Overheard at the 2025 California Michelin Guide Ceremony
Other winners included Korean tasting menu spot Restaurant Ki, which received its first star, as well as its chef Ki Kim, who received the Young Chef Award; sushi destination Mori Nozomi, which received a star; and Silvers Omakase in Santa Barbara. Lilo took home its first-ever star, giving chef Eric Bost and partner John Resnick their second after their other restaurant, Jeune et Jolie, both in Carlsbad. Bib Gourmands were also released on the evening of June 25, with LA's only additions being Komal in South LA, Rasarumah in Historic Filipinotown, and Vin Folk in Hermosa Beach. Here are some conversations from the event, both before and after the ceremony.
'This is the first year that I'm just enjoying it. I'm not nervous. I'm very excited. I think with Pasta Bar [in Encino], the team is amazing.' — Margarita Kallas-Lee, Pasta Bar
'We're trying to get two stars with Pasta Bar. We're trying to get a green star, trying to get all those things. A year ago, we planted a legit quarter-acre garden. If my brother [Lennon Silvers Lee of Silvers Omakase] gets a star, we'll be the first brothers in America to both own separate starred restaurants, only the second time that's happened in the world, and the only ones current. If the stars align…' — Phillip Frankland Lee, Pasta Bar
(They eventually did and Silvers Omakase received a Michelin star.)
'I'm super happy to be here, happy to have the crew with us, happy to be in town for a night. Feel good, some butterflies. Nobody knows what they're getting.' — Eric Bost, Lilo and Jeune et Jolie
'Super, super nervous. I didn't think I'd be this nervous, but my heart's clutching right now. I don't know what I'm getting. I'm very thankful and grateful. I'm here with my entire team. I'm fortunate to have a team that's very easy to work with, and fortunate to have a space that is ideal and designed for us to be in. I would like to take more credit and say that I intentionally did all this, and coincidentally and gratefully, things are working out. In life, we always have plans, but life never goes as planned. When it actually goes as planned, it's crazy — it's amazing.' — Ki Kim, Restaurant Ki
'This is my first time, I'm so excited.' — Nozomi Mori, Mori Nozomi
'It's nice to be back after five years. It's nice to see people that we know and see people get recognition in the industry. I know how privileged I am to be here, I know I'm an immigrant with privilege, and was able to come in a different way. I want to make a voice not only for me tonight but also for people that weren't in my position. They have the same talent as me but they will never be here, so I want to make it for them, too. These people are also working hard, they have dreams, and they still keep the faith to move on. So I want to make it for that.' — Aitor Zabala, Somni
'It's an exciting time to be with restaurant people. The last year and a half in LA has been the greatest stretch of fine dining openings that I can remember. Starting with the re-opening of Vespertine and Somni, plus Seline, Restaurant Ki, Nozomi Mori, Marea, and the forthcoming Jaca, Maydan, Sushi Noz LA, and Lielle. It's exciting to start seeing them recognized. But LA restaurants need help. The bottom dropped out of the market in the fourth quarter last year after multiple years, and before that, it was anemic growth. Sales per location were down 13 percent in the fourth quarter (of 2024) and over 10 percent in the first quarter of 2025. On a per-location basis sales are now lower than they were pre-pandemic. This is not sustainable.' — Saul Cooperstein, inKind Hospitality
Ki, Mori Nozomi, Silvers Omakase, and Lilo were given new stars for Southern California. And notably, Somni and Providence were awarded three stars, the first time any restaurant, let alone two, had been given the highest mark in Los Angeles history.
'I had no idea. I thought we lost when the list of two-starred restaurants came out. I had no pretensions about it. We just go in and do the work, and if it comes, it comes. Thankful to be supported by an incredible team at Providence. Honestly, I think we're the best we've ever been, in the kitchen and also the front of the house. I'm happy and elated but more than anything happy for Donato [Poto], my wife, Donato's wife, Tristan Aitchison, our chef de cuisine of 20 years, our cooks, prep cooks, fish cutters, runners, bussers, servers, captains. It's difficult, it's not always as rewarding as you might hope it would be. At this time of the U.S., to be surrounded by a group of people who feel apprehension and dread every day for what might happen to them or in their community, family members, or friends, to work with people who are experiencing that right now, it's very difficult.
I hope that this achievement, which they've all been a part of, brings a little pride and maybe eases their burden a little bit. I'm proud to have employed probably a team of 80 percent immigrants ever since the restaurant opened, and Providence wouldn't be Providence [without them]. None of these people in this room right now would be here were it not for immigrants, and I'm very proud to be an employer of dozens of immigrants who cook, clean, serve, and do all the very hard work day in and day out. I'm proud to be a part of this industry, representing Los Angeles.' — Michael Cimarusti, Providence
'There are a lot of restaurants in Europe that get three stars that are new. There's been a handful in the past two or three years. It's nice that it happened to two teams that everyone in the industry supports and looks up to. If you're a cook, Providence is the north star. The things we've endured this year alone in LA — 20 years is amazing.' — Jon Yao, chef of Kato
'This is big for LA — LA needed this. To see a restaurant like Providence doing it for 20 years, that's the most inspiring thing. I look at what Donato does with service, the passion, and the energy. It is hard to sustain that in our city for that long.' — Ryan Bailey, partner at Kato See More:
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
Squid Game Season 3 Sets Netflix Record With 60.1 Million Views in First 3 Days
Humans are… still watching Squid Game. Season 3 of the Korean thriller generated 60.1 million views in the first three days since its release, marking a new Netflix record. More from TVLine Leanne Morgan Netflix Sitcom From EP Chuck Lorre Will Drop All 16 Episodes This Month - Watch Trailer The Squid Game Season 3 VIPs Were More Cringe Than Ever - Why Did Bad Line Readings Slip Through Again...? Squid Game Recruits Oscar Winner to Bring Series Finale to a Tantalizing Close, Tease Potential U.S. Edition Squid Game Season 3 thus shot straight to the top of the Netflix Global Top 10 ranking, while landing on the streamer's Most Popular Non-English TV List at No. 9. (Netflix rightly defines a 'view' as 'total minutes viewed divided by total run time.') How'd Squid Game End? We Recap the Unusual Season-Finale Showdown View List The final, six-episode season also ranked No. 1 in each and every one of the 93 countries where Netflix maintains Top 10 lists — the first time any show has ever pulled that off in its debut week. TVLine readers gave Season 3 an average grade of 'B-,' while the series finale netted a 'C+.' As people presumably played catch-up, Squid Game Seasons 1 and 2 also made the Netflix Global Top 10 this week. Heading into Season 3's launch on June 27, Squid Game's first two seasons had amassed nearly 600 million views, with Season 1 topping the Non-English TV ranking with 265,200,000 views. Did Squid Game Stock Diapers? And More Lingering Final-Season Qs! View List
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
Apple Finally Has a Box Office Hit With ‘F1.' What's Next for the Studio's Movie Strategy?
Champagne showers, a staple of Formula One races, may be reserved for the racetrack, but the mood at Apple was certainly celebratory over the weekend, as the big-budget 'F1' delivered the studio its first box office hit. The film, starring Brad Pitt as a has-been Formula One driver who gets coerced out of retirement, generated $57 million domestically and $146.3 million in its opening weekend. Though 'F1' cost roughly $250 million to produce and requires several laps around the track to turn a theatrical profit, these initial ticket sales are encouraging for an original, adult-skewing tentpole. More from Variety Brad Pitt's 'F1' Races to No. 1 at Korean Box Office Brad Pitt's 'F1' Outraced by 'Detective Conan' at China Box Office Box Office: 'F1' Revs to $144 Million Globally, 'Lilo & Stitch' Nears $950 Million Milestone It's also a much-needed win for Apple. Six years into the tech giant's foray into the movie business, the company has fielded underperforming auteur-driven fare (Martin Scorsese's pricey 'Killers of the Flower Moon,' Ridley Scott's equally expensive 'Napoleon') and critically derided flops ('Fly Me to the Moon' and 'Argylle') but nothing that's been remotely commercial. Apple seemed to be rethinking its film strategy after deciding to curtail the theatrical release of 2024's 'Wolfs,' a tepidly reviewed crime drama with Pitt and George Clooney, to avoid the stench of another cinematic stinker. So there was a growing internal sense that if a crowd-pleaser like 'F1' didn't work on the big screen, Apple would be forced to abandon the movie business in favor of television, where its successes include 'Severance' and 'Ted Lasso.' Though Apple's future film strategy won't hinge on a single film, insiders at the company now believe that momentum behind 'F1' gives Apple a reason to at least stay the course. ''F1' is going to be Apple's biggest release at the box office by far,' says David A. Gross, who runs the FranchiseRe movie consulting firm. 'This film looks like the successful business model Apple has envisioned and wanted to execute for several years.' Back in 2023, Apple pledged to spend $1 billion annually on theatrical films. However, the studio has yet to make good on those ambitions. After director Spike Lee's 'Highest 2 Lowest,' which will receive a two-week run in cinemas this August through A24, Apple has no other big movies on the calendar in 2025 or 2026. Several films are either in production or development, including 'Mayday,' an action adventure starring Ryan Reynolds,' and a UFO feature from 'F1' director Joseph Kosinski and producer Jerry Bruckheimer. Meanwhile, gears are turning on a potential sequel to 'F1,' according to knowledgable sources. Moving forward, will 'F1' embolden Apple to charge ahead with theatrical and cultivate a robust film slate? Or, after the long and winding three-year journey to produce 'F1,' is the company more inclined to slow down and remain selective, taking only a few big swings with the right property and right people? Here are four ways that Apple's film strategy could evolve in the wake of 'F1.' Apple could commit to the big screen in the vein of Amazon MGM, which plans to release at least a dozen new movies a year. This option would likely require Apple to build out a distribution team, which is only realistic if the company is crafting a full slate of theatrical releases. Even a deep-pocketed company like Apple wouldn't be able to justify the money, resources and manpower to staff offices around the globe with just one to three movies annually on the schedule. Advantages: Apple can control the quality of every facet of its distribution — from marketing to theater bookings — from top to bottom. In theory, theatrical hits could provide a halo effect to boost subscribers and viewership on Apple TV+ and move hardware sales that fuel its core business. Risks: There's a reason that only five to six studios have major global distribution arms; it's a massive undertaking to build the infrastructure. Disney, Universal and Warner Bros., for example, have hundreds if not thousands of employees staffed in regional offices around the world to handle the marketing, publicity and distribution of films in territories from China to the United Kingdom to the United Arab Emirates. Of course, nothing is cost-prohibitive to Apple with its $3 trillion market cap, but the company isn't in the business of making reckless financial decisions. Even Amazon MGM, after a few years of building up their domestic distribution branch, is partnering with Sony on the international rollout of upcoming films. Plus, who wants to be on the receiving end of box office scrutiny? Likelihood: Not very… at least not in the immediate future. Who says Apple wants to become the next Disney? Apple can certainly afford to cherry-pick projects, choosing only to work with top directors and major stars on films that meet a certain criteria. And the studio is clearly willing to be the highest bidder to lure talent. In the vein of 'F1,' the studio could continue to fund one or two movies a year that align with the company's values and initiatives (in the case of 'F1,' some of the footage was filmed using the same camera technology that's in the newest iPhones). If Mattel plans to make a movie about the card game Uno, who says AirPods can't be the next big screen star? Advantages: Apple doesn't have to invest big bucks into distribution, in case the company's future theatrical ambitions fail to pan out. Yes, Apple has all the money in the world, but its sterling reputation is the company's biggest commodity. So the studio doesn't want to be associated with flops. This path will allow Apple to be ultra selective while remaining what CEO Tim Cook describes as a 'toolmaker,' telling Variety in a recent cover story that 'we make tools for creative people to empower them to do things they couldn't do before.'Risks: Without a distribution team, Apple relies on other studios (Paramount, Sony, Universal and Warner Bros. among them) to put its movies in theaters. However, there's a risk of burning through distribution partners. That's because those film companies haven't been making money when Apple's movies fail to break even at the box office. In exchange for distribution efforts, studio partners have received a nominal 7-12% fee of the film's total global gross. But in the case of 'Argylle' (Universal), 'F1' (Warners) and 'Napoleon' and 'Fly Me to the Moon' (Sony), studios are splitting the upfront marketing costs with Apple, which could run $50 million to $75 million per studio per film. That's a lot of money for films like 'Argylle' and 'Fly Me to the Moon,' which failed to hit $100 million or even $50 million at the global box office (remember, theaters keep half of ticket sales too). And since theatrical releases are landing on Apple TV+ after leaving the big screen, rather than going to Peacock, HBO Max or Paramount+, there's not much of a downstream incentive for other studios, either. Likelihood: Very… at least in the immediate future. Call it the Netflix effect. Apple could follow in the path of the streaming giant and grant films a qualifying awards run in select theaters for a few weeks instead of mounting a massive global theatrical release. After all, Apple became the first streamer to take home the coveted best picture Oscar for 'CODA,' a movie most people only watched on Apple TV+. That would entail more prestige plays and fewer all-audience tentpoles in the future. Advantages: This allows Apple to avoid box office scrutiny. The company can spend however much it wants to attract filmmakers and stars without having to worry about an embarrassing financial flop to tarnish its brand. Already, Apple doesn't disclose the number of subscribers or financial results for Apple TV+, which it includes in its 'Services' segment along with revenue from music, games and the App Store. Risks: Theatrical has been a sticking point for major directors like Christopher Nolan and Greta Gerwig, and the big screen distinguishes Apple from Netflix, which doesn't grant traditional releases. And, as Netflix is quite familiar, most movie theater owners don't want to work with a company that views their business as an anachronism. So theater operators could refuse to play Apple's movies if the company doesn't commit to nationwide releases. (Of course, Apple could just buy a cinema like Netflix did with the Egyptian in Los Angeles and the Paris Theater in New York City). But worse, Apple would be risking its movies fading into obscurity. More people have been talking about 'F1' than have ever discussed Netflix titles like 'The Electric State,' 'Red Notice' or 'The Gray Man.' And if you've never heard of 'Fountain of Youth,' a kid-friendly heist adventure led by John Krasinski and Natalie Portman which Apple dropped directly on streaming in May, you'd be Probably not, unless Apple isn't interested in working with the Spielbergs or Nolans of the world. With $30 billion in cash reserves, Apple could buy a major studio or entertainment library. There's been speculation for years that Apple might acquire Disney but in truth, plenty of other film studios (Lionsgate or Warner Bros. included) would be more eager to sell off lots. Advantages: Making that kind of purchase means procuring an arsenal of intellectual property as well as in-house expertise in terms of developing and distributing films. Then there's the windfall that comes from owning extensive film libraries, which generate revenue from licensing movies that have long been in their vault. Risks: So far, Apple has opted against writing that kind of big check because Cook feels it goes against the ethos of the company. 'I know that's a faster way into the business, but it didn't feel like Apple at the end of the day,' Cook told Variety. 'Apple should have something that we pour our passion into.' Plus, buying an institution comes with institutional headaches; there are facets of the movie business that are clunky and outdated — meaning there are plenty of reasons that Apple wouldn't want to shoulder the financial and organizational burdens. Likelihood: Depends on the fit… Best of Variety New Movies Out Now in Theaters: What to See This Week 'Harry Potter' TV Show Cast Guide: Who's Who in Hogwarts? 25 Hollywood Legends Who Deserve an Honorary Oscar
Boston Globe
10 hours ago
- Boston Globe
They wanted to spice up a humdrum life with an adventure, and got more than they asked for
Oh yes, the crack! It is moments like these, when Elmhirst comes close to breaking the fourth wall, that contribute to the pleasure of this exciting book. You know as a reader that you are in very capable hands. Advertisement The Baileys escape in a small rubber raft and a dinghy, which they lash together, although 'escape' might not be the right word. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up They got off the sinking yacht, yes, but they had no radio, no radar, no communication device. Certainly no motor. It was just some tinned food and water, a book or two, and each other, for the next 118 days, until they were rescued, nearly dead, by a Korean fishing vessel. The story of Maurice and Maralyn Bailey is true, one that has been well documented but is not well known, and Elmhirst has fashioned it into a fascinating narrative. She divides the book roughly into thirds — their lives before the journey, their four months on the water, and their lives afterward. Advertisement Maurice was an oddball with a terrible childhood — 'he had a stutter, and a hunched back,' and then he came down with tuberculosis as a teenager and spent months alone, in bed. 'It can stay with you, time like that,' Elmhirst writes. 'Conditioning loneliness, baking it in.' He grew up exacting and persnickety, antisocial to the extreme. That he met and married anyone was almost a miracle, even in his own eyes, but that his wife was someone as lovely and adventurous and strong-minded as Maralyn was almost incredible. They met when he was 30. She was nearly a decade younger and wanted nothing more than to get out of her parents' house and experience adventure. The yacht trip was her idea. England in those years was depressed, cold, confining. One gloomy November evening, she suggested they leave — buy a boat and sail to New Zealand. Maurice was dubious; by then they had a house and security. But 'In the grip of an idea,' Elmhirst writes, 'Maralyn could drill through rock.' That tenacity is likely what saved both their lives. Elmhirst, who has written for the New Yorker, the New York Times Magazine and elsewhere, had a wealth of material to draw from — journals, newspaper accounts, filmed interviews, and books that both Maralyn and Maurice wrote. She sifted through it all and chose her details wisely. She doles out the adventures, such as they were, and tells them vividly: the flares that didn't work; the turtles that attacked the flimsy plastic bottom of the boat; the many ships that passed them by without noticing their frantic waving; another whale. And she focuses on the relationship between the two castaways. Before the shipwreck, Maurice had been fully in charge. He was the captain, she ran the galley. But after the shipwreck, it was all Maralyn. She was resourceful and optimistic, unswaying in her belief that they would be rescued. She understood that they needed a schedule and intellectual stimulation to get through each day, and she made it happen. On a raft. In the ocean. While slowly starving. Advertisement She made a deck of cards out of pages ripped from the logbook, and they played whist. She read aloud from the books they had salvaged and they analyzed every sentence. She dreamed of what they would do when they were rescued. (Top on her list: build another boat.) She planned menus for dinner parties — pages and pages of menus. 'When you're dying of starvation,' Elmhirst notes, 'all you can think about is food.' That March night, from the rubber raft, Maralyn had the presence of mind to take a picture of the yacht as it sank, and then one of her husband, 'wearing an expression not of fear, not yet, but of a kind of taut blankness, as if he had not quite grasped what was taking place.' That moment — intrepid photographer and demoralized subject — is symbolic of their ordeal. 'A Marriage at Sea' is so much more than a shipwreck tale. It's a story of love and strength, a portrait of a marriage that — for all its oddities — is a true partnership. Maurice and Maralyn were not equals, but they fit together in a way that made them invincible. Elmhirst skates delicately over the metaphor. 'Somewhere, deep within, unspoken, we must all know, we do know, that we'll all have our time adrift,' she writes. 'For what else is a marriage, really, if not being stuck on a small raft with someone and trying to survive?' Advertisement A MARRIAGE AT SEA: A True Story of Love, Obsession, and Shipwreck By Sophie Elmhirst Riverhead, 256 pages, $28 Laurie Hertzel's second memoir, 'Ghosts of Fourth Street,' will be published in 2026 by the University of Minnesota Press. She teaches in the low-residency MFA in Narrative Nonfiction program at the University of Georgia.
