Michiganders show solidarity, rally with Canadians at major bridge crossings
The protest marked another weekend of demonstrations in Michigan, where residents have taken to the streets in protest for weeks, in contrast to the results of the 2024 election, where Donald Trump won the state by a bit more than 80,000 votes.
In Detroit, speakers and protesters were focused on building unity between the U.S. and Canada amid fraying relations, while speaking about Trump's proposed tariff policies.
Throughout the afternoon, an estimated 350 people collectively waved from Hart Plaza to Canadians demonstrating on the Windsor Riverfront. They sang 'O Canada,' listened to speeches and cheered as one member of the crowd, Michael Hatch of the Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians, performed an indigenous dance.
Chantel Watkins, a 34-year-old Detroiter running for Detroit City Council District 5, spoke to the crowd about building unity among working people in the city.
"(Workers) want to keep their job, they want to be able to participate in the economy,' Watkins said to the Free Press after her speech.
'The biggest thing that we really want to do is not only support workers, but support all Americans because tariffs are gonna come down and affect us all,' Watkins said.
In recent months, the Trump administration has proposed tariffs that would affect the automotive industry. On April 22, a group of U.S. auto industry representatives urged Trump not to impose his proposed 25% tariffs on imported auto parts, warning they would cut vehicle sales and raise prices.
Trump has indicated that he plans to impose those tariffs no later than May 3.
More: Reporter learns of turnaround at Ambassador Bridge to Canada
To Watkins, she hopes her representative can step in to prevent these tariffs (and an active 10% tariff on all imported Canadian goods), which she says will hurt Michiganders.
'I hope that all of our senators and U.S. representatives are hearing everyone,' Watkins said. 'Because they're the ones who have the first line of defense when it comes to the ability to talk to Trump and to fight for the world that the people of Michigan want.'
In Port Huron, hundreds of people lined up under the Blue Water Bridge.
Yoopers Unite, an organization of Upper Peninsula residents, and Lake Superior Indivisible organized the event, coordinating events at three locations. Blue Water Indivisible, which only recently became active, worked with the Lake Superior branch to arrange the gathering.
Martha Fitzgerald, a Marquette native who was born in Port Huron, said the organization decided to act because they felt Canada had been unfairly targeted by tariffs and Trump's insistence the country become the 51st U.S. state.
"In early March, when the rhetoric was so severe regarding their sovereignty, we decided to act," Fitzgerald said.
Marcello Asaro, who joined the protest with his mother, Geri, said he felt it was important to support Canada due to the years of friendship between the two countries.
"I think we have to look out for our neighbors," Marcello Asaro said. "We need to remember who helped us in our times of need."
Several of those present at the Bridge of Friendship gathering said they had friends and family who live in Canada, and that the tariffs have affected those relationships.
More: Sarnia mayor wants American flags removed due to Trump's 'economic terrorism'
Bonnie Havlicek, of Edmore, said her niece is married to a Canadian citizen and that her friends and family used to regularly cross the border without incident. She has not been to Canada since November, and she said she has heard from family that entering the U.S. has become more of a hassle.
"You don't treat friends and family this way," Havlicek said.
Fitzgerald, who herself has 18 cousins living in Canada, said it was important for both Canadians and other Americans to see there were people willing to speak out against the president's statements.
"If you sit alone and just stew, it doesn't help anything," Fitzgerald said. "When we get together and share our beliefs, it helps. Taking action, marching together is good for our physical and mental health, and hopefully for our democracy too."
Contact Johnathan Hogan at jhogan@gannett.com. Contact Liam Rappleye at LRappleye@freepress.com
This article originally appeared on Port Huron Times Herald: Hundreds gather at Michigan-Canadian bridge crossings for rallies
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Domino's Pizza, (DPZ): 'Be Prepared To Be steamrolled,' Says Jim Cramer
We recently published . Domino's Pizza, Inc. (NASDAQ:DPZ) is one of the stocks Jim Cramer recently discussed. Domino's Pizza, Inc. (NASDAQ:DPZ) is a well-known American pizza chain. The shares have gained 11% year-to-date, helped partly by a 4% jump in July. Domino's Pizza, Inc. (NASDAQ:DPZ)'s stock was helped by a strong earnings report, which saw its US same-store sales jump by 3%. Cramer discussed the firm's partnership with DoorDash: 'I remember when Russell Weiner called me. Russell Weiner's fantastic, the CEO's fantastic. And he said, the street's underestimating this partnership [with DoorDash]. And I said well I'm not gonna underestimate it, cause he's been wanting to go with me the whole lot time. . .But Russell is a hitter. And he said this would happen. People just said, well what does it mean? And the answer it that it means there is another channel. And historically there hasn't been another channel, because the owners, the franchisees, always want to be the only channel. But I just think he's fabulous. That was really good numbers. People who don't like him, be prepared to be steamrolled.' Previously, the CNBC TV host discussed Berkshire Hathaway's stake in Domino's Pizza, Inc. (NASDAQ:DPZ): 'Russell Weiner said do you know that Warren Buffett is now my second largest shareholder? And that's Dominos. And he said I don't speak to him but it is, and I said well I don't know, maybe it's possible that he's not, that he, but I went to Becky Quick, because Becky can ask him. But what an informator if you find out that he is your second-largest shareholder.' While we acknowledge the potential of DPZ as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the . READ NEXT: 30 Stocks That Should Double in 3 Years and 11 Hidden AI Stocks to Buy Right Now. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Sign in to access your portfolio


Newsweek
18 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Map Shows States Trying To Ban ICE Agents Wearing Masks
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A growing coalition of Democratic-led states is pushing legislation that would prohibit federal agents from wearing face coverings during immigration enforcement operations. California, New York, Massachusetts and Pennsylvania have introduced bills that would require federal officers to display visible identification—with limited exceptions for safety or undercover purposes—as part of a progressive effort to increase transparency and limit the agency's expanded powers under the Trump administration. Why It Matters Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has come under increased criticism for deploying agents in plain clothes and face coverings during operations, a tactic officials say is necessary to protect agents and their families from threats. The agency's approach has drawn heightened scrutiny amid the Trump administration's aggressive push to deport millions of undocumented migrants, placing ICE at the center of a highly visible crackdown on immigration. What To Know At the federal level, House Democrats have introduced the No Anonymity in Immigration Enforcement Act, which would require ICE agents conducting enforcement operations within the United States to display clear identification—with limited exceptions for public safety threats. Exceptions would be permitted only in limited circumstances, such as when there is an imminent threat to the agent's life or risk of serious bodily harm or when protective gear is necessary for health or safety reasons. In any case where an exception is used, a supervisor must review and document the incident within 48 hours to assess whether it was justified and determine whether disciplinary action is warranted. Senate Democrats have introduced the VISIBLE Act, which mandates that agents from ICE and Customs and Border Protection wear legible identification showing their names and agency affiliations. It would also prohibit the use of most face coverings during operations. Democratic Senators Alex Padilla of California and Cory Booker of New Jersey introduced the bill, saying the measure seeks to increase transparency and accountability in federal immigration enforcement. Acting ICE Director Todd Lyons defended agents' continued use of face coverings, even as the agency faces mounting criticism for obscuring personnel identities during enforcement actions. "I've said it publicly before, I'm not a proponent of the masks. However, if that's a tool that the men and women of ICE to keep themselves and their family safe, then I will allow it," Lyons said on CBS's Face the Nation. Representative Laura Friedman of California said in a news release: "I am deeply concerned about the prospect of ICE agents continuing to go about immigration raids in plainclothes, masks, and without identifiers that indicate what agency they're representing. The rules governing law enforcement should extend to federal immigration agents." Federal agents in a hallway awaiting individuals exiting hearings at an immigration court in New York. Federal agents in a hallway awaiting individuals exiting hearings at an immigration court in New York. Andrea Renault/STAR MAX/IPx At the state level, California is leading the way with its No Secret Police Act, introduced in June by Democratic state Senators Scott Wiener and Jesse Arreguín. Senate Bill 627 would prohibit all law enforcement officers operating in the state, including federal agents, from covering their faces during enforcement actions unless in specific, limited circumstances such as SWAT deployments, medical masking or undercover work. The California Senate Public Safety Committee advanced the bill last week, but it faces a legal gauntlet, particularly over whether a state can dictate how federal officers dress. In New York, Democratic Assemblymember Tony Simone introduced the Mandating End of Lawless Tactics (MELT) Act earlier this week. The MELT Act mirrors California's SB 627 by banning masks for state, local and federal officers, and it would require law enforcement officers to clearly display their names or badge numbers and ban most mask use during public duties. Violations would constitute misdemeanors. In Massachusetts, Democratic state Representative Jim Hawkins filed a similar bill on July 9, focused specifically on ICE personnel. He argues that ICE's use of face coverings in routine operations blurs the line between law enforcement and intimidation. In Pennsylvania, Democratic state Representatives Paul Friel and Rick Krajewski are preparing to introduce the Officer Visibility Act in early August. The bill would ban face coverings during public enforcement operations unless medically required or part of a covert investigation. What People Are Saying Tom Decker, a former director of ICE's New York field office, told Newsweek: "President Trump and his administration are doing exactly what he promised in his campaign, strengthening our borders and removing public safety threats from our communities, to include aliens in violation of our immigration laws." Representative Laura Friedman of California said in a statement shared with Newsweek: "I'll keep fighting to pass commonsense legislation, like the No Masks for ICE Act, to keep our communities safe." Scott Mechkowski, a retired ICE agent who worked for the agency between the mid-1990s and 2019, previously told Newsweek: "I think everyone knows the reasons for the masks. Every agent knows they would be doxxed [publicly identified] as would their families." John Sandweg, who served as acting director of ICE under former President Barack Obama from August 2013 to February 2014, previously told Newsweek: "If you're getting arrested by an officer or agent in a mask, especially if at that point they've not yet identified themselves as a federal officer, it creates a risk of bystanders thinking, rushing in to help, which could create the risk of violence or harm caused to the bystanders." Abigail Jackson, a White House spokesperson, previously told Newsweek: "ICE officers are being doxed, physically assaulted, and attacked—in some cases, their families are even being threatened. Instead of spending their time further demonizing heroic ICE officers, Democrat politicians should dial back the rhetoric and tell their supporters to stop attacking law enforcement." Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem told CBS: "It's for the safety of those individuals or the work that they're doing as far as protecting their identity so they can continue to do investigative work."

USA Today
20 minutes ago
- USA Today
After $220 million Columbia deal, Trump promises more to come
After commending Columbia University for "agreeing to do what is right," President Trump indicates his pressure campaign to reshape prestigious colleges isn't stopping any time soon. WASHINGTON – After announcing a $220 million deal with Columbia University to restore its federal funding, President Donald Trump indicated his pressure campaign to reshape prestigious colleges isn't stopping anytime soon. Not long after the settlement was reached, he wrote on his social media platform that similar agreements with "Numerous other Higher Education Institutions that have hurt so many, and been so unfair and unjust, and have wrongly spent federal money, much of it from our government, are upcoming." Columbia, a selective and wealthy Ivy League school in New York City, on July 23 agreed to pay more than $220 million in fines over several years to the government for allegedly violating federal civil rights laws. Last year, the campus became the epicenter of student protests related to the Israel-Hamas war. At the time, the tense environment drew nationwide concern over a spike in antisemitic and anti-Muslim incidents. The heightened scrutiny also focused the ire of many conservative politicians, who have long accused higher education more broadly of being too left-leaning. Read more: How Columbia University became the epicenter of disagreement over the Israel-Hamas war Trump's criticisms of the campus, however, have extended far beyond its compliance with antidiscrimination protections. In March, he demanded that the school overhaul its hiring, admissions and teaching practices. Columbia's president, Claire Shipman, said the university would appoint an independent monitor to oversee the campus in conjunction with federal officials, and to ensure administrators are abiding by the terms of the deal. The 22-page agreement contains sweeping concessions from the college, including handing over admissions data to the independent monitor, new faculty appointments, conducting reviews of some academic departments and more greatly scrutinizing foreign student enrollment. In return, the Trump administration promised to reroute more than $400 million in paused federal funding, largely for research, back to the college. In an interview on CNN the morning after the arrangement was announced, Shipman indicated billions more dollars were at stake. "It's not just money for Columbia," she said. "This is about science. It's about curing cancer, cutting edge, boundary breaking science that actually benefits the country and humanity." The unprecedented agreement came weeks after the administration struck a separate accord with the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia, another member of the Ivy League, to unfreeze $175 million in return for apologizing to swimmers who competed against a transgender athlete years ago. "I also want to thank and commend Columbia University for agreeing to do what is right," Trump wrote. "I look forward to watching them have a great future in our Country, maybe greater than ever before!" Zachary Schermele is an education reporter for USA TODAY. You can reach him by email at zschermele@ Follow him on X at @ZachSchermele and Bluesky at @