logo
RFK Jr. Accuses Congressman of Being Paid by Big Pharma to Support Vaccines

RFK Jr. Accuses Congressman of Being Paid by Big Pharma to Support Vaccines

Gizmodo24-06-2025
Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the Secretary of Health and Human Services, faced over three hours of questioning at a House subcommittee hearing on Tuesday that covered everything from the shocking errors in his first major health report to his complete ignorance of federal lawsuits against major health insurance companies. But one of the standout moments during the hearing occurred when Kennedy suggested that a sitting member of Congress only opposed the health secretary's actions because he was bought and paid for by the big pharmaceutical companies.
Kennedy made his name as an anti-vaccine extremist and has purged the CDC, NIH, and FDA of top advisors who believe in vaccines, including the entire CDC Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). Kennedy was asked Tuesday by Rep. Frank Pallone, a Democrat from New Jersey, why he had avoided getting any public input on his drastic decisions about vaccines, and the health secretary defended his actions by saying there was already a committee that oversees these things. Pallone pointed out that Kennedy had fired the committee.
PALLONE: With regard to vaccines, are you just afraid to receive public comments on proposals? There's been no public process
RFK JR: We have a public process for regulating vaccines. It's called the ACIP committee.
PALLONE: You fired the committee!
[image or embed]
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar.com) June 24, 2025 at 8:12 AMBut it was after Pallone's time had officially expired that the real drama of the hearing would begin. The chairman of the committee moved on to a more MAHA-friendly member of Congress, Rep. Neal Dunn, a Republican from Florida. And as Kennedy started to respond to Dunn's softball question, he would quickly move on to address Pallone, an unusual move that's not typically permitted under the rules.
Kennedy said that Pallone had previously been a champion of people who had been harmed by vaccines and only changed his tune after receiving money from the pharmaceutical industry.
'If I can take a minute just to respond to something that Congressman Pallone said, and I'll address you, Congressman Pallone,' Kennedy said. 'Fifteen years ago, you and I met; you were at that time a champion, for people who had suffered injuries from vaccines. You were very adamant about it, you were the leading member of Congress on that issue.'
Kennedy then moved on to the money part, and the fireworks started.
'Since then, you've accepted $2 million from pharmaceutical companies in contributions, more than any other member of this committee,' Kennedy said. 'And your enthusiasm for supporting the old ACIP committee, which was completely rife and pervasive with pharmaceutical conflicts, seems to be an outcome of those contributions.'
One of Pallone's fellow members of Congress objected because Pallone apparently didn't hear what was being said about him. Once it was explained to the chairman that he was impugning the reputation of a member of Congress, Kennedy was asked to retract his statement. Kennedy only did so with a smirk.
There were many other moments from the hearing that were jaw-dropping, as Kennedy often insisted he wasn't actually cutting programs that he had indeed cut. Other times, Kennedy defended the cuts with incredibly bad logic. For example, Kennedy was asked by Rep. Troy Carter of Louisiana about why he'd cut funding for studies on an HIV vaccine. The secretary had the gall to insist it was because a vaccine for HIV had been promised for decades without results.
CARTER: How could you possibly justify the decision to terminate HIV vaccines studies?
RFK JR: We've been promising an HIV vaccine since 1984 and every year Congress pours money into it
CARTER: Because they haven't come up with one, you then cut the forward motion by getting rid of NIH dollars?
[image or embed]
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar.com) June 24, 2025 at 10:05 AMDo you think that kind of logic would fly for other diseases like cancer? We haven't cured cancer yet, so naturally, you should give up on finding new treatments?
Lawmakers often pointed out that many of the cuts were for congressionally approved programs, and he had no authority to just unilaterally decide to cut things he didn't like. But that's what he did, just like Elon Musk frequently did as the head of the so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).
Rep. Nanette Barragan, a Democrat from California, grilled Kennedy over his cuts to Alzheimer's research. Kennedy insisted he didn't know about any of those cuts and repeatedly said he didn't know if what Barragan was saying was true. Kennedy claimed ignorance about things he should know throughout the hearing.
The health secretary is wildly unqualified for his role and wrote in a recent book that he doesn't even believe in germ theory, one of the most basic things anyone needs to accept in order to understand modern medicine. Instead, Kennedy believes in miasma, or bad air, a theory that was last popular in the 19th century.
Kennedy also made some wild comments about his plans for every American to wear a wearable device that can track glucose. Trump's pick for Surgeon General, who has yet to be confirmed by the Senate, owns a company that sells a wearable which would seem to fit with Kennedy's 'vision' for health tracking. Casey Means was nominated by Trump, reportedly at Kennedy's suggestion, after questions were raised about the president's first pick for the job, Janette Nesheiwat, and her credentials. Means, a 37-year-old holistic medicine doctor, co-owns a company called Levels that sells products for monitoring glucose levels. Consumers pay at least $200 for a one-year subscription to Levels.
People who aren't diabetic don't need to be constantly monitoring their glucose levels, but Means is convinced that it's one of the keys to health. And Kennedy clearly shares that view, since glucose was the first thing he mentioned during his testimony Tuesday as something that needs to be monitored.
Kennedy's call for every American to wear a health tracker is rather amusing, given the right-wing conspiracy theories about how the government wants to track you and poison your health. It was extremely common when the covid-19 vaccine was released to hear people insist that they contained a microchip put there by Bill Gates to connect everyone to 5G wireless signals. Those crackpots, needless to say, are now some of Kennedy's biggest defenders in the 'MAHA movement.'
Rep. Balderson asked Kennedy about privacy and wearables. But the health secretary didn't acknowledge the privacy aspect, instead talking about how he personally had friends who 'changed their lives from wearing a glucose meter.'
'They've lost weight, they've lost their diabetes, and you see that happen again and again,' Kennedy said. 'And it really has a miraculous impact on health in our country. It's 80 bucks a month and we're exploring ways of making sure that those costs can be paid for.'
It's not clear what Kennedy means by how those costs can be paid for, but it would obviously be a huge windfall for any company that makes glucose monitors if they were suddenly reimbursed by Medicare for people who didn't actually need to monitor their glucose.
'The Ozempic is costing $1,300 a month. If you can achieve the same thing with an $80 wearable, it's a lot better for the American people,' Kennedy said.
Kennedy's first major report, released in May, cited studies that simply don't exist. He's hawking products that people don't need, and it sounds like he's planning to launch a huge campaign next week for a product that his fellow MAHA cultists might make money from. And there appear to be no guardrails to stop any of it. Members of Congress can ask all the tough questions they like. But as long as Trump's in power, the MAHA movement is going to move full speed ahead.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

An Ohio couple welcomes a baby boy from a nearly 31-year-old frozen embryo
An Ohio couple welcomes a baby boy from a nearly 31-year-old frozen embryo

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

An Ohio couple welcomes a baby boy from a nearly 31-year-old frozen embryo

30 Year Old Embryo A baby boy born last week to an Ohio couple developed from an embryo that had been frozen for more than 30 years in what is believed to be the longest storage time before a birth. In what's known as embryo adoption, Linda and Tim Pierce used a handful of embryos donated in 1994 in pursuit of having a child after fighting infertility for years. Their son was born Saturday from an embryo that had been in storage for 11,148 days, which the Pierces' doctor says sets a record. It's a concept that has been around since the 1990s but is gaining attraction as some fertility clinics and advocates, often Christian-centered, oppose discarding leftover embryos because of their belief that life begins at or around conception and that all embryos deserve to be treated like children who need a home. 'I felt all along that these three little hopes, these little embryos, deserved to live just like my daughter did,' said Linda Archerd, 62, who donated her embryos to the Pierces. Just about 2% of births in the U.S. are the result of in vitro fertilization, and an even smaller fraction involve donated embryos. However, medical experts estimate about 1.5 million frozen embryos are currently being stored throughout the country, with many of those in limbo as parents wrestle with what to do with their leftover embryos created in IVF labs. Further complicating the topic is a 2024 Alabama Supreme Court decision that said that frozen embryos have the legal status of children. State leaders have since devised a temporary solution shielding clinics from liability stemming from that ruling, though questions linger about remaining embryos. Archerd says she turned to IVF in 1994. Back then, the ability to freeze, thaw and transfer embryos was making key progress and opening the door for hopeful parents to create more embryos and increase their chances of a successful transfer. She wound up with four embryos and initially hoped to use them all. But after the birth of her daughter, Archerd and her husband divorced, disrupting her timeline for having more children. As the years turned into decades, Archerd said she was wracked with guilt about what to do with the embryos as storage fees continued to rise. Eventually, she found Snowflakes, a division of Nightlight Christian Adoptions, which offers open adoptions to donors that allows people like Archerd. She was also able to set preferences for what families would adopt her embryos. 'I wanted to be a part of this baby's life,' she said. 'And I wanted to know the adopting parents.' The process was tricky, requiring Archerd to contact her initial fertility doctor in Oregon and dig through paper records to get the proper documentation for the donation. The embryos then had to be shipped from Oregon to the Pierces' doctor in Tennessee. The clinic, Rejoice Fertility in Knoxville, refuses to discard frozen embryos and has become known for handling embryos stored in outdated and older containers. Of the three donated embryos the Pierces received from Archerd, one didn't make the thaw. Two were transferred to Lindsey Pierce's womb, but just one successfully implanted. According to Dr. John David Gordon, the transfer of the nearly 31-year-old embryo marks the longest-frozen embryo to result in a live birth. He would know, Gordon says his clinic assisted in the previous record, when Lydia and Timothy Ridgeway were born from embryos frozen for 30 years, or 10,905 days. 'I think that these stories catch the imagination,' Gordon said. 'But I think they also provide a little bit of a cautionary tale to say: Why are these embryos sitting in storage? You know, why do we have this problem?' In a statement, Lindsey and Tim Pierce said the clinic's support was just what they needed. 'We didn't go into this thinking about records — we just wanted to have a baby,' Lindsey Pierce said. For Archerd, the donation process has been an emotional roller coaster. Relief that her embryos finally found a home, sadness it couldn't be with her and a little anxiety about what the future holds next, with possibly meeting the Pierces and the baby in person. 'I'm hoping that they're going to send pictures,' she said, noting that the parents have already sent several after the birth. 'I'd love to meet them some day. That would be a dream come true to meet — meet them and the baby.' Solve the daily Crossword

Corporation for Public Broadcasting to shut down after being defunded by Congress, targeted by Trump
Corporation for Public Broadcasting to shut down after being defunded by Congress, targeted by Trump

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Corporation for Public Broadcasting to shut down after being defunded by Congress, targeted by Trump

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Corporation for Public Broadcasting, a cornerstone of American culture for three generations, announced Friday it would begin taking steps toward its own closure after being defunded by Congress. This announcement marks the end of a nearly six-decade era in which it fueled the production of renowned educational programming, cultural content and even emergency alerts. The demise of the corporation, known as CPB, is a direct result of President Donald Trump's targeting of public media, which he has repeatedly said is spreading political and cultural views antithetical to those the United States should be espousing. The closure is expected to have a profound impact on the journalistic and cultural landscape — in particular, public radio and TV stations in small communities across the United States. CPB helps fund both PBS and NPR. The corporation also has deep ties to much of the nation's most familiar programming, from NPR's 'All Things Considered' to, historically, 'Sesame Street,' 'Mister Rogers' Neighborhood' and the documentaries of Ken Burns. The corporation said its end, 58 years after being signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson, would come in an 'orderly wind-down.' In a statement, it said the decision came after the passage of a package that included defunding and the decision Thursday by the Senate Appropriations Committee to exclude funding for the corporation for the first time in over 50 years. The corporation had hoped that the new budget might restore its funding, but that did not happen. 'Despite the extraordinary efforts of millions of Americans who called, wrote, and petitioned Congress to preserve federal funding for CPB, we now face the difficult reality of closing our operations,' said Patricia Harrison, the corporation's president and CEO. ___ Ted Anthony And Kevin Freking, The Associated Press Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Who will win the White House in 2028? JD Vance favorite, but Dems have better odds
Who will win the White House in 2028? JD Vance favorite, but Dems have better odds

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Who will win the White House in 2028? JD Vance favorite, but Dems have better odds

Donald Trump is a little more than halfway through his first year in office, and already people are jockeying for position for the 2028 presidential election. It was about a year ago when Trump overtook Democratic nominee Kamala Harris as the favorite to win the election and he cruised from that point on. The tides have turned once again, and now democrats are favored to win back the White House in 2028. But last July, Harris was the overwhelming favorite to defeat Trump, so things can change in a hurry. According to a Democrat is -110 to win the 2028 Presidential Election. Republicans come in at +100. So while the lead is ever so slight, it is noteworthy that for the first time in about a year, Democrats are favored to win the next presidential election. If you think an independent can win, that's where the real money is. Independents are +2000 to win. 2028 presidential betting odds When it comes to individuals, nobody has really been able to pull away from the pack. Vice President JD Vance remains the top choice on the betting market. He comes in at +250. Trump himself comes in at No. 2 in betting odds at +900. Right now he can't run again, but Vegas believes that could change. On the Democratic side, California Gov. Gavin Newsom and U.S. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez are the top two favorites, both coming in at +900. Bettinglectionodds also has their odds. That site has Vance as the favorite to be the next president with a 23.9 percent chance of winning. He's followed by Newsom (8.2 percent), Ocasio-Cortez (6.6 percent), Pete Buttigieg (4.9 percent), Josh Shapiro (3.7 percent), Ron DeSantis (2.5 percent) and Ivanka Trump (2.4 percent) as the favorites. This article originally appeared on Asbury Park Press: 2028 presidential betting odds: Vance, Trump, Newsom, AOC favorites

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store