‘The Government needs to stand up for policyholders' – backlash as motor insurance premiums to keep rising due to surge in claims
Drivers have seen motor insurance premiums rise for more than a year-and-a-half, with premiums up by more than 8pc in the year to May alone.
Now the Alliance for Insurance Reform says the increase in claims would push premiums even higher.
This is because the Central Bank said the cost of settling claims was 23pc higher in the first half of last year when compared with the previous six months.
'This is primarily driven by an increasing trend in both the number and cost of damage claims,' the Central Bank's H1 2024 Private Motor and Liability Mid-Year Reports show.
When compared with pre-Covid times, the cost of settling injury claims is down 16pc. This was driven by a fall in the number of claims settled.
The fact that the cost of settling motor damage claims shot up by 23pc in six months meant there was no justification to increase the official guidelines on award levels further, the Alliance said.
T he cost of settling motor claims went up 23pc in just six months
The Judicial Council has proposed that personal injury award guidelines should be increased by almost 17pc.
Justice Minister Jim O'Callaghan is to bring a memo to the Cabinet next Tuesday, paving the way for draft legislation that would give effect to a planned rise in award levels.
The Alliance said: 'T he cost of settling motor claims went up 23pc in just six months – now is not the time to increase these costs further.'
The Central Bank report also shows that there is no financial benefit for claimants to have their case taken away from the State's Injuries Resolution Board.
Injuries claims can be litigated if a settlement from the board is rejected.
The Central Bank's report found that the average award paid by the board and one that is litigated both come in at €24,000.
Legal fees for cases settled through the Injuries Board average €597. Litigated cases have average legal costs of €24,786.
The Alliance said this needs to be specifically addressed in the Government's forthcoming action plan for insurance reform.
Alliance board member Tracy Sheridan said: 'The increase in awards will raise premiums further and adversely impact the volume of claims settled at the Injuries Resolution Board.
We are already seeing month-on-month premium increases
'The Government has not said a word about the planned increase [in the award guidelines] for the last six months and there has been no opportunity for public debate either. This is wrong.'
Ms Sheridan said that if the Government increases award guideline levels by 17pc, there will be no check on costs.
'We are already seeing month-on-month premium increases as the cost of living continues to spiral out of control.
'The Government needs to stand up for policyholders, not make things more difficult for them,' she said.
The Central Bank also released a report on business liability insurance, showing claims were down 10pc in the first half of last year compared with the previous half year.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
2 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Housing, security and rising costs among key issues raised by Cork business group ahead of Budget 2026
Cork Business Association (CBA) President Dave O'Brien has commended what he calls a "positive momentum" in recent months, but said key challenges must be addressed in Budget 2026 to protect Cork City. Publishing its pre-Budget submission on Thursday, the group lists business costs, Garda numbers and investment in public transport as the main issues facing Cork, with the most urgent concern being the need for increased housing. "The housing crisis features as the number one priority in the CBA's recommendations," the business group said. "Despite various Government interventions, significant gaps remain in housing delivery, especially in Cork City." Among its recommendations are calls to expand the Living City Initiative by relaxing eligibility criteria, introducing a new Apartment Living Initiative to incentivise the construction of modern apartment blocks, adjusting tax treatment to make refurbishment and redevelopment projects more financially viable, and enhancing the Help-to-Buy scheme to include renovations of vacant or derelict properties. 'If the Government fails to act decisively now, re-election will be a tough ask,' the proposal said. Business costs In light on ongoing closures across the city, the CBA is urging the Government to follow through on its commitment to reduce VAT for food-related services, as well as supporting small businesses amid ongoing wage reform. Insurance costs also remain a major concern, the CBA said, urging the Government to improve market competition and underwriting capacity. The group also highlighted that businesses are struggling to meet the increasing costs of energy, asking the Government to conduct a full review into market charges associated with energy bills. Other suggestions include reducing Capital Gains Tax from 33% to 20% to align with EU averages, and refinements to the Employment and Investment Incentive Scheme (EIIS) to better support early-stage companies and mitigate investor risk. Security While commending recent initiatives such as Community Safety Wardens pilot, the group said the city needs a significant increase in Gardaí numbers. The submission also calls for a review of the current court system to explore alternatives to having guards on duty being held up in court all day, such as the use of affidavits, that could help return more Gardaí to front-line duties in the city centre. 'We're proud of what has been achieved over the past year through collaboration,' Mr O'Brien said. "But Budget 2026 presents an opportunity to take practical steps that will support small businesses, increase housing supply, and enhance public safety. "These changes will help ensure Cork's momentum is maintained. The time for incremental adjustments has passed. What we need now is bold, transformative policy intervention.'
Irish Examiner
2 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Ban on services from occupied territories has to 'factor in' US anti-boycott laws, says Taoiseach
The Taoiseach has warned that introducing a ban on services from the occupied territories could negatively impact multinational companies operating in Ireland due to US anti-boycott laws. Micheál Martin said the Government must 'factor in' laws passed in some US states that penalise companies who engage in boycotts, but it was open to including services in the laws if it is legally possible. 'That's an issue we have to factor in, because we don't want any companies or multinationals in Ireland inadvertently being caught up in this,' Mr Martin said. 'The objective is to create pressure on Israel to stop the war and in particular to adhere to international law and in terms of the ICJ (International Court of Justice) judgement.' At present, the Government's legislation to ban trade with the occupied territories in the Palestinian West Bank only applies to goods, not services. Asked if the Government was seeking to prioritise commercial interests over a moral argument, Mr Martin rejected the assertion. 'It's not commercial, like it's putting bread and butter on people's table,' Mr Martin said, citing the 'hundreds of thousands" of jobs from multinational companies in Ireland. 'The object of the exercise here is to put pressure on Israel, not to disadvantage Ireland unduly and that's a factor." Mr Martin said people should be aware the legislation would be 'misinterpreted' within the United States. He added there were other challenges with the legislation, including its potential impact, citing that only €690,000 worth of trade has been done with Israeli occupied territories over the last five years. 'There's no point in Ireland coming out the worse if it had no impact on Israel. That's the only point I'm making, we have to be clear-eyed in terms of the impact. People should know about the impact is what I'm saying,' Mr Martin said. 'We don't want to inadvertently catch companies and have them punished in the United States for something they're not aware of.' The Taoiseach also questioned how it would be possible to prove if services were procured from the occupied territories. 'How do you actually detect, how do you punish the offence, the practicalities around all of that. Those are real and the bill is fundamentally symbolic, it's important.' Mr Martin said there are still 'very narrow grounds' to implement the bill. Anti-BDS legislation is in place across numerous US states, including California and Florida, which can levy sanctions against companies who participate in boycotts against Israel. Gambling legislation Meanwhile, the Taoiseach said he would favour a ban on free bets by gambling companies, adding it should take place if recently passed laws allow for it. 'We don't want young people being lulled into and induced by gambling at an early age, for example, through that mechanism because addiction, once it starts it's very difficult to shed an addiction. Gambling can have catastrophic consequences on families,' Mr Martin said. His comments come after an ESRI report found that companies offering free bets led gamblers to spend more, lose more and push them into making bad decisions. 'Our findings imply that gambling offers aren't merely marketing tools, but pose a real risk of financial harm, particularly among vulnerable groups,' said Dr Diarmaid Ó Ceallaigh of the ESRI's Behavioural Research Unit. Read More No use crying over spilt stout: Taoiseach rallies after faux pas in Tokyo
Irish Daily Mirror
2 hours ago
- Irish Daily Mirror
Fury in Fianna Fáil at Fine Gael handling of college fee fiasco
Fianna Fáil politicians took part in the "most heated parliamentary party meeting in a long time" as they fumed over how Fine Gael has handled the third-level fee row. One politician at Wednesday night's meeting referenced former Fine Gael leader Leo Varadkar's infamous 2020 comments when he told a Cabinet meeting on Covid, "if we keep doing business like this, we won't be doing business for long". He made the comment at the height of the pandemic amid frustration over how Taoiseach Micheál Martin was running things. Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael have been at loggerheads all week following Minister Lawless' admission on RTÉ's This Week, suggesting that as there would be no cost-of-living package in Budget 2026, the €1,000 off third-level fees will not be repeated this year. He added that fees would revert to €3,000 in September. This has led to backlash from Fine Gael politicians, who have called for clarity in both the Dáil and the Seanad. Maeve O'Connell, Fine Gael TD for Rathdown, went on RTÉ's Liveline on Monday and called for clarity over the fees, stating that there was a commitment in the programme for government to reduce and abolish third-level fees. The Irish Mirror understands that the majority of the Fianna Fáil parliamentary party meeting on Wednesday was dominated by discussions about third-level fees and Fine Gael. It was expected that it would focus on the National Development Plan. There was a particular focus on the contributions from Fine Gael Senators in the Seanad, with one TD suggesting that the comments had been "coordinated". One politician reminded the party of Mr Varadkar's comments hitting out at Fianna Fáil and saying that "if this is the way we're doing business we won't be doing business very long". One TD said: "It was the most heated parliamentary party meeting in a while". They also noted that as Taoiseach Micheál Martin was in Japan, politicians felt more free to speak. Another TD said: "When your friends and foes are both acting like this…" Fianna Fáil politicians were also annoyed about the voice note Mr Harris sent to the Fine Gael parliamentary party earlier this week, stating that Fine Gael had signed up to a programme for government that promised to cut student fees. One TD speaking to the Irish Mirror today accused Mr Harris of "stirring the pot constantly". On Wednesday evening, at the same time, the Fianna Fáil parliamentary party was taking place, Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael politicians were meeting in a "joint party room" to discuss the nitrates directive with Fine Gael Agriculture Minister Martin Heydon. Sources at the meeting told the Irish Mirror that Mr Heydon was talking about how he needed the support of the two parties on the matter and how everyone needed to act as a "team". Multiple people said that in response to requests for support, one Fianna Fáil senator referenced Fine Gael's actions towards James Lawless this week, noting that he was also a member of the "team". One politician described it as a "mic drop moment", suggesting that the nitrates argument could cause a further rift between the two parties shortly. It comes as the Labour Party confirmed that a protest will take place outside Leinster House next Tuesday from 6pm to protest over the "fee increase". The story dominated Leaders' Questions for a third day this week, with Sinn Féin's Matt Carthy using just 49 seconds of his four-minute slot to ask Finance Minister Paschal Donohoe whether student fees will be €2,000 or €3,000 in September. Minister Donohoe would not give a direct answer to the question but stated the Government is "clear on what that objective is". He added: "We are clear that temporary measures in place when inflation was high need to be looked at as well as how we can put in place other measures that can make a difference to something we know is an acute difficulty for many and those who are already receiving needed supports."
