New law forces B.C. legislator to quit her ‘part-time' job as municipal councillor
VICTORIA — A B.C. Conservative legislator has lost what she called her 'part-time' job as a councillor after a new law banning MLAs from also serving as municipal representatives came into effect.
Misty Van Popta represents Langley-Walnut Grove in the provincial legislature, but lost her job as a municipal councillor in the Township of Langley in the Fraser Valley on Thursday when the Eligibility to Hold Public Office Act came into effect and forced her to resign.
'I'm obviously disappointed, but not shocked,' she said after the passage of the law. 'When you see that bill being presented, and you know that the government has the balance of power, you know it is going to pass.'
Van Popta was elected as councillor in 2022, but didn't step down after being elected to the legislature last year, drawing criticism from the provincial NDP.
The NDP's Darlene Rotchford, who tabled the new law as a private member's bill, said legislators needed to give '110 per cent' to their jobs, and can't do that if they are trying to hold down another.
Van Popta – whose photograph no longer appears on the township's website – said her decision to hold two elected offices at the same time had precedent and was always meant to be a 'temporary solution.'
Van Popta added that she was planning to resign as councillor in 2026, the year of the next municipal elections, to save her municipality the cost of a byelection.
The last general municipal election in the Township of Langley cost about $500,000.
Van Popta's Conservative colleague Heather Maahs quit her Chilliwack school board position after becoming an MLA last year. The school board byelection in March cost an estimated $100,000.
Van Popta said she felt that the NDP singled her out, and she was able to prove she could do both jobs.
'There is just no evidence to substantiate the fact that I haven't been working 100 per cent as an MLA,' she said.
She said that being a municipal councillor in her community with a population of about 162,000 was a 'part-time job.'
Van Popta said being a councillor with the township is not the 'same thing as being a municipal councillor in the City of Vancouver' or other large community.
'I have demonstrated over the last seven months that it was doable,' she said of her two jobs.
Rotchford said the bill was not focused on anyone in particular, but meant to close a loophole.
'This is something that shouldn't be allowed,' Rotchford said in the legislature on Wednesday. 'We are ensuring that all (MLAs) are giving 110 per cent in closing that loophole, when you are an MLA in the province of British Columbia, similar to other provinces across the country.'
There is no rule preventing federal members of Parliament from serving as councillors.
Richmond Coun. Chak Au was elected as an MP representing Richmond Centre-Marpole in April.
This report by Wolfgang Depner of The Canadian Press was first published May 30, 2025.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
33 minutes ago
- CTV News
B.C. braces for impact of Trump's 35 per cent tariffs
U.S. President Donald Trump has hiked Canada's tariffs to 35 per cent - here's what that means for B.C. For Michael Devereux, an economics professor at the University of British Columbia, the new tariffs imposed on Canada Friday morning are 'confusing.' Devereux told CTV News the 35 per cent levies – which U.S. President Donald Trump blamed, in part, on fentanyl going over the border – will hurt Americans. '(They're) much more important for the U.S. consumer because they actually pay the tariffs,' said Devereux. Approximately 90 per cent of Canadian exports, which are covered under the Canada United States Mexico Agreement, or CUSMA, are still tariff-free. But Devereux explained the remainder that are could have a significant impact on the economy, if U.S. consumers choose to stop purchasing those Canadian goods. B.C. Forestry Minister Ravi Parmar said, 'No sector has felt the weight of that more than our forestry sector here in British Columbia.' Parmar said his ministry is currently focusing on creating robust trade relationships with other nations. 'I'm going to be ensuring that my team has boots on the ground in those places supporting small and medium-sized companies to be able to explore finding new customers,' he said. While those negotiations are ongoing, Parmar said the B.C. government is still hopeful their federal counterparts can secure a long-term deal with the U.S. Federal ministers including Vancouver MP Gregor Robertson were tight-lipped on Friday, but did say Prime Minister Mark Carney was attempting to forge the best deal possible for Canadians Carney put out a statement in the morning that read, in part: 'The Canadian government is disappointed by this action and will act to protect Canadian jobs,' adding that he will continue to negotiate with the Americans. Devereux said British Columbians are in a difficult situation, and with CUSMA renegotiations on the table next year unless what he called a rational deal is made, things could get worse. By CTV News Vancouver's Demetra Maragos
CTV News
2 hours ago
- CTV News
What does the 35 per cent tariff mean for B.C.?
Vancouver Watch U.S. President Donald Trump has hiked Canada's tariffs to 35 per cent - here's what that means for B.C.
Vancouver Sun
4 hours ago
- Vancouver Sun
B.C. NDP has promises to keep, but no money to spend
VICTORIA — The New Democrats face increasing pressure to live up to their commitments on long-term care for seniors, child care for families, and safeguards for children in government care. The most recent push came this week from the B.C. seniors advocate, Dan Levitt. He warned that seniors on the waiting list for long-term care facilities are clogging hospital beds and ER waiting rooms. The number of seniors on waiting lists for publicly funded long term care has tripled under the NDP, from 2,381 the year before they took office to 7,212 currently, Levitt reported. A daily roundup of Opinion pieces from the Sun and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Informed Opinion will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. Premier David Eby defended the government's performance, saying the New Democrats had added 5,500 spaces since taking power. Yet Levitt provided a scorecard on NDP election promises. The party's 2020 election platform promised 3,315 new beds and replacements for 1,755 others. To date, it has only delivered a fraction, 380 net new beds in all. The advocate identified the current shortfall at 2,000 beds. Eby professed to welcome the findings and conceded, given an aging population, 'we have to build faster, we have to build more and we have to build it more affordably to meet the demand that's out there,' Earlier this summer, the Coalition of Child Care Advocates lamented B.C.'s faltering progress on $10-a-day child care, a key promise in NDP election platforms going back to 2017. 'In 2018, because of $10-a-day advocacy, B.C. became a national leader in child care,' said spokesperson Sharon Gregson in a June 24 news release. 'That progress has now stalled. With just three years remaining in the government's 10-year plan, the province has flatlined provincial child care funding in the last two budgets, with no new provincial funds committed to achieving the promise of quality, universal $10-a-day child care by 2028.' Joining Gregson in the call was former NDP MLA Katrina Chen, who served as the NDP's minister of state for child care under Premier John Horgan. 'We need to get child care back on track in B.C.,' she said. Three weeks later came a survey from the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives which found that B.C. had the most expensive child care in the country. Only 10 per cent of the province's licensed spaces met the $10-a-day standard promised by the NDP. Also in mid-July, the child and youth representative, Jennifer Charlesworth, provided a one-year update on the recommendations in Don't Look Away, her report on the horrific case ofYou saw there is a correction Colby. Colby is the name the representative gave to the 11-year-old Indigenous boy, tortured to death by the extended family members into whose care he was placed by the government. While acknowledging the province had made 'significant progress in some areas,' the representative said it still fell well short of where it needs to be in safeguarding children in care. 'We said in our report Colby's death was entirely preventable and without significant change future deaths are entirely predictable,' Charlesworth told Simi Sara on CKNW. 'Important changes have been made. But we are still in a very precarious state in child well-being and we've got a lot of work still to do before I can say with confidence that it's extremely unlikely that this kind of horrific situation would not happen again.' Charlesworth credited the New Democrats with good intentions in their response to the report. But she also flagged the main reason for the lack of sufficient progress on her recommendations. 'I am very concerned that with fiscal limitations, these good intentions will not translate into timely on the ground improvements,' the representative told Ashley Joannou of The Canadian Press. 'The government has a significant deficit, there are fiscal reviews underway, and what we worry — because we have seen it many times — that what gets cut are social programs.' One could readily adapt the same excuse for the NDP failure to deliver on child care, long-term care and any number of other programs and priorities. Premier David Eby referred this week to the 'fiscal challenges' facing his government, an understatement if ever there was one. The government is budgeting for an $11 billion deficit this year and shortfalls of $10 billion each of the next two years. Moreover, with the economy slowing and revenues faltering, the fiscal situation could get worse. In his time as premier, Eby has failed to manage the budget or set realistic priorities, instead spending as if there were no limit. Now, when he's run out of money, he faces the challenge of satisfying the expectations he and the New Democrats themselves have raised. In a column Friday on the LNG Canada terminal in Kitimat, I wrote that an LNG Canada spokesperson said 'a new facility of this size and scope may face operational setbacks.' The quote marks wrongly gave the impression of a direct quote from the company. Rather, it was a paraphrase from a story by the Reuters news agency. An LNG Canada spokesperson says the company told Reuters: 'A new facility of the size and complexity of LNG Canada requires a break-in period to stabilize, which is normal in new LNG facilities.' vpalmer@
