logo
Australian and Chinese leaders seek to boost trade despite differences on other issues

Australian and Chinese leaders seek to boost trade despite differences on other issues

BEIJING (AP) — The leaders of Australia and China sought to deepen trade ties despite their differences over regional security and human rights at talks Tuesday in the Chinese capital.
Chinese leader Xi Jinping told Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese that seeking common ground while setting aside differences is in line with 'the fundamental interests of our two countries and our two peoples.'
Albanese concurred with Xi's remark, saying 'That approach has indeed produced very positive benefits for both Australia and for China.'
Australia, like many countries in the Asia-Pacific region, is caught between China and the United States. Its economy is heavily dependent on exports to China, including iron ore for the steel industry. It also shares America's concerns with China's human rights record and its growing military activity in the Pacific, including in waters near Australia.
Albanese has sought to repair Australia's relationship with China since his election in 2022.
Monday Mornings
The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week.
'One in four of our jobs depends upon trade,' he said at a news conference in Shanghai on Monday. He noted Australia's efforts to diversify its trade by expanding ties with Southeast Asian nations such as Indonesia and Singapore.
Albanese is in Beijing at the midpoint of a weeklong trip to China that started in Shanghai, China's commercial capital, where government and business leaders from the two countries discussed deepening cooperation in tourism and reducing carbon emissions in iron ore mining and steel production.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How Canada is responding to the U.S. steel and aluminum tariffs
How Canada is responding to the U.S. steel and aluminum tariffs

Winnipeg Free Press

time23 minutes ago

  • Winnipeg Free Press

How Canada is responding to the U.S. steel and aluminum tariffs

OTTAWA – U.S. President Donald Trump introduced 25 per cent tariffs on all imports of steel and aluminum on March 12, and doubled the levies to 50 per cent in early June. The Canadian government has responded with a number of measures. Initial response The day after the U.S. tariffs came into effect, Canada imposed a retaliatory 25 per cent tariff on American goods. The government said the levies cover $29.8-billion worth of imports in total, including $15.6 billion worth of steel and aluminum. The tariffs also cover a variety of other goods including gold, jewelry, platinum, scrap metal and waste, ceramics, iron products, umbrellas and candles. There are more than 530 products on the list ranging from screws and sewing needles to pipes and railway tracks, stoves and barbecues and, yes, even the kitchen sink. New protections On June 19, the government announced protectionist policies, including new federal procurement rules that limit access to Canadian suppliers and reliable trading partners, and pledged to adopt measures to address overcapacity and unfair trade practices in the steel and aluminum sectors. Prime Minister Mark Carney also said Canada will adjust steel and aluminum counter-tariffs on July 21, depending on how the trade negotiations with Trump were going. Later that month, tariff rate quotas were set on steel mill products imported from countries Canada does not have a free-trade deal with. If imports exceed 2024 levels, a 50 per cent tariff would kick in. The government said the measure was meant to address the risk that steel that had been intended for the U.S. market is redirected to Canada. Additional measures Tariff rate quotas will be expanded to countries that Canada has a free-trade deal with starting on Aug. 1, except for the U.S. and Mexico. Any imports above 2024 levels will be subject to a 50 per cent surtax if a trade deal is in place. Steel from countries with no trade deal with Canada will be subject to the tariff after imports exceed 50 per cent of the 2024 levels. Imports of steel that was melted and poured in China will also be subject to a 25 per cent levy, unless they're imported from the U.S. Canada has had a 25 per cent tariff on Chinese steel and aluminum products since last October. Business-specific relief Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. Businesses can apply for tariff exemptions or refunds in some circumstances, for example, if they are importing goods that are exported or used to produce goods for export within four years. There's also an exceptional relief program in cases where the imported goods cannot be sourced outside the U.S. or where there are 'exceptional circumstances that could have severe adverse impacts on the Canadian economy,' the Finance Department says. A $10-billion loan program for large companies aims to help businesses with a liquidity shortfall. Initially the program was for companies with more than $300 million in Canadian revenue to apply for at least $60 million in loans, but on Wednesday the government revised the criteria to $150 million in revenue and $30 million in minimum loan amount. The government has also announced temporary changes to the employment insurance program to waive the one-week waiting period for applicants and to allow businesses to reduce their hours without laying off workers. This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 16, 2025.

Federal court says Arkansas can enforce ban on critical race theory in classrooms
Federal court says Arkansas can enforce ban on critical race theory in classrooms

Winnipeg Free Press

timean hour ago

  • Winnipeg Free Press

Federal court says Arkansas can enforce ban on critical race theory in classrooms

LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (AP) — A federal appeals court ruled Wednesday that Arkansas can enforce its ban on critical race theory in classrooms, ruling the First Amendment doesn't give students the right to compel the state to offer its instruction in public schools. A three-judge panel of the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals vacated a preliminary injunction issued against the ban, one of several changes adopted under an education overhaul that Republican Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders signed in 2023. The prohibition is being challenged by two teachers and two students at Little Rock Central High School, site of the 1957 desegregation crisis. A federal judge had granted the injunction to the students but not the teachers. 'Just as ordinary citizens cannot require the government to express a certain viewpoint or maintain a prior message, students cannot oblige the government to maintain a particular curriculum or offer certain materials in that curriculum based on the Free Speech Clause,' the judges ruled. Attorneys for the teachers and students said they were disappointed in the ruling. 'It gives us pause and concern about a steady erosion of individual rights and protections in this great country,' attorney Mike Laux said in a statement. 'Nonetheless, major aspects of this lawsuit remain viable, and they will proceed in due course.' Critical race theory is an academic framework dating to the 1970s that centers on the idea that racism is embedded in the nation's institution. The theory is not a fixture of K-12 education, and Arkansas' ban does not define what constitutes critical race theory. Republican Attorney General Tim Griffin praised the court's ruling. 'With its ruling today, the 8th Circuit continues to ensure that the responsibility of setting curriculum is in the hands of democratically elected officials who, by nature, are responsive to voters,' Griffin said in a statement. Arkansas is among several Republican-led states that have placed restrictions on how race is taught in the classroom, including prohibitions on critical race theory. President Donald Trump in February ordered federal money for K-12 schools cannot be used on the 'indoctrination' of children, including 'radical gender ideology and critical race theory.' 'Big win for common sense, education freedom — and parents who just want our schools to teach kids how to think, not what to think,' Sanders, who served as Trump's press secretary during his first term, posted on X after Wednesday's ruling. The judges said they weren't minimizing the students' concerns 'whether in this case or in the abstract — about a government that decides to exercise its discretion over the public school curriculum by prioritizing ideological interests over educational ones.' 'But the Constitution does not give courts the power to block government action based on mere policy disagreements,' the court said.

Federal court says Arkansas can enforce ban on critical race theory in classrooms
Federal court says Arkansas can enforce ban on critical race theory in classrooms

Toronto Star

timean hour ago

  • Toronto Star

Federal court says Arkansas can enforce ban on critical race theory in classrooms

LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (AP) — A federal appeals court ruled Wednesday that Arkansas can enforce its ban on critical race theory in classrooms, ruling the First Amendment doesn't give students the right to compel the state to offer its instruction in public schools. A three-judge panel of the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals vacated a preliminary injunction issued against the ban, one of several changes adopted under an education overhaul that Republican Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders signed in 2023.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store