GM's $1.1 billion tariff hit bolsters mounting evidence that Americans are the ones footing the bill for Trump's import taxes
General Motors is the latest U.S. auto giant to say tariffs have taken a chunk from their earnings. The company beat earnings expectations on Tuesday, but reported a decline in second-quarter profits, including a $1.1 billion hit as a result of hefty import taxes.
GM reported a 2% dip in sales to $47 billion, as well as $1.9 billion in quarterly profits, compared to $2.9 billion in the same period last year.
Anticipating the impact of President Donald Trump's auto tariff policy—which outlined a 25% levy for many imported vehicles—GM withdrew its annual guidance last quarter, predicting an up to $5 billion pummelling from the levies. The company announced last month plans to invest $4 billion in domestic manufacturing plants in order to offset the cost of imports, as well as increase production capacity. Still, GM's reliance on compact cars made in South Korea has made it vulnerable to the levies.
'In addition to our strong underlying operating performance, we are positioning the business for a profitable, long-term future as we adapt to new trade and tax policies, and a rapidly evolving tech landscape,' CEO Mary Barra wrote in a letter to shareholders on Tuesday.
GM's rival Stellantis, which owns Jeep and Ram Trucks among other brands, announced on Monday $2.7 billion in net losses for the first half of the year as North American sales continued to slump. Those struggles were exacerbated by the 'early effects of U.S. tariffs,' according to Stellantis, which had a more than $350 million negative impact on the company.
America is eating tariff costs
The auto companies' tariff hit reinforced concerns—and emerging evidence—that Americans are the ones footing the bill for Trump's sweeping tariff policy.
Despite the U.S. Treasury collecting a record-setting $100 billion in customs duties so far this year, there has not been a meaningful reduction in the price of imported goods indicating exporters absorbing increased costs on their ends, according to a Deutsche Bank analyst note published on Monday. Instead, import prices have remained steady through June.
'The top-down macroevidence seems clear: Americans are mostly paying for the tariffs,' Deutsche Bank analyst George Saravelos said in the note.
Saravelos posited that because the Consumer Price Index has so far indicated only modest levels of inflation, 'it follows that American importers are mostly absorbing the tariffs into their profit margins.'
The phenomenon is exemplified by Stellantis and GM eating billions in tariff costs.
Auto tariffs are no exception
Bernstein senior analyst Daniel Roeska said auto companies have started to exhaust their strategy of absorbing tariff costs into their own margins as car prices are poised to skyrocket later this year.
'There are only two people who can pay for [tariffs]: either the shareholders or the consumer,' Roeska told Fortune. 'And in the end, there's going to be some sharing between those two halves. And so our view has been and continues to be that prices for cars are going to push up in the second half.'
There's already indications American consumers will be the next to take the tariff punch. Car companies are beginning to roll back discounts and incentives implemented months earlier to boost sales, as evidenced by Ford Motors switching away from its employee discount plan for prospective buyers in favor of a $0 down and 0% interest or financing plan. While GM's plan to move some manufacturing to the U.S. will help the company save on tariff and transport costs, it will also incur steeper labor costs. The strategic move is a good one, according to Roeska, but it illustrates that companies will largely encounter trade offs when it comes to managing the inevitable impacts of tariffs.
'There's not much you can do,' Roeska said. 'If the policy is to put tariffs on cars, then that will increase the cost of cars, and ultimately, that will likely increase the price of cars.'
This story was originally featured on Fortune.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
I Asked ChatGPT What ‘Generational Wealth' Really Means — and How To Start Building It
The term 'generational wealth' gets thrown around a lot these days, but what does it actually mean? And more importantly, how can regular Americans start building it? Read Next: Learn More: GOBankingRates asked ChatGPT for a comprehensive breakdown, and its response was both enlightening and surprisingly actionable. Also see five strategies high-net-worth families use to build generational wealth. Defining Generational Wealth: ChatGPT's Take When ChatGPT was asked to define generational wealth, it explained it as 'assets and financial resources that are passed down from one generation to the next, providing ongoing financial stability and opportunities for future family members.' But it went deeper, explaining that true generational wealth isn't just about leaving money behind; it's about creating a financial foundation that can grow and sustain multiple generations. The AI emphasized that generational wealth is more than just inheritance money. It's about creating a system where each generation can build upon the previous one's success, creating a compounding effect that grows over time. This includes not just financial assets, but also financial knowledge, business relationships and strategic thinking skills. Check Out: ChatGPT's Blueprint for Building Generational Wealth When asked for a practical roadmap, ChatGPT provided a comprehensive strategy broken down into actionable steps. Start With Financial Education ChatGPT emphasized that generational wealth begins with financial literacy — not just for yourself, but for your entire family. Here is what it recommended: Teach children about money management from an early age. Create family financial discussions and goal-setting sessions. Ensure all family members understand investment principles. Build a culture of financial responsibility. It stressed that many wealthy families fail to maintain their wealth across generations because they don't adequately prepare their children with the knowledge and mindset needed to manage money effectively. Build a Diversified Investment Portfolio ChatGPT recommended a multi-asset approach to wealth building: Real estate investments for appreciation and passive income Stock market investments through index funds and individual stocks Business ownership or equity stakes Alternative investments like real estate investment trusts or commodities. It explained that diversification is crucial because different asset classes perform differently in various economic conditions. This approach helps protect wealth from market volatility while providing multiple income streams. Establish Legal Protection Structures The AI strongly emphasized the importance of estate planning tools as well. Here are a few it highlighted: Wills and trusts to control asset distribution Life insurance policies to provide immediate liquidity Business succession planning for family enterprises Tax optimization strategies to minimize transfer costs. ChatGPT explained that without proper legal structures, wealth can be decimated by taxes, legal disputes or poor decision-making by inexperienced heirs. It stressed that these structures must be created while you're alive and able to make strategic decisions. Consider Dynasty Trusts For families with substantial assets, ChatGPT recommended exploring dynasty trusts. It explained these as vehicles that can preserve wealth across multiple generations while providing tax benefits. These trusts can potentially last forever in certain states, creating a truly perpetual wealth-building vehicle. Overcoming Common Obstacles ChatGPT identified several barriers to building generational wealth as well. First, it acknowledged that starting from different financial positions affects strategy. Those with limited resources need to focus first on building basic wealth before thinking about generational strategies. ChatGPT also warned against increasing spending as income grows. The AI suggested automating savings and investments to prevent lifestyle inflation from derailing wealth-building efforts. It also highlighted the complexity of tax planning for generational wealth, noting that improper planning can result in significant tax penalties that erode wealth transfer. This makes professional guidance particularly important for families with substantial assets, and the cost of professional advice is typically far outweighed by the value created through proper planning. Starting Small: ChatGPT's Practical First Steps For those just beginning, ChatGPT provided a few accessible starting points. Build an emergency fund (three to six months' worth of expenses). Maximize employer 401(k) matching. Start a Roth IRA for tax-free growth. Purchase adequate life insurance. Create a basic will. Begin investing in index funds. Consider real estate when financially ready. It emphasized that these steps can be started by anyone, regardless of income level, and that the key is consistency over time. The Importance of Values and Purpose One of ChatGPT's most interesting insights was about the importance of instilling values and purpose alongside wealth. The AI explained that families with strong values and a clear sense of purpose are more likely to maintain their wealth across generations. This can include teaching children about responsibility and work ethic and involving family members in charitable activities It also noted that generational wealth isn't primarily about the amount you leave behind. It's about creating a financial foundation and knowledge system that empowers future generations to build upon your efforts. The process of building generational wealth requires patience, discipline and strategic thinking, but the AI emphasized that with the right approach, any family can begin building wealth that will benefit generations to come. The key is to start now, stay consistent and always keep the long-term vision in mind. More From GOBankingRates 3 Luxury SUVs That Will Have Massive Price Drops in Summer 2025 The 10 Most Reliable SUVs of 2025 The 5 Car Brands Named the Least Reliable of 2025 This article originally appeared on I Asked ChatGPT What 'Generational Wealth' Really Means — and How To Start Building It
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Fizzy market week turns flat
By Mike Dolan LONDON (Reuters) - What matters in U.S. and global markets today By Mike Dolan, Editor-At-Large, Finance and Markets A buoyant week for world markets driven by emerging U.S. trade deals with major economies has gone a bit flat into Friday, with the corporate earnings season throwing up a series of high profile disappointments. The interest rate backdrop also turned a shade darker, with the European Central Bank holding its 2% rate steady as expected but with some officials signalling that the bar was high for further easing. Federal Reserve rate cut expectations also continued to tick lower despite relentless political pressure, with futures markets now pricing in just 42 basis points of additional easing this year. * The S&P 500 and Nasdaq eked out marginal gains to new records on Thursday, with Alphabet leading the way after its earnings beat. But Tesla's troubles continued, as it dropped more than 8%. Meanwhile, IBM clocked an 8% earnings day drop, American Airlines fell 10% and Honeywell was off 6%. UnitedHealth lost 5% after a probe into its Medicare practises, and Intel lost 5% overnight on its update. Wall Street futures were flat ahead of Friday's bell. * The European earnings season was also pockmarked with some negative reactions to corporate updates, with shares in German sportswear maker Puma sliding 15% on Friday and French car parts maker Valeo down 9% as both cut full-year outlooks. European stock indexes were down about 0.5%. A rebound in British retail sales last month came in below forecasts too. * A packed diary next week includes the August 1 U.S. tariff deadline, Federal Reserve and Bank of Japan meetings, key U.S. labor market updates, megacap earnings and a heavy Treasury debt auction schedule. Treasury yields were steady to a bit higher on Friday and the dollar nudged up too. Market Minute * Investors cashed out of highly valued global stocks on Friday and the dollar headed for its biggest weekly drop in a month ahead of a crucial week for markets that includes Donald Trump's tariff deadline and key central bank meetings. * U.S. President Donald Trump's trade deal with Tokyo opens scope for the Bank of Japan to raise interest rates again this year, sources say, a prospect the central bank may start to telegraph by offering a less gloomy view on the economic outlook. * South Korea's Industry Minister Kim Jung-kwan met U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick on Thursday and reaffirmed a commitment to reach a deal on tariffs by the August 1 deadline, South Korea's industry ministry said on Friday. * The optimism sweeping world stock markets following news of emerging and expected U.S. trade deals is undeniable and understandable. But, writes ROI markets columnist Jamie McGeever, it is also puzzling. * U.S. President Donald Trump sprang a double surprise on the copper market when he announced import tariffs of 50% effective next month. ROI metals columnist Andy Home notes that the market was betting on a different outcome. Weekend reads * GEN AI AND PRODUCTIVITY: The Generative AI boom shows encouraging signs of raising the productivity level of the wider economy, according to a Federal Reserve Board discussion paper. But the researchers conclude that GenAI's contribution to productivity growth will depend on the speed with which its benefits are obtained, and notes that historically it takes time for revolutionary technologies to be integrated into the economy. * SUBNATIONAL DEBTS: Debates about debt sustainability often only focus only on "sovereign" or central government balances and ignore a complex, growing role of subnational governments. In a piece on CEPR's VoxEU site, economists Sean Dougherty, Acaua Brochado and Pietrangelo de Biase point out how subnational government accounts for nearly 40% of public investment and more than a quarter of public spending. They argue these entities face tighter borrowing conditions, increasing investment responsibilities and market structures that often fail to price risk accurately. Left unaddressed, these dynamics could undermine both macro stability and government priorities. * DIGITAL SOVEREIGNTY: Europe's systemic dependency on Big Tech's social-media platforms threatens the continent's digital sovereignty as policymakers argue there's little alternative. But, as developer Sebastian Vogelsang argues on Project Syndicate this week, this ignores the potential for building apps on open-source frameworks like the AT Protocol, the foundation for Bluesky. * 'SPY COCKROACHES'?: For Gundbert Scherf - the co-founder of Germany's Helsing, Europe's most valuable defence start-up - Russia's invasion of Ukraine changed everything. As Reuters' Supantha Mukherjee, Sarah Marsh and Christoph Steitz report, the Munich-based company more than doubled its valuation to $12 billion at a fundraising last month. Scherf - a former partner at McKinsey - says Europe may be on the cusp of a transformation in defence innovation akin to the Manhattan Project. * SYRIA'S ECONOMICS: A Reuters investigation found that Syria's new leadership is secretly restructuring an economy broken by corruption and years of sanctions against Assad's government, under the auspices of a group of men whose identities have until now been concealed under pseudonyms. Away from public scrutiny, the committee obtained assets worth more than $1.6 billion. That tally is based on accounts of people familiar with its deals to acquire business stakes and cash seizures, including at least $1.5 billion in assets taken from three businessmen and firms in a conglomerate once controlled by Assad's inner circle. Chart of the day With Fed policy under a microscope, attention switches to the labor market next week - culminating in the release of the national employment report on Friday. Economists polled by Reuters expect the economy added 102,000 non-farm payrolls this month - which would be the lowest monthly tally since February. However, the U.S. Labor Department on Thursday showed jobless claims last week fell to 217,000 - well below estimates - signaling continued resilience in the job market. Today's events to watch * U.S. June durable goods orders (8:30 AM EDT) * U.S. corporate earnings: Aon, HCA Healthcare, Charter Communications, Phillips 66, Centene * South Korea's Finance Minister Koo Yun-cheol and Minister for Trade Yeo Han-koo meet U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Trade Representative Jamieson Greer in Washington * U.S. President Donald Trump makes private visit to Scotland -- Want to receive the Morning Bid in your inbox every weekday morning? Sign up for the newsletter here. You can find ROI on the Reuters website, and you can follow us on LinkedIn Opinions expressed are those of the author. They do not reflect the views of Reuters News, which, under the Trust Principles, is committed to integrity, independence, and freedom from bias. (by Mike Dolan; editing by) Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
CNN
12 minutes ago
- CNN
How Trump's mass deportations could backfire on the American economy by shrinking paychecks
Immigration Donald Trump Pay & incomeFacebookTweetLink Follow President Donald Trump has promised to unleash an economic boom that will turbocharge growth, fatten paychecks and chip away at America's mountain of debt. However, a new analysis from Trump's alma mater suggests that his immigration crackdown – a centerpiece of his second term – could do the exact opposite. Trump's policy of mass deportations would shrink most worker paychecks, erode gross domestic product (GDP) and spike the already-massive federal government budget deficit, according to a Penn Wharton Budget Model analysis shared exclusively with CNN. 'There is no question the US economy will get smaller as you deport a lot of the workforce,' Kent Smetters, professor of business economics and public policy at the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School, said in an interview. 'You simply have fewer bodies to produce. Fewer people means a smaller economy.' During the 2024 campaign, Trump vowed to wage the biggest domestic deportation program in American history and eventually expel millions of people. The Penn Wharton analysis found that a four-year policy in which 10% of the nation's unauthorized immigrants are removed per year would increase federal deficits by $350 billion, reduce GDP by 1% and dent the average worker's wages. The higher deficits are driven by a combination of lost revenue and new spending required to make mass deportations possible – on top of the funding for border security, interior enforcement and deportations provided by the tax and spending cuts package Trump signed into law this month. If the immigration crackdown spanned 10 years, the cost to the federal government would rise to $987 billion, GDP would shrink by 3.3% and wages would tumble by 1.7%, researchers found. That's not to say all workers would be harmed by the mass deportations. Penn Wharton concluded that authorized, lower-skilled workers – including US-born ones – would get a pay bump due to less competition. Wages for those authorized, lower-skilled workers would jump by 5% by 2034, the analysis said. However, if deportations are reversed after four years, wages for authorized low-skilled workers would eventually drop. 'Part of the promise of deportation is that those left behind are supposed to be better off. In reality, it's a much more mixed result,' Smetters told CNN. Penn Wharton found that the outcome for high-skilled workers is clearer: They'd be worse off. That's because unauthorized, low-skilled workers complement higher-skilled workers, defined in the analysis as native-born citizens, permanent residents and visa-holding immigrants with at least some college education. Higher-skilled workers 'are generally harmed by deportation more than authorized lower-skilled workers are helped,' the Penn Wharton analysis found, adding that higher-skilled workers have a bigger impact on paychecks and GDP and contribute more to taxes. High-skilled workers would suffer a $2,764 loss in annual wages on average if the immigration crackdown spanned 10 years, Smetters said. 'If you're middle class to higher income, you're going to be hurt by deportation because you rely on lower-skilled workers to make your job easier and to make your life more comfortable,' Smetters said. For instance, he pointed to office workers who are helped by lower-skilled employees who clean buildings, do security and help transport people. Lower-skilled workers, at times unauthorized, play central roles in various industries, including construction, restaurants and manufacturing. This is especially true in agriculture. Between 2020 and 2022, about 39% of crop farmworkers were US citizens, while 19% were authorized immigrants. That means the rest – 42% – held no work authorization, according to the US Department of Agriculture. 'There are a lot of jobs in the US that native-born people don't want – and foreign-born people are happy to have,' said Stephanie Roth, chief economist at Wolfe Research. The White House pushed back against the Penn Wharton findings. 'These sort of pedantic analyses miss the forest for the trees by not accounting for the immense costs that everyday Americans are forced to bear due to illegal immigration: violent crime, rising housing costs, eroding social trust and even the overbearing of emergency rooms,' White House spokesman Kush Desai said in a statement to CNN. Desai pointed to research that finds more than one in ten young adults in the United States are neither employed, pursuing higher education nor in vocational training. 'There is no shortage of American minds and hands to grow our labor force,' Desai said, 'and President Trump's agenda to create jobs for American workers represents this administration's commitment to capitalizing on that untapped potential to build America's next Golden Age while delivering on our mandate to enforce our immigration laws.' It's true that some young people are having trouble finding jobs. The unemployment rate for those aged 20 to 24 stands at 8.2% as of June – more than twice as high as the national rate, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. However, it's also true that America's aging population creates real challenges for the economy and businesses. Economists fear that as Baby Boomers continue to retire, businesses will struggle to find workers, a problem that would be compounded by a loss of foreign-born workers. Roth, the Wolfe Research economist, worries that mass deportations, along with the Trump administration's decision to terminate the legal status of hundreds of thousands of migrants, will cause some worker shortages and lift prices for consumers. 'We need immigration. Foreign-born workers are critical to the labor force – especially in this environment where the population is aging,' Roth said. Joe Brusuelas, chief economist at RSM, said the Penn Wharton study 'illuminates just how critical rational immigration policy is to the wellbeing of the American economy.' He said the United States needs comprehensive immigration reform that features cross-border migration to support the labor needs of manufacturing, construction, agriculture and household maintenance as well as leisure and hospitality. The study 'strongly implies that the current path of immigration policy is not economically sustainable nor supportive of growth or narrowing budget deficits,' Brusuelas said.
