logo
Carollo calls $500K he spent to elect Rosado ‘worst political mistake' of his life

Carollo calls $500K he spent to elect Rosado ‘worst political mistake' of his life

Miami Herald4 days ago
As he left the most recent Miami City Commission meeting this month, a seething Joe Carollo had harsh words for his new colleague, Ralph Rosado: 'You will never be a future mayor.'
In less than a month, the longtime city commissioner went from bankrolling Rosado's campaign and celebrating his subsequent victory, to deeply regretting the sleepless nights and mountains of cash he spent to ensure Rosado would become the city's next District 4 commissioner.
During the breakneck six-week special election, Carollo's political committee, Miami First, spent over a half-million dollars on Rosado's election. But according to Carollo, his help went far beyond mere financial assistance.
In an interview with the Miami Herald, Carollo laid out his winning strategy that he said catapulted Rosado from trailing 25 percentage points behind opponent Jose Regalado to defeating Regalado with 55% of the vote last month. At the end, just 548 votes separated the two.
That strategy entailed staying up until 2 or 3 a.m. creating campaign mailers, spending three days filming Rosado's 30-second campaign ad, and ultimately dragging the Regalado name through the mud to decimate any goodwill associated with one of South Florida's most prominent political families. A flurry of anti-Regalado attack mailers accused the former assistant building director of abusing animals and alleged that the Regalado family has ties to international drug traffickers.
Rosado, who declined to be interviewed for this story, said in a written statement to the Herald that he ran a 'positive, issue-focused campaign.' Rosado said Carollo's 'insights were appreciated' but that 'ultimately, the decisions about our message, outreach and the contrasts we drew were made by our campaign, and we're proud of the way we connected with voters and executed our plan with integrity and focus.'
Rosado's opponent sees it differently.
'It was character assassination,' Regalado told the Herald in a recent interview. 'It wasn't a positive campaign. It was one of the most negative campaigns I've ever seen in my life.'
Carollo says he was heavily involved in Rosado's campaign and that Rosado was '100%' aware of what was taking place behind the scenes — including the anti-Regalado smear campaign.
But now, weeks after Rosado's swearing-in, Carollo regrets those efforts.
'It's the worst political mistake that I've made in my life,' said Carollo, who was first elected to the Miami City Commission in 1979.
His change of heart follows several City Commission votes by Rosado that Carollo took issue with. That includes Rosado's tiebreaker vote in favor of postponing the upcoming November election to 2026 — a measure backed by the mayor — as well as Rosado's vote to shutter the Bayfront Park Management Trust in January of next year. Carollo previously chaired the Trust, but he was ousted from the agency earlier this year, and it was turned over to his rival, Commissioner Miguel Angel Gabela.
Rosado now joins Gabela on Carollo's ever-evolving list of political adversaries — a roster that currently includes Commissioner Damian Pardo and Mayor Francis Suarez, whose political committee spent over $1 million on Rosado's election.
'I didn't expect anything with Ralph Rosado, with the exception of him coming here to be an honest commissioner,' Carollo said. 'I didn't expect him to come here to be a lap dog — another lap dog — for Mayor Suarez.'
Carollo explains his winning strategy
While Suarez outspent Carollo 2-to-1 in support of Rosado's campaign, Carollo maintains that his efforts, paired with help from his wife, Marjorie, are the real reason Rosado was victorious.
'It's not just the money. … It's the strategy,' Carollo said.
He added: 'Bottom line is that if Mr. Rosado had not had an angel like Joe or Marjorie Carollo, he never, never, never would have gotten elected.'
In a sit-down interview with the Herald, Carollo explained a two-prong strategy that he said paved the way for Rosado to defeat Regalado by less than 600 votes.
Step one was to run a negative campaign not just against Regalado, but his whole family.
Carollo said such a strategy was required in this particular situation, where there was less than two months to campaign and where Rosado was facing off against a member of one of South Florida's most powerful political families. Jose Regalado's father, Tomás Regalado, is a former Miami mayor and city commissioner and currently serves as the county's property appraiser; Jose Regalado's sister is Miami-Dade County Commissioner Raquel Regalado.
'I could've ran just a straight campaign of being positive, and you could not have beaten these people in what really amounted to four weeks of advertising,' Carollo said. 'You could've done it in six months, maybe. But not in four weeks. Not [against] the Regalado name.'
Of the $547,000 that Carollo's political committee, Miami First, spent on Rosado's election, the vast majority — over $420,000 — went to radio and television ads, according to campaign finance reports. Another $86,000 was spent on mailers and printing alone.
'You had to expose the negative of the Regalados, and you had to do it in a way that you give people the truth with the proof,' Carollo said. 'And that's how we did it: the truth with the proof.' (Regalado, meanwhile, has called Carollo's claims completely baseless.)
District 4 residents were getting inundated with a sea of negative mailers, television and radio ads. But it couldn't only be negative, Carollo explained, because that would leave voters so disillusioned that they might skip the ballot box altogether.
So the second step of his strategy involved offering voters a positive alternative to Regalado. Carollo went as far as offering Rosado almost a complete copy-paste of a mailer Carollo sent out in his own 2021 run for city commissioner, in which Carollo is holding up his grandson.
In a visually similar mailer, Rosado is seen holding up his nephew. Carollo said he designed the mailer, although it says it was paid for by Rosado's campaign.
Carollo also said that he and wife, Marjorie, spent a total of three full days filming Rosado's 30-second campaign video. That included one day of meeting and interacting with Rosado's family members off-camera, followed by two days of filming.
Carollo told the Herald that he and Marjorie directed the video and were heavily involved in its production.
That's different from what Rosado has stated publicly. He initially told political blogger Elaine de Valle that Carollo was not with him at Douglas Park filming a campaign video. When de Valle told Rosado that she had a video clip showing Carollo and his wife seemingly directing a shot, Rosado told her he would get back to her but never did, de Valle reported.
When the Herald later asked Rosado to clarify the incident, he described something serendipitous, saying Carollo happened to be in the Douglas Park area while Rosado was filming, so he decided to swing by and offer some insights.
But that's not true, Carollo said.
'Everything that was said there was written by my wife and myself. Everything,' he said of Rosado's 30-second ad.
Mayor's involvement
Carollo also described a coordinated effort between himself and Suarez to get Rosado elected. While Carollo would handle the negative campaigning, Suarez would focus on the positive side, Carollo said.
Suarez's political committee, Miami for Everyone, spent $1.1 million on Rosado's election, according to campaign finance reports. That includes $900,000 that went directly to Rosado's PAC.
Suarez declined to be interviewed for this story. In response to written questions, he denied Carollo's claim that there was a coordinated effort of any sort.
'I'm proud to have supported Ralph Rosado for Commissioner,' the mayor said. 'He ran on a clear, public platform and made his positions known throughout his campaign — including to your publication.'
Suarez said Carollo's claims 'come at a very particular time, in light of the recent Commission votes that could impact his and his family's ability to continue making a living out of the city taxpayer's pockets.'
'For the past two and a half years, our office has had a positive working relationship with Commissioner Carollo's office,' Suarez continued. 'However, now Commissioner Carollo is throwing out baseless claims hoping something sticks — but you have to ask: why now, and not a year ago or two years ago? These are the same political tactics we've seen for years, and they're as transparent today as they have ever been.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Are powerful people in both parties involved in an  Epstein cover-up?
Are powerful people in both parties involved in an  Epstein cover-up?

Miami Herald

timean hour ago

  • Miami Herald

Are powerful people in both parties involved in an Epstein cover-up?

Two-party scandal? President Trump and MAGA are pointing the finger at former President Biden, asking why he didn't reveal the entire Jeffrey Epstein file while in office. No doubt it's a distraction tactic, but actually, that's a fair question. We know that former President Bill Clinton and other top Democrats flew aboard the 'Lolita Express,' Epstein's 200-seat aircraft. To where and why, I wonder. Are powerful people in both political parties engaged in a cover-up? Mac Melvin, Key Biscayne Disturb this groove As an ordinary citizen not schooled in economics, my understanding is that the Federal Reserve's mandate is to maintain full employment and price stability. It's a delicate dance of adjusting interest rates down during periods of low employment (to stimulate businesses to produce and hire more) and adjusting rates up to keep prices in line. Fiscal policy, on the other hand, is determined by politicians deciding how much to tax and spend. When the Fed and politicians try to 'dance' together, we can expect fiscal responsibility to prevail. (During the Clinton administration, the national debt was eliminated and we had a surplus, so it can be done.) When politicians spend more than they raise in taxes, it puts pressure on the Fed to lower rates due to the cost of the national debt. A harmonious dance preserves the value of the currency. A reckless dance partner — Congress and the administration, unnecessarily cutting taxes for the rich — increases the national debt and upsets the balance. Because the U.S. dollar is not backed by a tangible asset (gold), it is a fiat currency, which can easily be devalued by requiring the Fed to print too many dollars to cover excessive spending and/or requiring the Fed to reduce interest rates, leading to inflation. We need better dance partners and less ego. Richard Masington, Coral Gables Brightline blameless My thanks to the author of the July 22 letter, 'Narrow margins,' who wrote in defense of Brightline. I, too, felt that the Herald's reporting, which seeks to blame Brightline for the deaths that have occurred on its tracks, was off base. If I am driving at a fairly fast speed and someone suddenly jumps or walks directly into the path of my oncoming car and I hit and kill them, I might feel many emotions, but I certainly would not blame myself. Brightline is doing all it can. In any of these cases, what does the Herald expect Brightline to do? Joanne Miles, Hollywood Rail safety I've been reading the Herald's ongoing coverage of Brightline Florida train deaths. Please keep up the good work. I have been trying for years to get more safety features added to this high-speed train, such as 24 hour/7 days a week live video cameras, like those on I-95 and the Florida Turnpike. With such cameras, the train engineer will have more time to stop. Thomas Ladomirak, Fort Pierce Arts attacked I am the artistic director and founder of Karen Peterson and Dancers, a nonprofit that has been working in Miami-Dade County for more than 35 years. We have a national and international reputation for featuring choreography by dancers with and without disabilities. The Miami Herald and ArtBurst have featured my work since our first performance in 1990 at the New World School of the Arts. I am dismayed that 'Loud and Live,' a private for-profit company with a sparse track record, is now managing Tropical Park. The Miami-Dade contract requires Loud and Live to pay through its revenue streams $250,000 annually to the A3 Foundation, formed in 2023 and run by Francisco Petrirena, who is also chief of staff to Art Noriega, Miami's city manager. Meanwhile, my organization, with its 35 years of consistent outreach work in Miami-Dade's dance and disability communities, is facing significant budget cuts. I moved to Miami four decades ago seeking opportunities to create, perform and give back. I am very concerned about arts inequality, sweetheart deals and budget slashes in Miami today. Karen Peterson Corash, Miami Federal grant I'm amazed at the display of chutzpah by U.S. Reps. Mario Díaz-Balart and Carlos Giménez at the groundbreaking of the new cargo facility to serve Miami's airport and seaport. Part of the $33.5 million cost was a grant from the U.S. Department of Transportation. That grant was provided under then USDOT Secretary Pete Buttigieg. This fact was left out of the Herald's July 23 report. I remind readers that Díaz-Balart, Giménez, Rep. Maria Elvira Salazar, U.S. Sen. Rick Scott and former Sen. Marco Rubio, all voted against the bipartisan Biden Infrastructure Bill 2021-2022, which funded this project. Transparency is a beautiful thing. Dolores Mendoza, Coral Gables Inspect hypocrisy Re: the July 23 story, 'DeSantis announces inspections of local government spending in Broward.' What a hypocrite! DeSantis and his wife's Hope Florida initiative is being investigated by his Republican-led legislature for potential money laundering and fraud. They funneled taxpayer money through Hope Florida to fight ballot initiatives for marijuana and abortion. They also failed to file any financial forms with the state. So much for Florida's DOGE. John Meic, Davie Miami election Re: the July 23 Miami Herald online editorial, 'Miami power grab: It took a judge to remind city leaders they can't cancel democracy.' My thanks to Miami-Dade County Circuit Court Judge Valerie Manna Schultz for honoring the law and protecting the rights of our citizens. Readers may recall that it also took another wise judge to remind three previous city commissioners and a mayor that their desire to rezone Mercy Hospital to build luxury condos was also illegal spot-zoning. Unfortunately, citizens seldom receive justice unless they have the will and means to take issues to our courts. We can only hope that the next batch of elected representatives will be more law-abiding and responsible to citizens. Harry E. Gottlieb, Coconut Grove Upside down The Trump administration is accusing former President Barack Obama of treason for attempting to undermine the legitimacy of Donald Trump's 2016 election victory. Yet, Trump pardoned the Jan. 6, 2021 insurrectionists and the case against him for attempting to disrupt President Biden's 2020 election victory was abandoned. The world is truly upside down. Sometimes, it seems we are living in the world of Alice in Wonderland, where things get 'curiouser and curiouser.' Peter M. Brooke, Doral Miami zoning In 2021-2022, the Miami21 Task Force (with members selected by the Miami City Commission) discussed more than 100 suggestions for potential improvements to the city's zoning code. These were organized into a report by my firm, DPZ CoDesign. Not one of the recommendations resembled the proposal for the Transit Station Neighborhood Development. Miami21 already encourages transit-oriented development (TOD) with several incentives. If there is to be further encouragement of TOD, it can be done within the current framework, which maintains protection of neighborhoods while promoting transit-oriented and pedestrian-friendly development of underdeveloped commercial corridors. Elizabeth Plater-Zyberk, partner, DPZ CoDesign, Miami Wrestler's death I am saddened to learn of the passing of Hulk Hogan. His name was synonymous with professional wrestling, transcending the industry to become an American pop culture fixture. My condolences to his fans, friends and family. Paul Bacon, Hallandale Beach Nation at risk I attended a Common Cause online seminar recently, along with 2,000 people from across the nation. The frustration and angst over ordinary citizens' lack of power to influence the course of any governmental action in any sphere at any level dominated the discussion. And this is after only six months of a four-year presidential term. The audacious autocracy of this government is beyond what any novelist could conceptualize. One can only conclude that the apocalypse has arrived and America is dystopia. Barry J. White, Kendall

Harvard ‘wants to settle' after Columbia's $200M fine over civil-rights probe, Trump says
Harvard ‘wants to settle' after Columbia's $200M fine over civil-rights probe, Trump says

New York Post

time2 hours ago

  • New York Post

Harvard ‘wants to settle' after Columbia's $200M fine over civil-rights probe, Trump says

WASHINGTON — Harvard University 'wants to settle' after seeing Columbia get all of its grant funding back in exchange for a $200 million fine to resolve civil-rights violations, President Trump said Friday. 'Harvard wants to settle, but I think Columbia handled it better,' Trump told reporters on the White House's South Lawn before departing for a trip to Turnberry, Scotland. 'They have a very good, Obama-appointed judge,' he said of the jurist overseeing Harvard's case. 'And so they'll get a little kick out of that. But ultimately, we win that case. And the bottom line is we're not going to give any more money to Harvard.' Trump stripped the Cambridge, Mass., school of $2.6 billion in federal funding earlier this year because he said it discriminated against Jewish faculty and students by not protecting them enough from hate, and also because the Ivy League promoted DEI. 6 President Trump claims Friday that Harvard University 'wants to settle' its court case involving his administration stripping funding over discrimination issues. Anna Wilding/ Harvard has shown no signs of relenting in its lawsuit against the administration, but the president and Education Secretary Linda McMahon have both expressed confidence in a future settlement. 'We're hoping that Harvard will come to the table,' McMahon told NewsNation's 'Morning in America' on Thursday. 'We're already seeing other universities that are taking these measures before investigation or before our coming in to talk to them.' Former Harvard President Larry Summers had posted on X that the terms of Columbia's recent agreement, which allowed for the return of $400 million in grants and other federal funding, were 'an excellent template' for his alma mater. In particular, Summers noted the deal's commitments to academic freedom and reforms to address the explosion of antisemitism on campus after Hamas' Oct. 7, 2023, massacre in Israel — not to mention the return of grants that have stalled scientific and medical research. As part of its agreement, Columbia University will also appoint an independent monitor, place disciplinary issues under the purview of the provost's office, submit 'semi-annual' reports on its compliance with Title VI, VII and IX anti-discrimination rules to the feds and ensure it is implementing merit-based hiring and admissions requirements. 6 An anti-Israel mob illegally occupies Butler Library at Columbia University in spring 2024. Obtained by NY Post It will also pay out more than $20 million to Jewish employees who were discriminated against. Not all Jewish alumni were convinced that the terms were enough, pointing to several provisions floated during negotiations in April — such as placing departments under an academic receivership or abolishing the University Judicial Board for not punishing anti-Israel demonstrators — that weren't agreed to. 6 'We're hoping that Harvard will come to the table,' Education Secretary Linda McMahon told NewsNation's 'Morning in America' on Thursday. AFP via Getty Images 'Whatever money it is, Columbia is treating it as a drop in the bucket,' said Shai Davidai, who announced he was leaving the school earlier this month after a year-plus investigation into him cleared the business school professor of wrongdoing. 'We have to remember the billions in endowments,' he said of the Ivy League school's outside haul. Still, 'I hope they're feeling a little bit of pain — and rethink their actions in the future,' Davidai said, As for the more than $20 million promised to Jewish workers who were discriminated against, the professor said he doesn't know whether he'll see 'a penny' of it. 'I'm cautiously optimistic — because nobody knows. We don't have any assurances,' he said. Sam Nahins, a Columbia grad student trapped inside the school's main Butler Library during the student siege on campus last year, added that the deal's promised safety enforcement may prove difficult based on the vague language of the pact. 'It's a great step in the right direction, but the biggest concern is faculty members not facing accountability for their incitement and involvement,' Nahins said. 6 'The settlement was carefully crafted to protect the values that define us and allow our essential research partnership with the federal government to get back on track,' said Columbia acting President Claire Shipman in a statement. REUTERS 'I think with the [faculty] senate losing disciplinary power, the school adopting the [International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance] definition of antisemitism and students leaving Columbia in masses due to expulsions, suspensions, and graduation, we might see and feel a difference on campus,' Nahins said. But the rot at the fabled Ivy runs deep, the grad student said. 'That can all be for nothing if professors keep indoctrinating students.' Columbia acting President Claire Shipman in a statement, 'The settlement was carefully crafted to protect the values that define us and allow our essential research partnership with the federal government to get back on track. 'Importantly, it safeguards our independence, a critical condition for academic excellence and scholarly exploration, work that is vital to the public interest.' 6 Harvard, in its case against the Trump administration, has argued that the revoking of grants violates the university's First Amendment rights. Getty Images An email from the Columbia provost's office Wednesday night noted the significance of having none of its academic departments 'placed under outside supervision or receivership,' according to a copy obtained by The Post. 'This landmark agreement, including a record-breaking $21 million EEOC settlement—the largest ever for victims of religious or racial discrimination—is a direct result of President Trump's unwavering commitment to combating antisemitism and ensuring justice for Jewish students and faculty,' said White House principal Deputy Press Secretary Harrison Fields in a statement. 'This historic settlement with Columbia is a monumental victory for the Jewish community and the entire country, and everyone should applaud a return to common sense and upholding the civil rights of all Americans.' 6 Former Harvard President Larry Summers said the terms of Columbia's agreement, which allowed for the return of $400 million in grants and other federal funding, were 'an excellent template' for his alma mater after losing $2.6 billion in funding. AFP via Getty Images Harvard, in its case against the Trump administration, has argued that the revoking of its federal grants violates the university's First Amendment rights, a line of argument that Boston US District Judge Allison Burroughs seemed inclined to agree with during a Monday hearing. Burroughs questioned whether the government had the ability to make 'ad hoc' decisions about yanking research dollars without being able to prove Harvard officials have actually done enough to curtail Jew-hatred on campus. Reps for Harvard University did not immediately respond to a Post request for comment.

Industry praises slate of crypto bills, economists unsure of promise
Industry praises slate of crypto bills, economists unsure of promise

UPI

time5 hours ago

  • UPI

Industry praises slate of crypto bills, economists unsure of promise

July 25 (UPI) -- Congress and President Donald Trump have taken steps toward regulating digital currency with the passage of a package of bills on Capitol Hill. Trump signed the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins Act and, or GENIUS Act, into law last week, establishing a framework for regulating stablecoin, a form of cryptocurrency that is backed by a stable asset. Industry stakeholders are applauding the law, saying it will enable the United States to be a leader in digital finance. Economists are not unanimously convinced that it will be the consumer-focused game-changer it is made out to be. "The passage of the GENIUS Act represents an important step toward establishing a clear regulatory foundation for the digital asset industry in the United States," Paolo Ardoino, CEO of pioneering cryptocurrency company Tether, said in a statement to UPI. "The U.S. now has the opportunity to reassert its leadership in digital finance by supporting open networks and programmable money. Stablecoins have become essential infrastructure in global markets, powering dollar access, enhancing cross-border settlements, and strengthening financial resilience." The GENIUS Act is just one piece of legislation that underlines lawmakers' interest in establishing guidelines for the realm of digital finance. The House passed two more bills last week relating to cryptocurrency: the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act and the Anti-CBDC Act. Both must pass the Senate to become law. Aaron Klein, senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, told UPI that, when considering these actions together, a signal is being sent to consumers that cryptocurrency is here to stay. "It's something the government is passively and explicitly supporting," Klein said. "The enthusiasm by Congress and by the president personally issuing his own crypto for his own financial gain is a giant signal for the American public. Many of them will see this as a green light and won't look at the fine print." GENIUS Act The GENIUS Act will enable the government to regulate the licensure and permissions for stablecoin companies to offer and sell stablecoin in the United States. It also enables the federal government to enforce regulations with the use of fines and imprisonment for violations. Companies seeking to issue stablecoin are required to have the capital to back them up. They must also meet reporting and auditing requirements. In terms of U.S. interests, U.S.-regulated stablecoin could extend access to the U.S. dollar across the world due to its requirement that it is backed by the dollar or Treasury bills. "What's going to happen is this creates a new market but also a passive demand for U.S. government debt," Joshua Robert Hendrickson, professor of economics at Ole Miss, told UPI. "By doing so it potentially weakens the mechanism by which rising debt tends to lead to higher borrowing costs." The law sets the stage for broader adoption of stablecoin, Christian Catalini, founder of the MIT Cryptoeconomics Lab, told UPI. "No bill is perfect, but this is a great starting point for mainstream adoption to begin," Catalini said. "I'm sure there will be further adjustments along the way as we learn more about the strengths and weaknesses of the current law." Licensing will not be limited to traditional financial institutions. Fintech companies can also seek permission to issue stablecoins. "I expect lots of entry by U.S. banks, fintechs and digital wallets," Catalini said. "Some foreign fintechs and neobanks will use this as an opportunity to expand their U.S. presence and services." Klein said he is waiting to see how foreign companies will be treated by federal regulators. He believes the GENIUS Act does not establish strong enough guardrails to ensure that foreign companies, such as Tether, are held to the same auditing standards as U.S. companies. "One of the big loopholes in the GENIUS Act is the ability to certify to an American standard that the stablecoin issuers' audited financial statements are accurate and of high-quality," Klein said. "The first test of the GENIUS Act will come in how the foreign-issued stablecoins like Tether are treated in their auditing. Because Tether does not use U.S. auditing standards for their account." Klein is also unconvinced that stablecoin adoption will greatly improve America's payment systems. Real-time bank transactions have been a reality in Brazil, Mexico, England and Japan for years and in some cases decades. The United States passed the Expedited Funds Availability Act in 1987. One of its purposes was to require financial institutions to speed up making deposited funds available. This set maximum hold periods and generally requires cash and electronic deposits to be made available within the next business day. "You don't need stablecoins to have real-time payments," Klein said. "You need a Federal Reserve that cares about working people which we haven't seen for decades. Instead the Federal Reserve has prioritized bank profits from overdraft fees over helping people have access to their own money." Having the bill signed into law does not guarantee its effectiveness, Klein adds. It is up to federal regulators to create and adopt policies that they will then execute. There have been instances when the execution fell short, leaving consumers exposed. In 1994, the Home Ownership and Equity Protection Act was passed to establish consumer protections against predatory home lending practices. It called on federal regulators to regulate prime subprime mortgages. More than a decade later, the rise in subprime mortgage lending culminated in the Great Recession. "In 1994, Congress passed a law requiring the Federal Reserve to regulate subprime mortgages and they didn't do it," Klein said. "Alan Greenspan said we don't need to regulate this market. Look how that worked out." Bills advancing in Congress The Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act prohibits the Federal Reserve from issuing a central bank digital currency. The Federal Reserve explored the potential risks and benefits associated with establishing a central bank digital currency under an executive order signed by former President Joe Biden in 2022. Rep. Tom Emmer, R-Minn., sponsored the bill in the House. On the House floor prior to the vote, he said the impetus for the bill is a concern that a Federal Reserve-issued digital dollar would be used to track consumers. "Unlike decentralized digital assets, a CBDC is a digital form of sovereign currency that is designed, issued, and monitored by the federal government," Emmer said. "It is government-controlled programmable money that, if designed without the privacy protections of cash, this could give the federal government the ability to surveil and restrict Americans' transactions and monitor every aspect of our daily lives. In other words, every dollar you spend, where you spend it, who you spend it with would all be visible to and tracked by the watchful eyes of Washington." According to Hendrickson, a centralized digital currency offers a solution where there is no problem. "One of the things that people say would be a benefit of a central bank currency, they point to the number of people who don't have bank accounts," Hendrickson said. " They say it would give greater access to FDIC services. If people don't have bank accounts, when you ask them why their number one reason is they don't trust banks. So it's unclear why they would trust a central bank." "I don't think people want to give up that degree of privacy," he continued. When the U.S. Treasury Department encouraged the Biden administration to continue studying the potential of a government-issued digital dollar, it highlighted the importance of innovation done carefully. "It's kind of been sold as this technological innovation but there's no technology necessary," Hendrickson said. "Just giving more people access to their ledger is not a form of technology." Like the GENIUS Act, the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act is meant to put a regulatory framework in place for cryptocurrency. It does so by codifying oversight responsibilities and defining what is considered a digital commodity. Oversight responsibilities would belong to the Securities Exchange Commission and Commodity Futures Trading Commission. The SEC's role would be in regulating cryptocurrency offered as investment options, such as cryptocurrency that is offered as part of an investment contract. The high-profile collapse of Silicon Valley Bank in 2023 and the FTX fraud scandal that began to unfurl in 2022 pushed the need for regulation to the forefront, Hendrickson said. "At the time what was really happening was all regulation of cryptocurrency was happening through SEC enforcement," he said. "You would find out that you broke a rule when the SEC brought charges against you. That's not an effective way to regulate an industry. The collapse of FTX was a catalyst for both politicians and people in the industry to say, look, now is the time to get a regulatory framework in place for these kinds of things."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store