
Maintain status quo on removal of existing flagpoles: HC full bench
2
3
Madurai: A full bench of the
Madras high court
on Tuesday directed the state to maintain status quo prevailing as of date until further orders concerning the removal of existing flagpoles of political parties and organisations across the state.
The full bench was hearing an appeal preferred by state secretary of the CPM, P Shanmugam, challenging the order passed by a single bench that dismissed his plea seeking to prevent officials from removing the party's flagpoles across the state. The appeal was referred to a larger bench by a division bench after considering that the earlier order of another single bench directing the removal of all flagpoles of political parties and organisations across the state was confirmed by a coordinate division bench.
Senior counsel N G R Prasad, appearing for the appellant, contended that issues of constitutional importance arise in this case since the rights of political parties, communal parties, or associations have been involved. The single bench issued directions in violation of the principles of natural justice, which were cited by a division bench while issuing a reference for the constitution of a full bench.
The state also requested securing necessary instructions from the authorities concerned on the issues raised by the parties.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around
Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List
Undo
A full bench of justice S M Subramaniam, justice R Vijayakumar, and justice S Sounthar observed that to provide an opportunity to all political parties and organisations likely to be affected or aggrieved, they must be heard before taking the final decision on the issues raised by the parties. The judges directed the chief secretary to issue a public notification enabling political parties and organisations willing to get impleaded in the appeal as respondents for the purpose of presenting their case or defending the case of the appellant.
Hence, the judges directed the chief secretary to issue a public notification in two English and two Tamil dailies with wide circulation across Tamil Nadu, stating that those willing to get themselves impleaded as respondents in the present appeal should file the impleading petitions before the Madurai bench on or before Aug 5. The chief secretary should effect the publication on or before July 25. The judges made it clear that no petition for impleadment or any other purpose from any third party will be entertained after Aug 5.
Since the appellant raised an apprehension that the existing flagpoles would be removed by the state govt to implement the order passed by the single bench, the judges directed the state to maintain status quo. The respective parties are at liberty to file their affidavits or counter affidavits before the court on or before Aug 5. The matter was posted for hearing on Aug 6.
Meanwhile, CPM state secretary, Shanmugam, in a statement said that the interim order of the full bench is a victory for the legal battle of the party. He congratulated the counsel who appeared for the party in the case.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


News18
18 minutes ago
- News18
'How Did Terrorists Enter Pahalgam?' Opposition Questions Govt During Op Sindoor Debate
Last Updated: Gogoi also said why security agencies are not able to nab the terrorists behind the Pahalgam attack The opposition parties came down heavily on the BJP-led central government over the terrorist attack in Jammu and Kashmir's Pahalgam in April this year, and the announcement of a ceasefire after a three-day conflict between India and Pakistan by US President Donald Trump. After Defence Minister Rajnath Singh opened the debate in Parliament on Operation Sindoor, Congress MP Gaurav Gogoi led the opposition's discussion, questioning the government over alleged security lapses. The Deputy Leader of Congress in the Lok Sabha asked Rajnath Singh why he did not mention in his speech how terrorists from Pakistan reached Pahalgam and killed 26 people. 'It is our duty to ask these questions in the interest of the nation," he added. Gogoi also said why security agencies are not able to nab the terrorists behind the Pahalgam attack. 'It has been 100 days since the Pahalgam attack took place, but this Govt has not been able to catch those 5 terrorists… Today, you have drones, Pegasus, satellites, CRPF, BSF, CISF and the Defence Minister went there a few days ago, but still you are not able to catch them… It took almost 1 hour for an Ambulance to reach Baisaran, where the attack took place," he added. 'The entire country, and the Opposition, were supporting PM Modi. Suddenly, on May 10, we got to know that there had been a ceasefire. Why? We wanted to know from PM Modi that if Pakistan was ready to kneel down, then why did you stop, and to whom did you surrender? The US President has said this 26 times that he forced India and Pakistan to announce a ceasefire," he said. Gogoi asked how many of India's fighter jets were downed during the conflict, saying these jets cost millions of rupees. 'We want to know from Rajnath Singh ji today how many of our fighter jets were downed. We have to tell this not just to the public but also to our jawans, as they are being lied to as well," he added. Trinamool Congress MP Kalyan Banerjee also questioned the government over Trump's ceasefire announcement, saying, 'PM Modi, why once you couldn't post on your 'X' handle that whatever the American President said is incorrect… The moment you stand in front of the American President, your height is reduced to 5 feet, and your chest is reduced to 36 inches from 56 inches. Why are you so afraid of the American President?" view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Haryana: Vikas Barala dropped from law officer post after not joining
Vikas Barala CHANDIGARH: In a significant turnaround by the Nayab Singh Saini-led BJP govt, the office of the Advocate General has dropped the name of Vikas Barala as a law officer as he did not report for joining, an official spokesperson of the state govt confirmed on Monday. The official categorically confirmed that except for Vikas Barala, the rest of the law officers appointed had joined and assumed charge. Consequent to the joining report compiled by the concerned authorities, Vikas Barala's name was dropped, the official remarked. Notably, the development came within a week after the Haryana govt notified the list of appointments of law officers in the office of the Advocate General Haryana to defend the state in the Punjab and Haryana High Court as well as the Supreme Court of India. On July 18, the Haryana govt notified the appointment of 92 law officers, including Vikas Barala, to the office of the Advocate General Haryana. Barala, who happens to be the son of Rajya Sabha MP Subash Barala, is facing trial as an accused in the stalking and attempted abduction of the daughter of a senior Haryana bureaucrat (now retired). His name figured as Assistant Advocate General (AAG) for defending cases of Haryana in New Delhi, including the Supreme Court of India. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Learn More - How Watching Videos Can Boost Your Income TheDaddest Undo This triggered controversy and put a question mark on the criteria adopted and the rules followed for the selection of names by the screening committee, which was constituted by the AG office. Opposition parties and leaders criticised the Saini-led govt on this appointment. As to why Vikas chose not to join remains a mystery. However, sources indicate that it was a decision of the party high command as well as the govt after he did not report for joining. The screening committee, which comprised two retired judges of the high court, ignored the serious charges against him. The members of the Advocate General Haryana-headed screening committee that recommended Vikas's appointment were Mani Ram Sharma (IAS), special secretary, home department as the nominee of the additional chief secretary (home), Ritu Garg, legal remembrancer, and two retired judges, Justice Darshan Singh and Justice H S Bhalla, who were members (eminent legal professionals). Normally, those having affiliation with the ruling party are appointed as law officers, and their tenure is co-terminus with the party in power. On August 5, 2017, Vikas Barala and his friend Ashish allegedly followed the bureaucrat's daughter and tried to stop the car of a senior Haryana bureaucrat. The girl called the Chandigarh police, who apprehended the boys. At the time of the incident, they were under the influence of liquor. Both were booked under section 354 D (stalking) of the IPC and under the provisions of the Motor Vehicle Act. Later, police added two more sections for attempted kidnapping, and they were arrested. Vikas's father, Subhash Barala, was then serving as the state president of Haryana BJP. The trial of the case is currently pending before the district court in Chandigarh and is slated for hearing on August 2. The trial is at the stage of recording prosecution evidence.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Scuffle at funeral in Ballia between Ex-MLA and former MP's son
VARANASI: High voltage drama unfolded in the Bairia area of Ballia district on Sunday evening when former MLA Surendra Singh and former MP Virendra Singh Mast's son, Vipulendra Pratap Singh, came face to face, and their supporters clashed. The incident occurred when they went to take part in a funeral at the cremation ground along the river Ganga in the Hukum Chhapra area. Ballia's Additional Superintendent of Police (Southern), Kripa Shankar, on Monday said that police were investigating the matter after lodging FIRs on the complaints of both groups. During the initial investigation, he said it came to light that the former MLA and Vipulendra, along with their supporters, went to take part in the funeral of Shyamu Upadhyay's wife when a dispute occurred, leading to a scuffle between them. FIRs were lodged after both parties filed their complaints with the Bairia police on Sunday late at night. After registering cases, necessary legal actions are being initiated, he added. Surendra Singh, who contested the 2022 assembly election as a rebel after BJP denied retaining a ticket to him due to his controversial statements after winning the 2017 assembly election from Bairia, and Vipulendra, whose father was also denied a ticket by BJP in the 2024 Lok Sabha election, went to the cremation ground near Hukum Chhapra in the Bairia area on Sunday evening. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Remember Him? Take A Deep Breath Before You See Him Now The Noodle Box Undo During their stay at the cremation ground, some arguments started between the duo, leading to a physical altercation between Vipulendra's supporters and the former MLA. After the intervention of other people and dignitaries present there, both parties left the scene. However, upon reaching Devraj Brahm Baba turning, both groups confronted each other again. On being alerted by locals, Bairia police station in-charge Rakesh Kumar Singh reached there and also alerted senior officials after calling heavy forces from five neighbouring police stations. Before ASP CO Faheem Qureshi could reach the spot, the former MLA reached the Bairia police station to file a complaint against Vipulendra and his supporters for assault. In his complaint, the former MLA alleged that he was attacked by Vipulendra and his supporters, who attempted to kill him, and demanded action against them. Since the incident occurred in the Haldi police station area, the in-charge from Haldi was also called to Bairia by officials. Later, Vipulendra and his supporters, who stayed at the Sonbarsa cold storage until late in the evening, also lodged a complaint alleging that the former MLA's son and their supporters attacked Vipulendra.