I tested a food waste app for a week – it cost half as much as my usual shop but there was a big downside
The app definitely saved me money - but there was a big downside.
5
Here's how it works...
You open the Too Good To Go app and set the location radius from between 1km and 30km to scout out the options in your area.
There are establishments offering meals and groceries, as well as bakeries and shops selling breads and pastries.
Each shop will have a surprise bag (or box) of surplus goods that are about to go off, and will set a pick-up window for collection.
You won't know what you've got until you open your bag - which is all part of the fun, but can be quite annoying as I learned.
Even with the same shop, what you get will change with each order on a daily basis.
What you receive depends on what is left over at the end of the day, although the app does tell you what you can expect as a rough guide.
Days 1 & 2: A box of limp veg
Day one and my first problem arose - trying to find a Too Good To Go option that I could pick up outside of my working hours.
Fortunately, I found a £4 surprise bag from Petit Village, a nearby green grocers roughly a 15 minute walk from my house.
It was the last one left, and had a decent collection time between 12pm and 6pm.
From worm bread to mealworm kebabs... could eating bugs and insects in everyday food be the future?
I dashed off after to work to go collect my bounty.
While some establishments will need to cook or pack your food once you arrive to collect your order, others - like Petit Village - will have your surprise bag ready and waiting.
I showed the man behind the counter my collection code, and confirmed in the app that I was collecting, before being handed a crate full of vegetables.
I got a bag of cherry tomatoes, three larger tomatoes, two avocados, a head of lettuce, a green pepper, four red chillies, seven carrots and a fistful of beets.
Now, these vegetables were pretty limp, one of the avocados was squishy, some of the carrots were bendy and the lettuce had certainly seen better days.
But that's the whole point, right?
They were all edible (apart from a funky-looking carrot I composted).
And as another example of technological brilliance (or laziness) I used ChatGPT to conjure meals with those exact ingredients.
You can do the same, with my prompt: "Please give me five recipe ideas using at least four of the following ingredients..." and then list your produce.
You can even throw in a few bits you might already have in your cupboard - like pasta or cous cous, or some stuff lurking in the freezer.
All the options sounded great, and I reworked a roasted vegetable salad suggestion into a Moroccan-style cous cous, and whipped up a spicy tomato salsa and guacamole to have with some chips.
The lettuce went into a salad along with the second avocado and some more cherry tomatoes on Day 2, which paired nicely with a fishcake I had in the freezer.
When it comes to making meals with surplus goods - time is of the essence.
You don't have long until these veg are deemed inedible.
That's when I start looking for my next meal...
5
Days 3 and 4: Monster lasagna
At this point, my box of veg is running low - and it's all getting too limp for my liking.
The night before, I tapped 'buy' on a £3.99 surprise bag from The Laundry, a popular restaurant in London's Brixton that is a two minute walk from a friend's flat.
It's a lovely restaurant that my friend and I have been meaning to try for a while - where a main costs between £18 and £26.
So, £3.99 is a steal - and the generous portion of lasagne with a side of carrots and roasted butternut squash tasted really good.
It even had a decent collection slot of between 10am and 11:40am - which I could dash out to as I wasn't working that day.
This was my lunch on Day 3, and even on Day 4 - the portion really was of monster proportions.
One surprise box from this place could honestly feed two!
WHAT OPTIONS ARE THERE?
There are all kinds of shops, bakeries, cafes, restaurants, and supermarkets giving food away for cheap on the Too Good To Go app.
Shops include: Aldi, Morrisons, Co-op, Budgens, Londis, Nisa and even M&S.
Restaurants and cafes include: Greggs, Pizza Express, Fireaway, Costa, Starbucks, Pret, Cafe Nero, Gail's, Yo Sushi, Carluccios, Harvester, Toby Carvery and more.
Some train stations even have options.
Plus, there are tons of independent cafes, restaurants, bakeries and delis if you want to try something new without breaking the bank.
You will have more options in large towns and cities, like London.
Although some quieter parts of the capital do seem a bit short of choice.
Smaller places and villages might not have any retailers listed - and when they do, you could have some competition.
5
Days 4 and 5: Mid Mediterranean
Now even though I have lunch lined up for Day 4 - I need to be alert to what my options are for the rest of the day.
All the best deals get snapped up quick.
So on a hot day, I opted for a £5.20 surprise bag from Paella Street, a stall at Tabard Street Food Market, just a 10 minute walk from the office.
It was supposed to be a post-lunchtime deal, and gave me the smallest collection window I had encountered yet: between 2pm and 2:15pm.
I received two very sweaty boxes of vegan paella - which wouldn't have cost much more to have fresh.
And to be honest, the state of them left me Googling how to revive old paella.
However, once successfully revived on the hob at home, just one box of the two made a very nice dinner.
The other I stuck in the freezer for a rainy day.
Day 6: Out of options
At this point, I'm running out of options.
I have a choice to make: eat baked goods for dinner (not ideal), or wait until 10pm to collect a meal suitable enough for tea (also not ideal).
This is where I had to draw the line and go to an actual supermarket.
But it taught me an important lesson about the best time to buy surprise goodies on Too Good To Go.
The verdict
I have spent a total of £13.19 in five days, over three payments.
That's about £4.40 on average - nearly half what I would usually spend on eating per day.
I usually spend around £170 a month on groceries, across an average of 19 transactions - which is nearly £9 on average every time I go to the shops.
So it does work out cheaper - but is it worth it?
Pros:
Good variety of food
Pushes you out of your comfort zone
Great if you can be spontaneous
Even better if you use to supplement a slightly smaller weekly shop
Cheap way to try local restaurants
Reduces food waste
Cons:
Often inconvenient in terms of collection hours or location
Not good for people with allergies or dietary requirements
5
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
14 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Gerard Taylor obituary
Britain has never been entirely clear about how to understand what it is that designers do. Are they offering a service, or is design a form of cultural self-expression? Gerard Taylor, who has died aged 70, always believed that it can be both. The Scot learned this early on in his career, when in 1981 the great Italian designer Ettore Sottsass invited him to join his Memphis collective, not long after Taylor had graduated from the Royal College of Art in London. A kind of anti-Bloomsbury group based in Milan, Memphis turned the conventional idea of good taste upside down with a series of deliberately transgressive collections of furniture, glassware and domestic electronics, using cheap materials such as plastic laminate and a vibrant colour palette. The self-initiated work that Taylor did for Memphis, as well as under his own name in those days, such as his sculptural ceramics or, later, with Daniel Weil, the Quasimodo chair, which looked like the physical realisation of a cafe chair in a Cubist painting, are in museum collections now, or sought after at auction. But Taylor also enjoyed working for clients, designing beautifully crafted shops for the Esprit brand that had little in common with the conventions of mass-market fashion at the time. He would later be responsible for the architecture of half a dozen of Habitat's most interesting stores when it was run by Vittorio Radice. When Radice moved to Selfridges, Taylor worked there too, and later for the Irish fashion designer Orla Kiely. Taylor's sketchbooks, overflowing with pencil drawings and analytical watercolours, reflect the commitment that he put into all his work whether they were personal projects or not. 'I believe that a designer should never work for their client, they have to work for themselves,' he told one interviewer. 'They have to serve their client, they have to be rigorous and professional, [but] your vision has to go way beyond what the client is asking for. You always have to be pushing yourself to do what you think is interesting.' Taylor's longest-lasting client was Orangebox, an innovative manufacturer of office furniture that began as a start up in the Glamorgan village of Hengoed. In the 20 years that Taylor was the creative director, helping to shape its products, Orangebox grew into a worldwide business, employing 400 people, and successful enough to be acquired by the American giant Steelcase. 'We weren't selling chairs, we were selling stories,' Taylor said. At the time of his death Taylor was working on an exhibition at the Modern Institute gallery in Glasgow, planned for next year. According to Taylor's brother-in-law, the artist and author Edmund de Waal, it will include both early furniture designs and more recent sculptural work that explores the relationship between colour and space. Born in Bellshill, a former mining town in Glasgow's Lanarkshire hinterland, Gerard was one of six children of Mary and Michael Taylor, a buyer for the industrial manufacturer Honeywell who in latter years bought a sub-post office. After St Saviour's secondary school in Glasgow, Gerard considered studying art at Glasgow School of Art, but instead chose product design, where, following graduation, one of his tutors encouraged him to apply to the RCA for a master's. He spent his summers working on set designs at the BBC, including for the Two Ronnies, and used some of his earnings to go to New York to see the painter Agnes Martin installing a museum show of her work. When he graduated in 1981, design in London had momentarily become neither service nor art, but big business. Based on the profits that they made rebranding state-owned industries such as British Airways and British Telecom as they were prepared for privatisation, design consultancies were being floated on the stock market. It was not a version of design that appealed to Taylor. He was determined to work for Sottsass, Memphis's founder, and the designer of beautiful machines for Olivetti, the Apple of its day. Taylor, who described himself as a 'ballsy Scotsman', had heard Sottsass speak in London while at college, and met him again in his final year. After showing him his portfolio of sophisticated drawings, and projects that ranged from a stage set for Timon of Athens to a hi-fi system, Sottsass invited Taylor to Milan to work in Sottsass Associati, the new design studio he was setting up. Taylor became a partner for five years (1982-87), then set up a studio in London with Weil, a fellow RCA graduate. Their partnership was dissolved in 1992 and Taylor subsequently practised on his own. Having begun his career early enough to take part in Memphis, Taylor worked long enough to see the practice of design utterly transformed by the digital explosion. Four decades ago it was still possible for a designer to shape technology, as well as convey how it worked. 'Usually [the product] comes in bland boxes that are a hopelessly inadequate reflection of the marvels which they contain,' Taylor then wrote. Smartphones have since taken over so many everyday functions that entire categories of object are redundant. Those that are left are not easily influenced by an independent designer. Taylor focused instead on furniture design, on which it was still possible to have an impact, in particular at Orangebox, which he joined in 2002. 'Human dynamics are the same. That is the beauty of furniture – a chair from 1920 is essentially the same as a chair of today,' he said. 'The chair is consistent and the table is consistent but what is not consistent is the dynamic of the context around them, what happens at the table, all the paranoias and ideas of the people sitting at the table, that's what changed unbelievably dramatically in ways we never thought of.' When it comes to technology, Taylor believed that if designers can't shape it, they should try to humanise it: 'The role of design has to be the creation of more engaging, softer, kinder and more humane work environments as a counterpoint to the continuously accelerating demands of technology and its increasing control of our workplace. We have to use design to help balance the tsunami of ever-shortening tech cycles of change and obsolescence.' Taylor was married twice. His first marriage, to Sue Minter, an interior designer, ended in divorce. In 2023 he married Clare Chandler, a psychologist and coach, and she survives him. Gerard Taylor, designer, born 3 March 1955; died 20 June 2025
Reuters
15 minutes ago
- Reuters
Welfare cuts U-turn shows extent of UK's fiscal challenges, S&P says
LONDON, July 4 (Reuters) - The inability of Britain's government to make cuts to welfare spending this week underscores the extent of the challenges it faces in repairing its finances, credit rating agency S&P Global said on Friday. UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer was forced to scrap 5 billion pounds ($6.83 billion) worth of benefits cuts due to opposition from within his own government, reducing the already razor-thin margin it relies on to meet its self-imposed fiscal rules. "We consider the inability to make modest cuts to welfare spending, which has ballooned in the UK since the 2020 pandemic, underscores the UK government's very limited budgetary room for manoeuvre," S&P said in an analysis. S&P has a "stable" outlook on its AA UK credit rating and though it sees the fiscal position as "vulnerable" it said the direct effect of this week's last-minute policy reversal was small in the context of the country's "existing fiscal challenges". The now-cancelled 5 billion-pound-a-year of mainly disability allowance cuts would have amounted to 0.2% of 2025 GDP, by 2029. That compares with last year's headline government deficit of 5.9% of GDP - equivalent to almost 170 billion pounds. "Getting the deficit down to the pre-pandemic five-year average of 3% of GDP would require a roughly 70 billion pound consolidation effort," said S&P, which is next due to review Britain's rating on October 10. "We expect that the UK's fiscal consolidation will remain a slow process," it added. ($1 = 0.7321 pounds)
BBC News
16 minutes ago
- BBC News
Scottish Water union members to vote on pay offer
Union members at Scottish Water are to vote on a pay offer made by the company to try to end a series of of members of Unite, Unison and the GMB have been on strike at the company regularly since the most recent was a seven-day stoppage last Water said the current offer would see pay increase by 7.5% over two years on average. It said the offer followed "positive discussions" with the unions. Unions believe the strikes have caused the company difficulties. However, there have been no major disruptions to the water supply on strike days to test the company's emergency people who have taken part in the industrial action work in a wide range of practical and administrative jobs at the publicly-owned water industry in Scotland was never privatised and is directly accountable to the Scottish government. Unison is urging its members to reject the offer, while Unite and the GMB have not made a the offer is turned down, strikes could resume. The results should be known later this STUC has called on the Scottish government to intervene in the dispute after months of a had also claimed the company had been attempting to undermine the unions in the strike – a charge Scottish Water has denied. 'Above inflation increases' Scottish Water said it urged all members to vote on its "very strong and progressive" pay said the combined offer for all employees provided a minimum increase of £2,850 - made up of a £1,400 underpin for 2024/25 and a £1,450 underpin for 2025/26.A spokesperson said: "Those on lower salaries would see higher percentage increases. "This builds on a decade of above inflation increases at Scottish Water that reflects our commitment to the principles of fair work while ensuring increases are affordable for customers too."It is in everyone's interests that the current dispute is resolved so that our people can get the pay increases they deserve and continue delivering an essential service to the people of Scotland."
