Donald Trump tells Moscow to reach peace deal with Kyiv in 10-12 days or face severe tariffs
has given
Russia
'10 or 12 days' to reach a peace deal with Ukraine.
The US president slashed the 50-day deadline he had issued to Moscow earlier this month to end Europe's biggest war since 1945 or face 'severe' tariffs on its trade.
Ukraine
welcomed Mr Trump's intention to bring the deadline forward by almost a month and his admission he was 'very disappointed' by Russian president
Vladimir Putin
and 'not so interested in talking [to him] any more'.
'I'm going to make a new deadline of about 10 or 12 days from today. There's no reason in waiting … I want to be generous, but we just don't see any progress being made,' Mr Trump said beside British prime minister
Keir Starmer
in Scotland on Monday.
READ MORE
Earlier, as the leaders stood on the steps of his hotel in Turnberry, Mr Trump said: 'We thought we had it settled numerous times. And then president Putin goes out and starts launching rockets into some city like Kyiv and kills a lot of people in a nursing home or whatever. You have bodies lying all over the street, and I say, 'That's not the way to do it'.'
Mr Trump said he had 'spoken to president Putin a lot. I always got along with him very well', but was now 'very disappointed in him'.
Since Mr Trump started his second term at the White House in January, Ukraine has urged him to put more pressure on Russia to abandon its full-scale invasion of almost three-and-a-half years, which he said he would be able to end 'in one day' during his re-election campaign.
Kyiv agreed in March to a US proposal for a full 30-day ceasefire if Russia also pledged to stop fighting, but over summer the Kremlin's forces have intensified ground attacks on eastern Ukraine and drone and missile strikes across the country.
Andriy Yermak, chief of staff to Ukrainian president
Volodymyr Zelenskiy
, quickly thanked Mr Trump on social media 'for standing firm and delivering a clear message of peace through strength' and for 'shortening the timeline he gave Putin, because he believes the answer is obvious'.
'Putin respects only power – and that message is loud and clear. When America leads with strength, others think twice,' Mr Yermak said.
Mr Zelenskiy is pushing for a peace summit with Putin, but says Ukraine will not accept terms that would amount to capitulation – including demands currently set out by Moscow.
The
Kremlin
insists it respects Mr Trump's push for peace and is willing to hold talks, but only when Ukraine accepts the permanent occupation of five of its regions, abandons any hope of joining
Nato
and complies with other restrictions on its sovereignty.
Mr Trump announced on July 14th he would impose 'severe' tariffs on some Russian exports and on countries that buy them unless a peace deal was agreed within 50 days.
The main target would be oil, which is still a huge revenue-earner for the Kremlin and a major contributor to its war chest.
Russia's army enjoys a large advantage over Kyiv's forces in numbers and arms supplies and it continues to make slow gains in parts of eastern Ukraine.
Ukrainian troops are holding their ground in most areas and claim to have retaken some territory in the northern border region of Sumy in recent days.
Russian national airline Aeroflot cancelled dozens of flights on Monday due to what it called an IT fault.
Two pro-Ukrainian hacker groups said they had destroyed thousands of the company's servers and stolen a vast amount of passenger and other data.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
22 minutes ago
- Irish Times
BusConnects route will come in ‘on time, on budget', says Darragh O'Brien
Darragh O'Brien has pledged that the first of 12 BusConnect corridors in Dublin will come in 'on budget and on time'. Construction is due to begin on the 9.2km Liffey Valley to Dublin city centre route in September after a contract worth up to €274 million was signed with Irish company GMC Group Ltd. Announcing the launch on Thursday, the Minister for Transport said 'it's going to transform bus use within the city' along with significant cycling and walking facilities. Passenger numbers are predicted to increase by 58 per cent with faster travel times. The project is expected to take about three years, he said. Asked about the potential for delays, Mr O'Brien acknowledged he and interim National Transport Authority (NTA) chief executive Hugh Creegan would have responsibility. READ MORE But he said he emphasised to GMC that construction should be 'on time and on budget'. 'That's what we will do our level best to ensure and we have built contingency into this contract too,' he said. 'I think most people understand from a lot of the projects that we build here this is a medieval city. The routes have been mapped and have been surveyed as well. But we're looking at a three-year build on this. If we can do it sooner than that we will, but we're being realistic about it.' Planning for all 12 corridors has been approved, but a number remain subject to High Court judicial review. BusConnects aims to 'transform' bus services. The corridors will cover 230km of dedicated bus lanes overall with 200km of cycling infrastructure. The Liffey Valley scheme is to start at Fonthill Road and connect to the Liffey Valley shopping centre bus interchange. It will continue through Coldcut Road and Ballyfermot village before moving along Sarsfield Road, Grattan Crescent, Emmet Road, James's Street, Thomas Street and High Street, connecting to and the city centre transport network. It will be accompanied by 13.3km of improved cycling infrastructure. Mr O'Brien said the bus corridors were 'really significant', while the proposed MetroLink will be 'transformational ... not just for Dublin, but for the region, and indeed for our airport'. The railway line will link the city centre and Dublin Airport. He rejected comments by Ryanair group chief executive Michael O'Leary , who said the MetroLink project was a waste of money. Mr O'Brien said Ryanair has changed aviation across Europe, but 'this isn't just about the airport or airport connectivity'. North Dublin is a major growth area and MetroLink enabled further economic development for the airport, 'but above and beyond the airport, more housing development along the route, too'. The business case for MetroLink showed a €4 return on every €1 invested. 'It's a badly needed project,' he said, adding: 'We're the fifth-best connected airport in Europe. We're one of the few without a direct rail link into the city and beyond.' Asked about the introduction of contactless payments on public transport, Mr O'Brien said this should be phased in from the end of 2027 or in 2028.
Irish Post
28 minutes ago
- Irish Post
British government urged to change course on IFI funds
THE BRITISH government's decision to withdraw £1 million funding from the International Fund for Ireland (IFI) has prompted widespread criticism from political leaders. Established in 1986 by the British and Irish governments, the IFI was created to promote economic and social progress while fostering dialogue between unionist and nationalist communities. Over the years, it has attracted funding from a wide range of international donors, including the United States, the European Union, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. A spokesperson for the British government confirmed that it would not be providing the final tranche of a £4 million pledge made in 2021, citing a 'very challenging fiscal position' that necessitated 'difficult but necessary decisions' to stabilise public finances. The cut comes less than six months after the Trump administration paused US foreign aid to the fund, dealing a second major blow to its operations this year. The decision has been sharply criticised by political representatives across Northern Ireland. Sinn Féin MP John Finucane said in a statement that the withdrawal was 'extremely concerning' and warned that peace funding 'must continue to be supported.' He added that the British government should be increasing its commitment in light of the US pullback, not reducing it. Matthew O'Toole, leader of the opposition in the Northern Ireland Assembly, accused the British government of undermining established peace-building structures in favour of politically motivated alternatives. He highlighted the timing of a separate £1 million funding announcement for the 'Connect Fund,' a scheme intended to strengthen links between Northern Ireland and Britain. The fund was introduced following a deal between the previous government and the DUP to restore devolved government at Stormont. O'Toole described the Connect Fund as lacking transparency and criticised it for focusing exclusively on unionist concerns while sidelining the north-south and cross-community aspects central to the IFI's work. He called on the British government to urgently explain its position and address growing concerns. The government has denied any reallocation of funds, stating that the IFI and the Connect Fund are 'entirely separate' initiatives. A spokesperson reiterated that the government 'remains supportive of the IFI's aims of promoting peace and reconciliation.' In Ireland, the Department of Foreign Affairs confirmed it had contributed €4 million to the IFI this year and expressed hope that Britain would reconsider its decision when the fund's next four-year strategy is unveiled later this year. A spokesperson said the department looked forward to continued collaboration with Britain on reconciliation efforts. The IFI, now chaired by Shona McCarthy, acknowledged Britain's past support and emphasised its commitment to working with all partners to deliver peace initiatives across Northern Ireland and the southern border counties. The organisation was set up as an independent international body to support projects aimed at healing divisions and fostering economic stability in communities still marked by the legacy of conflict. With the loss of funding from both Britain and the US, questions now loom over the IFI's ability to sustain its current level of operations. See More: IFI, Northern Ireland, Shona McCarthy
Irish Times
37 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Gavin Pepper agrees to abide by certain orders but denies filming son of finance firm's boss
Dublin city councillor Gavin Pepper has told the High Court he is prepared to abide by orders prohibiting him from attending or filming outside the homes of staff of credit servicing and asset management firm Pepper Finance Corporation. Mr Pepper, an Independent who was elected in the Ballymun/Finglas area, and who has no connection with Pepper Finance, has denied he shot footage for social media outside Pepper managing director Ian Wigglesworth's west Dublin home or of the businessman's son, who has special needs. He told the court he and his partner have a child with special needs themselves and had every sympathy with someone in the same situation. He also said when he was outside the Wigglesworth home, he did not engage with Mr Wigglesworth's son and it was the child who approached him while he was talking on the phone to his partner. READ MORE On Tuesday, Mr Wigglesworth and Pepper were granted an interim injunction preventing the councillor from attending the Wigglesworth home or filming and watching him and his family or from publishing home addresses of Pepper employees. That application was made ex parte – meaning only the Wigglesworth/Pepper side was represented – and on Thursday Mr Pepper appeared himself saying he wished to be given time to get legal representation. Mr Pepper, who is also a taxi driver, of Plunkett Green, Finglas, Dublin, was also required to remove social media posts which contain footage of videoing which took place outside Mr Wigglesworth's home. Brian Conroy SC, for Mr Wigglesworth and Pepper Finance, said Mr Pepper has a well-established association with the far right and social media posts promoting far-right ideas. Mr Conroy said while Mr Pepper had since Tuesday agreed to some of the orders, he did not seem prepared to delete certain social media posts or not attend homes of other Pepper employees. [ Injunction granted restraining Gavin Pepper from filming home of Pepper Finance boss Opens in new window ] Mr Pepper told Mr Justice Brian Cregan he was prepared to comply with most of the orders made on Tuesday but he said a number of allegations had been made against him which were not true, including that he had recorded the Wigglesworth family. However, certain orders now sought in relation to deleting posts would interfere with his role as a democratically elected representative and his constitutional right to free speech. He needed time to get legal representation, he said. Mr Conroy said his side was particularly concerned in relation to certain posts already up in relation to Mr Wigglesworth and his family. These and other posts were clearly threatening and crossed the line in relation to freedom of expression, counsel said. His claims about Mr Wigglesworth's son 'rang hollow' when there was one video in which Mr Pepper is clearly outside the Wigglesworth home and there is clear identification of a minor who is a member of that family. Asked by the judge if he was prepared to abide by the order not to attend outside the homes of other Pepper employees, he said he was. Asked if he was prepared to take down four specific posts, Mr Pepper said he wanted time to challenge it 'because they are making out that I am a bad guy'. He did not believe 'anything I said was defamation'. The judge said he had an absolute right to express any 'understandable grievances about vulture funds' but Pepper was saying some of the posts clearly crossed the line. Pepper does not think it can be called a vulture fund, the court heard. Mr Pepper agreed to a suggestion by the judge that he would take down the posts until the case returns before the court in October when he will also have a chance to get a solicitor to argue his case in that respect. He also said he did not accept he was some sort of a bad person and he thought looking for extra orders in this way was unfair before he got representation. The judge said he would have the opportunity to address what he felt was tarnishing his name and an unfair portrayal of him so far when he swears an affidavit. The judge said he would make an order in relation to taking down four posts of June 12th, July 24th, 25th and 27th within seven days of making the order. He also made similar orders on Tuesday in relation to other Pepper employees. The orders must be complied with within seven days of them being formally made. He also gave both sides liberty to apply to the vacation courts should anything arise between now and October.
