EDITORIAL: Social agreement needed for disposing of Fukushima soil
The government has decided on a basic policy direction for the huge volume of contaminated soil resulting from the 2011 triple meltdown at the Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power plant of Tokyo Electric Power Co.
The two main measures are to recycle some of it and to eventually dispose of all the soil outside of Fukushima Prefecture.
However, no course for those measures has been laid down because of difficulties in finding a location to serve as a final disposal site.
This is a grave issue that society as a whole must squarely face.
Soil removed during decontamination work within Fukushima Prefecture has been accumulating at an interim storage facility near the nuclear plant so as not to interfere with reconstruction efforts in the prefecture.
The equivalent volume of 11 Tokyo Domes has been collected.
In order to obtain local understanding, the government has proposed moving that soil outside of Fukushima for final disposal by 2045.
The Fukushima governor accepted that proposal, but said it was an 'agonizing decision.'
Many blocs in the Diet supported a legal revision that clearly stated it was the central government's responsibility to dispose of the soil outside of Fukushima.
There is major significance to the promise made to disaster-stricken areas that were forced to shoulder serious environmental pollution and the bitterness of losing one's hometown.
Because there were doubts about whether that goal could be realized, it is also a fact that politicians made a decision before thorough discussion was conducted.
With only 20 years before the deadline for final disposal, the most pressing issue will be recycling the soil so the volume for final disposal is reduced.
The plan is to use about three-fourths of the total volume with radiation concentration levels under 8,000 becquerels per kilogram of soil in public works projects in various parts of Japan.
In the recently decided basic policy, one measure included was using the soil in shrubbery planted within the grounds of the prime minister's office as a sign the central government was taking the lead in the matter.
To ensure sufficient safety, the government has said the radiation exposure of workers handling the soil would be kept under international standards and that measures would be taken to prevent the soil from becoming airborne or spilling out from the work site.
But understanding will not deepen if only scientific safety is emphasized.
The Environment Ministry's plan for experimental use of the soil in the Tokyo metropolitan area never got off the ground because of opposition from local residents.
When the government recently sought out views about the recycling soil standard, many concerns and doubts were submitted.
There was a sharp difference of opinion regarding the radiation risk from the nuclear plant accident in relation to farm products and the release of treated water into the ocean.
Rather than imposing its views, the government has the responsibility of making every effort to achieve social agreement by removing concerns through civil dialogue with local governments and citizens.
Now is also the time to enter into serious discussions about final disposal that will come after recycling.
There are many issues to discuss, such as the cost and burden, including recycling of the soil, and what plans the government has for the areas around the nuclear plant once final disposal is completed.
The handling of the removed soil is an especially difficult matter for the processing of the nuclear accident.
According to an Environment Ministry study, only one in four respondents outside of Fukushima Prefecture know about the policy of final disposal outside of that prefecture. That is much lower than the slightly more than half of the Fukushima Prefecture respondents who are aware of that policy.
The accident of 14 years ago occurred while Japanese society continued to use nuclear power under a 'safety myth.'
The electricity generated at the Fukushima No. 1 nuclear plant was mainly used in the Tokyo metropolitan area.
There is a need for deep and careful consideration about how to achieve a resolution to the issue by having the entire nation tackle the task of dealing with the aftereffects.
--The Asahi Shimbun, June 4
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
2 days ago
Overseas Voting for Japan Upper House Election Begins
Seoul/Beijing/Taipei, July 4 (Jiji Press)--Voting for the July 20 election for the House of Councillors, the upper chamber of the Diet, Japan's parliament, started for Japanese nationals abroad on Friday. Voting began at the Japanese Embassy in Seoul, South Korea, at 9:30 a.m. Friday Japan time, following Thursday's start of the official campaign period for the election. "I'd like to see stability in the (Japanese) government, given that tariff negotiations are ongoing with the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump and the global situation is unstable," said Naoya Maeda, a 27-year-old graduate student living in the South Korean capital. Maeda, who is originally from the southwestern Japan prefecture of Kagoshima, said that he cast his vote "in hopes that the cooperative relationship between Japan and South Korea will be maintained." "We hope people will take advantage of this opportunity to participate in politics," an official at the embassy said. [Copyright The Jiji Press, Ltd.]
2 days ago
Max Vote-Value Gap Rises to 3.126 Times for Upper House Poll
News from Japan Politics Jul 4, 2025 16:58 (JST) Tokyo, July 4 (Jiji Press)--The maximum vote-value disparity between House of Councillors prefectural constituencies has risen to 3.126 times for the July 20 election for the upper chamber of the Diet, Japan's parliament, according to an estimate by Jiji Press. The figure was up from 3.03 times in the previous Upper House election in 2022. The Supreme Court has ruled the 2022 poll to be constitutional in terms of disparities in the value of votes. As of Wednesday, the number of eligible voters across the country stood at 104,245,113, the internal affairs ministry said Thursday. Tokyo had the largest number of voters, at 11,645,722, while Fukui had the smallest, at 620,962. In terms of the number of voters per seat, the most populous Tokyo constituency had 970,477 voters, against 310,481 voters in the least populated Fukui constituency. The gap between the two was 3.126 times. [Copyright The Jiji Press, Ltd.] Jiji Press
Asahi Shimbun
2 days ago
- Asahi Shimbun
Sanseito pushes motherhood over careers, queries gender policies
Sanseito party leader Sohei Kamiya addresses a crowd in Tokyo's Chuo Ward on July 3, kickstarting his party's Upper House election campaign. (Jin Nishioka) The leader of right-wing minor opposition Sanseito party called for a societal shift that encourages more women to stay home and raise children, rather than pursue full-time careers. Sohei Kamiya was giving a speech in central Tokyo ahead of the July 20 Upper House election. Kamiya, 47, criticized what he called Japan's 'misguided' emphasis on gender equality policies in recent decades. While he acknowledged that women joining the workforce is 'a good thing,' he argued that Japan has 'gone too far' in pushing women into the workplace, at the expense of the country's declining birthrate. 'We've made mistakes, like with this whole gender equality thing,' Kamiya said in his July 3 address. 'Of course, women working is fine. But we pushed too hard with the 'everyone must work' mentality. 'What we really need to do is create an environment that gives incentives to young women to bear children and make them feel secure in doing so,' he added. To support this shift, Kamiya proposed a sweeping financial incentive: a monthly child allowance of 100,000 yen ($690) per child until age 15. 'That's 18 million yen per child. If you have two children, that's 36 million yen. With this kind of support, staying home to raise children becomes a reasonable option, better than a part-time job or office temp work,' he said. Founded in 2020, Sanseito has steadily built support on a platform of tax cuts, nationalist ideology and a 'Japanese First' message that calls for tougher immigration controls. The party currently holds five seats in the Diet, including the one held by Kamiya. During the speech, Kamiya also made remarks about the biological limitations of childbirth, stating that only young women can bear children. Although Kamiya emphasized that he did not intend to marginalize older women, a portion of the speech referencing this topic was later removed from the party's official YouTube video. Sanseito said the omission was due to a 'technical issue,' not censorship. When pressed by reporters about his comments, Kamiya clarified that while medical advances have enabled women in their 40s to give birth, 'there are biological limits.' He emphasized that encouraging women of childbearing age to have more children is key to reversing Japan's population decline. Sanseito has made family policy a central plank of its platform for the election, emphasizing that childbirth and parenting are 'core national priorities.' The election is widely seen as a test of Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba's minority government, which is facing poor public approval ratings due to the cost-of-living crisis and other issues. Sanseito promotes the idea that being a stay-at-home mother should be recognized as a legitimate and honorable choice, one that it argues has been overshadowed in recent decades by career-focused narratives.
