Plans to split UK market into energy pricing zones dropped
The Energy Secretary had been considering proposals for zonal pricing that would see different areas of the country pay different rates for their electricity, based on local supply and demand.
But the Government has now decided to retain a single national wholesale price.
Energy Secretary Ed Miliband said: 'Building clean power at pace and scale is the only way to get Britain off the rollercoaster of fossil fuel markets and protect families and businesses for good.
'As we embark on this new era of clean electricity, a reformed system of national pricing is the best way to deliver an electricity system that is fairer, more affordable, and more secure, at less risk to vital investment in clean energy than other alternatives.'
Energy business SSE said the move provided 'much-needed policy clarity' for investors and consumers.
Martin Pibworth, chief executive designate of SSE, said: 'This decision brings welcome clarity and enables us to get on with investing in and delivering critical clean energy infrastructure, in doing so transforming our energy system and supporting the UK Government's bold ambitions for clean power by 2030.
'Zonal pricing would have added risk at a time when the UK needed to accelerate its clean power transition, making energy bills more expensive. This decision reaffirms the UK as a world-leading renewables market, enabling the efficient delivery of the homegrown energy the country needs.'
Gareth Stace, director-general at UK Steel, said the industry was pleased the Government had heeded warnings and ruled out the 'risky' proposal.
'Zonal pricing would have penalised existing industrial sites, driving up electricity prices, further damaging our ability to thrive, foster jobs, and undermining much needed investment in steelmaking.
'Electricity prices for the UK steel sector are among the highest in Europe. UK Steel warned that zonal pricing would have created a 'postcode lottery' for industrial power prices, conflicting with the Government's own ambition to reduce power costs for British industry.
'As the industry transitions fully to electric arc furnace technology, price competitiveness will become even more central to the sector's future.
'While today's decision provides clarity on the direction of electricity market reforms, the Government must ensure that the alternative to zonal pricing, reformed national pricing, supports rather than hinders industrial competitiveness.'
Claire Coutinho, shadow secretary of state for energy security and net zero, said: 'Ed Miliband promised to cut energy bills by £300, but instead as I warned, bills are going up and it's increasingly obvious that this promise was a fantasy.
'The truth is that wind developers have Ed over a barrel because he set himself impossible wind targets, that means we'll be paying them billions of pounds extra, roughly £100 on bills by 2030, not to produce energy, but simply to turn off.
'Even Downing Street are waking up to the fact that Ed's net zero zeal is going to impose huge costs on bills and jobs as we lose businesses to more polluting countries with cheaper energy. That's bad for households, our economy and emissions.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
23 minutes ago
- Reuters
German 30-year yield hits 21-month top, continuing steady march higher
LONDON, July 14 (Reuters) - German 30-year government bond yields hit their highest in nearly two years on Monday and 10-year yields their highest since early April as investors looked through the latest tariff news to focus instead on the impact of rising Japanese yields. Longer-dated bond yields have been rising around the world on the back of broad investor fears about the scale of government debt. Germany's 30-year yield rose as high as 3.26% on Monday, its highest since October 2023. A break past the 3.26% hit then would take it to its highest since August 2011. Benchmark Bund yields rose to as much as 2.737%, their highest since March 28, a few days before U.S. President Donald Trump's original "Liberation Day" tariff reveal. "Today there is definitely spillover from Japan," Reinout de Bock, head of European rates strategy at UBS, said. German yields have been rising as investors brace for increased bond issuance after parliament earlier this year approved plans for a massive spending surge, particularly on defence and infrastructure, hoping to revive economic growth. The yield on the 20-year Japanese government bond rose 12 bps on Monday to its highest since 2000, and 30-year yields rose 13 bps. Japanese moves "become a concern in the sense that they have a lot of foreign bonds, and so what (Japanese investors) might not do is to reinvest their redemptions and coupons back into France or into the U.S." Jens Peter Soerensen, chief analyst at Danske Bank, said. "I'm not super worried about it, but ... as long as the Japanese yields rise in the long end, then there will be some kind of impact, because it's the same measures that drive also European yields." Also in the mix was the latest trade news, after Trump said on Saturday he would impose a 30% tariff on most imports from the European Union from August 1. But markets have largely looked through the news, with European shares only down slightly, the euro flat against the dollar, and bonds seeing no real safe haven rush. "The latest tariff threats of 30% on EU goods are above the upper end of the recently discussed ranges, but with negotiations still progressing until the 1 August deadline, any risk-off and subsequent support for Bunds looks set to be limited at best," Commerzbank rates strategist Hauke Siemssen said. "After all, Trump has repeatedly threatened substantial tariffs but extended deadlines in the subsequent days," he said. French 10-year bond yields rose 2 bps to 3.43%, after President Emmanuel Macron on Sunday announced a plan to push forward defence spending, pledging to double the military budget by 2027, three years earlier than originally planned. His government is already struggling to make 40 billion euros in savings in its 2026 budget. Italy's 10-year yield was up 1.5 bps at 3.62%, leaving the closely watched spread between Italian and German yields at 88 bps. , "Everybody's hiding behind Germany," said Soerensen. "That's why you see spreads like Germany versus Italy and so on tightening, because supply is quite high from Germany and increasing quite significantly. And the rest are trying not to increase as much."
The Independent
27 minutes ago
- The Independent
Striking doctors have badly misjudged the mood of the nation
The most crucial statistic relating to the current threat by resident (formerly 'junior') doctors to go on strike is derived not from the inflation indices, or even the pitiful state of the UK public finances, but from the latest readings of public opinion. In a dramatic shift from where it stood during those long-running disputes under the Conservatives, when the medics were cheered on even by disappointed patients, support for their cause has collapsed. A year ago, some 52 per cent of the public felt that strike action was justified. Now that figure has exactly halved, to a mere 26 per cent. Without the backing of public sentiment, or the political pressure it brings to bear, it is much less likely that the doctors will win this time round. Nor, despite widespread sympathy for their complaints, do they deserve to. The doctors, or rather their representatives at the British Medical Association, have badly misjudged the mood of the public. Since the general election, resident doctors have seen their wages rise by much more than most other working people, and – in the case of the award they won shortly after Labour came to power – with few (if any) commitments to improving productivity. The newly installed chancellor, Rachel Reeves, wanted the strikes over and done with quickly because of the damage they were doing to the NHS and the wider economy. So did the public. The government did the right thing in immediately honouring the recommendations of the independent pay review body, though they should have insisted that progress be made on productivity. Instead, they hoped that the BMA would join them in rebuilding and reforming the NHS to make it once again an institution that people could rely on and the country could be proud of. Now, the five-day strike scheduled for the end of July – with no doubt more to follow – puts all of that in jeopardy. All the signs are that the health secretary, Wes Streeting, will resist the pay demands – and he is right to do so. The pay of doctors in the NHS – as with other groups providing a vital public service, such as the police and the civil service – should be insulated from politics and determined by the independent bodies tasked with deciding a fair settlement, taking all the factors into account, including affordability. This has been done, and will be done again. The BMA always submits its own evidence and arguments, and these are fully accounted for. The whole process is designed to avoid the kind of damaging industrial action that is now about to take place. Mr Streeting is being pragmatic and sensitive in agreeing to hold direct talks with BMA representatives, but he is under no obligation to submit to their demands. He has a duty to protect the patient and the taxpayer, too. What is too little noticed is just how arbitrary the central demand of the BMA is. The doctors want their pay to be further boosted such that it regains the real value that prevailed in 2008, as determined by the movement in the retail prices index – so by around 29 per cent. Other indices suggest a lower adjustment, but that's beside the point. Not only does this 'non-negotiable' figure look outlandish to people who are struggling with the cost of living crisis, many of whom have no hope of ever earning as much as a doctor, let alone a consultant; it is also illogical. There is nothing special about 2008, except that – as the resident doctors (fairly) point out – it was when their salaries began to decline in real terms. Well, that broadly applies to many other jobs, albeit some more than others, in reference to various points in the past. But there is no law, of man or of nature, that can guarantee a given level of income for any group in perpetuity – and certainly not in a dynamic economy. It is absurd. For reasons that are sometimes obscure, productivity and real wage growth in the UK – and to some extent across other advanced economies – have generally stagnated since the global financial crisis of 2008. Doctors are not alone in experiencing a painful squeeze, and in fact, many have suffered more – including nurses. The doctors seem very out of touch with their public. They thereby risk losing the very thing they profess to love – the National Health Service itself – by making it look unreformable, unsustainable, and unworkable. If Labour can't rescue the NHS from its own staff, who can? Politically, the voters will conclude that Sir Keir Starmer, Rachel Reeves and Wes Streeting are no more able to fix it than were Rishi Sunak, Jeremy Hunt and Victoria Atkins. They will simply note that the endless strikes are back, as the waiting lists once again begin to grow longer. The electorate may then be more ready to listen to radical siren calls from Nigel Farage for the NHS to be dismantled. If the public finally lose faith in it, and the health service ends up privatised, then the doctors' world will change radically – and not necessarily to suit their own interests.
Daily Mail
34 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
RICHARD LITTLEJOHN: The Labour morons are happy to damage Britain to support their half-baked virtues. Their treatment of Donald Trump tells us exactly why they can't be trusted
For once, I'm with Peter Mandelson. Our Man In Washington says Donald Trump should be welcomed with open arms when he makes his State visit in September because 'he really does love Britain'. You don't have to agree with the President's policies, or admire the cut of his jib, to acknowledge that as leader of our most important military ally and trading partner he is worthy of respect.
