
A grassland bird eavesdrops on prairie dog calls to keep itself safe from predators
Prairie dogs are the Paul Reveres of the Great Plains: They bark to alert neighbors to the presence of predators, with separate calls for dangers coming by land or by air.
'Prairie dogs are on the menu for just about every predator you can think of'— golden eagles, red-tailed hawks, foxes, badgers, even large snakes — said Andy Boyce, a research ecologist in Montana at the Smithsonian 's National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institute.
Those predators will also snack on grassland nesting birds like the long-billed curlew.
To protect themselves, the curlews eavesdrop on the alarms coming from prairie dog colonies, according to research published Thursday in the journal Animal Behavior.
Previous research has shown birds frequently eavesdrop on other bird species to glean information about potential food sources or approaching danger, said Georgetown University ornithologist Emily Williams, who was not involved in the study. But, so far, scientists have documented only a few instances of birds eavesdropping on mammals.
'That doesn't necessarily mean it's rare in the wild,' she said, 'it just means we haven't studied it yet.'
Prairie dogs live in large colonies with a series of burrows that may stretch for miles underground. When they hear one each other's barks, they either stand alert watching or dive into their burrows to avoid approaching talons and claws.
'Those little barks are very loud — they can carry quite a long way,' said co-author Andrew Dreelin, who also works for the Smithsonian.
The long-billed curlew nests in short-grass prairie and incubates eggs on a ground nest. When one hears the prairie dog alarm, she responds by pressing her head, beak and belly close to the ground.
In this crouched position, the birds 'rely on the incredible camouflage of their feathers to become essentially invisible on the Plains,' Dreelin said.
To test just how alert the birds were to prairie dog chatter, researchers created a fake predator by strapping a taxidermied badger onto a small remote-controlled vehicle. They sent this badger rolling over the prairie of north-central Montana toward curlew nests — sometimes in silence and sometimes while playing recorded prairie dog barks.
When the barks were played, curlews ducked into the grass quickly, hiding when the badger was around 160 feet (49 meters) away. Without the barks, the remote-controlled badger got within about 52 feet (16 meters) of the nests before the curlews appeared to sense danger.
'You have a much higher chance of avoiding predation if you go into that cryptic posture sooner — and the birds do when they hear prairie dogs barking,' said co-author Holly Jones, a conservation biologist at Northern Illinois University.
Prairie dogs are often thought of as 'environmental engineers,' she said, because they construct extensive burrows and nibble down prairie grass, keeping short-grass ecosystems intact.
'But now we are realizing they are also shaping the ecosystems by producing and spreading information,' she said.
___
The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Science and Educational Media Group and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
4 hours ago
- The Independent
Mark Zuckerberg's charity backing away from DEI and political spending after Trump criticisms and staff tensions: report
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, the multi-billion-dollar philanthropy led by Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg and his wife Dr. Priscilla Chan, is reportedly moving away from political spending, following criticism from Republicans and internal tensions with liberal staff members. The initiative, founded in 2015, always invested in a combination of social and scientific causes, but has recently rebranded as 'science-first,' and has ended internal diversity programs, housing initiatives, and diversity-focused funding for scientists. This spring, a school for low-income students that Chan founded also closed. The shift, which has also included an overall slowdown in spending, with $336 million in grants, less than half the group's average, came after a series of bruising encounters with politics, The New York Times reports. Chan and Zuckerberg were reportedly frustrated after getting criticism from Trump and his allies for efforts like donating $400 million to nonpartisan election infrastructure in the 2020 race, an effort MAGA derided as 'Zuckerberg bucks.' Trump, for his part, threatened the Meta boss with 'life in prison' during the 2024 campaign if he intervened in the election. Political fatigue reportedly began even earlier, according to the Times, with Zuckerberg growing frustrated with criticisms from liberal staff members at the philanthropy in the wake of the 2020 racial justice protests. The Independent has contacted the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative for comment. The organization has explained the changes as a combination of new strategy and a shifting political landscape. In a June letter, Chan, a pediatrician, emphasized the group's long-running commitment to curing disease, a cause she became attached to as a doctor in San Francisco. 'It was there that I saw the limits of medicine and science up close, working with children with rare diseases,' she wrote in a June blog post. 'For those families, expanding the limits of what we know — advancing basic science research — is their only hope for a better life for their child. In a February post, the initiative explained its decision to cut its DEI teams as a response to the ' shifting regulatory and legal landscape.' In recent years, the Supreme Court has struck down race-based affirmative action in higher education admissions, and the Trump administration has sought to end DEI in both the public and private sector. At the same time, as the Republican has returned to power, Meta has repositioned itself with moves seen by some as an attempt to remain in the administration's good graces, including ending diversity programs, eliminating fact-checkers, putting Trump ally Dana White on the Meta board, and attending the president's inauguration earlier this year. Shortly after Trump was elected, Zuckerberg was spotted at Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate, where senior White House official Stephen Miller said the tech billionaire had 'been very clear about his desire to be a supporter of and a participant in this change that we're seeing all around America, all around the world, with this reform movement that Donald Trump is leading.'


Daily Mail
7 hours ago
- Daily Mail
The American women who are making Elon Musk's doomsday prediction a reality
Elon Musk has warned for years that 'population collapse' is a bigger threat to civilization than climate change. Now, new research has suggested that American women may be quietly proving him right. The study looked at the fertility intentions of over 41,000 women aged 15 to 44, finding that 50 percent of them were uncertain if they would have children in the future, even though they desired to be a mother. Researchers found that economic pressures, social shifts, and emotional uncertainty are driving a growing disconnect. The data also showed that uncertainty about having children isn't the same for all, and younger women are experiencing the biggest changes. Women aged 15 to 29 became increasingly unsure not only about whether they would have children, but also how strongly they felt about wanting them. In contrast, women aged 30 to 44 showed relatively stable levels of certainty over time. The data was collected from 2002 through 2019, which the team speculated revealed why US birth rates have been on a steady decline since the 2007 Great Recession. The fertility rate has decreased by 21 percent between 2007 and 2024. Musk, the billionaire father of 14 children, has often pointed to declining fertility as a sign that modern societies are forgetting how to survive. He previously said that low birth rates mean few workers, increased debt, strained healthcare and pension systems, and total social unrest. The US fertility rate was stable at about 2.0 children per woman in the 1990s and early 2000s, reaching a peak of 2.12 in 2007, statistics show. But the fertility rate steadily declined in the aftermath of the Great Recession, falling to 1.62 in 2023. Sarah Hayford, co-author of the study and professor of sociology at The Ohio State University, told Ohio State News: 'People's feelings about having children are complicated, and we found there are a lot of nuances. 'It suggests that there is no simple answer to the declining birth rate in the US.' The study used data from the National Survey of Family Growth, a federally funded survey conducted by the National Center for Health Statistics. Over the years studied, the team found that 62 percent of women said they intended to have a child and 35 percent did not intend to, with only a small percentage saying they didn't know. But up to half of the participants who intended to have children said they were only 'somewhat sure' or 'not sure at all' that they would realize their intention to have a child. The team found that women with higher incomes and education levels were more inclined to report 'very sure' that they would have children than those on the opposite side of the spectrum. Levels of certainty among women considering having children, showing the percentage who said they were not at all sure, somewhat sure, or very sure. Data includes confidence intervals and is grouped by parental status (b) and age (c). However, women with a bachelor's degree who gave that answer declined from 65 percent in 2014 to 54 percent in 2018. The data revealed another pattern holding women back from having children -the actual desire to be a mother. Up to 25 percent of childless women wouldn't be bothered if they never had kids. 'This not being bothered was especially high among younger women, and it increased over time among those who were younger,' Hayford said. 'They are open to different pathways and different kinds of lives. If they don't become parents for whatever reason, it doesn't seem that upsetting to many of them.' One commonly suggested reason for the declining birth rate is that young people today feel uncertain about the future, both of the country and the world, which may be causing them to delay or avoid having children. The team conducted a second study, surveying 3,696 people, which found that the more disassified they were with their own lives, the less likely they were to want a child. 'It was a bit of a surprise to us, but it was only their personal situation that mattered in whether they expected to have children,' Hayford said. 'It wasn't so much what was going on in society that predicted their fertility goals.'


Daily Mail
10 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Jannik Sinner's three-month drugs ban from tennis felt all too convenient, too light on the fading principle of strict liability... excuse those of us rooting for Carlos Alcaraz at Wimbledon, writes RIATH AL-SAMARRAI
This is a true story - a dog once ate my homework. Well, he clawed a couple of pages into a state of disrepair, but my geography teacher didn't quite buy that a border collie was solely responsible for late submission. Nor did a different teacher when the same pet peed on my sister's English essay. I miss that dog, a good boy mostly, but I also wonder what those teachers might have brought to the arbitration of doping disputes in elite sport.