logo
Immigration May Stop But Foreign Brands Keep Coming

Immigration May Stop But Foreign Brands Keep Coming

Forbes27-05-2025
The exterior of the Chopard mansion that has become the new Lalique store in New York.
The U.S. is the largest and most competitive retail market. Success here brings scale and validation in other markets.
Especially in Asia, many consumers aspire to own products that are made by popular U.S. brands. America is often the great unlock for worldwide success and brand growth.
While many non-U.S. brands have found success here, they're in the minority. For most non-U.S. brands, America is more graveyard than goldmine for their worldwide ambitions. It's a crowded, fast-moving and mercilessly competitive market that's hard to stand out in. It looks a lot easier to succeed here than it really is.
But they keep coming because the promise is so great.
So it is that three French brands have recently opened (or re-designed) new stores on expensive, prime real estate in New York. Each brings a unique approach and takes a different kind of retail gamble.
One is the department store Printemps. Arriving with a big splash and written about extensively (including by me), its reviews are universally positive.
Retail expert, advisor and investor Ken Pilot said about it, 'I can't remember the last time I walked into a store and was blown away.' He loves the displays, the merchandising surprises around every corner and the artful consistency of presentation across brands. As Pilot says, 'art, design and shopping converge seamlessly' in the new Printemps store.
The other new store by a French brand is Lalique, the legendary French tabletop brand renowned for its crystal glass creations and iconic bottles and vases. Lalique was founded in 1888 in Paris by Rene Lalique and today the brand also includes jewelry and fragrances.
The Lalique store is getting a lot less attention than the Printemps store. So let me show it to you.
The outside (pictured above) could not be a more elegant New York entrance. It's a mansion owned by the Chopard family that is now leased to Lalique.
When you enter there's a stairs (or lift if you're disabled). At least when I was there, a person greets you at the top of the stairs.
The entrance to the store.
The rear of the first floor.
First floor main area.
Second floor selling area.
Second floor fragrance area
The new store was inspired by the Lalique bar at the well-known restaurant Daniel where it allowed high-end customers and collectors of Lalique to see the brand in a new way.
James Mun, CEO of Lalique, said previous U.S. Lalique stores were 'very traditional.' But 'we weren't seeing a lot of our collectors and die-hard fans' in the stores and we 'weren't seeing a lot of new next generation' consumers come in either. So Lalique decided to 'revamp the retail experience' to 'educate the next generation of Americans" about Lalique.
The new store is right beside stores of the jewelry brand Graff, luxury brand Hermes and leather brand Goyard. Mun says they hope to attract those high-end customers to the Lalique store.
Mun says the townhouse allows them to show other products including fragrance and interior designs which Mun says is the company's fastest growing segement. He says the store is more of a 'home environment' and they are 'breathing Lalique life into it.'
The Lalique store is gorgeous and it's a pleasure to be in such a beautiful environment.
Mun is right to think about how to integrate their online presence with their store. Consumers want brands to speak with one voice and to shop interchangably between online and physical stores. He's also right to think about attracting younger consumers. If Lalique can't do that, their future is a big question mark.
But when I consider the potential success of the store, it makes me wonder about a few things:
- Will consumers find it? Lalique isn't big enough to have a giant advertising budget and while the Goyard/Hermes/Graff customer base might see it, few other casual passersby will. It can be fun to shop in a beautiful New York mansion but if you don't know it's there it's not worth much.
- What makes retail interesting now? The Printemps store is fun to be in. What makes that true is hard to define exactly and it's a little different for each person. Printemps is offering clothing, footwear, fragrance and beauty but above all, food. Every area of the Printemps store has either a bar or restaurant or some offering where shoppers can sit and be part of the environment.
And it has action. The merchandise is different from what you'll see almost anywhere else and the food keeps the people inside. All those elements make it more likely that a consumer will buy something. Lalique doesn't have that.
Printemps has people that look like you or what you'd like to look like. It feels right as a customer to be in an environment where you feel like you belong. When I was in the Lalique store on a sunny, 70-degree day, there was one other customer on one of the floors. It makes a consumer wonder: why am I alone here? What does everyone else know?
You might say that the private, exclusive, rarefied atmosphere is a key to success in luxury. But Hermes and Chanel do pretty well being on some of the most heavily foot-trafficked streets in New York with tons of traffic in-store.
If the Lalique store is going to do well, it will take time for people to find out it's there; Lalique can't afford a blowout marketing budget. The store has to work.
It will also take adaptation. They're planning events and there's no doubt that will help. But having a store on an expensive piece of real estate that isn't visible to the high-end consumers going by is kinda risky.
If you build a store that looks like someone else's, it's not interesting and consumers don't come back.
That's what's so interesting about the newly redone Longchamp store on Spring Street in Soho in New York.
When you enter, you're looking at what must be one of the most interesting stairs in a public place in New York, here:
Stairs at entryway of Longchamp store in Soho, New York
And the view from the top of the stairs is just as interesting. It makes you want to walk on it.
Top view of the staircase at Longchamp store in Soho, New York
The store is on a busy shopping street with lots of pedestrian traffic, the window is inviting and the store is intriguing. But of course the product and the store experience are what will make it succeed or not and here Longchamp acquits itself well.
Longchamp store shop floor area in Soho, New York
There's no question when you're in the Longchamp store that handbags and small leather goods are the brand's identity, there's no mistaking it. The prices are accessible, you can buy a handbag for well under $200 and it's hard to find one more than $600.
The sales staff is well trained, knowledgeable about the product and helpful without being overbearing. They are also keyed in to comment kindly on something about how you look.
I was not told what the rent is or how much the improvements cost so I can't say if Longchamp is getting a good return on its investment. But the store works and it's both a great showcase for selling and a fun place to be.
I'm not the only one who thinks so. The store is busy and there were many customers even though I was there on a rainy weekday afternoon. There are multiple events and activities going on in the store they'd like to try, like painting photography and refreshments.
All three stores, Printemps, Lalique and Longchamp are unique in their own ways. That's important because consumers don't want more sameness. But uniqueness can be risky because American consumers can be fickle and often don't respond the way non-U.S. consumers do.
If Printemps and Longchamp keep doing what they're doing it appears that their New York stores will be successful. But the Lalique store is less clear. They need to get more people in the store and the path to doing that is difficult and costly. It's one of the most vexing problems in retail: how do you adapt an established brand that works well abroad to what U.S. consumers want now?
If you're successful in your home market, it's easy to believe you'll be successful in the U.S. and that motivates brands to try. But success in America isn't guaranteed by pedigree and it's a big investment to market in the U.S. For foreign brands, the formula requires deep consumer understanding, smart store design and often, a willingness to rehtink legacy.
But it's also a big opportunity. And that's why, no matter what happens with immigration, the scale, status and singular challenge of retail success in America will keep the brands coming.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why Ground Beef Prices Are Hitting Record-Highs in the U.S.
Why Ground Beef Prices Are Hitting Record-Highs in the U.S.

Time​ Magazine

time16 minutes ago

  • Time​ Magazine

Why Ground Beef Prices Are Hitting Record-Highs in the U.S.

For many Americans, the cost of ground beef is starting to weigh down their weekly shopping baskets. Ground beef prices rose by 10.3% in June, when compared to the same time last year, surpassing $6 per pound. The price of steak rose by 12.4% within this period. 'Egg prices have been through a rollercoaster ride. And now with beef, we're seeing quite a significant price rise,' says David Ortega, a food economist and professor at Michigan State University. Earlier this year, egg prices skyrocketed, more than doubling in price in April when compared to March 2024. The sharp increase was caused by bird influenza outbreaks on American farms, which infected over 23 million birds that had to be culled. As of early July, egg prices have since fallen back down to $3.78 per dozen from $6.23 in April. Over the past 12 months, food prices as a whole have only risen by 2.7%, so what is causing this sharp increase in the price of ground beef? Here's a breakdown of what's behind the soaring prices: Cattle herd sizes are at a record low Although the demand for ground beef products remains high in the U.S., the supply is facing a squeeze. Cattle herd sizes are at the lowest they have been for almost 75 years, with just under 87 million cattle and calves recorded across the country at the start of 2025, according to the American Farmers Bureau Federation (AFBF). AFBF economist Bernt Nelson has said that prices for feed steers (cattle bred for slaughter) have reached record highs, encouraging farmers to sell their cattle for meat production instead of breeding. 'High cattle prices combined with the unpredictability of future prices and profitability could compel farmers to continue marketing a higher percentage of females for beef rather than breeding,' he said in a February blog post. And as farmers still struggle to make profit despite high prices, they may decide to sell off their remaining cattle due to slim margins. 'Even with these record high prices, margins for cattle farmers and ranchers are razor-thin thanks to continued elevated supply costs,' Nelson said in May. One of the main high costs getting in the way of sustainable profit for cattle ranchers is that of feed for their herds, and this links back to adverse weather conditions brought on by climate change. Read More: Why Were Eggs So Expensive in April? Drought driven by climate change 'One of the main drivers has been the effects of climate change on beef production in the U.S. This is something that doesn't cause prices to rise overnight, so there's a considerable lag involved,' says Ortega. A significant drought took place across the Great Plain states in 2022, forcing a lot of cattle farms to sell their livestock. 'What that [drought] does is erases feed for producers. There's less forage availability, so they sell a lot of their animals, because it becomes very costly to hold on to them,' Ortega notes. A lot of the sold livestock, often slaughtered and turned into beef products, includes 'breeding stock,' meaning that in the long-term there is less capacity to breed new cows to keep up with consumer demand. 'If you couple that with the strong demand for beef, and there has been strong demand in particular for ground beef, because it is a very familiar product to consumers, it really puts a lot of pressure on prices, and that's why we've seen the increases,' says Ortega. Uncertainty due to tariffs and concern over what might happen in the future Ortega says he believes that tariffs 'are starting to play a role' in the rise of beef prices. Despite a lot of domestic production, the U.S. still imports significant amounts of beef, particularly more lean trimmings. These trimmings are important for ground beef products. 'We import a lot of lean trimmings from countries like South Africa and Brazil, and that is in order to be able to blend this with our beef that tends to be fattier, and so we can make the proper blends in terms of fat content,' Ortega says. President Donald Trump threatened earlier this month to install a 50% tariff against Brazil for what he described as a 'witch hunt' against former President Jair Bolsonaro, who is facing allegations that he planned to stay in power despite losing the 2022 Brazilian election. 'If these do go into effect, or even higher tariffs [are implemented], then I think we're going to see a notable further increase on things like ground beef and hamburger meat,' Ortega says. Brazil, the world's largest exporter of beef, saw a rise in sales of meat to the U.S. this year after a trade war between Washington, D.C., and Beijing escalated. In May, Brazilian exports to the U.S. rose by 20%, and current imports from the country are almost double what they were in June 2024, according to the USDA. With beef imports rising by 10% over the past year, a higher U.S. dependency on the product from abroad puts it more at risk should tariffs increase, particularly on top exporters to the U.S., the largest being Canada. The U.S and Canada are currently in the midst of trade negotiations, with Trump most recently threatening a 35% tariff on all Canadian goods starting Aug. 1. Global supply chains of beef have already been disrupted as a result of looming trade wars. 'There is a tremendous amount of uncertainty on the policy and trade front,' Ortega says, arguing that it has contributed to such price increases. According to experts, even the slightest change within the beef market, as a result of tariffs, could further impact prices. 'Tariff-induced trade wars are sowing uncertainty for both ranchers and consumers alike. This has the potential to impact demand for beef, and even small changes in demand with such tight supplies could have a big impact on prices,' said Nelson. Read More: Why Tomatoes Are Becoming a Lot More Expensive How long will consumers feel the impact of these price increases? When asked about when grocery shoppers could see prices start to fall, Ortega calls this the 'million dollar question.' 'Our research shows that it could be four years or so before prices for the consumer start to stabilize,' Ortega says. Other price fluctuations, such as when eggs were reaching record-high prices earlier this year, were more 'predictable' as they were due to bird influenza outbreaks. But as there's more at play regarding the ground beef price hikes, it's harder to know when things will settle.

Trump's Math Fail Sparks Massive Online Trolling
Trump's Math Fail Sparks Massive Online Trolling

Buzz Feed

time17 minutes ago

  • Buzz Feed

Trump's Math Fail Sparks Massive Online Trolling

President Donald Trump is getting heat on social media for making a claim on Tuesday about cutting drug prices that's essentially mathematically impossible. Trump began promisingly enough with a complaint shared by Democrats and Republicans alike: the high cost of medication, and how much more Americans pay for some medications than patients in other countries. He promised to reduce those costs ― but to a very unlikely degree. 'We're gonna get the drug prices down. Not 30% or 40%, which would be great. Not 50% or 60%. No, we're gonna get them down 1,000%, 600%, 500%, 1,500%,' Trump said at a Republican dinner. 'Numbers that are not even thought to be achievable.' Critics quickly pointed out the reason those numbers are not thought to be achievable: reducing the price by 100% would make the drugs free. Reducing it by '1,000%, 600%, 500%, 1,500%,' as Trump said, would make the cost negative dollars ― with the drug company essentially paying people to take the medication. Trump: This is somebody nobody else can do. I can get the drug prices down… 1000% 600% 500% 1500%. Numbers that are not even thought to be achievable. — Acyn (@Acyn) July 23, 2025 @acyn/ C-SPAN / Via Twitter: @Acyn Several users asked Grok, the AI chatbot on X, if Trump's numbers made sense. Grok called Trump's claim ' mathematically impossible,' ' hyperbolic and not literal ' and ' total bullshit.' But Trump insisted he could use 'a certain talent that I have' to convince pharmaceutical companies that they have no choice but to reduce their prices. Trump also mentioned an executive order he signed in May to invoke 'most-favored nation' status in drug costs, which he says would ensure that drug companies can't charge Americans any more than what they charge patients in other nations. However, the details of that plan remain hazy, and at least one pharmaceutical CEO said discussions with the White House are ongoing and expected to take time. Trump on Tuesday insisted that his order will lead to those price cuts. 'We will have reduced drug prices by 1,000%, by 1,100, 1,200, 1,300, 1,400, 700, 600,' he said. 'Not 30 or 40 or 50%, but numbers the likes of which you've never even dreamed of before.' Trump's critics offered some free math lessons: As someone who graduated from first grade, this is not how numbers work. — Hemant Mehta (@hemantmehta) July 23, 2025 @hemantmehta/ C-SPAN Thank goodness this guy isn't negotiating the percentages we pay in tariffs. — Justin Wolfers (@JustinWolfers) July 23, 2025 @justinwolfers / C-SPAN Quite a trick if he can do it. Are we going into negative numbers where big Pharma pays me to take their drugs? — Dj Omega Mvp (@DjOmegaMVP) July 23, 2025 @DJOmegaMVP/ C-SPAN Hard to imagine this guy was found liable of fraud for making up numbers — MeidasTouch (@MeidasTouch) July 23, 2025 @meidastouch/ C-SPAN So the drug companies are going to pay us to take their drugs? Dumbest President EVER. — SickoftheCrap (@SickoftheC) July 23, 2025 @SickoftheC The economics department at Wharton must be incredibly proud of this man's fundamental understanding of basic math. — Franklin Leonard (@franklinleonard) July 23, 2025 @franklinleonard/ C-SPAN Cant wait fill my next zpack at cvs and leave with a stack of their money — Ronnie (@Gem_Mint_Cards_) July 23, 2025 @gem_mint_cards_/ C-SPAN I feel like a requirement of being president should be understanding basic math. — Jared Ryan Sears (@JaredRyanSears) July 23, 2025 @JaredRyanSears So medicines would be free and pharmaceutical companies would pay us? — Bru🔮 💉🗣 (@brwninh4) July 23, 2025 @brwninh4 Getting paid to take drugs sounds awesome where do I sign up — TCL (@TitleTalkTCL) July 23, 2025 @titletalkTCL / C-SPAN Universal Prescription Income. Your move, Yang — Roger Sollenberger (@SollenbergerRC) July 23, 2025 @SollenbergerRC/ C-SPAN What kind of math is this? — Wu Tang is for the Children (@WUTangKids) July 23, 2025 @WuTangKids/ C-SPAN And people wonder how this idiot bankrupted casinos. — Jo (@JoJoFromJerz) July 23, 2025 @JoJoFromJerz/ C-SPAN Negative drug prices are on the way ! 🤣🇺🇸 — Christopher Schultz (@nalyticsatwork) July 23, 2025 @nalyticsatwork/ C-SPAN This is the fucking genius. — Fred Wellman (@FPWellman) July 23, 2025 @FPWellman/ C-SPAN — Dave Itzkoff (@ditzkoff) July 23, 2025 @DaveItzkoff/ C-SPAN @realDonaldTrump is out here pitching drug deals like it's Shark Tank for Cartels: 'I'm offering insulin for negative $300 and a lifetime supply of bleach injections… but only if you call in the next 15 minutes.' This QVC for crackheads. — Frank C (@FrankC164) July 23, 2025 @FrankC164/ C-SPAN

How zero-knowledge tools can help us verify age and protect privacy online
How zero-knowledge tools can help us verify age and protect privacy online

The Hill

timean hour ago

  • The Hill

How zero-knowledge tools can help us verify age and protect privacy online

In June, French President Emmanuel Macron declared that he'll ban social media for children under 15, stating, 'Platforms have the ability to verify age. Let's do it.' We've all seen what that 'verification' actually looks like: 'I'm over 18.' One click, and you're in. This is how the internet currently 'protects' minors. It's laughable, until you realize that this system is failing millions of children and teens every day. In the U.S., Federal Trade Commission Chair Andrew Ferguson also highlighted this profound inadequacy, calling simple date-of-birth entries 'little to no barrier' for underage access. This admission from a top regulator underscores what many have long known: Current systems throughout the world are failing our children. The other extreme can be even worse. Platforms requiring actual age verification often demand personal documents and store them in databases that have become high-value targets for bad actors. In December, Signzy, a major know-your-customer provider, suffered a malware attack exposing customer data, including scans of IDs and selfie biometrics. Similarly, in January, a massive data breach at education technology provider PowerSchool compromised the sensitive information of 60 million students. Such events are clear indicators of systemic vulnerabilities. Exposing personal identifiable data could lead bad actors right to the doorstep of children, youth and family members, the exact opposite of what age verification requirements are supposed to accomplish. Today's age verification tools were not designed for the digital age. Applying financial-focused risk management procedures (like 'know-your-customer') to social platforms or gaming sites is invasive and dangerous. When sensitive documents are uploaded and stored on third-party servers, data breaches aren't a matter of if, only when. For kids and families, this is unacceptable. For developers and platforms, it creates massive legal and regulatory challenges. For society, we're missing an opportunity to implement real protection that respects privacy. We're caught in a false choice: either no protection at all or too much vulnerable surveillance. But we no longer have to choose between these two failures. Zero-knowledge identity protocols remove this mutual exclusivity with enhanced security, privacy and user experience. Zero-knowledge cryptographic technology allows someone to prove something is true without revealing the underlying information. Think of it as showing you're old enough to enter a venue without showing your ID or revealing your name. The mathematical proof confirms that you meet the requirement. This approach enables users to cryptographically prove their age without exposing other sensitive information. For instance, they can confirm they are over 18 without revealing their exact birthdate or other identifiable features beyond what's necessary. The process generally involves a few key stages. Initially, a user interacts with their government-issued ID through a secure application, often on a smartphone. This interaction permits the extraction of necessary data directly from the document's secure elements. Next, a cryptographic proof is generated. This proof is a mathematical assertion that the user meets a specific age criterion (e.g., over 18). Crucially, this proof contains no personally identifiable information itself; it only confirms the truth of the age claim. This privacy-preserving proof can then be shared with an online service or platform. The platform verifies the proof's authenticity and validity using cryptographic techniques, confirming the user's age qualification without ever accessing or storing the underlying personal data from the ID. The platform learns only if the user is old enough. Major tech companies are already recognizing the potential. Google announced that it's integrating zero-knowledge proof technology into Google Wallet for age verification, with partners like Bumble already on board. Developers can integrate zero-knowledge age verification into their applications through open-source libraries and verification contracts. These systems check the cryptographic proof and confirm whether a user meets the defined minimum age threshold, all without storing or even seeing the user's full identity. The programmability of these systems is crucial for global deployment. Zero-knowledge protocols can automatically adjust to local regulations (e.g., age 16, 18 or 21) while maintaining the same privacy guarantees. Consider how this technology transforms real-world platforms. Gaming sites verify users meet age requirements without collecting ID copies. Dating apps confirm users' real ages without accessing other personal information. Content platforms gate mature content based on cryptographic proof rather than self-reported information or vulnerable document storage. This is privacy-first protection, enforceable by code and leveraging proven cryptographic technologies. Users maintain full control over their information, choosing what to disclose in each online interaction. We shouldn't accept that verifying a child's age online requires sacrificing privacy, or that doing nothing is acceptable either. The regulatory landscape is already shifting. New York's SAFE for Kids Act began requiring platforms to use age determination technology and restrict 'addictive' feeds to minors without parental consent. Other legislation, like the federal Take It Down Act and state-level App Store accountability acts, also signals a move towards stricter online safety, though some raise privacy concerns about mass data collection. Current age verification methods are also proving unreliable. The United Kingdom's Office of Communications recently fined OnlyFans operator Fenix International approximately $1.4 million for providing inaccurate information about its age verification, highlighting how even 'advanced' biometric systems can fail. As legislation aimed at protecting minors online continues to evolve, the technology industry should lead by example. We can protect vulnerable users without exposing their most sensitive information to bad actors. We can continue with systems that either don't work or create massive privacy risks, or we can embrace cryptographic solutions that protect both children and privacy. Platforms now have access to privacy-preserving tools that respect both user autonomy and legal responsibility. There's no excuse not to build better. Parents deserve peace of mind, kids deserve safety and we all deserve a more thoughtful internet. With increasing regulatory scrutiny and growing public demand for better protections, the impetus to shift away from ineffective checkboxes and invasive data collection toward genuinely workable solutions is clear: It is time to move on from the checkbox era. Rene Reinsberg is an entrepreneur who has co-founded multiple ventures including Celo, Self and Locu (acquired by GoDaddy). Jane Khodarkovsky is a former trial attorney and human trafficking finance specialist in the Money Laundering and Asset Recovery Section, Criminal Division, in the U.S. Department of Justice. She is currently a partner at Arktouros.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store