Lack of victims' rights in new Bill ‘outrageous', says Barnaby Webber's mother
(Left to right) Ian Coates, Barnaby Webber and Grace O'Malley-Kumar were all killed in the Nottingham attacks in 2023 (Nottinghamshire Police/PA)
Valdo Calocane, who had been diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia, killed 19-year-old students Barnaby and Grace O'Malley-Kumar and 65-year-old caretaker Ian Coates before attempting to kill three other people, in a spate of attacks in the city in June 2023.
He was sentenced to an indefinite hospital order in January last year after admitting manslaughter by diminished responsibility and attempted murder.
A judge-led public inquiry into the decisions made prior to the attacks was announced in February and is due to take place later this year.
Emma Webber said the Bill would be 'a betrayal of every victim who has already been failed by this system' if it was passed into law in its current form.
'This must not happen. It is utterly outrageous that the Government would even contemplate this,' she said.
'So egregious are the failings by every single agency involved in every aspect of our tragedy that a statutory public inquiry is under way.
'A significant part of the inquiry will focus on the failings of 'hospital managers' and 'clinicians' who failed to do their jobs properly. Resulting in the monster who killed my beautiful child be allowed to roam the streets and hide in plain sight.'
Ms Webber continued: 'Why has the Government chosen to include us as families in the proposals for the mental health bill, revision of our homicide laws and even the 10-year plan but conveniently chosen to ignore us on what is probably the one that will affect us the most?'
Campaigners have called on victims minister Alex Davies-Jones to amend the Bill by guaranteeing all victims have the right to be consulted, receive necessary information and be informed of key decisions, and to create a formal appeal process when information is denied.
Julian Hendy, founder of Hundred Families, said the Bill as it stands was 'not just a loophole, it's a kick in the teeth' for bereaved families and victims.
She said: 'We are talking about offenders who have been convicted of the most serious of crimes, which cause extreme concern amongst the public.
'This is not about punishment. It's about basic fairness, compassion, and transparency. Victims and their families should not be shut out of decisions that affect their personal safety and recovery.
'We have a lamentably long track record in our country of ignoring victims of serious crime. That has to stop. There is a balance to be struck.
'The Government has a clear opportunity to put this right and they must not waste it.'
The Victims and Courts Bill is currently at the report stage in the House of Commons after first being introduced to Parliament in May.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Argus
27 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
Starmer to meet Trump during Scotland trip ahead of state visit
Mr Trump is expected to travel to Scotland in July before the state visit in September. A Downing Street spokesman said: 'The White House has confirmed that President Trump will be making a private visit to Scotland later this month. US President Donald Trump (left) and Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer speaking to the media at the G7 summit in Canada (Suzanne Plunkett/PA) 'Given he is visiting a private capacity, there will not be a formal bilateral but the Prime Minister is pleased to take up the president's invite to meet during his stay.' Police Scotland have said they will seek Government help with the 'considerable' costs of the Trump visit, after it emerged last week that the force was in the early stages of planning for a visit. The US president's state visit will follow from September 17 to 19, Buckingham Palace has confirmed. He will be hosted by the King and Queen at Windsor Castle and accompanied by his wife, Melania Trump. There had been speculation about whether Mr Trump would be able to address Parliament, as French President Emmanuel Macron did during his state visit last week. MPs will not be around during the confirmed dates, which fall just after they start a break for party conference season. Nigel Farage called for Parliament to be recalled so Mr Trump can speak before MPs and peers. The Reform UK leader posted on X: 'Why does Keir Starmer think that the French president is a better friend to this country than the American president? Parliament must be recalled for Donald Trump's state visit to the UK. Why does @Keir_Starmer think Macron is a better friend of Britain than Trump? — Nigel Farage MP (@Nigel_Farage) July 14, 2025 'He's got it completely wrong. I believe Parliament should be recalled and Trump should be given the opportunity to address both houses.' The Liberal Democrats meanwhile did not urge for MPs to be called back, but said Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney should be invited for a state visit and to address Parliament. 'The Prime Minister should invite Mark Carney for an official visit to the UK just ahead of Trump's visit, including the opportunity to address Parliament. 'This would send an important signal that Britain stands shoulder to shoulder with Canada against Trump's chaotic trade war,' Sir Ed Davey said. Asked for Sir Keir's view on the president addressing Parliament, the Prime Minister's official spokesman said: 'The Prime Minister is focused on welcoming President Trump to the UK for an historic second state visit and building on the excellent relationship they've had that's been delivering for working people. 'The dates of the visit are for President Trump and the Palace (…) details around the programme will be announced in due course.' Stephen Gethins MP, the SNP's foreign affairs spokesman, said that Sir Keir should not be 'rewarding Trump's bad behaviour' and instead focus on rebuilding ties with European partners. 'While there is an obvious need to engage, rolling out the red carpet of a state visit is the wrong approach when dealing with Trump,' he said.
ITV News
34 minutes ago
- ITV News
Minister lays out £350 million plan to fund Jersey's health and infrastructure needs over five years
A Jersey Government minister has revealed proposals to invest £350 million across the health service and infrastructure developments. Talking exclusively to ITV News, Deputy Tom Binet says Project Breakwater is a five-year plan to tackle "critical" shortfalls in funding, with £220 million allocated for infrastructure needs such as the regeneration of Fort Regent and the town centre market, and a long-term commitment to European flights. The remaining £130 million will go towards overhauling the health service's digital systems and measures to prevent illness. Ideas for where to get the money from will appear in the Budget later this year but could include borrowing, dipping into savings and new medical charges. Speaking about the issues across infrastructure and health, Deputy Binet says: "Both of these areas have been badly underinvested in over the last ten years. "I'm very determined that we press for this money and commit to it properly. "Some of it might have to come from savings ... we do have a strategic reserve which we may or may not look at borrowing against. There are a number of different options." Highlighting the importance of increased funding, Deputy Binet adds: "It's critical. If we don't, we're just building up a lot of trouble for the future. We've identified, particularly in health, what needs to be done and have a very clear vision to make it right. "I think the savings are being delivered as aggressively as we possibly can; there's only so much you can do in terms of cuts against a background of making sure patient safety isn't compromised." He acknowledges the plans may have to be flexible, perhaps cutting out the "nice to haves" to reduce the overall cost slightly or extending the five-year funding period. US President Donald Trump has already put a dampener on the Government's previous hope to raise £52 million a year from taxing the biggest multinational companies at 15%, by seeking to exempt American businesses. Deputy Binet has also faced tough conversations with the Council of Ministers. He explains: "It's not all easy going because every department wants money but I made the point that it's not my health service, it's the island's. "I'd just ask everybody in the Assembly what type of system they want for their own family. "People need some hope and that's what we're trying to produce."
Daily Mirror
38 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Wes Streeting defends only paying for half the population to get an NHS dentist
Health Secretary Wes Streeting has defended why the Government is only paying for half the population of England to get an NHS dentist. MPs on the Health Committee grilled Mr Streeting on whether he would 'reconsider' a decision to stick with similar funding for dentistry that Labour inherited from the previous Tory government. The current £3 billion budget for England is only enough to fund care for half the population. The committee has previously heard that the budget has fallen from £3.6 billion in a decade and the British Dental Association said this equates to a funding cut of a third in real terms. Mr Streeting said: 'There is a constant tension between the level of ambition we have as a Government, the level of demand put on us by Parliament and the public, and the choices and trade-offs that we face. We are trying to deal with an NHS that has such a breadth and depth of challenges.' At this point acting committee chair Paulette Hamilton, Labour MP for Birmingham Erdington, intervened to say: 'Let me stop you there, because you could talk for another five minutes and I haven't got five minutes, will you reconsider this [funding] decision?' Mr Streeting replied: 'It is something we are constantly under pressure from Parliament and the public about, and we will do as much as we can as fast as we can on the NHS dentistry.' Before the 2024 General Election Labour promised to reform the 'flawed' NHS dental payment contract which leaves dentists making a loss treating patients who need most care. It pays dentists the same if a patient needs three fillings as if a patient needs 20 fillings. It has caused an exodus of NHS dentists to the private sector and means dental practices are no longer taking on new NHS patients. However this contract reform will depend on the overall funding settlement. An earlier committee hearing heard that dentistry got 3.3% of the NHS budget for England in 2010, but it is now down to 1.5%. Evidence by dentistry minister Stephen Kinnock at a previous hearing suggested the Treasury is refusing to fund radical reform and any new contract will likely recycle current "underspends" where dentists have to return cash due to the flawed contract. Last year the British Dental Association said there was £400 million underspend - much of which was quietly being syphoned off to other areas of the NHS. This underspend occurs because money is clawed back from struggling dental practices who do not hit treatment targets, usually due to lack of staff. The NHS contract pays the practice for each Unit of Dental Activity - known as a UDA. A check-up is worth one UDA while a filling is worth three. On the other hand, if an NHS dentist treats more patients than their target then they receive no payment for it - effectively capping the numbers able to access a dentist. More than 12 million people were unable to access NHS dental care last year – more than 1 in 4 adults in England. At the same time 90% of dental practices are no longer accepting new NHS adult patients. Data from the House of Commons Library showed 40% of children didn't have their recommended annual check-up last year. The UK spends the smallest proportion of its heath budget on dental care of any European nation. Government spending on dental services in England was cut by a quarter in real terms between 2010 and 2020. The number of NHS dentists is down by more than 500 to 24,151 since the pandemic. A Parliamentary report by the Health Select Committee has branded the current NHS dentists' contracts as 'not fit for purpose' and described the state of the service as "unacceptable in the 21st century". The system effectively sets quotas on the maximum number of NHS patients a dentist can see as it caps the number of procedures they can perform each year. Dentists also get paid the same for delivering three or 20 fillings, often leaving them out of pocket. The system should be changed so it enables dentists to treat on the basis of patient need. Wes Streeting said: 'The first thing we could do is make sure that we're making the most of the money that's already going in it. In opposition we complained a lot about the dentistry 'underspend'... but we know that fundamental long term reform is needed.' Britain has the lowest ratio of dentists per capita of any country in the G7. Eddie Crouch, chair of the British Dental Association, said: 'The sort of sums required to 'transform' dentistry are lost down the back of the sofa in the NHS in any given month. Restoring care to millions and consigning 'DIY' dentistry back to the Victorian era won't break the bank. But they will require sustainable investment."
