 2023 of $590 million for losses it suffered in connection with the case, which is due to go to trial in November. Citi (C.N), opens new tab provided as much as $850 million for a complex "transit financing" operation in which cargoes of nickel would be purchased from Gupta by Trafigura, repurchased by Citi and eventually resold to Gupta's firms, the document says. The new defence document alleges that Trafigura's and Gupta's staff worked together to lengthen voyage times to extend the period of credit offered by Citi and lessen the possibility of inspections at port warehouses that would reveal the cargoes true contents. Citi declined to comment. The letter, dated January 2022, cited in the defence document, from a Trafigura employee based in Mumbai to a Gupta employee, allegedly warned that banks would not find it logical to see a transit time of 95 days for a voyage from Taiwan to mainland China that would usually take a couple of days. "Luckily Citi accepted this one, with little suspicion, but we might not get as lucky in the future," the letter said. In December 2023, Gupta failed in his attempt to get a London court to lift a global freezing order on his personal and business assets. Gupta's lawyers alleged Trafigura did not disclose important information, an argument a judge rejected. Currently, the two sides are going through a disclosure process for further documents and witness statements ahead of trial.
Reuters
6 hours ago
- Reuters
Intel beats shareholder lawsuit over $32 billion stock plunge
July 24 (Reuters) - A federal judge dismissed a lawsuit accusing Intel (INTC.O), opens new tab of defrauding shareholders by concealing problems in a business where it manufactured chips for outside customers, leading to a $32 billion one-day plunge in its market value. While saying she "understands plaintiffs' frustrations," U.S. District Judge Trina Thompson in San Francisco ruled on Wednesday that Intel did not wait too long to reveal a $7 billion fiscal 2023 operating loss in its foundry business. Intel's stock price sank 26% last August 2, one day after the chipmaker announced more than 15,000 layoffs, opens new tab and suspended its dividend, hoping to save $10 billion in 2025. The Santa Clara, California-based company created the foundry business in 2021 to serve customers including (AMZN.O), opens new tab and Qualcomm (QCOM.O), opens new tab, while still making chips and wafers for internal use. In a 21-page decision, Thompson said Intel made clear that foundry results would be "obscured" until 2024, meaning its earlier financial reporting was not false and misleading. Thompson also cited an "overarching policy consideration" that because Intel's public statements suggested a "trial-and-error" approach to the foundry business, the company could have faced risks from reporting preliminary, unaudited data. The judge dismissed an earlier version of the lawsuit in March. Wednesday's dismissal was with prejudice, meaning the shareholders cannot sue again. A federal judge dismissed a lawsuit accusing Intel (INTC.O), opens new tab of defrauding shareholders by concealing problems in a business where it manufactured chips for outside customers, leading to a $32 billion one-day plunge in its market value. While saying she "understands plaintiffs' frustrations," U.S. District Judge Trina Thompson in San Francisco ruled on Wednesday that Intel did not wait too long to reveal a $7 billion fiscal 2023 operating loss in its foundry business. Intel's stock price sank 26% last August 2, one day after the chipmaker announced more than 15,000 layoffs, opens new tab and suspended its dividend, hoping to save $10 billion in 2025. The Santa Clara, California-based company created the foundry business in 2021 to serve customers including (AMZN.O), opens new tab and Qualcomm (QCOM.O), opens new tab, while still making chips and wafers for internal use. In a 21-page decision, Thompson said Intel made clear that foundry results would be "obscured" until 2024, meaning its earlier financial reporting was not false and misleading. Thompson also cited an "overarching policy consideration" that because Intel's public statements suggested a "trial-and-error" approach to the foundry business, the company could have faced risks from reporting preliminary, unaudited data. The judge dismissed an earlier version of the lawsuit in March. Wednesday's dismissal was with prejudice, meaning the shareholders cannot sue again. A federal judge dismissed a lawsuit accusing Intel (INTC.O), opens new tab of defrauding shareholders by concealing problems in a business where it manufactured chips for outside customers, leading to a $32 billion one-day plunge in its market value. While saying she "understands plaintiffs' frustrations," U.S. District Judge Trina Thompson in San Francisco ruled on Wednesday that Intel did not wait too long to reveal a $7 billion fiscal 2023 operating loss in its foundry business. Intel's stock price sank 26% last August 2, one day after the chipmaker announced more than 15,000 layoffs, opens new tab and suspended its dividend, hoping to save $10 billion in 2025. The Santa Clara, California-based company created the foundry business in 2021 to serve customers including (AMZN.O), opens new tab and Qualcomm (QCOM.O), opens new tab, while still making chips and wafers for internal use. In a 21-page decision, Thompson said Intel made clear that foundry results would be "obscured" until 2024, meaning its earlier financial reporting was not false and misleading. Thompson also cited an "overarching policy consideration" that because Intel's public statements suggested a "trial-and-error" approach to the foundry business, the company could have faced risks from reporting preliminary, unaudited data. The judge dismissed an earlier version of the lawsuit in March. Wednesday's dismissal was with prejudice, meaning the shareholders cannot sue again. Intel had been accused of inflating its stock price from January 25 to August 1, 2024. Lawyers for the shareholders did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Thursday. Intel and its lawyers did not immediately respond to similar requests. Intel has struggled to compete with rival chipmakers such as Nvidia (NVDA.O), opens new tab, Advanced Micro Devices (AMD.O), opens new tab, Samsung Electronics ( opens new tab and Taiwan's TSMC ( opens new tab. and benefit from growth in artificial intelligence. The company lost $18.8 billion in 2024, its first annual loss since 1986. The case is In re Intel Corp Securities Litigation, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No. 24-02683. Lawyers for the shareholders did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Thursday. Intel and its lawyers did not immediately respond to similar requests. Intel has struggled to compete with rival chipmakers such as Nvidia (NVDA.O), opens new tab, Advanced Micro Devices (AMD.O), opens new tab, Samsung Electronics ( opens new tab and Taiwan's TSMC ( opens new tab. and benefit from growth in artificial intelligence. The company lost $18.8 billion in 2024, its first annual loss since 1986. The case is In re Intel Corp Securities Litigation, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No. 24-02683. Lawyers for the shareholders did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Thursday. Intel and its lawyers did not immediately respond to similar requests. Intel has struggled to compete with rival chipmakers such as Nvidia (NVDA.O), opens new tab, Advanced Micro Devices (AMD.O), opens new tab, Samsung Electronics ( opens new tab and Taiwan's TSMC ( opens new tab, and benefit from growth in artificial intelligence. The company lost $18.8 billion in 2024, its first annual loss since 1986. The case is In re Intel Corp Securities Litigation, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No. 24-02683.
