&w=3840&q=100)
SC judge highlights need to create awareness on rights of disabled people
Justice Manmohan said the courts have and will deliver verdicts on issues concerning the rights of persons with disabilities, but the other organs of the State also have to rise to the occasion.
He was speaking at a conference held here on 'Judging and lawyering at the margins disability rights and beyond'. The conference was organised by Justice Sunanda Bhandare Foundation in collaboration with Qable.
"The need of the hour is to create sensitisation, to create awareness. And I think the more awareness is there about the Act, about the rights that are available, the more the society will understand, the more the courts will understand and it will ensure more compliance," said Justice Manmohan when asked about the issue concerning implementation of the judgements.
He also spoke on the issue regarding continuous monitoring by the court for compliance of its verdicts.
"First of all, the court dockets are absolutely full and really to say that court will pick up this issue and give it absolute priority is not feasible because every day the court is grappling with so many issues," he said.
Justice Manmohan said keeping in view the constraints, it has to be ensured that other organs of the State also rise to the occasion.
The judge said the legislature will have to be aware of the issue and will have to put in place some mechanism whereby the court orders are given effect to.
"Everything cannot be done at the pain of contempt. And if we start using the power of contempt repeatedly, it also loses its utility at some point of time," he added.
Justice Manmohan said it has to be ensured the executive machinery understands that this is an obligation on them and this is "not some charity being done".
"I think the basic problem that is arising is because everyone is believing that this is some sort of a charity which is being done. You think of any concept, whether it's gender justice, whether it is persons with disability, the mindset of the executive as well, to a large extent, the people who have been adjudicating these matters in the past have been that we will deal with it as if one is doing a bit of a charity," he said.
Justice Manmohan further said things will change once people will realise it is a rights-based approach and not charity.
"But yes, I agree with you. As a short-term measure, the court will have to monitor and will have to ensure that its judgments are implemented," he said.
Justice Manmohan also cautioned if people think the court is going to monitor a matter on a daily basis, it may be raising the hopes too high.
"We have to be realistic and we have to ensure that all organs of the State work towards it. Today, everything can't be left at the judiciary's doorstep. If you think that only judiciary is going to resolve the problem of this country, you are sadly mistaken," he said.
Justice Manmohan said until and unless all organs, including the society, works for it, there will be issue at hand.
"Just see, you need empathy in the society which is lacking," the judge said.
"So, the real issue is to sensitise the society to ensure all organs of the society work together and one should not expect that it will be solved only by the judiciary," he added.
Justice Manmohan said the judiciary may take the lead in the matter, but it will only get implemented at the ground level when everyone works together.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
36 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Chandigarh: Judiciary plays the role of stabilising core of democracy, says justice Surya Kant
The judiciary serves as the stabilising core of democracy, ensuring that its generative powers are channelled within constitutional boundaries and not allowed to descend into chaos, said Supreme Court judge justice Surya Kant on Sunday. He was delivering the first annual HL Sibal Memorial Lecture at the Punjab and Haryana high court. (From left) Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, chief justice of Punjab and Haryana high court, justice Sheel Nagu, and Supreme Court judge justice Surya Kant during the event in Chandigarh on Sunday. (Keshav Singh/HT) Addressing a gathering of judges, senior advocates and legal luminaries at the high court's main Bar Room, justice Kant reflected on the judiciary's critical role in upholding constitutional values, particularly through the power of judicial review. He underscored that elections in a democracy are not mere procedures but fundamental mechanisms that require judicial oversight to maintain integrity and fairness in elections. 'Judicial review acts as a powerful deterrent against electoral malpractices. It upholds democratic values and fosters public trust, ensuring that the lifeblood of democracy continues to flow unblemished,' he said. Recalling the contributions of late Heera Lal Sibal—a renowned constitutional expert and senior advocate—justice Kant said that Sibal had a deep engagement with election law and the judiciary's supervisory powers under Articles 32, 226, and 227. He cited landmark cases such as Jagannath V Union of India and Ghapilal V Banshilal, where Sibal had appeared in matters involving allegations of electoral corruption. Justice Kant also spoke about the evolving dimensions of judicial review in contemporary times. One example he cited was the Supreme Court's intervention in enforcing political parties' financial disclosure norms and regulating election spending, recognising the corrosive impact of unaccounted expenditures on electoral integrity. He further highlighted Article 324 as one of the more visionary provisions in the Constitution, allowing the Election Commission to function independently and uphold democratic guarantees without political interference. The lecture was presided over by chief justice of Punjab and Haryana high court, justice Sheel Nagu. Senior advocate RS Cheema, additional solicitor general of India Satya Pal Jain, and many members of the legal fraternity attended the event. An emotional Kapil Sibal—senior advocate in the Supreme Court and MP—delivered the vote of thanks, honouring the memory of his father. Several members of the Sibal family, including those from abroad, were also present for the occasion.


Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
Telangana State Police Complaint Authority inaugurated
Hyderabad: The Telangana State Police Complaint Authority (SPCA) was officially opened in Hyderabad on Sunday. The new body has been established to provide transparency and accountability, particularly regarding the misuse of power by police officers of the rank of Deputy Superintendent of Police (DSP) and above. The SPCA was set up in line with Supreme Court guidelines from 2006, which followed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by former IPS officer Prakash Singh. B Shiva Shankar Rao, a retired judge, will head the authority and inaugurated the office in the D block of BRKR Bhavan. He stated that the institution will be crucial in maintaining the integrity of the police force. 'Citizens can lodge complaints of any police misconduct. The State Police Complaint Authority will ensure transparency, accountability, and fair redressal of grievances,' he said.


The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Odisha self-immolation case: Crime Branch of Odisha police arrests two persons linked to the death
The Crime Branch of Odisha police has arrested two persons linked to Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP) in connection with a student's self-immolation on the campus of F.M. Autonomous College, Balasore, leading to her death last month. Crime Branch, which was tasked with the investigation into death that sparked nationwide uproar over girl's suicide, had picked up Subhra Sambit Nayak, ABVP's State Joint Secretary and Jyotiprakash Biswal, who sustained injuries while rescuing the girl, late night of Sunday. The 20-year-old girl had accused her teacher Samira Sahoo of harassing her. However, her repeated grievances had not been redressed. She had finally set herself on fire after rushing out from office of Principal on July 12. Two days after, with 95% burn injuries, she died in AIIMS, Bhubaneswar. Earlier in several video footages, Subhra Sambit Nayak, who had graduated from college, was seen arguing with principal on behalf of the deceased girl and demanded auctioned against the accused teacher. Both accused were produced before local court and were remanded to 14 days of judicial custody. During investigation, Crime Branch officials had questioned students, teachers, parents and journalists and examined video evidences during past several weeks. Some more arrests are likely to be made in the case. A few persons linked to National Students' Union of India, student wing of Congress, may also come in the ambit of probe as they had posted remarks on the girl on social media sites. The self-immolation by girl had raised serious questions about existence of functional internal complaint committees mandated under Internal Committee mandated under the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 (POSH) and the University Grants Commission (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal of Sexual Harassment of Women Employees and Students in Higher Educational Institutions) Regulations, 2015. Following girl's suicide, Opposition political parties had cornered the Mohan Majhi Government over the issue of safety of women in the State. The State government had subsequently in series of directions ordered to come up with internal complaint committees in all educational institutes. (Those in distress or having suicidal thoughts are encouraged to seek help and counselling by calling the helpline numbers here)