The Bank of England crowdsources ieas for new banknote design
0
Our banknotes have showcased notable historical figures since 1970, when William Shakespeare became the first person other than the monarch to feature on a Bank of England banknote. There are many ways to represent the UK on our banknotes. The consultation gives people the opportunity to express their views on what theme they would like us to feature on the next series of our banknotes. The six potential themes we have identified include:
notable historical figures
architecture and landmarks
arts, culture and sport
noteworthy events in history
innovation
nature
The public can also suggest other themes for the Bank to consider.
Victoria Cleland, the Bank of England's Chief Cashier, said: 'Banknotes are more than just an important means of payment - they serve as a symbolic representation of our collective national identity and an opportunity to celebrate the UK. I am really keen to hear what themes the public would like to see represented on the next series of notes.'
The next series of banknotes will feature a portrait of the monarch, regardless of the selected theme(s).
Banknotes are complex and it is a detailed, multi-year process to design, test and print them, to ensure they are high-quality, resilient and accessible.
Depending on which theme is selected, we may seek further feedback from the public on the specific images that could be used to show the chosen theme. We will keep the public updated, including announcing the final note designs in due course.
Notes to editors
The consultation closes at 11.59pm on 31 July 2025. We are seeking responses in particular from UK residents and British citizens living abroad. They can be submitted via an online form on the Bank's website or by post.
Examples for images depicting the six potential themes included in the consultation paper include:
notable historical figures: This theme, which is used on our current series, could be depicted by portraits of specific historical figures who have made an important contribution to UK society and culture. We will not represent living people on our banknotes, with the exception of the monarch.
architecture and landmarks: This theme could be depicted by images of iconic buildings and other places, such as castles, bridges or heritage sites across the UK.
arts, culture and sport: This theme could be depicted by images of the arts, music, literature, customs, food, film, television or sport which define the UK.
noteworthy events in history: This theme could be depicted by images of important events and movements which have shaped the UK.
innovation: This theme could be depicted by images of important advancements, technologies, discoveries or ideas developed in the UK.
nature: This theme could be depicted by images of native plants, animals, or natural landscapes such as rivers, lakes, mountains or coastal scenes from around the UK.
3. The first of the current G Series notes was the £5 issued in September 2016. This was followed by the £10 in September 2017, the £20 in February 2020 and the £50 note in June 2021.
4. While cash use has declined over the past decade, it is still the preferred payment method for around one in five people and used by many more. The Bank is committed to providing cash for those who wish to use it.
5. WeTransfer link to graphic for the consultation Opens in a new window, which may be a useful visual resource.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
31 minutes ago
- Times
Teaser 3275
Against the Odds I have taken a number of playing cards (more red than black) from a standard pack of 52 cards and distributed them in a certain way in two piles, each containing both red and black cards. A card is taken at random from the smaller pile and placed in the larger pile. The larger pile is shuffled; a card is taken at random from it and placed in the smaller pile. There is a one in eight chance that the number of red and black cards in each pile will be the same as they were originally. How many black cards in total were used? Send your solution to: The Sunday Times Teaser 3275, PO Box 29, Colchester, Essex CO2 8GZ or email The first two correct solutions opened after next Saturday each win a £20 Waterstones voucher. Open to 18+ UK & ROI residents only. Solution to Teaser 3273 52 The winners are: N Jones, Gillingham, Dorset; A Skidmore, Ripley, Derbyshire.
The Sun
32 minutes ago
- The Sun
Emma Raducanu gives new insight into her lovelife amid Carlos Alcaraz romance rumours
EMMA RADUCANU gave fresh insight into her lovelife after the Carlos Alcaraz romance rumours. Raducanu and Alcaraz announced they have teamed up on the court for the US Open mixed doubles event in New York. 5 5 But there have been suggestions the duo are linking up off it, too, especially after she watched the Spaniard in action at Queen's. A source exclusively revealed to SunSport the pair had a 'spark' and arrived at Queen's within minutes of each other amid suggestions of spending cosy days together. But Raducanu played down their possible relationship by giggling "we're just good friends" before Wimbledon started. However, after Wednesday's emphatic Centre Court victory over Marketa Vondrousova, she joked she had never been heartbroken. Among the VIPs in the Royal Box for the match was Olivia Rodrigo, fresh from her Glastonbury headline set. Raducanu claimed she did not know who was in the posh seats when she spoke in her on-court interview, insisting she was so focused on her match to notice. When speaking to the BBC, though, she confessed she had spotted golfer Tommy Fleetwood. But when told American singer-songwriter Rodrigo was in the crowd, Raducanu came back with a quick and cheeky response. The Brit, relaxed after booking her third-round date with world No1 Aryna Sabalenka, quipped: "She's got some great heartbreak songs. "If you're ever going through it, she's the one." Carlos Alcaraz claims he 'will do whatever she wants me to do' in revealing Emma Raducanu interview after Wimbledon win The BBC interviewer replied: "Thanks for the advice." Then the tennis ace laughed: "I wouldn't know though, of course not." Raducanu - who was told she was banned from having a boyfriend by her parents growing up - previously went out with billionaire heir Carlo Agostinelli, a former Harrow School head boy. Ex-Tottenham academy footballer Carlo is the son of tycoon Robert Agostinelli. The couple got together in May 2023 and were arm-in-arm at Paris Fashion Week as well as enjoying luxury holidays together in Greece and Mexico. 5 Wimbledon 2025 LIVE - follow all the latest scores and updates from a thrilling fortnight at SW19 But after they split up, they unfollowed each other on social media. On her relationship with Alcaraz and how they became friends, Raducanu said: "I've known him for years. "Wimbledon 2021 was the first time I started getting to know him, and I had a good run there and then also again in the US Open in 2021. "We have a good relationship still. He's obviously overtaken me a lot, but it's nice that we have that from a while ago. "I think for all of us, we really kind of value those connections that we had from when we were young because when you become a bit more known or a bit more successful, you just find yourself reverting back to people you knew from a young age because you're like, that's a real genuine connection. "Because it becomes very busy and you have a lot more friends but the ones that you've known for a long time mean a lot more to you." 5
Times
32 minutes ago
- Times
After a terrible anniversary week, is Keir Starmer finished?
At the Spectator summer party, one of the biggest events of Westminster's social calendar, much of the conversation centred around one man — Nigel Farage. The Reform UK leader and his allies adjourned to a private terrace overlooking the Spectator garden and private security cordoned off the stairs. There they sipped Dom Perignon while cabinet ministers and senior Tories including Kemi Badenoch and Robert Jenrick circled the garden below. When the news broke that Jeremy Corbyn, the former Labour leader, was planning to found a new party there were cheers from the Reform terrace. A new Corbyn-led hard left party meant yet more pain for Starmer — and a bad end to a truly terrible anniversary week for the prime minister. Senior Tories were disparaging about Farage and his coterie of supporters. 'They're so cocky,' said one shadow cabinet minister. Labour ministers said Farage offered 'no answers'. But both parties were alive to the threat posed by the man standing a few yards from them. At a cabinet meeting on Tuesday Starmer expressed his pride in his government's achievements after a year in power, listing off what he views as the successes. Free school meals, increasing defence spending to 2.6 per cent of GDP, trade deals with the US, the EU and India. The list went on. But within a few hours he was forced to make an extraordinary retreat in the face of a mass rebellion by Labour MPs over the government's welfare reforms, leaving a £5 billion hole in the exchequer. Then it got worse. On Wednesday Rachel Reeves, the chancellor, broke down in tears at the dispatch box, prompting a frenzy in the bond markets. As the dust settles this weekend, some cabinet ministers are asking the question: is it terminal? Will Starmer, who secured a landslide majority at the last election, lead Labour into the next election? 'It feels like it's done,' said one. Certainly the polling is bleak — and far worse than that for any party in recent political history that won a landslide just twelve months before. Research by YouGov for The Times this week found that just one in five voters (21 per cent) think that Labour has done well in office so far and less than a third think they are any better than the previous Conservative government. Across a range of issues the party's voters are deeply dissatisfied with the government's performance. On the cost of living, 62 per cent of those who backed Labour at the election say the government is doing badly, while 46 per cent are unhappy with the government's handling of the NHS. On Starmer himself: 69 per cent of voters think he's weak, 65 per cent say he doesn't care about people like them and 49 per cent say he's dishonest. Anthony Wells, head of European political research at YouGov, said: 'Labour's problem is that despite their landslide victory last year there was never any great enthusiasm for them in the first place — people were voting against the Tories. So as they have made some unpopular decisions they have not had any goodwill in the bank to fall back on.' Yet concerns about whether Starmer can survive need a reality check — Labour does not have the same appetite for regicide as the Tories or the same mechanisms for removing a leader. Even his most ardent critics concede that there there is no obvious successor who is capable of uniting Starmer's fragmenting electoral coalition. Angela Rayner, the deputy prime minister, appeals to those on the left of the party but there are questions about whether she could command broader support. Wes Streeting, the health secretary, has the same problem the other way — he can appeal to those in the centre but has more limited appeal to those on the left. The YouGov polling also shows that all the plausible Labour alternatives, including Rayner and Streeting, are seen as more likely to be worse than Starmer. The speculation about Starmer's future stems in part from the knowledge that things are likely to get much worse. As difficult as the first year has been, the challenges of the second will eclipse them — the biggest of which will be the budget. At the cabinet on Tuesday, before the week's calamitous events, Reeves sounded a warning to ministers. At that stage the government had only made a partial about turn on welfare, protecting all existing claimants at a cost of £2.5 billion. Reeves said the compromise came at a cost, and that money would need to be raised. She said the last budget, painful as it was with £40 billion worth of tax rises, represented the 'low-hanging fruit'. The next budget would be more challenging. The tax rises are likely to be big. The cost of the change in direction on welfare and winter fuel payments came to around £6 billion, but economists are much more concerned about the anaemic levels of economic growth and a potential downgrade in forecasts. Some put the figure that needs to be raised as high as £30 billion, which would require huge tax rises. Cabinet ministers privately acknowledge that the benefits U-turn means all options for raising tax are now on the table. That includes potentially breaking the manifesto pledge not to raise income tax, national insurance or VAT, although ministers are loath to do so. A tax raid on pension savings is also being considered. Paul Johnson, director of the Institute of Fiscal Studies, said it would be very hard for Labour to find the money necessary without touching those 'big three' taxes. 'I don't really think there is [a way of doing it],' he said. 'We don't really know what kind of levels of money the chancellor will need to find but if we are looking at £30 billion, which is quite plausible, I can't see a way in which she raises that kind of money without hitting people on middle incomes as they did with the national insurance increase.' One minister said that while they would prefer spending restraint over tax rises, they appear to be unavoidable. They said that all options would need to be considered. The Times has been told that the government will not reopen the spending review despite the scale of the gap in the public minister was philosophical. The reality was that on many occasions the government had to choose between 'bad choices or very bad choices'. That, at times, government is effectively a Sophie's choice, with no good options on the table.
