Federal vs. private student loans: What borrowers should know
Student Loan Servicing Alliance executive director Scott Buchanan explains what to know about repayment plans, budgeting strategies, and how to handle loans in default.
To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Wealth here.
While student loans offer a grace period for repayment, you will usually eventually have to pay them back. Yeah. All week, we're giving you everything that you need to know about paying back this money. And today, we're breaking down the difference between paying off federal and private student loans. For that, we have Scott Buchanan, who's the Student Loan Servicing Alliance Executive Director. Scott, good to have you here with us. So let's start by explaining the difference between federal and private loans.
Yeah. Thanks, Brad, for having me. Um, yeah, the difference is primarily is who is the lender. Um, federal student loans are lent directly by the federal government using money from Treasury. And private education loans are generally made by banks or other financial institutions, um, using sort of a private credit. Um, they're very similar in private education loans to other consumer credit like credit cards or mortgages or things like that where there are there's a test of credit worthiness, um, that that the lender will make. Um, as opposed to the federal student loan program where generally, it's a federal entitlement, and so if you're going to school have filled out the FAFSA, then you're entitled to get those loans.
How should borrowers approach federal loans?
Listen, federal loans are incredibly flexible in terms of your repayment options. You need to know what kind of loan you have. Do you have a unsubsidized loan? Do you have a plus loan or things like that, um, because they can have different benefits. But there's a lot of options, including forbearances, deferments, income-driven repayment plans, um, that can all dramatically adjust your monthly payment amount. Um, so something you need to always look at is the total balance of your loans and thinking about even when you're in school and thinking about potential repayment, remember you're going to have to borrow the course of two or four years. Um, and think about that in your repayment options.
What about private loans? When should borrowers consider applying for them?
Listen, you should always apply for these loans as early as possible. Once you get your federal financial aid award letter from your institution, talk to the financial aid office. Make sure you've maximized any institutional aid, um, that you can possibly get that would reduce the amount you have to borrow. Figure out how much federal loan ability you have, and then determine what your gap is going to be because the federal loans may not cover all your costs, and that's when you might turn to private education loans. And doing so earlier is better because you can shop around on private education loans and find a lender, um, who's got the best offering for you in terms of an APR, um, and the best sort of program options that are available under that loan.
So what should the plan of attack be for repayment?
Yeah. Well, listen, make a budget like all financial things. Um, you need to know in advance, like that's sort of the advantage of of of, you know, sort of going to school and having this period of time generally when we don't have to make repayment. You have plenty of time to put together sort of what your plan of action is going to be when you graduate and leave. Um, so, you know, number one, don't overborrow in the first place, as I always say. Um, but if you have already borrowed, um, then make sure that you sit down, figure out each monthly payment that you're going to have, the differences between your federal and your private loans because they're going to all have different monthly payments, different interest rates, um, and then put together a budget, a plan of action about how you're going to do it. If, remember, when you first graduate, your income is likely to be a lot lower than it will be in the future, that's when you need to talk to your federal loan servicer and say, hey, here's my financial situation on the federal student loans. How can I lower my monthly payment or how can I meet this this budget that I have today? And they're going to have a lot more options, whereas on the private loan side of things, um, it's going to be relatively set about the monthly payment.
If your loan has gone into default, what are the steps that you should start to take to make sure that you get back into good standing?
Yeah. Well, that's very different between federal and private loans as well. But on the federal student loan, um, once you reach 270 days delinquent, your loan can go into default. And that's when you need to call the Default Resolution Group at the Department of Education. Um, they will reach out and let you know that you're in default, and your servicer will as well. Um, but that's who you need to talk to. There are lots of options, including rehabilitating the loan, potentially consolidating the loan, um, because getting out of default, um, is something that you definitely want to do. And that's why loan rehabilitation would probably be your best bet on federal student loans because that removes that default from your credit history. On private education loans, it's different, and that's why you need to be very mindful about keeping on top of those private education loans because once they go into default and charge off, there's not a whole lot you can do other than sort of negotiate a settlement or potentially a repayment plan, um, to try to resolve the total amount of that debt.
And so once you have finally gotten to the point where you've fully paid off your student loans, then at that point, how are you kind of able to take advantage of other tax advantages as well that you should be making sure that you're also reporting?
Sure, absolutely. Uh, there's a there's a federal interest deduction on on student loans that you can take advantage of potentially. Now, that is tied to income. Um, so, you know, the higher income you are, the less likely are you to be able to take that benefit. But you should definitely during all of your repayment make sure that you're uh that you're uh as you're doing it in TurboTax or working with your accountant, make sure that you calculate the amount of interest that you pay. You'll get a statement from your loan servicer, just like you get W-2s and other things, um, from uh from your employer, and they will tell you how much interest may be eligible, and you should definitely take advantage of that.
Scott, thanks so much for taking the time and breaking this all down.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
Trump floats the possibility of tariff rebate checks
President Trump on Friday suggested the government might consider issuing rebate checks to some Americans from the tariff revenue collected this year. Why it matters: Rebates would return to consumers some of the higher prices they've paid as a result of those tariffs — but could also raise the specter of inflation, similar to previous bouts of government stimulus. What they're saying: "We have so much money coming in, we're thinking about a little rebate," Trump told reporters outside the White House. "A little rebate for people of a certain income level might be very nice." By the numbers: The government collected more than $100 billion in tariff revenue in the first half of this year, per Treasury data, and is on track to collect more than $27 billion this month alone.


CNBC
2 hours ago
- CNBC
Trump says he believes Powell is ready to start lowering rates
President Donald Trump on Friday expressed confidence the Federal Reserve will start lowering interest rates, a day after he met with central bank Chair Jerome Powell. The president again indicated the meeting took a positive tone and believes the Fed is ready to provide the monetary policy easing he has been seeking for months. "I think we had a very good meeting on interest rates. And [Powell] said to me ... very strongly, the country is doing well,'" Trump told reporters. "I got that to mean that I think he's going to start recommending lower rates." Powell and his fellow policymakers have been reluctant to lower rates as they wait to see the impact that Trump's tariffs have on inflation. In fact, one argument Powell has made against cutting is that the economy is strong enough that it can withstand higher rates as officials watch how the data evolves. Prior to Trump's remarks, White House budget director Russell Vought kept up the heat on the Fed's renovation project, pushing the case both for a review of the central bank while pressing for lower interest rates. Vought echoed Trump's desire for the Fed to start easing monetary policy as a way to help the economy and specifically the housing market. "There's a whole host of issues with regard to the Fed, and we want to make sure that those questions get answered over time," Vought said during the "Squawk Box" appearance. "This is not a pressure campaign on the Fed chairman." The tone following Thursday's meeting was more conciliatory after months — and even years — of rancor between the Trump White House and the Powell Fed. Both sides characterized the tour as positive, with a Fed official releasing a statement Friday saying the central bank was "honored" to welcome Trump as well as other Republican officials. "We are grateful for the President's encouragement to complete this important project," the Fed spokesman said. "We remain committed to continuing to be careful stewards of these resources as we see the project through to completion." Still, Vought said the White House plans to follow through on what Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has deemed the need for a review of "the entire" Federal Reserve. In addition to the issues over the building project and interest rates, officials also have criticized the Fed for the operational deficit it is running as interest rates have held high. The Fed in the past has remitted what it has earned from its investments back to the Treasury, but has been running a shortfall that totaled nearly $80 billion in 2024 as interest it pays on bank reserves has outstripped what it is realizing on investments. "We're going to continue to articulate our policy concerns with regard to the Fed's management," Vought said. "You don't get to just be at the Fed and not have any criticism directed your way. That is not something that exists in the American political system." During the Thursday meeting, Trump also expressed confidence that Powell and his colleagues will see things the president's way when it comes to rates. "I believe that the chairman is going to do the right thing," Trump told reporters then. "I mean, it may be a little too late, as the expression goes, but I believe he's going to do the right thing." Despite the previous rancor, Trump recently has backed off previous threats to try to fire the Fed chair, and he reiterated Thursday that he doesn't see the need for Powell to resign. Futures markets are assigning virtually no chance for a rate cut when the Fed meets next week, with the next move not considered likely until September. Market pricing also is tilted towards the possibility of another cut before the end of the year.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Investing $1,544 for your baby can help them retire with $1 million, financial pros say. Could it be that simple?
Amassing $1 million by retirement is a feat most Americans will never achieve for themselves, let alone for their kids. But it doesn't need to be this way, financial experts say. In a recent episode of the 'Money Guy Show,' podcast hosts Brian Preston and Bo Hanson, both financial planners, outlined three 'straightforward' ways parents can help their children retire with $1 million. The strategies require relatively modest contributions from the parents, provided they get started early enough, of roughly $1,500 as a lump sum at birth or $9,200 gradually invested by age 18. The younger the child is when they get started, the less the family needs to contribute to eventually reach seven figures. Wall Street braces for deluge of Treasury bills, a crucial test of market demand Why Tesla analysts are mostly upbeat about earnings, but investors aren't happy 'If I was writing the checks at Coke, I wouldn't write the check for this,' one expert says about cane-sugar Coke The strategies outlined by Preston and Hanson assume aggressive growth — and require an extreme level of patience. Parents must start investing for their children as soon as possible, and the children must allow that money to grow, untouched, for five to six decades, leaning on the power of compound growth to gradually get to $1 million. Implementing just one of these strategies could get a child to $1 million — an amount that will, of course, be worth a lot less in 60 years than it is today, due to inflation. But if parents can implement more than one of the strategies, their kids could be on a path to being multimillionaires by retirement age. The current reality for most retirees, meanwhile, is nowhere close to this. While many people say they'll need more than $1 million to retire, the median household financial assets of Americans ages 65 to 74 totaled $120,300 in 2022, according to the Federal Reserve. Lawmakers who met with President Donald Trump last month are interested in getting Americans invested in the markets as early as possible so they can 'experience the miracle of compounded growth and set [themselves] on a course for prosperity from the very beginning,' according to a White House statement. Tax-deferred 'Trump accounts' for babies, a provision of the new One Big Beautiful Bill Act, will be seeded with $1,000 from the federal government for U.S. citizens born between Jan. 1, 2025, and Dec. 31, 2028. Family members and employers can make additional contributions, and the money must be invested in a mutual fund tracking a stock index. The funds can be withdrawn penalty-free when the owner turns 59½. MarketWatch asked financial planners whether putting a child on the path to being a millionaire retiree could really be this simple. While they agreed that extremely early investments on a child's behalf can help them reach this target with far smaller contributions than if they began investing after starting to work full time in their 20s, some said the dollar amounts parents put in would likely need to be higher than those outlined on the 'Money Guy Show,' to account for slower growth rates than those used by Preston and Hanson. They also noted that parents as well as kids must stay committed to this extremely long-term plan. 'This approach depends entirely on staying invested through multiple recessions, wars, bubbles and panics,' Christopher Haigh, a financial planner and co-founder of Iconoclastic Capital in Rochester, N.Y., told MarketWatch. Parents and their children must be psychologically ready to not touch that money for six decades, and their children need to be committed 'to not mess with the plan.' Dan Honsberger, a financial planner and founder of Reel Financial Planning in Virginia, told MarketWatch that the growth assumptions of the 'Money Guy Show' were aggressive, and in reality, it is likely that the 'savings levels need to be higher' to reach $1 million by age 65. He estimates parents' contributions would need to be closer to $10,700 at birth or $37,600 by age 18, amounts that would be far more challenging for the typical family to set aside. 'I think the message here is still good and valid,' Honsberger said. 'If you can set aside and invest a chunk of money early in a child's life, letting it grow over a long time period, it will set them up for success later in life.' Preston and Hanson declined to comment. Assuming investments made during the first 20 years of a child's life grow 10% annually, on average, until age 65, with returns compounded monthly (read more about the assumptions used on the 'Money Guy Show' here), parents need only invest $1,544 when their child is born. Over the next 65 years, that $1,544 investment has the potential to grow to $1 million, Preston and Hanson said on the show. 'Almost 100% is specifically coming from the growth,' Preston said. Parents who get started later will need to invest a larger lump sum, because the money has less time to compound. For example, by age 5, the initial amount needed to grow to $1 million by age 65 would be $2,541; by age 10, the amount needed would be $4,181. Such estimates may be optimistic. Honsberger said he would assume a lower annual growth rate of 7%, which would mean a lump-sum investment of $10,708 at birth would be needed to grow to $1 million by age 65. The assumption that the compounding would happen monthly — meaning the returns are added to the principal every month so that the next month's growth is based on the new, larger balance — is 'reasonable,' he said, because growth and dividends get reinvested and compounded more than once per year. It's possible the investment would grow at a faster rate than 7% annually, he said, 'but I just wouldn't count on it.' Most parents likely cannot invest thousands of dollars all at one time during their children's first years. Only about half of parents even have three months' worth of living expenses saved for an emergency, according to the Federal Reserve. Still, that does not mean they can't incrementally set the foundation for their child to one day have a $1 million nest egg. Instead of investing a large lump sum, parents can gradually invest a total of $9,274 by the time their children turn 18, averaging $15.44 per month over 18 years, according to Hanson. Again, the assumption is that investments made before age 20 will grow at an average annual rate of 10%. 'We're talking about maybe the cost of a coffee, maybe two coffees a month to get you or to get your child to millionaire status by the time they retire,' Hanson said on the show. Assuming a more conservative 7% rate of return through age 65, however, parents would need to invest much more, Honsberger said: $37,612 by age 18, which averages out to $87 per month from the time of the child's birth. These gradual contributions can give a young person a big head start on retirement. The median net worth of people in their 20s is $6,511, according to data from the financial-services company Empower, based on its 'typical dashboard user' this month. 'We love this strategy for its simplicity and teachability,' Gene Thompson, a financial planner at Iconoclastic Capital, told MarketWatch. Modest gifts from relatives can help kids reach this goal, and 'it also reinforces the lesson that small, consistent actions can lead to big results.' The key is not fizzling out before reaching the 18-year goal. Many financial experts recommend automating investments to ensure contributions are made without having to rely on a person remembering to make them. The 'Money Guy Show' goal is to have $9,274 invested for a child by age 18. Parents of teenagers who may be too far behind to save this amount on their own can still catch up if their teen pitches in by working and making contributions to a tax-advantaged Roth IRA, and the parents accelerate those savings by matching their child's contributions. If a teen can start working at age 15, for instance, they would need to invest $111 in earnings each month for three years, along with a matching $111 investment from their parents, in a custodial Roth IRA. (Be mindful that the total contributions to a Roth IRA cannot exceed what the teen earned at their job and are also capped at $7,000 for 2025.) By the time the child is age 18, these investments can grow to about $9,200. 'A dollar-for-dollar parental match is a smart way to create real skin in the game for the child and turn short-term summer jobs into long-term assets,' said Iconoclastic Capital's Thompson. He said a broadly diversified, low-cost exchange-traded fund that doesn't require constant monitoring, like the Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF VTI, could be appropriate for this strategy. Honsberger's more conservative calculations require investing $942 each month — or $471 each from the teen and their parents — in order to hit $37,612 by age 18. That annual total exceeds the yearly IRS limit for IRAs, so some of those contributions would have to be invested in other accounts. Younger generations are more open to discussing money and wealth than previous generations were, and about 45% of parents say they are encouraging their children to set savings goals, according to a 2025 NerdWallet survey. While many parents prioritize saving for college, some are considering their kids' financial needs beyond school, because a college degree does not guarantee financial security. MarketWatch recently spoke to financial planners about yet another strategy for parents to help their children retire with $4 million without needing a college degree. It involves letting them live at home for three years after they graduate from high school so they can invest $25,000 annually while working full time from ages 18 to 21. They would then allow those savings to grow for decades. More on this: A TikTok hack claims to help kids retire with $4 million — if their parents can stomach some major sacrifices Marc Schindler, a financial planner with Pivot Point Advisors in Bellaire, Texas, said that while the strategies presented on the 'Money Guy Show' can technically make a child a millionaire by retirement, the value of $1 million will not be the same decades from now due to inflation. Assuming annual inflation of 2.5%, in 65 years, $1 million would have the same value as roughly $200,000 today. He also cautioned that if a child is planning to attend college, investing money into a regular brokerage account could reduce the amount of financial aid a child is eligible for and therefore increase college costs. To help offset some of the effects of inflation, Schindler suggests putting as much money as possible into tax-advantaged accounts such as a Roth IRA or 529 college savings account. Up to $35,000 in a 529 plan can be gradually rolled over into an IRA over several years without incurring taxes or penalties under certain conditions. 'The tax benefits of a Roth IRA and 529 plan are far more compelling than a regular brokerage account,' Schindler said. It's also possible, as Honsberger pointed out, that parents would need to invest more than Preston and Hanson suggest in order for their contributions to actually grow to $1 million. Still, no matter how much parents can invest or what types of accounts they choose, what they can take away from these scenarios, Haigh said, is that 'compounding interest is really powerful, and early habits always win.' 'I'm already up $45,000 in about an hour' — Reddit traders boast about wins as meme-stock mania returns Dow cuts dividend in half in reaction to 'lower-for-longer' earnings The S&P 500 just did something it's only done four times in 50 years. Here's what happened next. Sign in to access your portfolio