Florida Asks Supreme Court to Reinstate Immigration Law as Lower Courts Weigh Constitutionality
The petition is the latest in a months-long battle between Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier and US District Judge Kathleen Williams. Last week, Williams held Uthmeier in contempt for instructing officers to continue enforcing the new law despite the judge's orders to stop enforcement until the courts decide whether the law is constitutional. The attorney general's appeal to the Supreme Court said the state has a right to use the law to protect itself from the harm of illegal immigration. 'The legislation tracks federal law, and the injunction shouldn't cover every officer in the state who never had their day in court,' the appeal argued.
Gov. Ron DeSantis signed the legislation into law in February as part of President Donald Trump's push to crack down on illegal immigration, though many of Trump's immigration enforcement efforts are mired in battles with federal judges. Immigrants' rights groups filed lawsuits on behalf of two unnamed Florida-based immigrants living in the US illegally shortly after the bill was signed into law. The lawsuit said that the new legislation violates the Supremacy Clause of the US Constitution by encroaching on federal duties.
Williams issued a temporary restraining order and injunction that barred the enforcement of the new law statewide in April. The attorney general's office then unsuccessfully petitioned the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals to override that decision. After Williams issued her original order, Uthmeier sent a memo to state and local law enforcement officers telling them to refrain from enforcing the law even though he disagreed with the injunction. But five days later, he sent a memo saying the judge was legally wrong and that he couldn't prevent police officers and deputies from enforcing the law. 'Again, he may well be right that the district court's order is impermissibly broad,' the appellate judges said of Uthmeier. 'But that does not warrant what seems to have been at least a veiled threat not to obey it.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Arabiya
an hour ago
- Al Arabiya
Border Patrol hiring spree offers lessons as another Immigration agency embarks on massive growth
In 2006, top US Border Patrol officials were asked how long it would take to hire 6,000 agents–a roughly 50 percent increase at the time. Michael Fisher, then deputy chief in San Diego, says the officials concluded they would need five years. 'You have 2 1/2 years,' Fisher recalls being told. With Immigration and Customs Enforcement now preparing to add 10,000 employees within five years to assist with President Donald Trump's mass deportation efforts, the Border Patrol's torrid expansion in the early 2000s serves as a cautionary tale. Hiring and training standards were changed, and arrests for employee misconduct rose. Pressure to turbo-charge growth can also lead to attrition. 'If they don't uphold pretty rigorous standards and background checks, you can end up hiring the wrong people, and then you pay a huge price in how the public perceives them,' said Gil Kerlikowske, who was commissioner of Customs and Border Protection, the Border Patrol's parent agency, from 2014 to 2017. ICE, the main agency responsible for arresting and deporting people within the US, is set to get 76.5 billion, nearly 10 times its annual budget, under a bill Trump signed on July 4. Most of that money is for detention, but some is for hiring and other uses. The White House says ICE will grow from 20,000 employees to about 30,000. 'To do it today is an effort that needs to start years ago,' said Matthew Hudak, former Border Patrol deputy chief. 'The funding is there, but it is nearly impossible to bring in that many people that quickly because you hit challenges.' The Border Patrol nearly doubled its workforce from 11,264 agents in October 2005 to 21,444 agents six years later. To recruit officers, the agency sponsored a NASCAR race car and bull riding contests. It aired ads during Dallas Cowboys football games. It advertised at military bases. Billboards and job fairs hundreds of miles from the border promised fulfilling careers, resulting in thousands of applications a week. The agency also loosened some hiring guidelines and training requirements. The age limit for new hires was raised to 40 years old from 37. Spanish language training was cut by up to 30 days, some training was moved online, and other instruction was shifted to the field to lessen time at a training academy that the agency opened in Artesia, New Mexico, during the hiring surge, according to a Government Accountability Office report. Arrests for illegal crossings fell to their lowest levels in decades–a sign for some that the strategy succeeded. But other measurements were more troubling. In 2008, the Border Patrol struggled to keep new agents, with about 20 percent failing to graduate from the academy and more leaving after returning to their stations. Arrests of CBP employees for misconduct increased to 336 in the 2012 fiscal year from 190 seven years earlier. The agency saw a spate of high-profile corruption cases, including agents accused of smuggling people across the border or working with drug cartels to bring illegal drugs into the US. The polygraph pass rate for new applicants tumbled to 33 percent in 2012 from 58 percent four years earlier. While the accuracy of the tests came under scrutiny, one applicant admitted that his brother-in-law, a known Mexican drug smuggler, asked him to use his employment to facilitate cocaine trafficking. Another admitted to using marijuana 9,000 times, including the night before the exam. A 2015 Homeland Security report found that the number of investigators assigned to internal wrongdoing was woefully inadequate for the agency's growth. 'Any time you have massive political pressure to beef up overnight, it never turns out well,' said T.J. Bonner, the former president of the Border Patrol agents union, who retired in 2011. 'Too many corners have to be cut. Then when things go wrong, the fingers get pointed.' ICE and Homeland Security did not respond to questions about lessons that the Border Patrol's hiring spree or detailed plans for hiring at ICE. 'The unprecedented funding for ICE will enable my hard-working officers and agents to continue making America safe again by identifying, arresting, and removing criminal aliens from our communities,' Todd Lyons, the acting ICE director, said after Trump signed the bill. Critics say the administration's policy to target anyone in the country illegally, not just those with criminal records, could lead to abuses. Stephen Miller, Trump's deputy chief of staff and lead architect of his immigration policies, had set an aggressive target of at least 3,000 arrests a day, even before any additional hiring. 'When there are no priorities, everybody's a priority,' said Nayna Gupta, policy director of the American Immigration Council. 'You're very likely to see confusion, delay, wrongful arrest, more mistakes when law enforcement agencies, especially large ones, don't have clear direction and guidance for prioritization.' Chuck Wexler, executive director of the Police Executive Research Forum, said competition for qualified law enforcement is tough, with departments now offering signing bonuses of 10,000 to 100,000. Border Patrol staffing has yet to return to its peaks of the early 2010s. Trump tried to increase staffing in his first term. A contract with consulting firm Accenture PLC cost 13.6 million to set up in 2018 and resulted in only two hires over 10 months. Trump's bill allocates about 170 billion for border and immigration enforcement, with 4.1 billion for CBP hiring that includes 3,000 more Border Patrol agents. It comes at a time of historically low crossings after they reached a record high in December 2023.
Al Arabiya
3 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
A new mural in France shows the Statue of Liberty covering her eyes in a swipe at Trump
As statements go it's a big one. A towering mural in France of the Statue of Liberty covering her eyes is racking up millions of views online with its swipe at US President Donald Trump's immigration and deportation policies. Amsterdam-based street artist Judith de Leeuw described her giant work in the northern French town of Roubaix, which has a large immigrant community, as 'a quiet reminder of what freedom should be.' She said, 'Freedom feels out of reach for migrants and those pushed to the margins, silenced or unseen. I painted her covering her eyes because the weight of the world has become too heavy to witness. What was once a shining symbol of liberty now carries the sorrow of lost meaning,' de Leeuw wrote in a July 4 post on Facebook when Americans were celebrating Independence Day. Her depiction of the Statue of Liberty, a gift from the French people in the late 1800s, has inspired some sharp criticism. Rep. Tim Burchett, a Republican lawmaker from Tennessee, wrote in an angry post on X that 'the work disgusts me.' He said he had an uncle who fought and died in France, where US forces saw combat in both World War I and World War II. In an interview with The Associated Press, de Leeuw was unapologetic. 'I'm not offended to be hated by the Donald Trump movement. I am not sorry. This is the right thing to do,' she said. The town stood by the work, with its deputy mayor in charge of cultural affairs, Frédéric Lefebvre, telling broadcaster France 3 that 'it's a very strong and powerful political message.' Since returning to the White House amid anti-immigration sentiment, Trump has launched an unprecedented campaign that has pushed the limits of executive power and clashed with federal judges trying to restrain him. People from various countries have been deported to remote and unrelated places like South Sudan and the small African nation of Eswatini. Immigration is one of Trump's strongest issues in public polling in the US. The mural in Roubaix is part of an urban street culture festival backed by the town. Roubaix is one of the poorest towns in France. It was economically devastated by the collapse since the 1970s of its once-flourishing textile industry that used to attract migrant workers from elsewhere in Europe, north Africa, and beyond.
Al Arabiya
3 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
Zelenskyy says he and Trump are considering a drone ‘mega-deal'
President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy are considering a deal that involves Washington buying battlefield-tested Ukrainian drones in exchange for Kyiv purchasing weapons from the US, Zelenskyy said in an interview with the New York Post. Zelenskyy said his latest talks with Trump focused on a deal that would help each country bolster its aerial technology. Ukrainian drones have been able to strike targets as deep as 800 miles (1,300 km) into Russian territory. 'The people of America need this technology, and you need to have it in your arsenal,' Zelenskyy told The Post in the interview conducted Wednesday. The Ukrainian leader said drones were the key tool that has allowed his country to fight off Russia's invasion for more than three years. 'We will be ready to share this experience with America and other European partners,' he said. Ukraine was also in talks with Denmark, Norway and Germany, he said. On Thursday, Zelenskyy announced unspecified future agreements with the United States which he said would strengthen his country, as he appeared in parliament to put forward his new government. Next year's US defense and national security budget request boosts spending on small drones - in part because of lessons learned during Russia's war in Ukraine, where unmanned aircraft have proven to be an integral part of low-cost, yet highly effective fighting.
