Jammu and Kashmir Police warn action against people circulating content related to ‘removal of flag' in Srinagar
The community had claimed that the removed banner had images of deceased Hezbollah commander Hassan Nasrullah and Iran's spiritual leader Ali Khamenei on it.
A police spokesperson said certain social media users were 'circulating malicious content related to the removal of a particular flag'.
'Such posts have the potential to disturb public order and harmony. All social media account holders are hereby strictly advised to immediately delete such content and refrain from sharing or uploading any similar material in the future. Failure to comply will attract strict legal action under applicable laws,' the police said.
The police directive comes hours after protests broke out over the alleged removal of a banner set up for a Muharram procession in Srinagar's Saida Kadal area by the J&K Police. Locals alleged the banner, which was removed by a police officer, had 'revered Shia figures' on it. They claimed the police, however, 'allowed the banner to be used in the wake of protests'.
'The reported incident, where a police officer removed a religious symbol during Muharram, is deeply disturbing and must be treated as a serious overreach. Such actions not only display a lack of cultural awareness but also amount to undermining the lawful religious practices of Muslims . This is not just a question of misconduct— it is an abuse of authority,' Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) leader and Shie cleric, Muntazir Mehdi, said.
'Abuse of authority'
Aga Mujtaba, another Shia cleric, said the J&K Police's removal of revered Shia figures' pictures and banners a couple of days back in Sofipora, Pahalgam, and today at Ashai Bagh, Saida Kadal, Srinagar, followed by their reinstallation after protests, 'is a blatant abuse of authority'.
'This reckless act deeply hurts the Shia community's sentiments, disrespecting their religious beliefs and cultural heritage. Such actions risk escalating tensions and eroding trust in law enforcement,' Mr. Mujtaba said.
He urged the Director-General of Police (DGP) to hold accountable the officers responsible for this insensitive conduct and ensure strict measures to prevent such violations in the future. 'Respect for all communities' religious sentiments is non-negotiable,' Mr. Mujtaba added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
2 hours ago
- India.com
Pakistan owns some deadly weapons which can cause damage to India, one is better than US;...., the weapons are...
Pakistan owns some deadly weapons which can cause damage to India, one is better than US;...., the weapons are... Since the time of their independence, India and Pakistan have had a tense relationship. Over the years, India has made a name for itself globally in areas like technology, economy, and diplomacy. On the other hand, Pakistan has spent most of its resources and time on supporting terrorism and building its military power, even when its own people struggle for basic needs like food. Both countries have strong militaries and nuclear weapons, but India's overall military power is much stronger than Pakistan. Still, there are a few weapons Pakistan has that pose a real challenge for India. Tactical Nuclear Weapons (Short-Range Nuclear Missiles) One of the biggest concerns for India is Pakistan's tactical nuclear weapons, especially the Nasr (Hatf-9) missile. This is a short-range ballistic missile with a range of about 70 kilometers, and it is capable of carrying nuclear warheads. These weapons were designed by Pakistan as a direct answer to India's 'Cold Start' strategy, which is about launching quick military strikes across the border in case of conflict. The problem for India is that its nuclear policy is based on 'No First Use', which means it will not use nuclear weapons unless attacked first. India also focuses on massive retaliation in case of a nuclear attack, not small, tactical responses. Even the powerful S-400 missile defense system India has bought may not be fully effective against such short-range, low-flying missiles like the Nasr. Because of this, Pakistan's tactical nuclear missiles remain a serious concern for India's security strategy. Pakistan's Chinese weapons that could challenge India's air power In recent years, Pakistan has added powerful new weapons to its military, many of them bought from China. While India's air force is far superior overall, some of these new systems could pose serious challenges, especially during surprise attacks or short-term conflicts. J-10C Fighter Jet and PL-15 Missile Pakistan has purchased J-10C fighter jets from China. These jets are equipped with advanced radar and PL-15 air-to-air missiles. The PL-15 can hit targets up to 145 kilometers (around 90 miles) away, which is a greater range than India's AIM-120 AMRAAM missiles. During the India-Pakistan military conflict in May 2025, Pakistan reportedly used J-10C jets to target Indian Rafale aircraft. India has top-class fighter jets like the Rafale and Mirage-2000, but the long range of the PL-15 gives Pakistan a temporary edge in aerial combat, especially if used from a safe distance. HQ-9P and HQ-16 Air Defense Systems Pakistan has also bought HQ-9P and HQ-16 surface-to-air missile systems from China. These are designed to shoot down enemy aircraft and missiles from the ground. Although India destroyed some of these systems during the 2025 conflict they still present a short-term challenge during air operations. India's own air defense, like the S-400 system, is much more advanced. But the presence of HQ-9P and HQ-16 on the battlefield can still make Indian air strikes more difficult and risky, especially in the early stages of a conflict. New weapons Pakistan is adding 1. J‑35A Stealth Fighters on the Way Pakistan has reportedly approved the purchase of 40 J‑35A 'fifth‑generation' stealth jets from China. Deliveries are expected late 2025 or early 2026. This will be China's first export of a true fifth‑generation fighter and could give Pakistan an edge in the sky. India's most advanced jets at the moment are 4.5‑generation Rafales; its own fifth‑generation projects (Mark‑1 and Mark‑2) are still a few years off. 2. Beidou Navigation System Pakistan is the first country with full military access to Beidou, China's home‑grown GPS alternative. Beidou went fully operational in 2020 and is claimed to be up to 100 times more precise than earlier versions. Working from three orbit layers (GEO, IGSO, MEO), it gives Pakistan sharper weapon targeting and secure data links, reducing reliance on the U.S. GPS network. 3. India's Answer Agni‑V ballistic missiles (range ~8,000 km) out‑reach Pakistan's Shaheen‑III (about 2,750 km). Rafale fighters and the S‑400 air‑defence system give India strong air‑combat and missile‑intercept power. India also fields roughly 180 nuclear warheads, slightly more than Pakistan's ~170, and commands stronger Army, Navy, and Air Force assets overall.
Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
Sambhal mosque violence: Eight months on, fact-finding committee releases report
Eight months after violence rocked Uttar Pradesh's Sambhal over a court-ordered survey of the Shahi Jama Masjid, that left at least five people dead, a fact-finding committee has released a report on what led to the incident and its aftermath. The survey of the 16-century mosque was ordered by a local court on November 19, after a petition claimed a temple had been demolished to build the mosque in 1526. The order had been passed by the court of Civil Judge (Senior Division), Chandausi, Aditya Singh. The first survey took place on November 19. It was during the second survey on November 24 that violence broke out. The 114-page report was released on Tuesday by the Association for Protection of Civil Rights (APCR), in collaboration with Karwan-e-Mohabbat. The report, titled 'Sambhal: Anatomy of an Engineered Crisis – Myth, Violence, and the Weaponisation of Faith in a Muslim-majority city', alleged that on November 24, a slogan-shouting crowd accompanied officials and the mosque's ablution tank was drained — seen by many as a symbolic act of desecration — and this triggered violent clashes. Sambhal District Magistrate, Dr Rajender Pensiya, called the report a farce. Speaking to The Indian Express, Pensiya said a report can say anything. 'People became violent and started pelting stones at the police and the administration. The entire country heard the announcement when we were requesting them to go back,' he said. 'As far as the rumour of digging inside the mosque premises is concerned, if there was any digging, the soil would have been placed outside,' he said. Prepared by researcher Prakriti, Advocate Ahmad Ibrahim and activist Harsh Mandar, the report highlights two major issues — the process of the survey and what happened after it. 'On November 19, (advocate) Hari Shankar Jain and son Vishnu Shankar Jain, alongside Mahant Rishiraj Giri, priest of the Kela Devi Mandir, filed a petition in the district court in the morning requesting an immediate survey of the mosque, claiming it was actually a temple,' said the report. It said the government's advocate in this case did not raise any objections and an 'ex parte judgement' was passed in the afternoon, without hearing the mosque's representatives, allowing the survey to proceed within hours. 'Suspicion and unease spread among Muslim residents, intensified by the lack of standard precautionary protocols, such as notifying the Peace Committee or following basic communication norms,' it claimed. It further said, 'Police responded to the crowd of protesting Muslims with lathi charges, tear gas, and gunfire. Five Muslim men were killed, dozens injured, and over 85 were arrested. Eyewitness testimonies and videos contradict the official narrative that the crowd was violent.' The report further claimed in the weeks following the clash, 'police conducted house-to-house raids in Muslim neighbourhoods, filed dubious FIRs, and targeted political figures and activists'. As per the report, a few weeks after the violence, the Sambhal administration launched an anti-encroachment drive on December 14, specifically targeting areas like Sarai Tarin Main Market, Hindupura Kheda, Deepa Sarai, Khaggu Sarai, including areas near the residences of Samajwadi Party MP Zia Ur Rehman Barq, MLA Iqbal Mehmood, and SP leaders Aqeelur Rehman Khan and Firoz Khan that were affected by the unrest. The District Magistrate, however, said the actions were taken based on revenue records. 'If it belongs to the government and has been illegally encroached by people, we need to act on it,' he said. DM Pensiya also said that there was no correlation between the violence and the encroachment drive in the district. 'Encroachment drives are a regular process of any administration and it has nothing to do with the violence. The drive against the electricity theft had also begun by September 1,' he said. As for the ablution tank, he said it was emptied to check its depth. So far, 79 people, including three women, have been arrested. Last month, police filed a chargesheet against MP Barq and 22 others in connection with the case, officials had said. The police had also said that the investigation found no involvement of Sohail Iqbal in inciting the violence at the mosque, though he was present at the spot. Iqbal is the son of the local Samajwadi Party MLA, Iqbal Mehmood.
The Hindu
3 hours ago
- The Hindu
Sambhal temple-mosque row: Court to hear plea for ban on namaz at disputed site on July 21
A Chandausi court in Sambhal district on Thursday (July 3, 2025) set July 21 to hear a plea seeking ban on offering of namaz at the disputed Shahi Jama Masjid, which is claimed to be Harihar Temple. The petition sought the ban on offering of Islamic prayers citing its 'disputed status'. Civil Judge (Senior Division) Aditya Singh took on record the plea filed by one Simran Gupta. The dispute had previously reached the Allahabad High Court, where the Muslim side challenged the subordinate court's order for a survey of the mosque premises. On May 19, however, the High Court upheld the trial court's decision and directed that proceedings continue there. The petitioner argued that since the site was deemed disputed by the court, Muslims too should be barred from offering prayers, just as Hindus were restricted from worship. The plea requested that the mosque be sealed and placed under the custody of the Sambhal District Magistrate. Ms. Gupta also sought to be made a petitioner on behalf of the Hindu side. Both matters will come up on July 21. The original suit was filed on November 19, 2023, by eight Hindu petitioners, including advocates Hari Shankar Jain and Vishnu Shankar Jain. On that day, a court-ordered survey was conducted at the mosque. A second round of survey was carried out on November 24, after which the matter was placed before the Chandausi Civil Court. The last hearing was held on April 28. Advocate Sri Gopal Sharma, representing the Hindu side, told PTI that the High Court's order rejecting the Muslim side plea was submitted in court as part of the record. On the other hand, advocate Qasim Jamal, representing the Shahi Jama Masjid, acknowledged that the opposing side had submitted the High Court's ruling and said the mosque's legal team would abide by whatever order the court issues. Advocate Babu Lal Saxena, who filed the petition seeking a stay on namaz, told PTI that his client Ms. Gupta believes religious activity by any group should be restricted at the disputed site until a final judgment is passed. The case saw violent clashes in Sambhal on November 24, 2024, during the second survey at the mosque site. The unrest led to the deaths of four individuals and injuries to 29 police personnel. Following the violence, police named Samajwadi Party MP Ziaur Rahman Barq and Shahi Jama Masjid president Zafar Ali in FIRs, along with 2,750 unidentified individuals. To date, 96 people including Zafar Ali and several advocates have been sent to jail in connection with the incident.
