
Opinion: AISH clawback underscores Alberta's fraying social contract
But gratitude is not justice, and survival is not dignity.
Former premier Peter Lougheed once understood that. When he created the Assured Income for the Severely Handicapped (AISH), it was visionary, a bold commitment to lifting Albertans with disabilities out of poverty and away from the stigma of welfare. It was a moral promise, not just a budget line, to protect those who could not protect themselves — not out of pity, but out of principle.
That promise has been broken.
Today, AISH is framed as 'generous,' but only in the most cynical of comparisons. Alberta pays slightly more than other provinces, in a country where every disability program leaves people below the poverty line. Bragging about being the best of the worst is not a mark of excellence; it's a distraction.
The current rate of $1,902 per month sounds decent until you try to live on it in Calgary or Edmonton. After rent, utilities and food, most recipients are left choosing between medication and bus fare. This isn't generosity, it's slow deprivation, dressed in news releases.
And now, the Canada Disability Benefit, a long-awaited federal program meant to lift people out of poverty, is being clawed back by Alberta. AISH recipients are told to apply, only to have every federal dollar deducted from their provincial benefit. What should have been a turning point is instead a trap.
Alberta isn't supplementing, it's siphoning.
This is not how a just society behaves.
Justice means supporting people with disabilities not just in survival, but in well-being. It means recognizing that many want to work, but face unpredictable health conditions, chronic pain, PTSD or fatigue, which make conventional employment impossible. True justice offers flexibility, accommodation and stability, not punishment for failing to meet able-bodied expectations.
Yet, the myth persists that people with disabilities should be content with what they're given. That mere existence should be enough to inspire gratitude. It's a degrading expectation.
No one tells millionaires to be grateful for tax breaks. No one asks oil companies to be thankful for subsidies. But people with disabilities? They're told to smile while the social safety net is exchanged for a trampoline with a hole in it.
I've seen what happens when the system fails. When an adult with a disability loses the parent they relied on, they don't just lose a caregiver, they lose their home, their structure and their hope. They fall, and there's no net. And when they spiral into mental-health crises, the system shrugs. This isn't a fluke; it's the outcome of choices made by people in power.
And yet, Albertans with disabilities remain resilient. They remain proud. They are grateful, not for crumbs, but for every person who treats them with respect, for every doctor who listens, every stranger who sees their worth, every advocate who still has the energy to fight.
But make no mistake, they are owed more than gratitude. They are owed justice. For justice is the price of civilization.
Lougheed understood this more than 40 years ago. The current government has forgotten. Instead of defending dignity, they chase surpluses and weaponize austerity.
But we, persons with disabilities, understand.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Calgary Herald
6 hours ago
- Calgary Herald
'Alberta Forever Canada' petition sees potential hurdles according to Alberta political scientist
The countdown has officially started, and Thomas Lukaszuk has less than 88 days to garner over 290,000 signatures for his 'Alberta Forever Canada' citizen initiative. Article content Alberta's Chief Electoral Officer Gordon McClure issued the petition on Wednesday for a potential referendum that asks whether or not Alberta should remain in Canada. Article content Article content The petition was approved under older guidelines that the province had in place. In total, the petition needs to garner 293,976 signatures by Oct. 28. Article content Article content 'It definitely appears that a referendum on separation in this province was inevitable,' said petition originator and former progressive Conservative deputy premier Thomas Lukaszuk. 'Our premier has done everything she could to make it as easy and convenient for the separatists to strike a referendum by lowering the number of required signatures, extending the time of petitioning, and really relaxing fundraising rules.' Article content Article content Lukaszuk ultimately decided to start a new conversation to contrast voices promoting separatism in Alberta. Article content 'That's why I chose to do it,' he said. 'I was fortunate enough to file my petition first, my petition meets all the Federal Supreme Court of Canada and provincial legislative requirements.' Article content They will officially be launching the campaign in Edmonton tomorrow at the Strathcona Farmers Market at 9 a.m., alongside soliciting signatures from Albertans at public events, festivals, and knocking door-to-door. Article content Numerous canvassers from Calgary have also signed up, but are currently in the process of being registered with Elections Alberta. Article content 'They will probably be out in the next four or five days, because Elections Alberta is in the process of accrediting them and that's sort of a bureaucratic process that they have to go through, but there's no other way around that,' Lukaszuk said. Article content Lukaszuk is confident they will hit their mark. Article content 'It looks like there is a lot of appetite for it because there is no shortage of Albertans who want to sign the petition,' he said. ' We're inundated with questions of 'where can we sign,' so now the only challenge we have is getting can sign.' Article content Hurdles and pitfalls


Edmonton Journal
9 hours ago
- Edmonton Journal
Opinion: Premier Smith's wine tax isn't 'Canada First' — it's politics first
Article content When Premier Danielle Smith stood beside B.C. Premier David Eby in May 2024 and announced a new agreement to allow direct-to-consumer (DTC) wine shipping from B.C. into Alberta, many of us in the Canadian wine industry applauded. For the first time in years, it felt like provinces were putting Canadians — and common sense — ahead of bureaucracy and trade barriers. That optimism was short-lived. What Alberta's government did in the months that followed has undermined that agreement and added new costs to Alberta consumers. Worse, it was done quietly — during a time of global tariff uncertainty — under the cover of a foreign trade dispute. Let's walk through what happened: May 2024: Alberta and B.C. agreed to reopen DTC wine shipping. It was heralded as a return to fairness and free interprovincial trade. Article content Article content Article content April 1, 2025: Alberta added a new ad valorem tax — a percentage-based fee tied to the price of the wine. This wasn't part of the original agreement. It mirrors Alberta's wholesale markup, erasing the savings and simplicity that DTC wine was supposed to offer. What was the justification? Premier Smith's government pointed to the Trump administration's reimposition of U.S. tariffs on Canadian wine and other goods. But let's be clear: instead of shielding Canadian businesses from international instability, Alberta used those U.S. tariffs as an excuse to introduce a new tax on B.C. wineries and to raise costs for Alberta residents who want to buy directly. This is not leadership. It's a bait-and-switch. Albertans deserve to know the truth: your government made a public promise of access and fairness, then reversed course behind closed doors. The ad valorem tax introduced in April undermines the very spirit of the DTC agreement. It hurts Alberta consumers and penalizes B.C. producers trying to build direct relationships with wine lovers like you. You can still buy wine directly from B.C. wineries — but now you'll pay more than promised. And we'll get less than we should. This issue is bigger than wine. It speaks to how governments treat their agreements, their business partners, and —most importantly —their citizens. I urge Albertans to demand better from their leaders. Let's stop using international tensions as cover to quietly roll out new taxes on Canadians. Article content


Calgary Herald
10 hours ago
- Calgary Herald
Opinion: Premier Smith's wine tax isn't 'Canada First' - it's politics first
Article content When Premier Danielle Smith stood beside B.C. Premier David Eby in May 2024 and announced a new agreement to allow direct-to-consumer (DTC) wine shipping from B.C. into Alberta, many of us in the Canadian wine industry applauded. For the first time in years, it felt like provinces were putting Canadians — and common sense — ahead of bureaucracy and trade barriers. That optimism was short-lived. What Alberta's government did in the months that followed has undermined that agreement and added new costs to Alberta consumers. Worse, it was done quietly — during a time of global tariff uncertainty — under the cover of a foreign trade dispute. Let's walk through what happened: May 2024: Alberta and B.C. agreed to reopen DTC wine shipping. It was heralded as a return to fairness and free interprovincial trade. Article content Article content Article content Article content April 1, 2025: Alberta added a new ad valorem tax — a percentage-based fee tied to the price of the wine. This wasn't part of the original agreement. It mirrors Alberta's wholesale markup, erasing the savings and simplicity that DTC wine was supposed to offer. What was the justification? Premier Smith's government pointed to the Trump administration's reimposition of U.S. tariffs on Canadian wine and other goods. But let's be clear: instead of shielding Canadian businesses from international instability, Alberta used those U.S. tariffs as an excuse to introduce a new tax on B.C. wineries and to raise costs for Alberta residents who want to buy directly. This is not leadership. It's a bait-and-switch. Albertans deserve to know the truth: your government made a public promise of access and fairness, then reversed course behind closed doors. The ad valorem tax introduced in April undermines the very spirit of the DTC agreement. It hurts Alberta consumers and penalizes B.C. producers trying to build direct relationships with wine lovers like you. You can still buy wine directly from B.C. wineries — but now you'll pay more than promised. And we'll get less than we should. This issue is bigger than wine. It speaks to how governments treat their agreements, their business partners, and —most importantly —their citizens. I urge Albertans to demand better from their leaders. Let's stop using international tensions as cover to quietly roll out new taxes on Canadians.