DBS, OCBC, UOB Q2 results likely to be weighed down by lower interest rates
They are expected to post their Q2 financials next month, beginning with OCBC on Aug 1 and followed by DBS and UOB on Aug 7.
Net interest margins (NIMs) will probably be 'materially lower' in Q2, said Thilan Wickramasinghe, head of research and regional financials at Maybank Securities Singapore.
He noted that the Singapore Overnight Rate Average (Sora) was down 50 basis points – due to 'massive' domestic liquidity, partly because of safe haven inflows – while the Hong Kong Interbank Offered Rate (Hibor) was at its lowest since 2022.
The Sora decline provided only partial relief in funding costs, as banks 'weigh off preserving market share', he said.
DBS Group Research analyst Lim Rui Wen also expects NIMs to fall quarter on quarter by a high single digit, due to the lower Sora and Hibor.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
The rates' impact will likely be more pronounced as more loans get repriced against reduced benchmark rates throughout Q2, she added.
However, she noted that OCBC's and UOB's repricing of their fixed-deposit and flagship deposit account interest rates should buffer falling asset yields in subsequent quarters.
Wickramasinghe also pointed out that loan growth was better than expected in Q2, probably due to front-loading demand ahead of the expiry of US President Donald Trump's tariff moratorium.
While this may partially offset downsides in net interest income, it is unlikely to arrest sequential decline, the researcher said.
Trump impact
Analysts also said that Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariffs in April likely weighed on market sentiment, impacting wealth management fees in turn.
Tay Wee Kuang, an analyst at CGS International, said that macroeconomic uncertainty could continue to dampen fee income in the second half of the year, despite equity market sentiment having slowly recovered.
Nevertheless, Lim of DBS expects wealth management income to remain a tailwind for Singapore banks in the medium term, as wealth management activity began recovering in May.
This is also supported by ongoing growth in assets under management (AUM), she said. 'The investible portion of AUM is expected, as clients reallocated funds from fixed-deposit rates and (treasury-bill) rates, which continue to see declining rates through Q2.'
Wickramasinghe likewise expects sequential improvements in wealth management fees, given falling domestic benchmark rates and risk-on market conditions.
He added that significant volatility around foreign exchange, trade and interest rates would likely have supported trading income in Q2, which could surprise on the upside, especially for DBS and UOB.
Higher credit costs
Meanwhile, the three banks' credit costs could trend towards the higher end of their respective 2025 guidance, due to weakness across Asean economies such as Thailand and Indonesia , said Tay.
'However, we do not expect total credit costs to change drastically quarter on quarter, as we believe the pre-emptive general provisions recognised by the Singapore banks in Q1 should remain sufficient amid the current credit cycle,' he added.
Ongoing reviews of second-order impacts from the US tariffs may also lead the banks to maintain or increase their general provision buffers, said Lim. Therefore, general provisions write-backs are unlikely this year, she noted.
CGS International and Maybank Securities kept their 'neutral' call on the Singapore banking sector, with Tay noting that the lenders lack growth catalysts in an uncertain economic outlook.
The analysts expect UOB to restore its guidance for 2025, which it had suspended in Q1.
They are also awaiting more clarity from OCBC on its strategy, following its failed bid to privatise its insurance arm, Great Eastern . Clarity around returns may also take longer to resolve due to the lender's 'unexpected leadership change ', Wickramasinghe said.
But Lim, who has 'hold' calls on OCBC and UOB, expects the banks' dividend yields of up to 6.5 per cent to continue supporting share prices.
'As asset quality remains largely benign, and dividend yields stay attractive, comparable to Singapore real estate investment trusts, we expect share prices to remain well-supported in a low interest-rate environment and due to the safe haven appeal of the Singapore dollar,' she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Trump is winning his trade war, but Americans will pay the price
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox All indications are that Americans will pay more for nearly all the goods they consume when the effects of all of US President Donald Trump's tariffs kick in. - Judging from the air of concession wafting across world capitals from Tokyo to Brussels, United States President Donald Trump is prevailing in his trade war. The White House is in a celebratory mood. Almost every day, press conferences and statements catalogue the many supposed benefits flowing from Mr Trump's strategy. The strategy has brought trade partners to the negotiating table, is catalysing trillions in foreign investment commitments, protecting America's strategic industries and generating billions in revenue. So much winning, in Trump-speak. If success, however, means more jobs, more trade and a stronger economy, the evidence is more suspect. All indications are that Americans will pay more for nearly all the goods they consume when the effects of all the tariffs kick in. The universal baseline tariffs of 10 per cent have already been in effect since April and will remain in place for around 100 nations with no trade deficits with the US, like Singapore and Australia. Effective from Aug 7, more than 70 nations will face 'reciprocal' tariffs , ranging from 10 to 50 per cent. The concept of reciprocity seems questionable as Mr Trump's strategy from the start has been to exert pressure on trade partners rather than strictly mirror their tariffs. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore LTA, Singapore bus operators reviewing Malaysia's request to start services from JB at 4am Singapore Despite bag checks and warnings, young partygoers continue to vape in clubs in Singapore Singapore President Tharman meets migrant workers who saved driver of car that fell into sinkhole Singapore Now flying solo, Acres CEO Kalaivanan Balakrishnan presses ahead with wildlife rescue efforts Opinion The charm – and drawbacks – of living in a time warp in Singapore Business UMS Integration becomes first SGX company with secondary listing in Malaysia Singapore Ong Beng Seng to plead guilty on Aug 4, more than 2 years after trip to Qatar with Iswaran Business Decoupling to save on tax? You may lose right to property if ties go awry For those nations running a trade surplus with the US, the rate is at least 15 per cent. It is higher still for others, where geopolitics and personal vendettas sharpen the blade. Brazil, for instance, has no trade surplus with the US. Nevertheless, it has been slapped with a rate of 50 per cent at least partly because Mr Trump has an issue with the government prosecuting former president and Trump ally Jair Bolsonaro on coup charges. India, at a 25 per cent rate , also faces an unspecified penalty for its import of Russian energy and arms. The US has also caught on to transshipping, the sly rerouting of goods through lower-tariff nations. This practice now invites a 40 per cent penalty. More deals are to come, if the President wants them, according to Trade Representative Jamieson Greer in an Aug 1 TV interview. It is not clear what kind of deal will be struck with America's near peer rival . China poses a peculiar problem and the US is still alternating between confrontation and pressing for an advantage. 'Their economy and ours are like a square peg and a round hole, they don't really fit together very well,' Mr Greer said. But what is crystal clear is that America has just executed a major turn, reshaping the post-World War II economy to reflect Mr Trump's priorities of preserving American dominance in all spheres, from military might and manufacturing to energy. And the man is just six months into the job. Costs are more tangible than benefits As Mr Trump is never tired of pointing out, the threat of tariffs has persuaded the European Union and Japan to commit to investing US$600 billion (S$774 billion) and US$550 billion in the US, respectively. Combined with earlier investment commitments, including from Saudi Arabia, Mr Trump has touted the figure of US$12 trillion. Tariff revenues now make up 5 per cent of federal revenues, much higher than the historical average of 2 per cent. The figures are impressive – US$150 billion was collected in mere months, with projections of 'several hundred billions' by the year end. And American companies can now sell their goods – beef, rice, cars and other items – with zero tariffs in many more nations. Key American industries are sheltered through sectoral tariffs enacted in auto, steel, aluminium and copper industries. Pharmaceuticals and semiconductors are next in line. But plenty of fine print applies. Analysts caution that many pledges from foreign partners may be delayed, only partially fulfilled, or merely symbolic. Foreign investments in the US usually flow in tandem with dollars earned by companies from exports to the US. If tariffs penalise these exports, investing more dollars is challenging. The actual inflow of foreign investment will likely surpass the levels seen in recent years, say analysts at the Peterson Institute of International Economics (PIIE) in Washington. Just not, they add, by the large margins claimed publicly by Mr Trump. Dr Marcus Noland, an international trade economist at PIIE, found a clear example of the impact of Mr Trump's tariffs right in his own kitchen. The granola he has for breakfast is made by an American company with a plant in Ontario, Canada. Due to higher tariffs, the price of this granola has risen more than 40 per cent. 'Shortages and higher prices, there's no good here,' he maintains. Experts have tallied the costs. The average US tariff rate in the first quarter was 2.4 per cent, but climbed to 10 per cent in June. The latest levy announcements are set to bring that to more than 18 per cent, according to analysts at Gavekal Research. The median US household stares down an extra US$1,270 in expenses for 2025, a number projected to reach US$1,619 next year. Economic growth slowed from near 3 per cent in 2024 to about 1.2 per cent over the first half of 2025 and may be zero for the rest of the year. Some models predict wages will fall and leave scars that will stay raw for a generation. A recession now appears 'very, very likely', to quote Moody's Analytics chief economist Mark Zandi, who has been warning of this outcome since Mr Trump made his 'Liberation Day' tariffs announcement in early April. Corporate bottom lines tell a similar story. Apple's June quarter results dazzled, but only because buyers rushed to beat tariffs. The 25 per cent levy on India – where the company now produces its smartphones for the US market – darkens the next quarter. Amazon says inventories are its buffer now. But the future is 'impossible to know', says its chief executive Andy Jassy as supply chains in China, where the e-commerce giant sources its vast array of products, are in the crosshairs. Manufacturers, wholesalers and retailers increasingly report paying higher prices for the goods and services they buy and are slowly beginning to raise the prices they charge their customers, says the US Chamber of Commerce. Higher tariffs will directly punish the domestic manufacturing industry given that approximately 56 per cent of US imports are composed of raw materials and intermediary and capital goods. These will especially hit the small businesses which operate on thin margins and will find it harder to absorb the tariffs. Defined as those with fewer than 500 employees, they account for over 40 per cent of the country's economic activity. Industry insiders are also sceptical of Mr Trump's push to expand access for American products. 'I don't know that we wanted zero tariffs on American goods,' said an analyst who advises American businesses operating in South-east Asia. 'The more important things are the non-tariff barriers.' Hoover Institution economist David Henderson narrowed in on the impact of tariffs on the most important actor in the US economy – the consumer. 'For some countries, notably those in the European Union, tariff rates will be lower than they were before Trump began. That is a victory. But we should be clear about whom it's a victory for,' he noted in a July 31 commentary. 'The main gainers are European consumers, and the secondary gainers are US exporters. The big losers, though, from the high US tariffs, are US consumers and producers who use the tariffed items as inputs, and the secondary losers are foreign exporters,' he said. He noted that while US consumers will pay a 19 per cent tariff rate on goods from the Philippines and Indonesia, and a 20 per cent on those from Vietnam, their consumers will pay a zero per cent tariff on imports from the US. 'Don't get me wrong. I'm glad that people in those three countries, almost all of whom are poorer than the average American, will get the benefits of one-way free trade,' he said. 'But I feel bad for Americans, who will pay higher taxes,' he said. The deals, although heralded as victories by the Trump Administration, have not been struck in the traditional way. No formal texts bind them; and there seem to be differences in how they are regarded in Washington and overseas. In his quest for a 'good' deal, nation by nation, Mr Trump may have squeezed out some advantages. But will a refusal to consider the reality of an interdependent world come back to bite America in ways not yet apparent? And no monetary or symbolic victory can be counted as a 'good deal' if it results in squandering a precious asset that took the US years to earn – global goodwill. Can America afford to arm-twist the very same countries whose help it needs in its geopolitical rivalry with China? And if tariffs continue to be applied in purely mercantilistic terms, they may have the effect of transforming America First into America Alone.
Straits Times
7 hours ago
- Straits Times
After a lag, US consumers begin to feel the pinch of tariffs
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Government data showed prices rose in June on items heavily exposed to tariffs, such as home furnishings, toys and appliances. Companies are starting to shift more tariff-related costs onto consumers. Many businesses chose to absorb the additional tax during the early days of President Donald Trump's trade war . But evidence is emerging that they are running out of options to keep prices stable in the face of deteriorating profit margins, suggesting that the tariffs could have a more pronounced effect on prices in the months ahead. Government data shows that prices rose in June on items heavily exposed to tariffs, such as home furnishings, toys and appliances. And in recent days – before Mr Trump announced tariffs for much of the world on the night of July 31 – Adidas, Procter & Gamble, Stanley Black & Decker and other large corporations told investors that they either had increased prices or planned to do so soon to offset the tariff costs. Companies like Walmart and toy makers Hasbro and Mattel had already warned that tariffs would lead to higher prices. 'We have no interest in running a lower-margin business, particularly due to tariffs,' Mr Richard Westenberger, the chief financial officer of Carter's, a children's apparel maker, said on a call with analysts July 25. 'And if this is something that's going to be a permanent increase to our cost structure, we have to find a way to cover it.' Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Despite bag checks and warnings, young partygoers continue to vape in clubs in Singapore Singapore Ong Beng Seng to plead guilty on Aug 4, more than 2 years after trip to Qatar with Iswaran Singapore LTA, Singapore bus operators reviewing Malaysia's request to start services from JB at 4am Singapore NDP 2025: Veteran Red Lion says each leap 'feels like 5km run' Business Decoupling to save on tax? You may lose right to property if ties go awry Singapore Lessons learnt from Singapore's love-hate relationship with e-scooters Opinion At UN's Wipo, Singaporean Daren Tang strives to create an equal music for haves and have-nots Asia Mass grave with over 100 skeletons in Sri Lanka brings up old wounds Economists have been watching for signs of tariff-related price increases since Mr Trump rolled out his trade policy in the spring. But inflation remained relatively muted, defying expectations and prompting the White House to declare that those who predicted the tariffs would elevate prices were mistaken. Even some forecasters are acknowledging that the tariffs have taken longer to work their way through to consumer prices than initially anticipated. Mr Jerome Powell, chair of the Federal Reserve, said on July 30 that the process might be 'slower than expected at the beginning'. 'We think we have a long way to go to really understand exactly how it will be,' he said. Ms Sarah House, an economist at Wells Fargo, said the next three to six months would be 'crunch time,' as more tariff rates solidified. 'Businesses are grappling with the fact that tariffs are here to stay, and as there's more certainty around a higher tariff environment, they are going to be more willing and able to adjust their prices,' she said. 'We're getting to a point where you're going to start to see those feed through.' NYTIMES
Straits Times
7 hours ago
- Straits Times
Lashing out over Russia and jobs data, Trump displays his volatile side
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox On Aug 1, Mr Trump, confronted with foes and facts that he could not easily control, displayed another side of himself. WASHINGTON - Despite slowing over the first half of the year, the US economy has remained reasonably healthy. Yet when the jobs report for July was released Aug 1, showing a substantial slowdown in hiring, President Donald Trump lashed out, claiming the figures were rigged and firing the head of the government agency that produces them. Mr Dmitry Medvedev was once president of Russia, but now is little more than the Kremlin's favourite online troll. Yet when he got under Mr Trump's skin with provocative posts about nuclear war, Mr Trump, already increasingly infuriated by President Vladimir Putin's unwillingness to work with him to end the war in Ukraine, responded on Aug 1 as if a real superpower conflict could be brewing, ordering submarines into position to guard against any threat. Just days earlier, Mr Trump had returned to the United States from a golf trip, happily flexing his political and diplomatic power. A capitulating Congress had passed his signature domestic policy legislation, despite concerns over its deep cuts to the social safety net. The European Union caved to Mr Trump and his threat of tariffs by announcing a trade deal during the president's trip to Scotland. Emboldened, Mr Trump moved ahead with sweeping tariffs that could reshape the world economy. But on Aug 1, Mr Trump, confronted with foes and facts that he could not easily control, displayed another side of himself, responding with disproportionate intensity and a distinct impatience. His actions were part of a pattern in which he has shown growing intolerance toward those who will not bend to his will. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Despite bag checks and warnings, young partygoers continue to vape in clubs in Singapore Singapore Ong Beng Seng to plead guilty on Aug 4, more than 2 years after trip to Qatar with Iswaran Singapore LTA, Singapore bus operators reviewing Malaysia's request to start services from JB at 4am Singapore NDP 2025: Veteran Red Lion says each leap 'feels like 5km run' Business Decoupling to save on tax? You may lose right to property if ties go awry Singapore Lessons learnt from Singapore's love-hate relationship with e-scooters Opinion At UN's Wipo, Singaporean Daren Tang strives to create an equal music for haves and have-nots Asia Mass grave with over 100 skeletons in Sri Lanka brings up old wounds Mr Jerome Powell, the Federal Reserve chair who has defied Mr Trump's demands for interest rate cuts, has been subject to withering and relentless criticism and insults from the president. Mr Trump has assailed those of his own supporters who have refused to drop their demands for release of the Jeffrey Epstein files. But his actions on Aug 1 were especially striking because they involved fiery reactions to two of the biggest issues on his plate. Russia under Putin, once viewed by Mr Trump as a partner in solving big problems, has left Mr Trump frustrated and facing mocking reminders of his pledge that he could bring the war in Ukraine to an end on his first day in office. With Mr Putin now responding to Mr Trump's peace efforts by launching more attacks and brushing off threats of further US sanctions, Mr Trump has turned against him – and on Aug 1 used his commander-in-chief powers to respond to baiting posts from one of Mr Putin's online attack dogs. Soon after disclosing on his social media platform that he had ordered nuclear submarines 'to be positioned in the appropriate regions, just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that', Mr Trump fired the head of the Bureau of Labour Statistics, claiming that the employment numbers were being massaged to make him look bad. 'I think he deliberately surrounded himself with yes men and yes women,' said Mr John Bolton, a former national security adviser to Mr Trump. 'It's more evidence he's not fit to be president. This is not the way a president responds to either one of these situations.' In firing the commissioner of the statistics bureau, Ms Erika McEntarfer , who was confirmed on a bipartisan basis in 2024, Mr Trump accused her of a long pattern of rigging the job numbers to hurt him before and after the 2024 election, a claim dismissed by economists across the political spectrum. 'I believe the numbers were phony, just like they were before the election,' Mr Trump said as he left the White House on Aug 1. 'And there were other times. So you know what I did? I fired her, and you know what I did? The right thing.' The move cemented many fears that Mr Trump, who has already fired inspectors general and installed loyalists in the Justice Department, would eventually root out government officials who report politically inconvenient data or intimidate them from publicly disclosing bad news. Mr William W. Beach, a former head of the Bureau of Labour Statistics who was nominated by Mr Trump during his first term, described the firing as 'groundless' and warned that it sets 'a dangerous precedent'. 'This escalates the president's unprecedented attacks on the independence and integrity of the federal statistical system,' Mr Beach said in a joint statement with other statisticians. 'The president seeks to blame someone for unwelcome economic news.' Mr Trump similarly showed little caution earlier in the day in responding to Mr Medvedev, who had said in a social media post that Mr Trump should imagine the apocalyptic television series 'The Walking Dead' and noted the Soviet Union's system for launching a nuclear strike. 'Words are very important,' Mr Trump said. 'And can often lead to unintended consequences. I hope this will not be one of those instances.' Mr Bolton said it was the president who needed to show more discipline. 'He may not even understand what he's doing,' Mr Bolton said. 'It's so natural to him to say outrageous things that he's incapable of thinking about the strategic consequences.' Having surrounded himself with aides unwilling to challenge his impulses, Mr Trump faces no constraints on lashing out impulsively, Mr Bolton said. 'Trump is not deterred by reality,' Mr Bolton said. 'He just says what he wants to say.' In attacking Mr Powell, the Fed chair, Mr Trump has sought to accuse him of mismanaging an expensive renovation of the central bank's headquarters. But when Mr Trump showed up at the building recently to make his case, Mr Powell, in a low-key but remarkable display of defiance, publicly challenged cost figures being cited by the president.
