logo
A surprise IRS move on political endorsements leaves faith leaders and experts divided

A surprise IRS move on political endorsements leaves faith leaders and experts divided

WASHINGTON (AP) — A surprise move by the IRS that would allow pastors to back political candidates from the pulpit without losing their organization's tax-exempt status is drawing praise from conservatives and even some progressive religious groups but concern from other leaders of faith, along with tax and legal experts.
A 1954 provision in the tax code called the Johnson Amendment says churches and other nonprofits could lose their tax-exempt status if they participate or intervene in any political campaign on behalf of or in opposition to any candidate for public office. The rule was rarely enforced.
While the IRS did not go as far as calling for the repeal of the Johnson Amendment, it said in court documents Monday that communications in good faith by a church to its flock does not amount to 'intervening' or affecting the outcome of a political campaign.
'Communications from a house of worship to its congregation in connection with religious services through its usual channels of communication on matters of faith do not run afoul of the Johnson Amendment as properly interpreted,' the IRS said.
The new IRS interpretation came after decades of debate and, most recently, lawsuits from the National Religious Broadcasters association and other conservative churches complaining that the amendment violates their First Amendment rights, among other legal protections.
Speaking to reporters Wednesday, President Donald Trump called the IRS' assessment 'terrific.'
'I love the fact that churches can endorse a political candidate,' he said. 'We have a lot of respect for the people that lead the church.'
While some congregations see a new freedom to speak openly about preferred candidates, others see openings for campaign finance corruption, new pressures on religious leaders and an overall entanglement between church and state.
Praises to the IRS
Robert Jeffress, pastor of a Baptist megachurch in Dallas and a Trump ally, called it 'the right decision.' He said his church's tax-exempt status was threatened because of an IRS investigation into their political endorsements, costing the megachurch hundreds of thousands in legal fees.
'The IRS has no business dictating what can be said from the pulpit,' he said. 'They need to stay the heck out of our churches.'
Calvary Church Chino Hills, a Southern California megachurch led by Jack Hibbs, has been endorsing candidates for years, particularly in local elections. Gina Gleason, director of the church's political engagement team, said she hopes the move will encourage smaller churches previously hesitant for fear of triggering an IRS response.
'I'd have thought if the IRS had targeted any church it would've been us,' she said. 'But we got sound legal advice from lawyers and religious liberty organizations that explained we were within our constitutional rights.'
For Democrats trying to connect with people of faith, this decision is timely, said Doug Pagitt, pastor and executive director of Vote Common Good, a progressive and evangelical Christian organization.
'Conservative pastors who have been blatantly endorsing candidates regardless of the Johnson Amendment over the years created a disadvantage causing Democrats to step away from faith voters,' he said. 'There was a true imbalance between how many more opportunities there were for Republican voters.'
The IRS statement, Pagitt says, also puts an end to the delicate dance pastors and congregations were forced to do.
'You could talk about politics in the church gymnasium, but not in the sanctuary or from the pulpit,' he said. 'Pastors could express political opinions on their personal Facebook page, but not on the church's website. It's just silly.'
Church politicking concerns
Tax and constitutional law experts, meanwhile, are wary of what entanglements could arise from the IRS' new position.
Philip Hackney, a University of Pittsburgh School of Law professor who studies the relationship between churches and tax authority, said the decree could allow churches to push new boundaries.
'It's essentially creating a political intervention tax shelter for churches,' Hackney said. 'It has the potential to corrupt their mission, more towards politics and away from their true beliefs.'
Other religious groups, particularly in faith communities of color, are viewing it with skepticism. The Rev. Mark Whitlock, senior pastor at Reid Temple African Methodist Episcopal Church in Glenn Dale, Maryland, said it raises more questions than answers.
'From those of us in the Black church, this decision is being viewed with caution, apprehension and skepticism,' he said. 'The question we're asking is: 'Why now?''
Whitlock said he will continue to do what the Black church has always done — educating and civically engaging parishioners. His congregants' political views vary, too.
'If I do say something in church, it needs to be God-centered, God-focused and a revelation that God gave you,' Whitlock said. 'You can't go to the pulpit as a campaign manager.'
Raymond Chang, president of the Asian American Christian Collaborative, warned that a repeal of the Johnson Amendment could help tether some congregations to certain parties or candidates.
'This can lead to a partisan identity becoming the primary marker of a church or congregation, over a commitment to the Gospel, which cuts against both existing major parties,' he said. 'Church leaders may also face pressure to make political endorsements.'
What comes next
Nearly 80% of U.S. adults believe churches and other houses of worship should not come out in favor of one political candidate over another during elections, a Pew Research Center survey conducted in 2022 found.
White evangelicals and Black Protestants were a little more divided on the matter, with about one-third in each group favoring political endorsements. But in every other religious group surveyed, there was a strong consensus against political involvement by houses of worship.
Others are more optimistic that the IRS statement puts to bed unfounded criticisms against the agency for a rarely enforced rule.
Terry Lemons, a former IRS official who began at the agency under Democratic President Bill Clinton, called it a 'common sense approach through a narrowly written filing.'
Roger Colinvaux, a Catholic University of America law professor, said he would caution churches against 'overinterpreting' the IRS statement. He points out that the word 'endorse' does not appear anywhere in it and said his biggest concern is religion being used as a partisan tool in campaigns.
Pagitt at Common Good said not all pastors will seize the opportunity because they might be ministering to a divided congregation or might not be comfortable mixing politics and religion.
Chieko Noguchi, spokesperson for the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, said Tuesday that the IRS statement doesn't 'change how the Catholic Church engages in public debate.'
'The Church seeks to help Catholics form their conscience in the Gospel so they might discern which candidates and policies would advance the common good,' Noguchi said. 'The Catholic Church maintains its stance of not endorsing or opposing political candidates.'
___
Bharath reported from Los Angeles.
___
AP's religion coverage receives support through the AP's collaboration with The Conversation US, with funding from Lilly Endowment Inc. The AP is solely responsible for this content.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

ICE Agents in Despair Under Stephen Miller's Impossible Orders
ICE Agents in Despair Under Stephen Miller's Impossible Orders

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

ICE Agents in Despair Under Stephen Miller's Impossible Orders

A new report from The Atlantic's Nick Miroff finds morale at Immigration and Customs Enforcement is suffering as the agency, under the direction of President Trump and Homeland Security adviser Stephen Miller, targets undocumented immigrants who haven't committed crimes. While the Trump administration may claim its deportation campaign prioritizes violent criminals and gang members, in reality, it has focused on arresting noncriminals, evidently to hit quotas passed down by Trump and Miller. And while the administration may claim ICE agents are happier than ever, Miroff's report—based on conversations with 12 current and former ICE personnel—shows that the change is frustrating many agents and officers. One ICE veteran finds the job so 'infuriating' that the agent is considering quitting. 'No drug cases, no human trafficking, no child exploitation,' said the agent, who complained about having to focus instead on 'arresting gardeners.' A former agent told Miroff that 'morale is in the crapper,' and 'even those that are gung ho about the mission aren't happy with how they are asking to execute it—the quotas and the shift to the low-hanging fruit to make the numbers.' Another former ICE official suggested that this shift is vindicating criticisms the agency has faced in the past, observing, 'What we're seeing now is what, for many years, we were accused of being, and could always safely say, 'We don't do that.'' One of Miroff's interviewees was Adam Boyd, a young attorney who resigned from the agency's legal department because it's no longer focused on 'protecting the homeland from threats.' Instead, he said, 'It became a contest of how many deportations could be reported to Stephen Miller by December.' Boyd told Miroff: 'We still need good attorneys at ICE. There are drug traffickers and national-security threats and human-rights violators in our country who need to be dealt with. But we are now focusing on numbers over all else.' One former ICE official said that there are now 'national-security and public-safety threats that are not being addressed,' as the agency moves staff from its Homeland Security Investigations division, focused largely on transnational crime, to its Enforcement and Removal Operations division—a move that many perceive as retaliation for HSI in recent years distancing itself from the agency's deportation arm. When Miller issued his demand for 3,000 arrests per day, he reportedly steamrolled any veteran officials who dared to speak up about its impracticality, which has led many to keep silent since then for fear of drawing his ire, Miroff writes. This means that 'no one is saying, 'This is not obtainable,'' an ICE official told him. 'The answer is just to keep banging the [ICE rank-and-file] and tell [them] they suck. It's just not a good atmosphere.'

ICE Is So Out of Control, They Tried to Raid a Kids' Baseball Practice
ICE Is So Out of Control, They Tried to Raid a Kids' Baseball Practice

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

ICE Is So Out of Control, They Tried to Raid a Kids' Baseball Practice

Then they came for the children: even in self-designated sanctuary cities such as Manhattan, apparently no one is safe from the ire of federal immigration agents under the Trump administration. Youman Wilder, a baseball coach for middle and high school students, was leading a group of 11 kids through batting cage practice near 72nd Street in Riverside Park last month when he caught ICE agents interrogating some of the minors. 'I go over quickly and the agents are asking the kids inappropriate things like where they are from, their country of origin, so I say, 'Whoa, whoa,' and I tell the officers that their questions are inappropriate, and that I'm going to tell my kids not to answer them,' Wilder told the West Side Rag. Wilder said the officers identified themselves as ICE agents, were armed with guns and tasers, and had 'ICE' printed across the front of their tactical vests. The coach—who received his master's degree in law—told the kids that they didn't need to answer the agents' questions, instructing them to instead line up on the opposite side of the batting cages. But ICE didn't like that: Wilder said that's when one of the agents raised their voice at him, accusing him of being a 'YouTube lawyer.' 'I said no, I just know how the Constitution works,' Wilder told Eyewitness News. But the agents continued to threaten him, per Wilder, talking about cuffing the coach and openly questioning what the kids would 'have to lose by answering' if they were in the U.S. legally. 'I told them that they still have their Fifth and Fourth Amendment rights, and that they don't have to speak to you or help with any investigation,' Wilder told the Rag. All the kids, according to Wilder, were born in the U.S. and are U.S. citizens, born to parents from Africa, South America, and Mexico. 'It's all about civics. If you don't know your rights, they will trample on them,' Wilder told the Rag. The coach also expressed his shock and dismay at the amount of people who watched the interaction but failed to intervene. 'There were people watching and the agents were telling them to move back, that they would be arrested for interfering, and not to take pictures,' Wilder told the Rag. 'The worst thing is that the six or seven people who were watching, followed their orders!' 'I never in my life thought this was going to happen in the Upper West Side in New York City,' Wilder told Eyewitness News. 'That whole thing, until it happens to you, you're not aware? It happened to us.' Wilder has since changed the location and practice times for his team, but some kids and their parents have been so rattled by the event that they haven't returned to practice. 'I knew that they could arrest me, but I knew that they couldn't keep me,' he said. 'My whole thing is that I'm African American, and most of my kids are Latino and Black, so it was all about how do I get these kids home. I never raised my voice. I just talked about the law. And I was just focused on how can I get these kids to where they need to go, when they are in my care.' Wilder was 'the only thing that stood between those kids in Riverside Park and a Florida detention center buried deep in the Everglades,' Upper West Side Assemblymember Linda Rosenthal wrote in a newsletter earlier this month. Rosenthal told Eyewitness News that Wilder was right to intervene and had the legal authority to do so. Although President Donald Trump has heaped endless praise on the federal deportation agency, ICE agents have reportedly never been so miserable, forced to primarily detain noncriminal immigrants in order to meet their quota: 3,000 arrests per day, per Homeland Security adviser Stephen Miller's demands.

Kraft Heinz reportedly plans to split up, spin off grocery business
Kraft Heinz reportedly plans to split up, spin off grocery business

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Kraft Heinz reportedly plans to split up, spin off grocery business

-- Kraft Heinz (NASDAQ:KHC) Co is preparing to break itself up by spinning off a significant portion of its grocery business, according to a Wall Street Journal report published Friday. The food giant is looking to separate many Kraft products into a new standalone entity that could be valued at up to $20 billion, the report said, citing people familiar with the matter. Following the split, Kraft Heinz would retain its sauce and spread products, including the company's flagship Heinz ketchup and Grey Poupon Dijon mustard. Kraft Heinz shares are gaining over 2.5% following the publication of the WSJ report. Related articles Kraft Heinz reportedly plans to split up, spin off grocery business Air India crash probe reveals pilot cut fuel flow to engines S&P 500 falls after Pulte claims Powell considering resignation Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store