Letters: Why we should appreciate the hidden and often undervalued benefits of art and architecture to our communities
David Hopkins, Remuera.
Power to the people
Too many New Zealanders are paying too much for food, water, electricity and housing, essentials for life of every person.
New Zealand produces these 'essentials' abundantly and cheaply to meet legitimate needs of the people. Why do New Zealanders pay so much?
Your Power To The People article series provides analysis about people unable to pay high-cost power bills, disconnection/reconnection fees plus company responses.
Every home needs basic lighting and power for cooking and heating at minimal cost, which requires cheap electricity. People in huge luxury houses, profitable businesses and high-tech data centres using massive amounts of water and electricity should pay market rates.
The modest majority of New Zealand citizens and ratepayers want an equitable system, good wages and affordable essential services. This requires the Government and multinational corporations to do better act in the interest of our people and the environment.
Laurie Ross, Glen Eden.
Get housing right
It seems that Housing Minister Chris Bishop thinks Auckland's main purpose is to boost the economy and he knows just how to achieve it – by building lots of high-rise apartment blocks next to railway stations without any consideration for the environment.
Forget good design, volcanic views and character areas. He is driven by a mindless economic imperative that will allow developers to throw up the slums of the future.
He portrays himself as a housing warrior but he will find that Aucklanders disagree. We want more housing but not at the detriment of this beautiful city.
Margot McRae, Devonport.
A bilingual world worth striving for
Your editorial (July 30) sums up the continued opposition of some of our leaders to all things Māori. Changing the position of the words on our passport – puting New Zealand above Aotearoa – is a symbolically significant, but petty and ridiculous decision, which sadly may gain support from those who firmly believe English, and all things English, should forever come first.
We have a unique culture in this country, thanks to the courage, persistence and generosity of the indigenous people, and we should treasure it, not fear it. The language, still at risk, is essential to the culture, so its status should always be recognised, and its wider use ecouraged. The English language, on the other hand, faces no such threats. It's always going to be dominant.
A bilingual, bicultural country would be a goal worth striving for. I, for one, would rather live in it rather than in a colourless, defensively monolingual world.
J.A. Mills, Whangārei.
Passport to discovery
New Zealanders travel. A lot. Most who travel as tourists do so to experience other cultures.
How proud most of us are of our bilingual passport cover which acknowledges we are a forward-looking country that respects the indigenous culture of those who were here before.
How embarrassing it is that our Government is changing this as if it's a good thing.
Samantha Cunningham, Henderson.
A unique bicultural society
I enjoyed the irony in your editorial (July 30) on the proposed switch in the order of name on the cover of the Aotearoa New Zealand passport.
Like, is this what is exercising our Government while our country suffers from the major effects of climate change? While house prices are out of reach for many families and homelessness is increasing? While healthcare access and treatment is limited? And the impact of inflation steadily bites the most disadvantaged citizens?
Aotearoa New Zealand has a unique bicultural society which increasingly embraces the original indigenous culture whose language has sound and meaning which English, the second culture, does not.
Nobody knows where 'Zealand' even is, do they?
Christine Keller Smith, Northcote Point.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
36 minutes ago
- Scoop
Schools Are Struggling To Recruit New Board Members As Deadlines Loom
Schools around the country are struggling to recruit new board members, with deadlines looming. Just 2000 parents have applied across 10,000 soon-to-be empty school board positions. New Zealand Rural Schools Leadership Association president Andrew King told Nine to Noon schools were getting desperate. "I don't know that we've ever been in a year where it's been so hard in terms of actively needing to recruit," he said. "Lots of shoulder tapping, asking current board members to stay on for another term... That's becoming more and more prevalent." King speculated as more households were running on dual incomes, both parents felt too busy to accept a board position. "There are huge numbers of working families where mum and dad are both having to work," he said. "From a rural schools perspective, there's a lot of farming community people who think 'well I'm so busy at these times of the year, calving season and so forth, that I can't commit to coming to meetings and working groups so I just won't put my name forward,' too many people trying to make ends meet." Meredith Kennett, president of NZ School Boards Association, noted schools were not alone in struggling to recruit New Zealanders. "It is concerning and probably a mark of the times. We're not the only ones experiencing this, with the news of local body elections struggling to get nominations as well," she said. "It might be reflective of where we're at as a society, but I do think the number will rise and traditionally it does rise in the last few days of nominations." Andrew King also explained that parents may be unwilling to take on the responsibility of being a board member. "Should anything go wrong at a school the board is responsible, obviously your principal is the day-to-day manager and theoretically you can have faith and trust that your principal will be putting everything in place, but a really important role of the board is governance and a big part of governance is knowing about everything that's going on. "And just understanding everything that's going on is a big job in itself." Social media complicated that further, Kennett said. "The general sense of divisiveness at the moment, the worry of a person putting themselves out to stand for something publicly. It means you're risking someone having a go at you," she explained. "Your local Facebook page might have a go at you if something happens within the school, and schools and school boards are pretty careful about what they might say publicly so therefore they might not respond to something which means you can look like you're not engaging." Meanwhile, compensation was slim. "It's about [$55] a meeting, and I don't think that's changed for about 20 years. In rural communities where parents might have to be driving 30 to 50 kilometres to get to the meeting each night it doesn't even cover mileage really," King said. Kennett clarified the $55 allowance was not set in stone. "Boards actually do have the ability to set their own payment rate. So the $55 dollars come from... If you're on a school board up to $55 is non-taxable, so that's an allowance payment for volunteering, basically," she said. "At NZSBA we don't see it as a volunteer role... So boards can set the rates differently."
Scoop
an hour ago
- Scoop
Electoral Commission Rejects Claims Of Māori Roll Tampering
The Chief Electoral Officer is adamant his commission is not changing people's enrolment details without their consent and is pleading with people struggling to access their enrolment details to get in touch. His comments come amidst a flood of claims on social media from Māori who allege their enrolment details have been changed, or erased, without their knowledge. Te Pāti Māori are seeking an explanation and has advised Crown Law it wants to look into the reports as part of a two-pronged legal action against the Electoral Commission. Speaking to RNZ, the commission's top officer, Karl Le Quesne, said they have not and would not change anyone's details without their consent. "I can give you an assurance that we are not moving people from the Māori roll to the General roll or the other way, unless they're requesting that we do that," he said. The commission had been monitoring their online enrolment system "really" closely this week and had so far received 30,554 enrolments and updates - 92 percent of them made online. "We understand some people are having some trouble, so if you are, we really encourage you to call us on 0800 36 76 56 and we'll help you resolve it." Le Quesne said. It was likely those who could not find their details online were on the dormant roll, he said, echoing comments made by the commission's deputy chief executive of operations, Anusha Guler, earlier this week. "When we check today, we've got 114,451 people on the dormant role." According to the Electoral Commission 2023 General Election Report, the dormant roll contains voters who have been removed from the main roll for their electorate because they no longer live at an address and have not updated their enrolment details. At the election, there were 96,406 people on the dormant roll, and of those, 86 percent were on the general dormant roll while 14 percent were on the Māori dormant roll. Le Quesne said being on the dormant roll did not mean people had been taken off their main roll. "We don't switch roles for them when they go on the dormant role. We just need an address from them so we can update their enrollment." He said the system was designed to protect people's information, and getting your details "exact" was really important. The "auto-fill" feature on some people's mobile phones and laptops could be messing with an online entry. "We're really encouraging people to either turn off that auto-fill, or when it auto-fills, you delete it and try and find your address from the drop-down box, because that'll find the address that matches your enrollment record. "I tried myself this morning, and the auto-fill on my phone put in one address, but it wasn't exactly the address that I was enrolled under." People can go online to to enrol, check or update their details, or call 0800 36 76 56.
1News
an hour ago
- 1News
Govt announces foreign visitor charges at popular DOC sites
Foreign visitors will soon need to pay a charge to access some of New Zealand's most famous tourist destinations on conservation land, the Government announced today. It was also announced that concessions would be widened to allow for more business activity on conservation land. The charges announced today would mean foreign tourists visiting Cathedral Cove / Te Whanganui-a-Hei, Tongariro Crossing, Milford Track, and Aoraki Mount Cook would need to pay between $20 and $40 per person. New Zealanders would not be charged for access. Conservation Minister Tama Potaka said foreigners made up 80% of all visitors at the destinations. Conservation Minister Tama Potaka. (Source: 1News) ADVERTISEMENT He estimated the charges could make up to $62 million a year in revenue, which would be directly reinvested into those same areas. 'Tourists make a massive contribution to our economy, and no one wants that to change," Potaka said. Prime Minister Christopher Luxon said sites that were "truly special" to Kiwis needed to be protected, and said the charges would give the Department of Conservation more support. "But I have heard many times from friends visiting from overseas their shock that they can visit some of the most beautiful places in the world for free." Prime Minister Christopher Luxon. File photo. (Source: Getty) Luxon said it would create more economic opportunities out of underutilised Department of Conservation land. The charge would be similar to the cost of admission for international visitors to the Auckland War Memorial Museum, where an adult currently paid $32 and child, aged between five and 15, paid $16. ADVERTISEMENT Alongside the charges, the Government also announced widening concessions, for businesses to operate on conservation land. Aoraki / Mount Cook along the Hooker Valley Track on a sunny day in the South Island. (Source: "We're going to fix the Conservation Act to unlock more economic activity through concessions – like tourism, agriculture, and infrastructure, in locations where that makes sense," Luxon said "That means more certainty for businesses, less bureaucracy, and much faster decisions, so the businesses that should be operating can get up and running." Luxon said there would still be restrictions to protect the natural environment. "Of course it won't make sense for businesses to be operating on every part of the DOC estate," he said. "But where it does make sense, we need to get to the 'yes' much faster – instead of being bogged down in process and uncertainty." Tourist enjoying views of upper Clinton valley on Milford Track. (Source: Luxon said the current concessions scheme was "totally broken", saying it often took years to obtain or renew, "leaving businesses in a cycle of bureaucratic limbo". 'Outdated rules mean we've got examples of modern e-bike users being turned away from potential touring opportunities because they have to be considered as proper vehicles. "And tourism on the Routeburn is being held up because the trail crosses artificial boundaries, with different rules and different limits."
