Judiciary pay tribute to the late Aodhán Ó Faoláin
Mr Justice Brian Cregan said he wanted to pay tribute to Mr Ó Faoláin, on behalf of the judiciary before the formal business of the court began this morning.
Mr Ó Faoláin reported from the High Court, Court of Appeal and Supreme Court for most national and local media organisations in Ireland.
The judge said that in the days since Mr Ó Faoláin's death, it was as if the legal community suddenly realised what had been lost.
He said this was reflected in the tributes paid to him from judges, lawyers and the Attorney General as well as colleagues in the media.
Mr Justice Cregan said Mr Ó Faoláin's writing was simple, direct and free of jargon. He said his opening sentences always made the reader want to read more.
The judge said it was a core principle of the Constitution that justice should be administered in public and this required court reporters to tell the stories to their readers.
While barristers got lost in legal principles, he said Aodhán always told the stories of the people at the heart of the cases in an interesting, accurate and accessible way, a skill for which he was justly admired.
The judge said the loss of a member of one of the many communities who worked in the Four Courts was always felt, and he said Mr Ó Faoláin would be a great loss to everyone who worked in the building.
He said it was heartbreaking that he had passed away at such a young age, and the eulogy by his wife, Janet, at his funeral service showed just how heartbreaking it was.
Mr Justice Cregan said those working in the Four Courts would miss him and would honour his memory.
Mr Ó Faoláin was cremated after a funeral service at the Victorian Chapel at Mount Jerome Crematorium in Harold's Cross in Dublin yesterday.
The service was attended by many leading figures from the worlds of law and journalism, including Minister for Justice Jim O'Callaghan, Supreme Court judges, Gerard Hogan and Séamus Woulfe, Court of Appeal judge Brian O'Moore, High Court judges Conleth Bradley, Cian Ferriter, Charles Meenan and other members of the judiciary as well as a number of senior barristers, registrars from the High and Supreme courts and current and former tip staff.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
On call with the Dublin Fire Brigade
Nikita Hand speaks to the media at the High Court after Conor McGregor loses his appeal over the verdict in the civil rape case. Video: Stephen Conneely
Sunday World
5 hours ago
- Sunday World
Dubliner jailed for stealing and crashing €80k car after day out with girlfriend
The court heard that Melia had taken a brand new Toyota Land Cruiser from the driveway of a house in Greystones before crashing it a short distance away A Dublin man who stole a car in order to get home from a day out with his girlfriend in Greystones, Co Wicklow before crashing it and trying to hijack another vehicle has been jailed for five and half years. Alan Melia (31) of Cherry Orchard Avenue, Ballyfermot pleaded guilty to the unauthorised taking of a vehicle as well as causing criminal damage to it to the value of €80,000 on February 9, 2024. He also pleaded guilty to a separate charge of attempting to hijack another vehicle on the same date. His girlfriend, Jade Burns (21) of Beatty Park, Celbridge, Co Kildare separately pleaded guilty to charges of trespass and allowing herself to be carried in a stolen vehicle. A sitting of Wicklow Circuit Criminal Court heard that Melia had taken a brand new Toyota Land Cruiser from the driveway of a house at Blacklion, Greystones, Co Wicklow at around 7.30pm before crashing it a short distance away on Killincarrig Road, Greystones. Garda witnesses described how Melia drove forward and crashed the vehicle into a garden wall with Burns in the passenger seat after the owner of the vehicle, his wife and another male had attempted to stop him driving away. They told prosecution counsel, James Kelly BL, that the other male was struck by an open passenger door as Melia then reversed out of the driveway. However, the owner of the Land Cruiser managed to get Burns out of the passenger seat from the vehicle before Melia made his getaway. Stock photo News in 90 Seconds, Friday August 1 The court heard he appeared to have lost control a short distance away and crashed into an ESB pole while driving 'at significant speed.' Gardaí said that Melia then attempted to hijack another vehicle from an eyewitness who had stopped his vehicle to assist the accused thinking he might have been seriously injured. Evidence was given that Melia jumped into the rear seat of a white Mercedes-Benz before trying to climb into the driver's seat. A struggle ensued between the accused and the driver who managed to get out of the car with the keys of the vehicle. Melia was then detained by a number of individuals until gardaí arrived on the scene. The driver of the Mercedes-Benz told gardaí that Melia sounded incoherent and under the influence of something. The accused was brought to St Vincent's University Hospital in Dublin for treatment but was discharged a short time later and brought to Bray Garda station. Melia, who was on bail at the time, made full admissions to gardaí when interviewed the following morning apart from disputing that he was trying to steal the Mercedes-Benz. The court heard he had 112 previous convictions. Melia is already serving a six and a half years prison sentence imposed by the Court of Appeal over an incident in which he rammed Garda vehicles while driving the wrong way down the M1 motorway after robbing a petrol station in Northern Ireland on August 23, 2020. Burns, who had no previous convictions, was also cooperative although she did not identify Melia to gardaí and could not remember the incident. In a victim impact statement, the owner of the Toyota Land Cruiser, said it was an incident he wanted to forget and his child still had nightmares about it. The man said he had also suffered financially as he was out of work for weeks without his vehicle, while his motor insurance costs had also increased. Under cross-examination by counsel for Melia, Colman FitzGerald SC, gardai acknowledged that the defendant wanted to take the jeep to drive home to Ballyfermot and agreed that it was not 'a planned enterprise.' Mr FitzGerald told Judge John Martin that the accused had very significant difficulties in his life from a young age and was 'caught up in a flurry of drug-taking and criminality.' 'There is a chaotic and criminal rhythm to his life,' Mr FitzGerald noted. Counsel for Burns, Comfort Odesola BL, said she was deeply remorseful and embarrassed about her actions. Ms Odesola said the accused had been brought up in foster care but had turned to drug abuse after she was 18. She told the court that Burns was hanging out with her boyfriend on the day before they decided to go to Greystones and there was no intention to commit any burglary. The barrister said what happened had been a catalyst for Burns to make changes and to take life more seriously. She noted that the accused was assessed at being at a moderate risk of reoffending due to being unemployed but stressed that she had 'cleaned up her act' and had been drug-free since the incident. Judge Martin said the evidence about Melia was 'most unimpressive' and noted that he had threatened a prison governor while in jail. Commenting on a report from the prison governor where he was described as 'nothing but trouble', the judge said he had 'never seen one like it.' He also observed that Melia was 'no stranger' to the unauthorised taking of vehicles. 'It was appalling behaviour. There is no other word for it,' said the judge. He claimed Melia had shown a persistence in attempting to take the vehicle and was 'determined to drive it like a dodgem.' The judge imposed sentences of six and a half years imprisonment for the criminal damage to the vehicle, four years for stealing it and four years for the attempted hijack with all terms to run concurrently. Judge Martin said he would suspend the final 12 months of the sentence for a period of two years to encourage rehabilitation and on condition that Melia places himself under the supervision of the Probation Service on his release and attend addiction counselling. He sentenced Burns to 18 months in prison for being carried in a stolen vehicle and six months for the trespass offence but suspended both sentences fully on condition she places herself under the supervision of the Probation Service for a period of two years. Addressing Burns the judge remarked: 'You got in with a bad lot and they have brought you down.' He also observed that she might not be in court if she had been in the stolen vehicle with Melia after he drove away. On her relationship with her co-accused, he advised: 'Maybe you could do better for yourself.'
Irish Daily Mirror
8 hours ago
- Irish Daily Mirror
Debunked: Conor McGregor makes series of misleading claims in court rant
Conor McGregor has made a number of misleading claims - after losing his appeal of a civil finding that he raped Nikita Hand. In a lengthy and rambling post on social media platform X, McGregor sensationally stated that he has no intention of paying the legal fees of James Lawrence - who the High court previously heard he referred to his solicitors and admitted paying his bills. In his post McGregor referred to the November High Court case which he lost and the appeal case which he also lost as a 'shake down,' and insisted he didn't say he was paying Lawrence's fees. 'You are out of your f*cking mind if you think I am paying James Lawrence legal costs, folks. Who said I was paying his fees?'I said I didn't know if I was, when the accusers barrister asked me on the stand, as I didn't. (who is paying his own fees I should have asked him at that time) ???' he posted. However in the High Court case itself McGregor was pressed by trial Judge Alexander Owens if he was paying Lawrence's fees or not. In response to cross examination first from Ms Hand's Counsel McGregor stated that he 'possibly' paid James Lawrence legal fees and referred him to them. 'I'm not 100 per cent. I get staggering legal bills.' The Irish Mirror's Crime Writers Michael O'Toole and Paul Healy are writing a new weekly newsletter called Crime Ireland. Click here to sign up and get it delivered to your inbox every week Judge Owens then stated to McGregor that it was a simple question - did he pay Lawrence's bills or not. McGregor responded by saying: 'I believe I did.' In refusing Lawrence costs at the conclusion of the High Court case in November, Judge Owens said both men were acting in "lockstep" in their defence of the action and it would be inappropriate to award costs to Mr Lawrence even though the jury found he did not rape Ms Hand. The Court of Appeal this week refused to allow Lawrence to be paid his costs as they too found that the money would ultimately end up going to McGregor, who was paying his fees. Nikita Hand speaking to the media after attending the Court of Appeal (Image: Collins Photos) McGregor goes on to claim in his new post that he was 'on the stand in a world of fog being accused of a crime I didn't commit, and that I was actually cleared of criminally and exonerated by every witness present, as well as believed twice over by the public prosecutor, but still up on a stand civilly, in absolute shock.' This statement is also misleading - as McGregor was not in fact 'cleared' or 'exonerated.' Gardai did investigate the alleged rape and sent a file to the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP). However the DPP decided not to take the case and therefore no criminal charges were levelled against the UFC fighter. This by itself does not mean McGregor was 'cleared' or 'exonerated' of the claims - just that he was not charged or convicted of any criminal offence. However the finding by the civil jury in November that he was liable for assault - whereby the assault in question was the rape that occurred in the Beacon Hotel in Sandyford in 2018, means the fighter can hardly claim he was 'exonerated.' The finding of the jury has also now been upheld by the three Judges of the Court of Appeal. McGregor goes on to make claims about why the criminal case did not go ahead - stating that there was plenty of evidence of CCTV footage which he claimed showed Ms Hand 'partying away, messaging away' and leaving and coming back to the hotel 'not a f*cking laughing, dancing, kissing, biting, play fighting. It's some watch. I was home HOURS and this is all going on,' he wrote. All of the footage was played in full and repeatedly re shown to the jury in the civil trial - with them ultimately siding with Ms Hand who stated she was drunk and not in the right state of mind at the time of the footage. Having been shown this footage and heard arguments from both sides they nonetheless sided with her, that she had been raped in the room by McGregor. McGregor goes on to attack Ms Hand in his post by saying: 'How people sleep at night is beyond me. I'm sure they don't. Not soundly anyway, no way. Impossible. To falsely accuse someone of rape and lose, then attempt to ignore that fact/brush it under the rug is truly heinous on another level!' However Ms Hand did not lose her case - she in fact won it, and had it re affirmed this week by three learned Judges of the Court of Appeal. Mr McGregor can continue to claim he did not rape Ms Hand - and it is a fact that he is not convicted of the criminal offence. He has however been found to have raped Ms Hand and is liable for it, by a civil jury. He now claims he 'welcomes' the new case taken by Ms Hand against him and the suddenly withdrawn proposed witnesses, couple Samantha O'Reilly and Stephen Cummins. Ms Hand is suing McGregor, Ms O'Reilly and Stephen Cummins for damages for 'malicious abuse of the process of the court.' It comes after McGregor's own Counsel announced at the opening of the appeal earlier this month that they would not be called as witnesses - after admitting that the evidence was not sustainable. Now in his new post McGregor is trying to claim that the evidence of Ms O'Reilly and Mr Cummins ought to have been heard - despite his own legal team arguing it shouldn't. 'I believed their claim, as portions of it was verified through the response affidavit to it,' he claimed. 'Why these two witnesses were not called, i will never know. It was on the very morning of. They were present and very eager to testify,' he claimed. 'It seemed they were pulled out of fear from my appointed team tbh. For what I don't know. These people said they seen something, let us all hear. If it's legit, great, it sounds very legit to me. If it's not, it's on them.' After the evidence was suddenly withdrawn the Judges of the Court of Appeal made the decision to refer the matter to the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP), after reading submissions from Ms Hand's legal team about the couple. Ms Hand's Counsel flagged concerns that potential perjury had been committed by the couple - and subornation of perjury by Conor McGregor himself for attempting to introduce the now withdrawn 'evidence.' He now claims he is 'happy this is still ongoing' - despite now being liable for a staggering €2M legal bill he has to pay Nikita Hand - and the remainder of the €250,000 award. Sign up to the Irish Mirror's Courts and Crime newsletter here and get breaking crime updates and news from the courts direct to your inbox.
