Cyclists won't be unfairly targeted on pedestrian-only paths: Baey Yam Keng, Singapore News
Beginning on Tuesday, cyclists as well as motorised and non-motorised personal mobility device (PMD) users will face severe penalties for using pedestrian-only paths.
First-time offenders can be fined up to $2,000 or jailed for up to three months, or both.
Following that, some cyclists have voiced their concerns, arguing that the penalties are only applied to cyclists and mobility device users while pedestrians can still traverse both pathways legally.
On Facebook group Singapore Park Connector Network (PCN) Cyclist, some users have expressed their displeasure towards the new regulation.
"Not going [to] fine pedestrians but only cyclists?" One user questioned. "Why not ask the pedestrian to jaywalk on the road, and cars must give way, if not fine the driver?"
There were also concerns about how cyclists should navigate overtaking slower parties or pedestrians on the cycling path.
Asked a user: "If I overtake them and ride on the pedestrian-only path, will I also get fined?"
Another complained: "Pedestrians are allowed to walk on the cycling path (and are) only encouraged not to. If cyclists cycle on the pedestrian path, cyclists would be fined or jailed. Double standards!" Enforcement officers to consider 'ground situation': Baey
In his Facebook post, Baey said he understands that cyclists are concerned about this change, and worried about being targeted and fined.
"I want to reassure everyone that our enforcement approach will be reasonable, and enforcement officers will consider the ground situation," Baey stated, providing examples of extenuating circumstances such as cyclists veering off to avoid obstacles or overtaking slower path users.
Explaining the rationale behind this regulation, he shared that pedestrians, especially the elderly and young children, are the most vulnerable users of these paths.
And users of active mobility devices (including bicycles) travelling at faster speeds should always keep a lookout for users, particularly pedestrians who travel at lower speeds while using the paths.
He stressed that the priority for enforcement is against errant cyclists who speed or ride in reckless manners that pose danger to others.
The regulation, while important, is only one part of keeping users safe, Baey said.
"We need to cultivate a culture of gracious path sharing, and protect the safety of the most vulnerable, especially with our ageing population."
[[nid:718327]]
khooyihang@asiaone.com
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
International Business Times
2 hours ago
- International Business Times
Former Illinois GOP Senate Candidate Tried to Get Husband Murdered After Learning About Long-Distance Lover's Inheritance
New details have emerged over the arrest of a former Illinois GOP Senate candidate who tried to get her husband killed. Allison Salinas, 48, is charged with one count of Solicitation of Murder. Prosecutors filed a petition to detain Salinas on Thursday, following her arrest on Tuesday. Salinas ran as a Republican for a U.S. Senate seat in Illinois in 2021. According to court documents released by the Tazewell County State's Attorney's Office on Thursday, Salinas came under investigation this month after a Facebook video emerged, allegedly implicating her in the murder for hire plot. Salinas' Long-Distance Boyfriend Told Cops She Tried to Manipulate Him After Learning About His Inheritance, Told Him to Kill Her Husband Pekin Police were contacted in February of 2024 by James Turrentine of Dallas, TX, in reference to his relationship with Salinas. He told police that the pair had briefly dated in high-school, and struck up a long-distance relationship in 2021 after Salinas reached out to him. Turrentine told police that he felt Salinas attempted to manipulate him after she reportedly learned about an inheritance. He says Salinas also began discussing her desire to leave her husband, Patrick Salinas, without having to split assets. Allison had allegedly begun discussions of murdering Patrick in November or December of 2023, with Turrentine trying to deflect the conversations because she reportedly wanted Turrentine to kill Patrick for them to be together. When Turrentine Refused, She Tried to Solicit Another Person to Murder Her Husband Turrentine stated he made it known to Allison that he would not harm Patrick, at which point Allison allegedly sought another person to murder her husband. The conversations reportedly continued for several months, with Turrentine saying he became frustrated with the topic, and indicated that he could find someone to commit the murder in the hopes that Allison would drop it. Turrentine then told police that Allison would repeatedly ask if he found someone, then explained that he lied to her and told Allison the Secret Service contacted him about the murder for hire plot. He says the detailed conversations stopped, but Allison was asking if he had heard anything further, as recently as two weeks ago. Turrentine also indicated that he made the Facebook video post to draw attention to the issue. 'I Need You to Make this Happen' Turrentine provided to Pekin Police two recorded phone conversations with Allison between February and March of 2024. Allison allegedly discussed different ways to kill Patrick, with Turrentine suggesting to her that some old friends of his dad could do it. Allison allegedly stated to him that "I need you to make this happen." Screenshots of text messages between the pair were also given to Pekin Police. On May 27th, 2024, Allison allegedly started a conversation with a picture of her husband with a text message stating "There's ur pic u need." Turrentine replied with a thumbs up emoji, with Allison following up by texting "Can't talk, don't text back but please with everything I mean to you... Just take care of this." Court documents also reveal that Allison had allegedly sent Turrentine a screenshot on July 21st, 2024 of a Google search relating to spousal immunity in criminal cases. Allison Also Considered Sneaking Shellfish into Patricks Food Because He was Allergic to It Pekin Police had also interviewed Ashley Allen, a close friend of Allison's who lived with her in the fall of 2023. Allen told police that she was in the passenger's seat of a vehicle during a phone call between Allison and Turrentine, and hearing Allison allegedly discussing finding a "ghost" to murder Patrick, which she described as another term for a hitman. Allen also testified that Allison discussed sneaking shellfish into Patrick's food, which he is allergic to. Allison was interviewed by Pekin Police on Tuesday, and reportedly acknowledged that she had discussed Patrick's murder with Turrentine for an extended period. However, Allison maintained that she was not in a good mental state. She was asked by police about the conservations and admitted that there was no indication to Turrentine that she was not serious about the topics.
AsiaOne
7 hours ago
- AsiaOne
Motorcyclist, 23, dies in accident involving lorry near Woodlands Checkpoint, Singapore News
A 23-year-old motorcyclist died after an accident with a lorry near Woodlands Checkpoint on Friday (July 25) morning. In response to AsiaOne's queries, the police said they were alerted to the accident along the Bukit Timah Expressway (BKE) towards SLE at 6.50am. A 23-year-old male motorcyclist was pronounced dead at the scene and his 23-year-old male pillion rider was unconscious when taken to the hospital. Videos posted to social media show a blue police tent covering the body on the left-most lane of the expressway, with a trail of blood on the road. A lorry is seen stationary on the road shoulder. The police said a 39-year-old male lorry driver is assisting with investigations, which are ongoing. In a Facebook post at 8.40am, the Immigration and Checkpoints Authority said there is "very heavy traffic congestion" after Woodlands Checkpoint on the BKE due to the accident just before SLE Exit. It advised arriving travellers to expect delays and co-operate with officers directing traffic on site. [[nid:720490]]
CNA
9 hours ago
- CNA
Singapore private investigators see spike in work injury claim cases; NGOs warn against generalisations
SINGAPORE: Demand is rising among private investigation firms in Singapore, for a different type of surveillance: To verify whether work injury claimants have genuine injuries. While fraudulent work injury claims have been put under the spotlight in recent days, non-government organisations told CNA that such cases were extremely rare among low-wage migrant workers. They urged against making sweeping generalisations, pointing out they have witnessed instances where injured workers were unable to get fair compensation. The issue was sparked by the death of Ms Jane Lee, owner of local business Sumo Salad, who had published Facebook posts about a foreign employee who allegedly filed a false work injury claim to get compensation. The Manpower Ministry (MOM) subsequently said it had been in communication with Ms Lee before her death, and that investigations into the claim were ongoing. The worker involved was covered under the Work Injury Compensation Act (WICA), and MOM said it was working with the employee's insurer to "assess the validity of the case". On Thursday (Jul 24), Minister of State for Manpower Dinesh Vasu Dash reiterated that MOM was probing the matter and working with the insurer. He said that in cases of "egregious" behaviour by employees, action has to be taken; but added it was also important to find incentives for workers and employers "to model the right behaviour" for their health, safety and well-being. Last year, 26,843 work injury claims were awarded. The total compensation payout was S$138.2 million (US$108.4 million). CNA has asked MOM for data on the number of fraudulent work injury claims detected, and how officers go about verifying work injury claims. CNA has also reached out to multiple insurers for more information on how they typically verify work injury claims. MORE ENQUIRIES, MORE CASES Three private investigation firms – Asia Top Investigation, Detective Don PI and Eyes Private Investigator – told CNA they have recorded a surge in requests to investigate potentially fraudulent work claims. They said the cases come mostly from the construction sector, with some in the food-and-beverage and service-related industries. Mr Ivan Tan, operations manager and investigator at Asia Top Investigation, said his firm dealt with 15 such cases last year. Five years ago, the agency would get about five enquiries a year. Last year, they received two to three enquiries a month. Mark (not his real name), the director of Eyes Private Investigator, said that in the past one-and-a-half years, his firm has received four to five enquiries every week and taken on an average of two cases a week. Previously, they used to take up one to two cases every fortnight. Four out of nine investigators at Eyes focus on work injury cases. Mark estimated that he alone has handled 50 to 60 such cases, which he said mostly involved foreign workers. The private investigators CNA spoke to said their work can take anywhere from a day to two weeks. Mr Tan from Asia Top charges S$1,800 for up to eight hours of surveillance on weekdays, and S$2,100 on weekends. Two licensed private investigators will follow the subject to gather photo and video evidence of his or her activities, and produce a report for the client which can also be submitted to court as evidence, said Mr Tan. Investigators are sometimes also called to testify in court to back up their report. "We don't try to force the narrative into one direction. However, if let's say the worker indeed is faking injury, what we do is we try to focus on that specific body part which she claims is injured and is not functioning well," he said. One case he worked on involved a dishwasher with a finger injury who was found moonlighting as a waitress. "Her fingers are working fine because (she) can serve food, (she) can carry plates," said Mr Tan. Then there was an administrative worker in a private clinic who resigned and took extended medical leave citing "different ailments". But investigators found her working for her employer's competitor during her notice period. According to Mr Tan, in all 15 cases his firm investigated last year, there was evidence that the injuries were feigned. For Mark, he recalled one to three cases out of his firm's entire portfolio where no such evidence was found. The investigators said that after submitting their reports, they typically do not keep track of cases all the way to resolution. But Mark has received feedback from some clients, of employees withdrawing their work injury claims after being confronted with the evidence. Lawyer Ray Louis told CNA he once advised an employer in a dispute with a cleaner, who filed a claim for a back injury from a fall. An investigator followed her and obtained evidence of her moving around 'normally'. Mr Louis said that while this employer still could not prove that the worker's injury was fake, he was able to show that it was not as serious as she had made it out to be. 'It forced the claimant to settle at a lower amount,' said the lawyer. CNA has also contacted business associations to ask if fraudulent work injury claims are an issue among its members. The last known case to be publicised was in 2021, when two foreign workers were convicted for making fraudulent WICA claims in 2019. According to an MOM release, one was found to have staged a fall, while the other said his injury was sustained at work when it did not. "A REAL DROP IN THE OCEAN" Under WICA, employees in Singapore who are injured in work accidents or suffer diseases due to work can make claims without having to file a civil suit under common law. According to MOM, one remains eligible to claim for compensation even if he or she no longer works for the employer or their work pass is cancelled. Workers can claim medical leave wages; medical expenses including hospital bills; and a lump sum compensation for permanent incapacity, current incapacity or death. Speaking to CNA, Transient Workers Count 2 (TWC2) vice-president Alex Au said the NGO sees more than a thousand injury cases a year, with no more than 'one or two' cases where they have doubts over the veracity of the claim. 'We are talking about a real drop in the ocean,' he said. If anything, low-wage migrant workers in particular often find that the 'balance of proof' is stacked against them when they suffer injuries at the workplace, said Mr Au. This could be due to employers who "control" various forms of evidence which could have been used by workers to make legitimate claims, he added. As a result, the subsequent insurance report would state that the injured worker's account was not corroborated by any evidence. "These are the reasons why we think that the percentage of invalid claims is probably higher than really fraudulent claim(s)," said Mr Au. Ms Dipa Swaminathan, founder of charity and migrant worker advocacy group ItsRainingRaincoats, warned against painting all workers with the same 'tainted brush'. 'Every single time they have an injury … if there's going to be an assumption that they're making it up, can you imagine how hard their life is?' she said. 'We have seen the other side of the story, where even for genuine workplace injuries, they're not able to get any compensation.' Ms Swaminathan said her organisation has never seen a fraudulent case in 10 years of working with migrant workers. Former Nominated Member of Parliament Anthea Ong, a council member of a community initiative helping migrant workers pay for critical illness treatments not covered by their mandatory insurance, was concerned about the potential fallout from WICA coming under the spotlight. 'If every employer is now going to be a little bit suspicious and don't act on it when their workers have met with an accident at the workplace, that might mean that those workers who really, genuinely need immediate emergency attention may not get that and that could put their lives at risk,' she said.
