RAM affirms Sabah Development Bank Berhad's AA1 Rating
Published on: Wed, Jun 04, 2025 Text Size: RAM is the leading and largest credit rating agency in Southeast Asia, and publishes credit ratings to give independent, forward-looking opinion about an issuer's ability to repay its financial obligations. - Bernama pic Kota Kinabalu: RAM Rating Services Berhad (RAM) has on 4 June 2025 affirmed AA1/Stable/P1 ratings of Sabah Development Bank Berhad (SDB)'s debt instruments. The AA1 rating indicates high safety for payment of financial obligations by SDB and the 'Stable' outlook reflects RAM's expectations that the long-term rating will be unchanged over the intermediate term. SDB's Commercial Papers are also affirmed at P1, the highest short-term rating assigned by RAM which reflects high safety for payment of short-term financial obligations. RAM is the leading and largest credit rating agency in Southeast Asia, and publishes credit ratings to give independent, forward-looking opinion about an issuer's ability to repay its financial obligations. In RAM's report, it stated that 'The affirmation of SDB's ratings reflects our expectations of continued financial support from the Sabah state government (the State). Given the State's strong track record of support and SDB's strategic role in advancing Sabah's development objectives, we assessed the Bank to have an 'almost certain' likelihood of receiving state support, in accordance with our Rating Approach for Government-Linked Entities ('GLE') (October 2024).' In RAM's assessment, which evaluates both the importance of the GLE and the strength of its relationship with the Government, 'almost certain' represents the highest category of potential outcomes. SDB has made significant strides in its 3-Year Transformation Journey, which it embarked on in the second half of 2023 under a new Board and Management. The Bank's aggressive restructuring efforts, backed by strong support from the State Government, have resulted in a substantial reduction of its bond repayment obligations from RM5 billion in July 2023 to RM3 billion as of today. As a result of the kitchen-sinking exercise initiated in the second half of 2023, the Bank's total capital ratio fell to 7.9% by year-end. However, with strong support from the State Government, it has since improved, reaching 19.6% by the end of 2024. Since the setup of an independent professional recovery team in September 2023, notable progress has been made in addressing the Non-Performing Loans (NPLs). From January 2024 to April 2025, the Bank's Board approved RM965 million in settlement proposals, in addition to the RM2 billion in pledged securities placed under receivership. In line with the mandate from State Government, SDB is now focused on financing development projects in Sabah predominantly in the infrastructure, power and water sectors. The State has positioned SDB as the lead lender for local content in major investments in Sabah, reinforcing the Bank's strategic role in State's economic development. Between January 2024 and April 2025, SDB approved RM1.708 billion loan applications aligned with its developmental mandate. During the same period, the Bank dropped RM9.389 billion in loan applications that either fell outside its mandate or did not meet its enhanced credit standards. * Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel and Telegram for breaking news alerts and key updates! * Do you have access to the Daily Express e-paper and online exclusive news? Check out subscription plans available.
Stay up-to-date by following Daily Express's Telegram channel. Daily Express Malaysia
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Express
4 hours ago
- Daily Express
65pc success in mediation cases: Yet 99pc cases opt for full trial
65pc success in mediation cases: Yet 99pc cases opt for full trial Kota Kinabalu: Only one per cent of court cases are sent to mediation - an alternative dispute resolution (ADR) mechanism - despite it helping to resolve 65 per cent cases without needing a trial which helps clear the backlog of unfinished cases. This was among topics discussed by senior judges, lawyers and mediation experts at a recent conference on Global ADR Horizons organised by the Borneo International Centre for Arbitration and Mediation (Bicam), here. Advertisement 'Mediation works in 25 to 52 per cent of cases across different courts, but judges are only sending a pathetically low 1-1.5 per cent of all cases to mediation,' said former Chief Judge of Sabah and Sarawak Tan Sri David Wong Dak Wah. The Bicam Chairman shared his own experience with mediation, remembering how lawyers first saw it as bad for business when it started over 20 years ago. SPONSORED CONTENT 'The lawyers' reaction was that mediation was stealing our work,' he said. His view changed when he became a judge in 2005 and was drowning in unfinished cases. Advertisement After taking required mediation training, David tried his first mediation, a property fight between a father and son. The experience was eye-opening, but not in a good way. 'After about two hours, I think both sides were getting nowhere. And the father just suddenly got up. He said, 'Judge, whatever you say, I agree'. Advertisement 'That is not mediation. When people come before a judge, they think the judge will decide for them. That is not mediation,' he said. This experience convinced him that judges and court staff think very differently from real mediators, they approach problems in completely different ways. 'The mindset of a judge and legal officers are completely different to what we call real mediators,' he said. Now working as a private mediator, David admits he still benefits from being a former judge, but notes the difference. He also pointed out the need for better public awareness about mediation. 'We try to connect with, for example, developers' associations and tell them, do you know there is something called mediation? Many say they had no idea,' he said. For major construction disputes worth millions, David said the mediation fees of RM5,000 per day would be tiny compared to potential legal costs and the value of solving things quickly. Kuala Lumpur legal firm Samrith Sanjiv & Partners Managing Partner Samrith Kaur, who works as both an arbitrator and mediator, agreed with David about the intimidation problem. 'There is definitely an intimidation factor when a judge sits as a mediator. No denying that,' she said. 'People feel that the judge knows best, that the judge has the power. He knows the facts and the law. 'But on the flip side, sometimes you need someone with authority to help parties reach a conclusion,' she said. She said success often depends on how well lawyers prepare for mediation. 'If lawyers are well-trained in mediation, it is good because they will prep their clients. But if they are not, then there are problems. And when you come out, it is no longer a win-win situation. 'There are two types of mediation. One is facilitative and the other is evaluative. 'Lawyers should know whether they want facilitative mediation where the mediator helps parties talk to each other, or evaluative mediation where they need a judge to assess the situation,' she said. On how mediation relates to other ways of solving disputes, Samrith said mediation both works alongside and competes with court cases and arbitration. 'It works together when the court sends cases out or gets another judge to handle the mediation. 'It also keeps things private and preserves relationships,' she added. 'Courts do not come up with creative solutions. They just follow what the law says. Mediation is very flexible, so the outcomes are flexible too. 'You can see parties apologising to each other. Sometimes people just want an apology. We do not see that in arbitration or court cases,' she said. She said timing matters, noting that mediation can happen at different stages before legal action to preserve relationships, after filing when issues are clearer or during court proceedings when parties are tired of the process and rising legal bills. Hong Kong's Mediation Chambers Mediator, Alix Povey provided an international perspective, sharing how their jurisdiction has developed court-annexed mediation over the past two decades. 'Our history is quite similar to Malaysia,' she said, pointing out how Hong Kong initially had informal mediation in the early 2000s before formalising it through the Mediation Ordinance in 2013. 'The Hong Kong experience revealed the important role of lawyers in mediation success. When Practice Direction 31 was introduced, making mediation virtually mandatory with cost consequences for unreasonable refusal, the results were telling. 'There were two camps in some ways, the really pro-mediation lawyers and others who maybe did not understand it. They thought they were going to be losing their business if you go to mediation,' she said. She said Hong Kong's latest numbers from their trial settlement programme showed how much lawyers influence the outcome. 'Of 541 cases that went to mediation, 329 settled overall. But the breakdown showed 247 cases with legal representation settled, while only 16 cases without lawyers reached agreement. 'You can see the huge difference between having lawyers as part of the process and not having lawyers. Whereby 75 per cent were settled with lawyers as opposed to four per cent,' she said. She also pointed out that certain types of cases lend themselves better to mediation. 'I personally think that family cases really lend themselves to mediation, because we go back to that win-win situation. 'You do not want family members fighting each other. 'If they go to court, they will just want to destroy one another. But with mediation, you can help them reconcile and get along again. 'Things like fraud and criminal cases cannot be mediated. Or if you need the court to set a legal precedent, then it should probably go to trial,' she said, pointing out which cases are not suitable for mediation. Special Officer to the Chief Judge of Sabah-Sarawak Dr Melissa Chia offered the perspective of someone who has conducted countless mediations within the court system while developing innovative approaches to overcome its limitations. 'I did not choose to become a mediator on my own. Judges would send cases to me. My first boss was Tan Sri David and he was the one who taught me how to mediate,' she said. Melissa has found ways to deal with the intimidation problem that other speakers pointed out. She purposely changes how she looks and acts during mediation sessions. 'I would tell them I am not acting as a judge today. That is the first thing I would say when they came to see me. 'I would wear colourful jackets instead of the usual black and white court robes. I would say, my name is Melissa, please just call me Melissa. 'Today, I am not a judge, I am nobody special. I am just someone helping you work things out,' she said. She has come up with creative ways to handle family disputes involving children. 'With the children, I use drawings. I draw with them. In one case, I actually played hide and seek with a girl before she felt comfortable enough to tell me what was bothering her,' she said. 'Mediation is not just about finding a quick fix or deciding how much someone should pay and calling it done. To me, mediation is about rebuilding relationships. We need to understand what is really troubling people,' she said. She shared a story of one of Malaysia's biggest mediation wins, the longest Native Customary Rights case that involved 300,000 pages of court papers and dragged on for 15 years before being solved through court mediation. 'Every day in court, everyone was protesting outside. But guess what? The case was settled through court mediation. The parties were so happy that afterwards, they were celebrating outside the court. They even built a statue to represent making peace,' she said. Melissa linked this success to local traditions, pointing out that among Sabah's native communities, the old concept of Sogit means making peace, fixing what is wrong and keeping the community in harmony. 'We do not want the native people to think of Sogit as punishment, but as a way to make peace instead,' she said. 'If you ask me whether courts should send all cases to outside mediators, I would say maybe we can work together. We need a balance because not everyone can afford private mediation. 'Everyone, from the people in court cases to the lawyers, needs to understand what mediation really is and why we do it in the first place,' she said.
Borneo Post
5 hours ago
- Borneo Post
Malaysia drops High Value Goods Tax, leans on expanded SST instead
Amir Hamzah says the principle of HVGT has been embedded into the revised sales tax system, where luxury and discretionary items are now taxed at higher rates of 5 or 10 per cent. – Bernama photo KUALA LUMPUR (July 30): The government has decided not to proceed with implementing the High Value Goods Tax (HVGT), Finance Minister II Datuk Seri Amir Hamzah Azizan said in a written parliamentary reply yesterday. In a written parliamentary reply to Jempol MP Datuk Shamshulkahar Mohd Deli, he said the principle of HVGT has been embedded into the revised sales tax system, where luxury and discretionary items are now taxed at higher rates of 5 or 10 per cent The government expects to collect RM5 billion in additional revenue this year from the July 1 expansion of the Sales and Service Tax (SST), with the amount projected to double to RM10 billion in 2026, he explained. Amir Hamzah added that the targeted diesel subsidy programme is saving the government up to RM600 million a month. The Low Value Goods (LVG) tax, which came into effect on January 1 2024, generated around RM500 million in revenue this year. Meanwhile, the Service Tax on Digital Services (SToDS) brought in RM1.6 billion in 2024, after being imposed since January 2020. The Capital Gains Tax (CGT), effective from March 1, 2024, is estimated to yield RM800 million annually, although the final amount will only be known after corporate taxpayers file their returns. Amir Hamzah clarified that the government has no plans to introduce a separate digital goods tax, as digital services are already taxed under the existing service tax framework. Amir Hamzah Azizan high-value goods tax
Malay Mail
6 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Malaysia drops High Value Goods Tax, leans on expanded SST instead
KUALA LUMPUR, July 30 — The government has decided not to proceed with implementing the High Value Goods Tax (HVGT), Finance Minister II Datuk Seri Amir Hamzah Azizan said in a written parliamentary reply yesterday. In a written parliamentary reply to Jempol MP Datuk Shamshulkahar Mohd Deli, he said the principle of HVGT has been embedded into the revised sales tax system, where luxury and discretionary items are now taxed at higher rates of 5 or 10 per cent The government expects to collect RM5 billion in additional revenue this year from the July 1 expansion of the Sales and Service Tax (SST), with the amount projected to double to RM10 billion in 2026, he explained. Amir Hamzah added that the targeted diesel subsidy programme is saving the government up to RM600 million a month. The Low Value Goods (LVG) tax, which came into effect on January 1 2024, generated around RM500 million in revenue this year. Meanwhile, the Service Tax on Digital Services (SToDS) brought in RM1.6 billion in 2024, after being imposed since January 2020. The Capital Gains Tax (CGT), effective from March 1, 2024, is estimated to yield RM800 million annually, although the final amount will only be known after corporate taxpayers file their returns. Amir Hamzah clarified that the government has no plans to introduce a separate digital goods tax, as digital services are already taxed under the existing service tax framework.
