Coalition sharply divided over third-level fees
Fianna Fáil
Minister for Further and Higher Education
James Lawless
that the student contribution could increase by as much as €1,000 next year.
Fine Gael
was privately seething at the controversy, with party sources saying their TDs had received a barrage of representations from concerned parents and students, while radio shows and social media channels were also full of opposition to the measure.
One party source said there had been 'panic' following Mr Lawless's suggestions, pointing to 'two days on Liveline' and also how the issue dominated Leaders' Questions in the
Dáil
.
Fine Gael backbencher Willie Aird said very few students have parents 'with deep pockets who can come up with this €1,000'.
READ MORE
'I'm pleading with ye today not to go ahead with this,' he said in the Dáil.
Fianna Fáil sources insisted it was Mr Lawless's responsibility to set his own budgetary priorities in the Department of Further and Higher Education, and blamed Fine Gael for overreacting to his comments.
The Government had decided not to include any cost-of-living package in the next budget, sources said, and Ministers would have to decide how to manage that in their own departments. They pointed out the commitment to reduce the student contribution fee in the programme for Government had to be done 'in a financially sustainable manner'.
One senior Fianna Fáil source also insisted that more than half of all students already receive a full or partial subsidy of their student contribution fee, adding that the income threshold for fee supports this year is at an 'historic high at €115,000'.
'It is important to target those most in need,' the source said. 'Families that need more will get more.'
On a visit to Japan, Taoiseach
Micheál Martin
sought to avoid being dragged into the row, saying the issue of student fees would be part of negotiations between individual Ministers and the Minister for Public Expenditure.
'There's a broad range of priorities there. So it'll all go forward to negotiations,' Mr Martin said.
At home, Tánaiste
Simon Harris
also sought to avoid escalating the row in public, suggesting that some assistance to students would be included, on a permanent basis, in the budget.
Mr Harris said parents of college students should pay fees in instalments and 'see where the budget brings us'.
The controversy arose after Mr Lawless said on Sunday that because the Government had decided there would be no cost-of-living package in this year's budget, the €1,000 reduction to fees of €3,000, which was a part of recent budgets, would no longer apply – suggesting an effective €1,000 increase for many students.
The fees issue – always incendiary in Irish politics – dominated exchanges in the Dáil.
Sinn Féin
finance spokesman
Pearse Doherty
said 'sending a kid to college is already costing families an arm and a leg' and 'hitting them with an extra €1,000 will make going to college impossible for many, and no wonder young people are leaving this country in their droves'.
Acting
Social Democrats
leader
Cian O'Callaghan
said the Government 'promised to reduce student fees, you are now breaking those promises that you have made'.
The row between the Government parties comes amid a backdrop of funding shortages for the third-level sector.
A funding gap of €307 million was identified by the government in 2022. Privately, many in higher education circles say badly-needed funds have been diverted into measures aimed at cutting college fees instead. In last October's budget, however, the Government pledged to increase core funding, rising from €50 million in 2025 to €150 million extra by 2029.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
a few seconds ago
- Irish Times
Second tier child benefit could leave up to 100,000 worse off, tax strategy paper suggests
The introduction of a second tier, means-tested child benefit payment would involve the replacement of some existing supports and could lead to some lower-income households losing out financially, the Tax Strategy Group (TSG) papers suggest. According to TSG, based on some estimates, up to 100,000 children could end up being worse off. The TSG, which prepares a range of papers for the Government in advance of the budget being framed, paper on social protection notes that it has been suggested that to address deprivation experienced by children most effectively would require putting in place a second tier, means-tested, child benefit payment. However, t argues that public discourse on this suggestion does not generally recognise that it involves the replacement of the second tier of child payments that already exists in the form of the Child Support Payment (a means-tested payment to families in receipt of weekly social welfare payments) and the Working Family Payment (aweekly tax-free payment for employees on low pay with children). READ MORE 'Most recently the ESRI has proposed the replacement of these payments with a single second tier payment and modelled an option costing over €700 million annually over and above the existing payments,' the paper notes. 'In doing this, it acknowledges that its proposal is in outline form would require substantial work to refine and cost fully. 'It also acknowledges that some lower income households would lose income – with payments reducing in respect of approximately 100,000 children. This is a complex issue that would need to be fully understood before any new second tier payment is introduced.' The paper notes that the programme for government contained a commitment to developing a proposal for a Working Age Payment, which would be given to low-income households based on their pay levels rather than their employment status and involve a child-related element. 'Accordingly, any new second tier payment would have to be considered in the context of how it would interact with this payment – a consultation on which is due to issue later this year,' the paper added. The paper said that pending these developments, 'it remains clear that it is important to target welfare increases to the households with children where the risk of poverty is greatest and that such an approach favours investment in targeted rather than universal benefits'. The paper says that Child Support Payment (CSP), currently paid at €50 for children under 12 years and at €62 for children 12 years and over, is one such targeted measure. It estimates that a €1 increase in the payment for both age cohorts would cost about €15.45 million in a year. 'Annual increases in the Child Support Payment mitigate the risk of poverty for families with children. There was a proportionately larger increase in the rate in respect of children 12 years and over in Budget 2025. 'One advantage to adjusting the rate of the Child Support Payment rather than the personal rate is that it equally benefits lone parents and couples with children, without an adjustment to the personal rate of each scheme. 'Other targeted measures that would directly reduce child poverty, include increasing the weekly income thresholds for the Working Family Payment and increasing the Back-to-School Clothing and Footwear Allowance. Households with children that receive other supplementary welfare supports such as Fuel Allowance would also benefit from increases in this payment. 'The support of the Public Employment Service delivered by the Department's Intreo Centres is also important in assisting parents, particularly lone parents in transitioning from welfare to employment and will have a material impact on the income levels of these households.' The paper also highlights that when one-off payments in recent budgets are excluded, increases in core social welfare payment rates between 2019 and 2025 lagged behind price inflation by between 2.5 to 5.5 per cent and lagged wage growth by between 9 and 13 per cent. 'Accordingly, as the use of 'one-off' payments is ceased, it will be important to ensure that other rate measures are effective in targeting the reduction in poverty among those most at risk of poverty,' it stated.
Irish Times
a few seconds ago
- Irish Times
Avolon orders 90 Airbus jets
Irish aircraft lessor Avolon has ordered 90 new passenger jets estimated to be worth at least €12 billion from European giant Airbus as it bets that global demand for flying will keep gaining altitude. Dublin-based Avolon, which buys aircraft from manufacturers and leases them to airlines, said profits grew 36 per cent to $143 million (€122 million) in the three months to June 30th. The company confirmed that it had ordered 90 new aircraft from leading commercial jet manufacturer Airbus that will be delivered over the next eight years. The order, for 75 A321 aircraft used for short-haul flying and 15 A330s, designed for long distances, is worth more than €12 billion based on prices published by Airbus. READ MORE However, Avolon can negotiate significant discounts on those figures and does not comment on prices. Shareholders in its parent, China's Bohai Leasing, must approve the deal. Avolon continues to see strong growth in demand for flying around the world as more people in developing countries begin earning enough money to travel, according to its chief executive, Andy Cronin. [ Avolon raises $1bn bank facility Opens in new window ] 'We believe that that will continue for the foreseeable future,' he said. 'Aviation has shown its resilience against multiple challenges in the last few years.' Recent figures from the International Air Transport Association show travel demand is up almost 6 per cent this year. Delays in getting critical parts for aircraft and other problems are hindering manufacturers such as Airbus' and Boeing's ability to keep up with demand. How will the updated National Development Plan shape Ireland in years to come? Listen | 35:59 Mr Cronin acknowledged that this could affect the order's schedule. 'I would be surprised at the end of eight years if everything runs perfectly on time. The world doesn't work like that,' he said. However, he explained that placing the order gave Avolon an advantage over rivals as it secured its place in the queue as aircraft become available. Mr Cronin noted that both types of plane were in demand. 'This demonstrates our confidence in the long-term demand for new aircraft,' he said in a statement. [ Avolon profits soar, helped by $150m net insurance payout relating to aircraft in Russia Opens in new window ] Benoît de Saint-Exupéry, Airbus executive vice president, predicted that Avolon's order would open new markets and add customers for both models. Avolon expects airlines in Asia, India, Europe and North America to lease the new aircraft. The company had agreed lease deals for 98 per cent of its current order book, including the 140 jets pledged from Airbus and Boeing in 2023, by the end of June. Many of those jets went to Asian carriers, said its chief executive. In Europe airlines are replacing older planes with newer, more fuel efficient and quieter models. The order brings to more than 500 the total number of A320neo that Avolon owns, manages or has pledged to buy from Airbus. At the end of June it owned, managed or had on order 1,116 aircraft, while it had 142 airline customers in 60 countries. Meanwhile, Avolon is continuing with legal action against insurers who did not pay out after it lost aircraft leased to Russian airlines following the country's invasion of Ukraine in 2022. Mr Cronin said that the amount involved was not material. Insurers paid it $150 million last year, settling most of its claims. Avolon said in 2022 that political risk deterred it from doing much business in Russia. The Irish company buys aircraft from manufacturers with a combination of its own cash and borrowings. It leases the planes to airlines, earning revenue from the rent they pay. It had $8.8 billion in available debt and cash at the end of June.
Irish Times
31 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Income tax dilemma for Government as VAT cuts could cost €1bn
The income tax dilemma faced by the Government in framing October's budget is underlined in key pre-budget papers, which say that indexing tax bands and credits for inflation would cost over €1 billion. This is why Ministers are now considering holding off the proposed cut in VAT for the hospitality sector to 9 per cent until the middle of next year , as they need to leave funds to increase income tax credits and widen tax bands, to ensure wage inflation does not lead to a higher tax burden on households. The Tax Strategy Group papers, drawn up by senior civil servants to outline budget options, outline the high cost of cutting VAT on hospitality. The full year cost of a cut to the VAT rate in all areas of hospitality is just over €800 million. Adding hairdressers and entertainment brings the total to €867.7 million. If the Government also decides to extend the VAT cut on household energy bills, the total rises to over €1.05 billion. As well as deferring the cut to the middle of the year, the Government may also consider restricting it to the food and catering element of hospitality and excluding accommodation, which would save €134 million in a full year. However, the papers warn that there are 'practical operational concerns in having different VAT rates applying to hotel accommodation and meals given how the sector operates, with various packages ranging from bed and breakfast accommodation through to all-inclusive board and lodging packages. ' READ MORE [ Government likely to delay VAT reduction for hospitality sector until mid-2026 Opens in new window ] However, the civil servants did not repeat their strong criticism of the proposed cut in the 2024 papers, when they argued the cut from 13.5 per cent to 9 per cent would be 'unjustified' and represent an 'enormous fiscal transfer of taxpayer's money' to one sector On income tax, the papers estimate that wage growth will run at about 4 per cent next year and that adjusting income tax credits and bands to account for this would cost more than €1 billion in 2026. This would be roughly in line with the tax package introduced for this year. The papers also provide the latest estimates of who pays income tax in Ireland, with the top 1 per cent of taxpayers – earnings over €297,000, paying 23.4 per cent of all income tax and USC and the top 10 per cent, earning more than €106,500, paying 63 per cent of the total. Some 1.1 million earners are exempt from income tax completely. The papers also look at the politically controversial issue of inheritance tax , including a commitment by the Minister for Finance that the issue of how different relationships are treated would be examined. In particular, the threshold at which brothers, sisters, nephews and nieces of the person giving the gift or leaving the inheritance become liable to tax is €40,000, compared to €400,000 for children. The department points out that it is not unusual for tax systems internationally to treat different relationships with the person giving a gift or leaving an inheritance differently. Also, 70 per cent of those who had received a substantial inheritance or gift had received it from their parents. While the papers say it is not possible to estimate precisely the cost of having everyone now on the €40,000 threshold moved to the €400,000 one, it would not be greater than around €300 million. The civil servants suggest that another way to proceed would be to allow a person to choose one or two heirs to their estate, who would benefit from the €400,000 threshold. The civil servants also say that the Government could consider restricting the ' spiralling cost ' to the exchequer of relief for people passing on farms and businesses. The civil servants also modelled a scenario where CAT tax rates increased with the size of the inheritance. However, given the sensitivity of this area, this is unlikely to be taken up politically.
