logo
Hewlett-Packard lost hundreds of millions in Autonomy acquisition, judge rules

Hewlett-Packard lost hundreds of millions in Autonomy acquisition, judge rules

Hewlett-Packard (HP) lost hundreds of millions of pounds through its acquisition of British software company Autonomy, which was founded by Mike Lynch, a High Court judge has ruled.
The technology firm, now known as Hewlett-Packard Enterprise (HPE), sued the British entrepreneur for around five billion US dollars following its purchase of Cambridge-based Autonomy for 11.1 billion dollars (£8.2 billion) in 2011.
The company claimed at a nine-month trial in 2019 that Mr Lynch inflated Autonomy's revenues and 'committed a deliberate fraud over a sustained period of time', which it said forced it to announce an 8.8 billion dollar (£6.5 billion) write-down of the firm's worth just over a year after the acquisition.
In a ruling in 2022, Mr Justice Hildyard said the American firm had 'substantially succeeded' in their claim, but that it was likely to receive 'substantially less' than the amount it claimed in damages.
He said that Autonomy had not accurately portrayed its financial position during the purchase, but even if it had, HPE would still have bought the company, but at a reduced price.
A hearing was then held last year to decide the amount that Mr Lynch must pay in damages, before the businessman died aged 59 along with his 18-year-old daughter, Hannah, and five others when his yacht, the Bayesian, sank off the coast of Sicily last August.
On Tuesday, Mr Justice Hildyard ruled that HPE suffered losses amounting to £697,876,753 through the purchasing of Autonomy, some of which is set to be paid by Mr Lynch's estate.
He also ruled that Mr Lynch's estate is liable to pay part of around 47.5 million dollars in damages, which is worth around £35 million.
Some of the money is due to be paid by Sushovan Hussain, Autonomy's former chief financial officer, who was also sued by HPE.
He was convicted in April 2018 in the US of wire fraud and other crimes related to Autonomy's sale, and was sentenced to five years in prison.
While he has since settled HPE's claim, he could still be required to pay damages.
A further hearing to deal with matters including interest, currency conversion and whether Mr Lynch's estate can appeal against the decision is set to be held in November.
Handing down his ruling, Mr Justice Hildyard expressed his 'great sympathy' for Mr Lynch's family, calling his death a 'tragedy'.
He said: 'It is a source of anxiety to me that I have to deliver a judgment that will inevitably cause further stress on those involved.'
In the 197-page ruling, he said he considered that HPE's claim 'was always substantially exaggerated' and that the five billion dollars figure claimed 'was not based on detailed analysis'.
Following the ruling in 2022, Mr Lynch, who was also the founding investor of cybersecurity giant Darktrace, was extradited to the US in May 2023 to face criminal charges after his removal was approved by the then-Home Secretary Priti Patel.
He was cleared of accusations that he orchestrated a fraud and conspiracy over Autonomy's sale in the US in June 2024, and was celebrating the acquittal on his yacht at the time of his death.
In a statement written before his death, issued posthumously by his representatives on Tuesday, Mr Lynch said: 'Today's High Court ruling reflects that HP's original five billion dollar damages claim was not just a wild overstatement – misleading shareholders – but it was off the mark by 80%.
'HP acquired Autonomy for 11.6 billion dollars and today's judgment is a view that Autonomy's actual value was not even 10% below the price HP paid.
'This result exposes HP's failure and makes clear that the immense damage to Autonomy was down to HP's own errors and actions.
'An appeal process will be considered later this year.
'The English civil case included hearsay evidence from the US and we were never able to question or cross-examine those witnesses.
'This is in direct contrast to the rights of defendants in the US legal system.
'When in the US criminal trial we were able to cross-examine the relevant witnesses, a very different story emerged. Why is the English legal system so trusting?'
A spokesperson for HPE said: 'We are pleased that this decision brings us a step closer to the resolution of this dispute.
'We look forward to the further hearing at which the final amount of HPE's damages will be determined.'
Jeremy Sandelson, who was appointed by the court as administrator of Mr Lynch's estate, said he would be 'examining the judgment carefully', including whether to appeal both the 2022 ruling and the judgment on Tuesday.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The weirdest laws still standing in the UK, including little-known pub rule
The weirdest laws still standing in the UK, including little-known pub rule

Scotsman

timean hour ago

  • Scotsman

The weirdest laws still standing in the UK, including little-known pub rule

There are some very odd laws which still exist today Sign up to our Retro newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... From handling salmon suspiciously to beating your carpet, the UK has some particularly strange laws which few people know about Many date back hundreds of years and are historic relics which are rarely enforced But some of these obscure laws could still land you in trouble There are some very strange laws in the UK which are still technically standing but few people know about | Getty The law in the UK is constantly evolving, yet there are some historical oddities which bizarrely remain in place. From handling salmon suspiciously to lingering after a funeral, these little-known laws could still potentially land you in trouble. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Legal experts at Future Bail Bonds have compiled a list of the UK's strangest laws which are still technically enforceable. Some apply across the country, laid down in lingering Acts of Parliament, while others are specific to certain regions, hidden away in local by-laws. Although they are technically still in place, the obscure laws are largely unenforced and some may conflict with modern human rights law, meaning they could be overturned if challenged. Many are kept purely for heritage reasons, but some people have fallen foul of the little-known laws in recent years - including someone who was fined £160 for staying too long at his own wife's funeral just 10 years ago. How many of these laws did you know still exist in the UK? Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Shooting a Scotsman with a crossbow (except on Sundays) An ancient and very specific law allows someone in York to shoot a Scotsman with a crossbow, as long as it's not a Sunday. Remarkably, this law, dating back to historic conflicts, still technically applies within the city walls. Although it's clearly incompatible with modern law, it has never been officially repealed. Entering the House of Parliament in armour According to a 14th-century statute still technically in force, it is illegal to enter Parliament while wearing a suit of armour. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The law was originally created to prevent intimidation and violence during political debates. The outdated rule is not actively enforced today, given it's not exactly a common occurrence. Reporting a whale found to the monarch A royal prerogative, dating back to 1322 and still standing, states that any whale or sturgeon found on British shores is the property of the monarch. These 'royal fish' - valued at the time the law was introduced for their oil, blubber, bone and flesh - must be reported to the brilliantly-titled Receiver of Wreck. Another law, dating from 1324, states that if a whale is stranded on a UK shore, the head belongs to the king and the tail to the queen. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Not hanging washing across the street Local by-laws are in place in many historic towns across the UK, including Bath, which prohibit residents from hanging laundry lines across the street or attaching them to public buildings. The rules were introduced to keep the towns looking smart, and they are still enforced in some conservation zones. Handling salmon suspiciously This law is a relatively recent one, dating back to The Salmon Act 1986. It was introduced to combat illegal fishing and poaching but is so loosely worded that it could apply to almost any actions involving a salmon. That's why it's widely regarded as a humorous legal relic. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Beating a carpet in the street The Metropolitan Police Act 1839 makes is illegal to beat or shake carpets, rugs or mats in public streets, except for doormats before 8am. The rule was part of efforts to reduce dust and noise in Victorian London but it remains active and has been enforced in rare cases. Playing knock knock ginger This popular childhood prank, which involves knocking on someone's door and scarpering before they answer, has been around since the 19th century. But few people realise the game is technically prohibited, under a law introduced in 1839. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Lingering after a funeral This seems particularly harsh, but you're not allowed to linger after a funeral, under a law which was introduced to enable gravediggers to carry out their work. This law was reportedly enforced as recently as 2015, when a man attending his own wife's funeral in Worksop, Nottingham, stayed on an extra 20 minutes and was fined £160. Getting drunk in an English pub Did you know it's technically illegal to get drunk in an English pub? | AFP via Getty Images Were this historic law regularly enforced, the nation's prisons would be overflowing. England never banned alcohol but various laws were introduced to reduce drinking. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The Licensing Act 1872 made it illegal to get drunk in an English pub - a law which technically still applies today. Paying with too many coins This law was only introduced in 1971, as part of legislation brought in when the UK switched from pounds, shillings and pence to decimal currency. It remains active. Sounding your horn through anger It is an offence to sound your car horn through anger. This is another little-known rule which could get many motorists in trouble. The legislation was only introduced in 1986 in an effort to keep roads calm and safe, and it remains enforceable. Why haven't strange laws been repealed? So why are these laws still standing? Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad One reason is that Parliament rarely finds time to review archaic legislation unless it becomes controversial. Another is that some of the outdated laws have become part of that region's heritage - a source of pride for locals and fascinating trivia for tourists. What laws would you make if you could? We asked people around the UK what strange new laws they would introduce if they had the power. No socks and sliders in public was one suggestion. Another person said it should be law for everyone to be as tidy as possible. What law would you like to see introduced where you live? Let us know in the comments section.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store