For some Californians, high transportation costs put owning a car out of reach
His 20-mile journey from South Los Angeles to the San Fernando Valley takes about 90 minutes each way.
"Half an hour just to get to downtown, to get to the train station, then another half-an-hour just to get from the train station to get here, and then the bus will take me straight to my job," Andrade told CBS News. "I would do this journey every day just to get my family through."
His journey was easier when he had a car. But following a crash, fixing it just cost too much for Andrade, who is the sole provider for his family.
"It's almost like a struggle, every paycheck," Andrade said.
To cut down on daycare costs, his wife stays at home with their young son.
"It's heart wrenching, you know," Andrade said. "Because it makes me feel like I'm not enough, you know, as a human. Like, I'm not really doing much."
Andrade's family's struggles mirror that of millions in California. According to a study released earlier this year from the nonprofit United Way, 35% of California households — or about 3.8 million households — do not make enough to afford basic costs of living, such as rent, groceries and gas.
United Way CEO Pete Manzo says the study is just a snapshot of a national problem.
"It's a crisis we've been living with," Manzo told CBS News. "It's like we're running a high fever. We have too many households where people are working hard and they can't earn a decent standard of living."
One of the biggest challenges is access to transportation. AAA says the cost of owning a new car — including monthly payments, insurance, maintenance and fuel — runs more than $12,000 per year for the average American household.
"You're basically saying to a family, it's going to be a $1,000 a month or more to get to and from work, to get to and from school," Manzo said. "It's not cheap."
The costs may not be as high in some other states as in California. But nationwide, taking into account inflation, the financial burden of transportation is steadily rising, along with housing and childcare, United Way analysis has found.
Manzo says that advising families in California to move somewhere more affordable isn't necessarily a practical solution.
"For one family, that might be a decent idea," Manzo said. "But it's pretty disruptive to just pick up and leave all your other family relationships and all your community ties to move somewhere to make it cheaper...Expecting them all to move somewhere cheaper just doesn't make sense."
For now, Andrade is saving up to afford a car for his family.
"They tell me, you know, don't give up, you got this."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wall Street Journal
30 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
The Shy Billionaire Who Built an Empire of Superteams
Over the course of Mark Walter's slow journey to build one of the most glittering portfolios in sports, doing a $10 billion deal to buy the Los Angeles Lakers turned out to be the easy part. Every other major acquisition—including the Los Angeles Dodgers, Chelsea FC, and the Cadillac Formula One team—had turned into protracted affairs that required the involvement of bankruptcy courts, suspicious rivals, or the British government. But when news first emerged last month that Walter, the CEO of Guggenheim Partners, was taking over the Lakers, it was already a fait accompli.
Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
OpenAI's Partnership With Microsoft is Good, Says CEO Sam Altman; There's ‘Tension,' But Already Planning ‘Next Decade Together'
Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, has emerged as one of the most influential voices in artificial intelligence (AI), known for his ability to navigate both technological innovation and complex business relationships. In a recent appearance on the Hard Fork Podcast, Altman addressed public speculation about the state of OpenAI's partnership with Microsoft, offering a candid perspective on the realities of high-stakes collaboration in the tech industry. Altman described a recent conversation with Microsoft (MSFT) CEO Satya Nadella, noting it was a 'super nice call' that covered a range of topics, including their shared hopes for a 'very long and productive future working together.' This sentiment underscores the depth of the relationship between the two companies, which began in earnest when Altman secured a $1 billion investment from Microsoft in 2019 — a move that enabled OpenAI to accelerate its research and product development at a critical moment. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman Plans 'Fundamentally New Type of Computer' That Will Make AI 'Transcendentally Good' Meta Platforms Stock Looks Cheap - Short OTM Puts for a 2% One-Month Yield Is SoundHound AI Stock a Buy, Sell, or Hold for July 2025? Stop Missing Market Moves: Get the FREE Barchart Brief – your midday dose of stock movers, trending sectors, and actionable trade ideas, delivered right to your inbox. Sign Up Now! Since then, the partnership has expanded dramatically. In 2023, Microsoft announced a new multi-year $10 billion investment in OpenAI, further cementing the relationship and integrating OpenAI's technology into Microsoft's products and cloud infrastructure. Altman acknowledged that, as with any 'deep partnership,' there are 'points of tension,' but emphasized that overall, the collaboration has been 'wonderfully good for both companies.' This pragmatic view is consistent with Altman's reputation for balancing ambition with realism, a skill honed during his years as president of Y Combinator and as a serial entrepreneur in Silicon Valley. Altman's authority on the subject is rooted in his track record of leading OpenAI through both rapid growth and significant challenges. He co-founded OpenAI in 2015 with the mission to advance digital intelligence for the benefit of humanity, and has since overseen the launch of transformative products like GPT-3, DALL-E, and ChatGPT. These innovations have not only shaped the direction of AI research but have also brought the technology to millions of users worldwide. Addressing rumors about friction between OpenAI and Microsoft, Altman remarked that while media coverage sometimes speculates about the partnership 'about to collapse,' his own conversations focus on 'how do we figure out what the next decade together looks like?' He was clear that 'there is' tension, but also 'so much good stuff there,' and he expects the partnership to remain valuable for both sides 'for a very long time to come.' Altman's approach reflects his broader philosophy: ambitious goals require strong, sometimes challenging alliances. His leadership style — marked by transparency, adaptability, and a focus on long-term value — continues to shape OpenAI's role at the forefront of artificial intelligence, and the company's ongoing collaboration with Microsoft remains a central pillar of that strategy. On the date of publication, Caleb Naysmith did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Disney: a "Value" Story Waiting to Be Heard
Disney's financials were able to tell me a fascinating story, just like many of its movies and TV series. The story begins in 2019 with a deterioration that seemed not only drastically degenerative but also unfixable; then, with a surprise twist, it suddenly changed course over the past two years. The protagonist? The entertainment segment, specifically, DTC. Initially seen by the market as the villain of the story, precisely due to the unpredictability of its results; a factor that had previously scared off major investors like Buffett himself. Specifically, I wonder: how will Disney succeed in integrating its MOATs into the new entertainment vehicles? Well, in my view, there is one that gives it an incredible advantage here too. But first... Warning! GuruFocus has detected 7 Warning Sign with DIS. I immediately bring Buffett into play, and the stories shared by the Oracle of Omaha, always a cornerstone in my investment style. First, I'd like to mention that Disney has some of thoseunique and diverse qualitiesrequired to clear the first filter of a value investor, you will grin when I tell you that, at that point, Buffett himself had decided tosell out from DIS ... with regret. The reasons? The usual ones: unpredictable returns. And in this, his lifelong colleague Munger also finds justification, whose reasoning will help enrich the risk section of this article (we'll see that soon). Similar to Gayner, known as the mini Buffett, with Markel Gayner Asset Management Corp. Same uncertainties, but two different periods. The first ones, the uncertainty lay in the transition to cable TV with a volatile model. And for today's investors, From cable TV to the new DTC services. Since 1997, when Buffett was deciding whether to sell or hold DIS, Disney has changed. It is no longer just an entertainment vehicle, but a legacy conglomerate. From the 10-K we know that about 46% comes from the main segment: entertainment. Then the second source of income is experience (38%), followed by sports (ESPN and similar) at 19.7%. This is net of intersegment eliminations. 50% of the entertainment segment's revenue comes from DTC, which includes the streaming service. Here, it competes through Disney+, and partly also with Hulu, with around 186 million subscribers, behind the giant Netflix in this regard, which has over 260 million subscribers, not to mention it is also the most expensive platform. Disney holds a 4.6% share of the DCT segment, Netflix 8.5%, YouTube (11.1%). DIS's financials tell a story, and it's a pleasure to listen to it. You can feel a rising climate of tension from the statement that started in 2019; you wouldn't want to be in the shoes of the CEOs from that period. If you followed the events, both Bob Iger and Bob Chapek were criticized in turn: First for the acquisition of 21st Century Fox, then for the pandemic, dragged down by closed parks, empty theaters, and Disney+ running at a loss., empty theaters, and Disney+ running at a loss. And if it's true that numbers speak, at the time a value investor would indeed have had reason to be afraid. But let's bring some order to it. Here's a TLDR: from 2019 to 2023, revenue and EPS collapsed, and total debt doubled with the FOX acquisition; cash burn increased steadily, and no new cash was being generated. ROIC fell below WACC, weighed down by macro conditions. The market fled from DIS stock. Now it's worth taking a look at these indicators: Net income grew by 111% in 2024 year-over-year, and TTM results already show a 411% increase. The CFO is breathing again, up 41% YoY, confirming a significant upward trend also in FCF, both levered and unlevered grew by nearly 30%. All three business segments are recovering, but what I liked the most was the strong rebound in the entertainment segment, with income up 171%. A major contributor to this was the reduced loss in the DTC segment. The DTC segment has reached breakeven; and if it were to maintain its current margins, there would be a potential operating margin of 5.5% (considering $336 million in operating income on $6.118 billion in revenue), even though this projection is not confirmed by the guidance. Considering the negative role it has played in DIS's financials over the past years, in my view a new scenario is opening up for Disney, one that the market may begin to price in. The operating margin of the DTC segment in the 10-K was 142/22,776, approximately 0.63%; while in the FY2024 10-Q, it stands at 5.5%. And I ask myself: if we extend the time horizon to 10 years, is it really unreasonable to assume that DIS could maintain the FY24 Q1 operating margin? In my view, not at all, especially considering that Netflix operating margin is around 20%. And this is feasible given that Disney has one of the strongest MOATs in the entertainment landscape: the Disney Characters. Animated characters don't age and don't renegotiate contracts, leveraging a cross-generational appeal that remains valid for decades (natural loyalty), which other platforms don't have. And with the expansion of its IP base through Pixar, Marvel, Lucasfilm, and 20th Century Fox, Disney will be able to keep its MOAT alive over the years, while also reducing competition in other sub-markets (like live-action). And this translates into the numbers through improved pricing power: it's no coincidence that the increase in prices (ARPU) and advertising revenues have driven the recovery of the DTC segment. So, what would a 5.5% operating margin contribute to DIS's overall EPS? Projecting the $6,118 million from the 10-Q across four quarters gives $24,472 million in annual revenue. At a 5.5% margin, that's about $1,346 million in operating income. Assuming only 26% of that becomes net income (as per total estimates), we get $350 million in incremental net profit. Considering that $4,972 million was reported in 2024, the DTC segment alone would generate a 7% increase in total net income. And this doesn't even factor in potential positive impacts on the other two segments, Experience and ESPN. But we can take it a step further: the FCF/Net Income ratio is about 1.5x. So the EPS increase generated by the DTC segment would translate into an incremental FCF of 7% 1.5 = 10.5%. This is the real reason why it might become attractive again to value investors. Over the past 10 years, FCF growth has been around 5%, but if that's the case, it wouldn't be so far-fetched to imagine it rising to at least 1015%, especially considering that entertainment is Disney's least capex-heavy segment (only 18% of the entertainment segment's FCO went into CAPEX, according to the latest 10-K). We now have the data to build a solid valuation section: If we assume that the DTC segment continues to contribute positively to FCF, and we apply an FCF/Net Income ratio of 1.5x, the EPS growth rate would reach 10% (i.e., 15% FCF growth 1.5). With a 10-year time horizon, that results in EPS10Y = 3.06 (1 + 0.10)? = 7.94 dollars. So, the forward P/E at 10 years would be 14x. Attractive. Using a simple DCF calculator from GuruFocus, I get a margin of safety of 33% with an 8% WACC, based on 10-year adjusted assumptions and an optimistic FCF growth rate of 15% over the next decade. Keeping the WACC fixed at 8%, which I consider reasonable, but lowering the FCF growth rate to a more conservative 10%, the model still yields a margin of safety of 5.78%. Would Buffett and Munger see more clarity in today's Disney? And would the mini Buffett be justified in holding it? In my opinion, Munger would disagree. To prove it, I refer to the Discovery case, appreciated by Munger because it lacked live-action content; a component that in theory represents Disney's MOAT. And that's a problem because it would erode the compounding effect generated by cash flows from the DTC segment, the very engine that supports my thesis. To quantify the risk, I follow an unorthodox but practical method, the Star Wars method: compared to Star Wars: Episode VII, the average budget for the following two films increased by +29%, while ROI dropped from 8x to 4x (from the reading of box office data). Film Budget WW Box Office ROI Episode VII (2015) $245M $2.07B 8.4x Episode VIII (2017) $317M $1.33B 4.2x Episode IX (2019) $275M $1.08B 3.9x This is a pattern not seen in other animated series, like the classic Toy Story, which maintained a ROI close to 5x with more linear budgets. While I recognize this doesn't depend solely on actor costs, on average, live-action films tend to see production costs increase progressively by around 20% (in line with these figures), and this directly impacts ROI. What if this cancels out the incremental EPS growth estimated for the DTC segment? In that case, EPS would grow by only +4.18% over the next 10 years. As a result, the forward P/E at 10 years would be 25x,which would be excessive, even compared to today's forward P/E distribution. In essence, the price would become congested. And that's a risk. I find it fascinating to see how Disney's management has been able to navigate the complications that emerged after 2019. And although the market hasn't fully caught on yet, the financials clearly reflect this recovery, and between the lines, a segment emerges: DTC. This could become the engine for a new level of cash generation and profit. With the right time horizon, Disney's unmistakable MOAT, which I identify in the Disney Characters, will once again play a decisive role, and in my view, DIS stock prices will have to adjust to these new prospects. This article first appeared on GuruFocus.
