Pro-Palestinian group loses bid to block U.K. govt's ban under anti-terrorism laws
At a hearing at the High Court in London, the group had sought to temporarily block what it considered to be an 'authoritarian' ban, which will go into effect at midnight. The ban will make membership of the group and support of its actions a criminal offense punishable by up to 14 years in prison.
Also Read | Pro-Palestinian protesters interrupt Microsoft's 50th anniversary party over Israel contract
But Justice Martin Chamberlain, who spent all day listening to lawyers representing the group and the government, declined to give the organization interim relief from the ban, which was first proposed by Home Secretary Yvette Cooper and approved by lawmakers earlier this week.
While conceding that the order to proscribe Palestine Action a terrorist organization may have 'wider consequences for the way the public understands the concept of 'terrorism',' he said it is not "the court's function to comment on the wisdom of the use of the power in the case.'
Huda Ammori, the co-founder of Palestine Action, was hoping the court would temporarily block the government from banning the group as a terrorist organization under the Terrorism Act of 2000 before a potential legal challenge. Some 81 organizations are already proscribed under the 2000 Act, including Hamas and al-Qaida.
Ammori's lawyer Raza Husain had asked the court to suspend the 'ill-considered' and 'authoritarian abuse of statutory power' until a hearing, which is due around July 21.
'This is the first time in our history that a direct action civil disobedience group, which does not advocate for violence, has been sought to be proscribed as terrorists," he said.
He added that his client had been 'inspired' by a long history of direct action in the UK, 'from the suffragettes, to anti-apartheid activists, to Iraq War activists.'
The ban was triggered after pro-Palestinian activists broke into a Royal Air Force base in Brize Norton, damaging two planes using red paint and crowbars in protest at the British government's ongoing military support for Israel in its war in Gaza.
Police said that the incident caused around 7 million pounds ($9.4 million) worth of damage, with four people charged in connection with the incident.
The four, aged between 22 and 35, were charged Thursday with conspiracy to commit criminal damage and conspiracy to enter a prohibited place for purposes prejudicial to the interests of the U.K. No pleas were entered at Westminster Magistrates' Court in central London and the four are scheduled to appear on July 18 at the Central Criminal Court.
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper announced plans to proscribe Palestine Action as a terrorist organization a few days after the break-in. She said the vandalism to the two planes was 'disgraceful,' adding that the group had a 'long history of unacceptable criminal damage."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
25 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Explained: Law on phone-tapping, and two HC rulings
Can the government tap the phones of suspects to gather evidence before a crime is committed? Last week, in two separate cases, the Madras and the Delhi High Courts gave varying answers to this question. What is the law on phone tapping in India, and how have High Courts interpreted it? The law on tapping The government's powers to intercept communication is laid down in — and circumscribed by — three pieces of legislation. The 140-year-old Telegraph Act was originally meant for intercepting telegrams, but over the years it has been expanded to include telephonic conversations. Section 5(2) of the Act states that both state and central governments can, 'on the occurrence of any public emergency, or in the interest of the public safety', authorise interception. Given that the right to free speech and the right to privacy are fundamental rights, any encroachment on these rights through surveillance is only permissible on narrow constitutional grounds. These grounds — the interest of the sovereignty, and integrity of India; the security of the state; friendly relations with foreign states; public order; or preventing incitement to the commission of an offence — are enumerated as 'reasonable restrictions' under Article 19(2) of the Constitution. Section 5(2) of the Act also mentions these grounds for authorising interception. For actions to be deemed a threat to 'public emergency, or in the interest of the public safety' and allow for interception, they have to necessarily fall into one of the reasonable restrictions. The High Court rulings Both the Madras and Delhi High Court cases involved 'preventing incitement to the commission of an offence', which is one of the valid grounds in law for authorising phone tapping. Both courts separately examined the nature of economic offences to determine if they could be deemed as 'public emergency' or 'public safety.' While the Delhi High Court upheld the interception order, the Madras High Court quashed it. DELHI HC: On June 26, the Delhi High Court rejected the plea of an accused who challenged a trial court's order accepting evidence gathered by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) through phone-tapping. The case related to the accused allegedly seeking to secure a sub-contract for the redevelopment of the ITPO complex into an Integrated Exhibition-Cum-Convention Centre through corrupt means. In 2017, the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) had authorised interception of his phone on the suspicion that he was attempting to bribe a public official. Justice Amit Mahajan stated in his order that given the contract was for Rs 2,149.93 crore, 'the economic scale of the offence, in the opinion of this Court, satisfies the threshold of public safety'. 'The threat posed by corruption cannot be understated. Corruption has a pervasive impact on a nation's economy and the same can impact anything from infrastructural development to resource allocation. Corruption by a public servant has far-reaching consequences as it serves to not only erode public trust and cast aspersions on the integrity of public institutions, but also renders the public at large susceptible and vulnerable by threatening the economic safety of the country,' the High Court said. Madras HC: The Madras High Court on July 2 quashed an interception order issued by the MHA in 2011 for intercepting the phone of an accused in a bribery case. The accused was allegedly attempting to pay a bribe of Rs 50 lakh to a senior Income Tax officer to help the accused hide undisclosed taxable income. Justice Anand Venkatesh in his order stated that a 'public emergency' must be construed narrowly. In the petitioner's case, the MHA's objective to deal with tax evasion would not qualify as a 'public emergency' under Section 5(2) of the Act, the court said. The court also flagged in its order a press note that was released by the Press Information Bureau in April 2011, four months before the MHA order, saying that the law does not allow the monitoring of conversations through phone-tapping 'to merely detect tax evasion'. Additionally, the court said that the phone-tap was unlawful since it did not comply with the procedural standards set by the Supreme Court in a 1997 ruling. Once a phone-tap order is declared unlawful, any information gathered through the tap cannot be treated as evidence in a court of law. Procedural norms In its landmark 1997 ruling in People's Union Of Civil Liberties vs Union Of India, the Supreme Court examined the constitutional validity of Section 5(2) of the Telegraph Act. While it upheld the law, the court laid down procedural safeguards for its application. The SC said that an order for phone tapping can be issued only by the home secretary of the state and central governments, and that this power cannot be delegated to officers below the rank of joint secretary. The authorising authority must also consider whether the information could 'reasonably be acquired by other means'. Within two months of ordering a phone tap, a committee comprising the cabinet secretary, the law secretary and the telecom secretary shall review the order. At the state level, the committee shall comprise the chief secretary, law secretary and another member other than the home secretary. The scrutiny by the board has also been included under Rule 419-A (17) of the Telegraph Rules.
New Indian Express
29 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Sinking of MSC Elsa 3: Kerala seeks Rs 9,531 crore compensation
KOCHI: The state government on Monday moved the High Court seeking a compensation of Rs 9,531 crore for the losses suffered in connection with the sinking of container vessel MSC Elsa 3 off Kerala coast on May 25. The government filed an admiralty suit against MSC Akiteta II, a Liberian-flagged sister vessel of Elsa 3, to secure the compensation amount for the damage caused to the economy, environment and the livelihood of fishermen following the sinking of the vessel owned by Mediterranean Shipping Company. Considering the plea, the court ordered the arrest of Akiteta II, currently docked at Vizhinjam port, until the shipping firm deposits Rs 9,531 crore in the court. The HC will consider the case on July 10. The state argued that Elsa 3 was carrying over 643 containers, which included hazardous cargo and plastic pellets known as 'nurdles'. 'Incident affected coastal economy' The subsequent oil slick and floating cargo are serious threats not only to coastal fisheries but also to public health. As of June 30, a total of 61 containers washed ashore, and about 60 tonnes of plastic nurdles alone were collected as part of the clean-up operations by over 600 government personnel and 300 volunteers, the government stated. The fish market has suffered a severe crash due to the fear of contamination, while six carcasses, including dolphins and a whale that are suspected to have died due to exposure to microplastic and toxic substances from the vessel, were found washed ashore. This has in turn affected the coastal economy and public confidence, says the admiralty suit, while claiming Rs 8626.12 crore as the damage due to pollution, Rs 378.48 crore to restore the environment, and Rs 526.51 crore for economic loss to fishers.
The Hindu
29 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Trump hosts Netanyahu in push for Gaza deal
U.S. President Donald Trump hosted Benjamin Netanyahu for dinner at the White House on Monday as he pressed the Israeli prime minister to end the devastating Gaza war. Mr. Netanyahu's third visit since Mr. Trump's return to power comes at a crucial time, with the U.S. President hoping to capitalize on the momentum from a recent truce between Israel and Iran. "I don't think there is a hold up. I think things are going along very well," Mr. Trump told reporters at the start of the dinner when asked what was preventing a peace deal. Sitting on the opposite side of a long table from the Israeli leader, Mr. Trump also voiced confidence that Hamas was willing to end the conflict in Gaza, which is entering its 22nd month. "They want to meet and they want to have that ceasefire," Mr. Trump told reporters at the White House when asked if clashes involving Israeli soldiers would derail talks. The meeting in Washington came as Israel and Hamas held a second day of indirect talks in Qatar on an elusive ceasefire. Mr. Netanyahu meanwhile said he had nominated Mr. Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize — the U.S. President's long-held goal —presenting him with a letter he sent to the prize committee. "He's forging peace as we speak, in one country, in one region after the other," Mr. Netanyahu said. 'We don't care' But Mr. Netanyahu was more cagey on peace with the Palestinians and ruled out a full Palestinian state, saying that Israel will 'always' keep security control over the Gaza Strip. "Now, people will say it's not a complete state, it's not a state. We don't care," Mr. Netanyahu said. Several dozen protesters gathered near the White House as Trump and Netanyahu met, chanting slogans accusing the Israeli prime minister of "genocide." Mr. Trump has strongly backed key U.S. ally and fellow conservative Mr. Netanyahu, lending US support in Israel's recent war by bombing Iran's key nuclear facilities. But at the same time he has increasingly pushed for an end to what he called the "hell" in Gaza. Mr. Trump said on Sunday he believes there is a "good chance" of an agreement this coming week. "The utmost priority for the president right now in the Middle East is to end the war in Gaza and to return all of the hostages," White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said. Ms. Leavitt said Mr. Trump wanted Hamas to agree to a US-brokered proposal "right now" after Israel backed the plan for a ceasefire and the release of hostages held in Gaza in exchange for Palestinian prisoners. The latest round of negotiations on the war in Gaza began on Sunday in Doha, with representatives seated in different rooms in the same building. Monday's talks ended with "no breakthrough," a Palestinian official familiar with the negotiations told AFP. The Hamas and Israeli delegations were due to resume talks later. Envoy trip Mr. Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff was due to join the talks in Doha later this week in an effort to get a ceasefire over the line. The US proposal included a 60-day truce, during which Hamas would release 10 living hostages and several bodies in exchange for Palestinians detained by Israel, two Palestinian sources close to the discussions had earlier told AFP. The group was also demanding certain conditions for Israel's withdrawal, guarantees against a resumption of fighting during negotiations, and the return of the UN-led aid distribution system, they said. In Gaza, the civil defense agency said Israeli forces killed at least 12 people on Monday, including six in a clinic housing people displaced by the war. Of the 251 hostages taken by Palestinian militants during the October 2023 Hamas attack that triggered the war, 49 are still being held in Gaza, including 27 the Israeli military says are dead. The war has created dire humanitarian conditions for the more than two million people in the Gaza Strip. Hamas's October 2023 attack resulted in the deaths of 1,219 people, mostly civilians, according to an AFP tally based on Israeli official figures. Israel's retaliatory campaign has killed at least 57,523 people in Gaza, also mostly civilians, according to the Hamas-run territory's health ministry. The UN considers the figures reliable.
