
How changes to the welfare bill affects your PIP and Universal Credit payments
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
BRITS on Universal Credit and PIP will see fewer changes to their payments after the Government U-turned on its welfare bill this week.
Sir Keir Starmer had been hoping to push through welfare reforms that would have seen a crackdown on payments to some benefits claimants.
Sign up for Scottish Sun
newsletter
Sign up
2
Sir Keir Starmer had been hoping to push through welfare reforms that would save billions
Credit: AFP
2
Universal Credit is one of the benefits set to be affected by the welfare reforms
Credit: Alamy
The reforms were aimed at saving billions of pounds on Britain's welfare bill, which is set to balloon in the next five years.
The Government has projected the number of working-age claimants of Personal Independence Payments (PIP) will rise from 2.7million in 2023-24 to 4.3million in 2029-30.
Meanwhile the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) has estimated the overall cost of the working-age benefit system would rise from £48.5billion last year to £75.7billion by 2030.
The reforms would have seen disabled Brits facing stricter tests for claiming PIP payments and a freeze on the health payment element of Universal Credit.
But in a major defeat for the Government this week, 49 Labour MPs rebelled against the welfare reforms.
It forced the prime minister to shelve the controversial reforms so the bill would not have to be scrapped entirely.
The bill will return to the Commons for a third reading on Wednesday before it can be passed.
Here is what the latest changes mean for you…
Personal Independence Payments (PIP)
PIP is the main benefit for people with a disability.
Three key benefits you could be missing out on
It's for people under state pension age who need help with daily activities or getting around because of a long-term illness or disability.
Payments currently start at £1,500 but can rise to £9,600.
The daily living rate comes in at £73.90 for the lower rate and £110.40 for the higher rate.
The mobility rate is worth £29.20 and rises to £77.05 for the higher rate.
Under the Government's plans, PIP claimants would have faced stricter tests to qualify for support.
The assessments involve questions about how difficult a person finds everyday tasks, and they give a score from zero (for no difficulty) to 12 (for most difficulty).
Needing help to wash your hair scores two points but needing help to wash between the shoulders and waist is worth four points.
The Government had proposed that people would need to score four points in one task such as washing and dressing to qualify for support.
Currently they can qualify with eight points across multiple activities.
Ahead of the bill's second reading last week, Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall announced a partial U-turn.
She said the changes would only come into effect in November 2026 and anyone claiming the benefit before that date would not be subject to the new rules.
That meant it would only affect new PIP claimants.
But following the rebellion by Labour MPs, the proposal has been scrapped entirely.
It means no changes are going to be made until after a further review has taken place.
The review is being led by Welfare Minister Sir Stephen Timms, who will work with disabled people and charities.
The review will consider:
The role of the PIP assessment – as the future single gateway to health-related and disability benefits
The assessment criteria – including activities, descriptors and points
Whether any other evidence should be considered alongside the assessment
How the PIP assessment could provide fair access to support across the benefits system
The review will be finished by autumn next year and its findings will be reported to the Work and Pensions Secretary.
That means it's not clear yet what recommendations will be made and what will be placed into law.
Universal Credit
The Government had also planned to make major changes to the health element of Universal Credit.
More than three million Universal Credit recipients don't have to find work due to their poor health.
A single person who is aged 25 or over can receive the basic level of the benefit, which comes in at £400.14 every month.
But those getting an incapacity top-up due to a disability or long-term condition can get an extra £422.37 - more than double the original payment.
The new plans mean that anyone up to the age of 22 will not be able to claim the health element.
Ministers had tried to freeze the payment for the next four years but a commitment has been made for it to go up with inflation.
That means people claiming the health element of Universal Credit and new claimants with the most severe conditions will see their incomes protected in real terms.
Existing claimants will get £97 per week until the end of the decade.
However, new claimants from 2026 will see the health element drop from £97 a week to £50 a week.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
28 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Labour ‘may refuse to use Israeli parts' in UK dome defence system in bid to appease pro-Palestinian backbench MPs
Labour was accused of planning to exclude hi-tech Israeli anti-missile systems from Britain's proposed 'Iron Dome' defences last night in a bid to appease its pro-Palestinian backbench MPs. Ministers faced claims that they were preparing to drop 'tried and tested' equipment from Tel Aviv-based firm Rafael in favour of a 'more politically correct' alternative. The accusations come as the Government seeks to upgrade and expand its array of Sky Sabre anti-missile units in imitation of Israel 's own 'Iron Dome' defences. Sources told the Mail on Sunday that even though Rafael's control and command system was currently used in all seven existing Sky Sabre units, Ministers were now looking to go instead for a Norwegian-produced rival. The Ministry of Defence responded last night by saying that no such decision had been made. But the fears come amid pressure from pro-Palestinian Labour MPs for the Prime Minister to toughen his policy towards Israeli amid mounting alarm over the scale of the Israeli military action in Gaza and the rising death toll of Palestinians living there. In particular, Sir Keir has faced calls to suspend all arms exports to Israel and to recognise Palestine as a state. Only yesterday, there were reports that French president Emmanuel Macron – who will make a state visit to the UK this week – is urging Sir Keir to hurry up and recognise Palestine. And last night, one security source told the Mail on Sunday: 'Keir Starmer doesn't want to be seen to be close to Israel on defence. 'He's terrified of the Palestinian lobby. 'And he's wary of [Attorney General] Richard Hermer saying they're complicit in helping Israel break international law.' The UK currently has no equivalent of Israel's famed Iron Dome missile defence system. But the Government's Strategic Defence Review promised last month to provide up to £1 billion in new 'homeland air and missile defence' as well as protection against cyber attack. The MoD is also set to upgrade and expand its current seven Sky Sabre medium-range, ground-based mobile air defence systems. However, sources claimed that instead of continuing with the existing Israeli-produced command and control units for Sky Sabre, Ministers were planning to appease their pro-Palestinian backbench MPs by switching to a Norwegian alternative called NASAMs. Last night, defence expert and cross-bench peer Lord Walney said: 'It would be inexcusable if tried-and-tested Israeli components were no longer used simply for politically convenient reasons.' Lord Walney, former chairman of Labour Friends of Israel, added: 'Britain needs the best high-tech defence as the world gets more unstable. 'It would be dismal if ministers ditched components from an Israeli company to avoid pressure from the pro-Palestine crowd.' Only last week, non-affiliated peer Lord Austin, the Government's trade envoy to Israel, told the House of Lords how 'the RAF would not be able to get its planes off the ground without Israeli technology' and that 'British soldiers would have been killed in Iraq and Afghanistan without Israeli defence equipment.'


The Herald Scotland
32 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Shona Robison urges Prime Minister to follow Scotland on taxation
Her comments come after Sir Keir Starmer's Government was forced into a last-minute climbdown in order for welfare legislation to pass its first parliamentary hurdle earlier this week. In a late concession on Tuesday evening, ministers shelved plans to restrict eligibility for the personal independence payment (Pip), with any changes now only coming after a review of the benefit. These changes are expected to put pressure on other parts of the Government's finances. Ms Robison said: 'People voted for a Labour government last year because they wanted change from the Tories – but after a year of attacks on the incomes of pensioners, the poor and the disabled, they are rightly wondering exactly what, if anything, is different. 'When Keir Starmer took office, he could have chosen to ask people on higher incomes to pay a little more in tax in order to protect public spending. 'Choosing instead to target the vulnerable is not leadership – frankly, it is political cowardice. 'If Keir Starmer had done in England what the SNP have done in Scotland with taxation, Labour would not be in the complete fiscal mess that they are in now. Sir Keir Starmer has been urged to rethink taxation (Lucy North/PA) 'After a year of mistakes, Labour needs a new direction – and they should look to Scotland. By asking people on higher incomes to pay a bit more in tax, we have ensured a majority of taxpayers pay less than they would elsewhere in the UK, and are able to unlock more spending for services like the NHS, as well as cut poverty by introducing a Scottish Child Payment, and ensure that everybody can benefit from important services like free tuition and free prescriptions.' She added: 'Labour used to tell Scotland that we didn't need independence and we just needed to get rid of the Tory government – but the last year has completely demolished that argument. 'No Westminster government will ever deliver the truly fair society which I believe the vast majority of people in Scotland want to live in – and that is why independence is the best future for Scotland.' Scottish Labour's economy, business and fair work spokesperson Daniel Johnson MSP said: 'SNP ministers have a brass neck to think they can lecture anyone after their atrocious financial mismanagement. 'The SNP use higher taxes on Scottish nurses and firefighters as a substitute for economic growth, waste billions on out-of-control prison and ferry projects, and have created multibillion-pound black holes in the public finances. 'Labour is delivering the largest funding settlement in the history of devolution, with £50 billion for Scotland's NHS, schools and public services this year alone. Despite that, the SNP are now gearing up to make cuts to fill their fiscal black hole. 'The SNP government has the money, they have the powers, but they are out of ideas, out of excuses and out of time. 'Next year, we have the chance to kick out this SNP Government that cannot be trusted with taxpayers' money.'


The Herald Scotland
32 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Family hubs to be rolled out across every council in England
The Education Secretary has said that the scheme will 'give a lifeline' to families. Family hubs were originally rolled out across 75 local authorities at the start of 2024 by the then-Conservative government. Officials say that the hubs will be rolled out in every local authority by April 2026, and there will be expanded so there are up to 1,000 of them by the end of 2028. Among the services available at the locations will be birth registration, debt advice, midwifery services and support for parents who are separating or have separated. Officials hope that the spaces will also provide families access to other services and social care. Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson praised the scheme (Ben Whitley/PA) Bridget Phillipson said: 'It's the driving mission of this government to break the link between a child's background and what they go on to achieve – our new Best Start family hubs will put the first building blocks of better life chances in place for more children. 'I saw firsthand how initiatives like Sure Start helped level the playing field in my own community, transforming the lives of children by putting in place family support in the earliest years of life, and as part of our plan for change, we're building on its legacy for the next generation of children. 'Making sure hard-working parents are able to benefit from more early help is a promise made, and promise kept – delivering a lifeline of consistent support across the nation, ensuring health, social care and education work in unison to ensure all children get the very best start in life.' The Conservatives have said that the announcement 'brings little clarity on what's genuinely new and what simply rebrands existing services'. Shadow education secretary Laura Trott (Stefan Rousseau/PA) Shadow education secretary Laura Trott said: 'That lack of clarity is part of a wider pattern. 'This is a Government defined by broken promises and endless U-turns.' Charity Save The Children has said it is 'pleased' to see the Government 'making it easier for families to get the help they need'. Dan Paskins, executive director of Policy, Advocacy and Campaigns at Save The Children UK, said: 'Focusing on family services for the under-fives will be vital in securing better outcomes for children, and we welcome the Best Start In Life announcement. 'We know from our work in local communities that bringing together parenting, healthcare and education support services in one place is an approach which works, so we are pleased to see the UK Government making it easier for families to get the help they need. 'With ministers now demonstrating an increasingly ambitious plan for children in the UK, we hope this drive for change continues when the child poverty strategy is released in autumn. 'This must include scrapping the two-child limit to Universal Credit, which is the only meaningful way to reduce the UK's record child poverty rate.' The head of the NAHT union welcomed the move. General secretary Paul Whiteman said: 'This is a positive step forward towards ensuring all children get the best start – and we are pleased to see tangible investment following this week's announcement of new targets for school readiness.'