Noosa Council workers locked in pay stoush in expensive holiday destination
Multiple bouts of strike action by Noosa Council workers since February have been responded to with lockouts, or threats of lockouts, from council management.
At least half a dozen union-aligned workers have been locked out of work until Monday, June 9, the unions said.
That industrial action has meant some services such as pothole repairs and bin collections have not been completed.
Noosa Council said it was working hard to maintain a balance between workers' rights and service delivery for residents.
The Queensland Industrial Relations Commission has also become involved, with a meeting scheduled for Friday morning which led to a new offer from council which will go to union members for consultation.
Prior to the meeting, Noosa Council CEO Larry Sengstock said its offer was fair and reflected increases in cost-of-living.
About 200 staff members at Noosa Council are represented by either The Services Union or the Australian Workers' Union.
Both unions have said they were hoping for a pay rise of at least 15 per cent over three years.
They said that would bring Noosa Council salaries more on par with other local councils, including nearby Gympie, where the cost-of-living was lower.
Tom Rivers, from The Services Union, said it used to be accepted that salaries were lower in Noosa because it was traditionally seen as such a good place to live that it was worth it.
But with the median house price in Noosa Heads exceeding $2 million or $1.3 million in the shire, according to CoreLogic data from 2024, Mr Rivers said that was no longer fair.
"It was always casually thrown around in Noosa that you're working and living in paradise, you don't need to get paid as much," he said.
An outdoor worker at Noosa Council on a band 4 would be earning about $61,000 a year.
At nearby Gympie, the same role would attract $68,000.
"Even at the top end of the [agreement], we're still not talking about that much money for living in such an expensive town," Mr Rivers said.
Michael Anderson from the Australian Workers' Union said the council's figures showed 30 per cent of their workers could not afford to live in the shire.
Many lived closer to inland towns such as Gympie where housing was more affordable.
Earlier this year, Noosa Council offered a pay rise of 15 per cent over three years and four months.
"A lot of our members are quite disgruntled by that extra four months," Mr Rivers said.
With Noosa Council looking unlikely to move, Mr Rivers said that could mean the prospect of further industrial action.
Last week, the unions took their call for higher wages to the public, doorknocking and talking to residents.
Mr Rivers said that had garnered a largely positive response, with the public mostly sympathetic to the unions' calls.
Mr Anderson agreed.
He said that extended to people understanding that rates would need to increase.
"They understand that workers need and require a livable wage," he said.
On the other hand, Mr Anderson said it has been "extremely difficult" to deal with the council throughout the process.
"Many of our members have experienced intimidation from … managers," he said.
He said in his experience, although lockouts were a "normal tactic", Noosa Council's approach had so far been at the "extreme end" of an employer's response.
Mr Rivers said the council's reaction had seemed "disproportionate" at times.
He said he had also heard members were concerned about staff retention rates, as many came and went within a couple of months, increasing workload for others and having an impact on morale.
Mr Sengstock denied the council has been trying to "intimidate" workers throughout the protracted industrial action by imposing and threatening lockouts.
"Our normal services have been suffering, and the residents are now starting to recognise that and demand their services are taken up," he said.
"It's a balancing act. I'm really trying to look after our staff, but also, you know, I've got to be conscious of delivering the services that our residents are paying for."
In a statement, a spokesperson for Noosa Council said it was "committed" to reaching a solution, and would respond to unions' claims in meetings with the commission.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
11 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
Coalition demands answers after Albanese government lifts biosecurity restrictions on US beef imports
The Albanese government is being urged to explain its backflip on a US beef ban after the Prime Minister previously insisted Labor would not 'compromise' on biosecurity. The Australian Financial Review revealed on Thursday that Australian officials had notified their US counterparts that restrictions on the importation of US beef will be lifted following a scientific review of the biosecurity risks. Responding to the reports on Thursday, Nationals Senate Leader Bridget McKenzie said the decision could pose a risk to our beef industry. 'We need to make sure our $11 billion beef export industry is protected. Our concerns would be any watering down of those science-based protocols would lead the risk of disease, entering this country, and our farmers, being subjected to unnecessary risk,' Ms McKenzie said. Shadow finance minister James Paterson said the government needed to explain its backflip. 'The prime minister himself has said that we couldn't relax the restrictions on the importation of US beef because of serious biosecurity concerns," Mr Paterson told Sky News. "So if the government has found some way of dealing with that issue, protecting our domestic agricultural industry from the introduction of foreign diseases and pests, then they should say so they should stand up and explain that, not anonymously leak it to a newspaper. 'Full credit to the AFR for getting the story, but a major story like this affecting a major export industry of about $11 billion a year and about an $82 billion domestic industry, when you include red meat more broadly, deserves more answers than this.' The restrictions had been cited by President Donald Trump as a justification for his decision to impose a 10 per cent across the board tariff on Australian imports – as well as much larger tariffs on steel and aluminium – in violation of the existing Australia-US free trade agreement. 'Australia bans – and they're wonderful people, and wonderful everything – but they ban American beef,' President Trump said in April In response to the comments, Prime Minister Albanese emphatically declared his government 'will not change or compromise any of the issues regarding biosecurity, full stop, exclamation mark, it's simply not worth it. So it's that simple.' A blanket ban on US beef imports - imposed following a mad cow disease in 2003 - was repealed in 2019. However biosecurity rules have remained in place due to the risk of beef from countries such as Mexico and Canada being imported through the US, and no American beef has been imported under the new scheme. But a government source told the AFR on Thursday that the US Beef Imports Review had undertaken a 'rigorous science and risk-based assessment over the past decade' and the bans would be lifted. Agriculture Minister Julie Collins confirmed the report, saying in a statement that her department was "satisfied the strengthened control measures put in place by the US effectively manage biosecurity risks.' However Cattle Australia CEO Will Evans said he was sure the decision would not have been made unless scientific experts had the 'utmost confidence' it would not impose a risk to Australia's cattle industry. 'Context is important here. We export more than $4 billion of beef a year to the US, and this has been a multi-year assessment process undertaken by the Department of Agriculture - they're the competent authority in this, and they're required to assess this under a rules based trading system. 'What they've done is they've completed a technical scientific assessment, and they've said, look, there are the right processes in place in these countries to be able to manage these risks, and they've determined that they're going to grant access after making this assessment over many years. 'Now, the cattle industry is a $75 billion industry in Australia. I'm sure they wouldn't have made this decision unless they had the utmost confidence that the science was correct.'
ABC News
11 minutes ago
- ABC News
Australia lifts biosecurity restrictions on US beef
Australia has lifted biosecurity restrictions on beef imports from the United States, one of the key grievances that led the Trump administration to impose tariffs on Australia. ABC NewsRadio's Sarah Morice spoke to John McKillop, the Chair of the Red Meat Advisory Council, about what the changes will mean for Australia's beef exports.
ABC News
41 minutes ago
- ABC News
Cattle producers move towards grain-fed beef as consumer demand and drought risks rise
As cost-of-living pressures force many shoppers to tighten their purse strings, premium meat options like grass-fed beef are getting harder to sell, and cattle producers are taking note. Across Australia they are opting to feed their stock grain rather than relying on pasture, both to meet consumer demand for cheaper meat and protect themselves from drought. While an abundance of grass on western Queensland grazier Josh Phelps's Tambo property might be reassuring right now, he said previous droughts had taught him not to rely on temporary feed. "We're really tending towards the grain-based model," he said. Initially his stock graze on pasture across 19,000 hectares before being finished in a feedlot — a purpose-built facility where cattle are kept in large outdoor pens and fed a consistent diet for up to 120 days. "We've had a run of [good] seasons which we're very grateful for," he said. "To be honest, it's been a bit of a healing period. Those terrible teens are still front of mind for some people, but I think we came through that and learned a lot of lessons. He said the approach not only ensured the animals had a reliable source of food in dry times, but also produced a more consistent animal before being sold to meatworks. "It creates a lot more control and a bit of a safety net," he said. But it was not just drought that pushed the producer in this direction. Mr Phelps said increasingly red meat consumers were being lead by price. "In the end it comes down to the consumer," he said. "They're just happy to buy that regular cut from the supermarket which is generally grain-fed. Mr Phelps is one example of a trend toward grain-fed beef that is playing out across the country with more cattle in feedlots at the start of 2025 than ever before. Erin Lukey, senior market analyst with Meat and Livestock Australia, said 1.5 million head of cattle were in feedlots in the first quarter of 2025, up 11 per cent on the previous year. "The grain sector has grown drastically and consistently, especially in the last five years," Ms Lukey said. "Nationally we have 90 per cent utilisation, which is how full pens are. "Feedlots as a drought mitigation tool has also increased in popularity." According to MLA, which researches and markets Australian beef globally, Queensland feedlots are at 93 per cent capacity and New South Wales are at 91 per cent. With feedlots so full, meat processors have limited capacity to take new animals, but Ms Lukey said that would not stop producers making the switch. "More grain-fed product is going to flow to the processor," she said. "Which means we're going to produce more grain-fed beef." Stefan Vogel, general manager of research at Rabobank, said most of the beef on Australian shelves was grain-fed or finished on grain, and consumer habits had a large impact on production. "When they [customers] go to supermarkets, they're trying to find ways to save money and increase the value of their basket," Mr Vogel said. "There's a demand for quality products at a reasonable price. "Feedlots play an integral role not only for the local consumer but also for Australia as a reliable supplier of meat in the global market."
