Conservatives say a suspicious document was made to sway prisoners against them. We looked into it
In posts on social media on Sunday, CPC candidates Ron Chhinzer, Larry Brock and Frank Caputo all shared the document, with Chhinzer and Brock implying that the Liberal Party could be behind the move.
"This document was found behind bars and handed over by a prison guard," wrote Chhinzer in an X post that appeared on Sunday. "Are the Liberals seriously trying to win over convicted criminals by targeting Conservative crime policies?"
CBC News' visual investigations team examined the document and found that it is likely an edited version of a real government webpage that has nothing to do with prisons. The page is about learning how to file taxes.
The Correctional Service of Canada (CSC), the agency responsible for running federal prisons, also said it found no evidence of the document circulating in correctional facilities and noted that it was not an authentic government document.
WATCH | CBC News investigates a strange document allegedly found in a prison:
We investigate: Did Liberals give prison inmates this anti-Poilievre letter to sway votes?
2 days ago
Duration 2:35
Conservative candidates shared a letter on social media, claiming it was given to prison inmates to sway their vote toward the Liberals. CBC News's visual investigations team found that the letter is likely an altered version of a real web page, and the Correctional Service of Canada says it found no evidence that it's being circulated.
The claim has also been repeated and shared by social media influencers and numerous people online with posts about the document garnering hundreds of thousands of views.
Some users noted that the image appeared to be of an official Government of Canada document on "official letterhead," referring to the government logo and text at the top of the page.
The document describes a number of elements related to the Conservative Party's proposal on crime, including the creation of a "three strikes" rule for serious crimes, designation as dangerous offenders and other elements.
But it also includes a number of proposals that the Conservatives have not put forward, like requiring inmates in maximum security facilities to wear orange jump suits, removing TVs and generally slashing funding for federal prisons.
Some social media users responding to the posts questioned whether inmates were even allowed to vote. Inmates in Canada have been allowed to vote, regardless of their sentence, since 2002.
Spelling errors, odd formatting
The document allegedly found in the prison has multiple spelling errors. Near the top, "proposal" is spelled as "preposal," and in another instance the document talks about "sellings guns," with an extra "s."
The letter uses circled numbers similar to the real webpage, as well as several identically-written references to virtual lessons and how long they take to complete. One sentence, about accessing an online portal, is the same in both documents.
The document has odd and jumbled formatting, suggesting it was poorly edited. It also has a file path in the bottom left corner, implying that it may have been printed out from someone's computer.
CBC News was able to easily recreate elements of the document — for example, the way the icons on the original webpage appear as empty boxes in the letter — by saving the real webpage as its own file, saving it again as a PDF and then simply editing the PDF with online editing tools that are widely available.
CSC said in a statement that the letter was not an official government documents and that it could not find evidence that it had been found in a federal correctional institution.
"While claims were made earlier this week about the existence of a certain document that was allegedly found at an institution, we consulted with Wardens and could not find it," the statement said. "The picture that was posted on social media was not an official Government of Canada document and we do not support circulating such documents under the Government of Canada wordmark."
Conservatives respond
Reached for comment, the national Conservative campaign reiterated that a correctional officer had provided the document and that they had found it in a prison.
The Conservatives also noted that a CSC statement, provided to another media organization earlier in the week, did not explicitly deny that the document may have circulated at some point in a facility. Rather, it said that the document was not currently in circulation.
Neither the central Conservative campaign nor the candidates who shared the document online replied to specific requests for comment about where the document allegedly circulated and why candidates suggested the Liberal Party was implicated.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
2 hours ago
Government blocked streaming sites for public servants as a 'people management issue,' documents show
Although streaming services like Netflix and Amazon Prime Video weren't straining the government's network, federal officials decided to block them because they were perceived to be a people management issue, according to internal documents obtained by CBC News. Last December, the agency responsible for IT services, Shared Services Canada (SSC), blocked access to paid subscription streaming sites, including Netflix, Hulu, Apple TV+, Prime Video, Disney+ and Crave for 45 government departments and agencies. At the time, a spokesperson for SSC said "streaming services are not considered work tools and offer no business value for the Government of Canada." (new window) Documents released as part of an access to information request provide more insight on how the decision was made. In an October 2024 email, SSC president Scott Jones wrote to officials at the Treasury Board, saying he wanted to raise a couple of issues, including the use of personal phones and streaming services among bureaucrats. He wrote about a recent meeting of deputy ministers, where they discussed the use of streaming services in federal buildings — and voiced his support to block them. While streaming may ultimately impact the bandwidth available to the [Government of Canada], it is also more importantly a people management issue, he wrote. In the current context and with public perception of the public service as it is … there is value in engaging [deputy ministers] on these issues and in committing SSC to take some action. Soon after, SSC moved to block the streaming services. This email and others were obtained via an access to information request made by Matt Malone, an assistant professor at the University of Ottawa, and shared with CBC News. Thousands of hours of streaming The request, which sought documents detailing the rationale behind the decision to ban streaming services on government networks (new window) , includes a report on traffic to the streaming sites in September 2024, broken down by department. The report shed a more fulsome light into how much streaming was being done on government networks, compared to the agency's official statement when the sites were banned. In a November 2024 statement, Shared Services Canada said that network traffic monitoring shows limited traffic to these sites from government systems. The report on streaming is presented as a bar chart, showing total volume of streaming per terabyte (TB). The amount of data used depends on the quality of video streamed. As an example, Netflix offers four data usage settings (new window) — ranging from low quality to ultra-high definition. If users were streaming on standard definition, one terabyte would equal at least 1,000 hours. If they were streaming on high definition, then one terabyte equals at least 340 hours of video. The departments with the highest streaming included the Department of National Defence at over three terabytes, Public Services and Procurement Canada (PSPC) with almost three terabytes and the Privy Council Office with about 1.5 terabytes of volume per month. The report includes the top 10 departments with highest traffic to streaming websites in September 2024, including Global Affairs Canada, the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (East), Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Treasury Board Secretariat, Canada Revenue Agency and Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada. All of those departments reported about 0.75 TB of streaming volume in one month. Given the number of civil servants employed by the government, this volume is fairly minimal. For instance, PSPC alone has about 19,000 employees. Cybersecurity expert Eric Parent says the numbers presented just by volume of data don't paint a full picture. The metric we're missing is how many users, how many users are actively on [streaming] and for how long, he said. The report also shows almost 10 TB of streaming done on the federal government's guest Wi-Fi. In a letter to colleagues, a director with SSC said the streaming numbers across the government could have been relatively low in part because they used a program that throttles the speed of streaming to prioritize different internet traffic on government networks. Kate McKenna (new window) · CBC News Kate McKenna is a senior reporter with CBC's parliamentary bureau in Ottawa, where she covers federal politics. She previously worked for CBC's The Fifth Estate and in the Halifax, Montreal and Charlottetown newsrooms. Her investigative and breaking news coverage has won five RTDNA awards. She is the author of No Choice: The 30-Year Fight for Abortion on Prince Edward Island.
Vancouver Sun
4 hours ago
- Vancouver Sun
EXCLUSIVE: Leaked audio of CBC disciplinary meeting with former TV host Travis Dhanraj
A leaked audio recording of an internal CBC disciplinary meeting for a national news anchor reveals the public broadcaster's tension over its policies on journalistic standards and freedom clashing with protecting its corporate image. Travis Dhanraj, once the host of a CBC television news show called Canada Tonight with Travis Dhanraj, resigned earlier this month with fiery letters accusing the CBC of 'tokenism masquerading as diversity, problematic political coverage protocols, and the erosion of editorial independence.' His letters, one to CBC leadership and another to CBC colleagues, were made public and created controversy, including over perceived political imbalance in news coverage at the publicly funded broadcaster. Last week, Conservative Members of Parliament called for a public hearing into Dhanraj's 'damning allegations' on workplace culture and biased reporting. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. CBC has denied Dhanraj's criticisms made in his letters. More than a year before his still reverberating resignation, however, a disciplinary meeting for Dhanraj was convened by CBC shortly after he made a social media post on April 19, 2024. His post on X said: 'At a time when the public broadcaster is under increasing scrutiny and when transparency is needed.' CBC's president Catherine Tait had been asked to appear on his show. 'We wanted to discuss new budget funding, what it means for jobs & the corporation's strategic priorities ahead. Our request was declined. This is unfortunate.' At a time when the public broadcaster is under increasing scrutiny and when transparency is needed, #CanadaTonight requested an intvu w/ @PresidentCBCRC Catherine Tait. We wanted to discuss new budget funding, what it means for jobs & the corporation's strategic priorities ahead.… The disciplinary meeting preceded his removal from on-air duties for the CBC News Network show that bore his name. Dhanraj declined to comment on the recording or the meeting, referring questions to his lawyer, Kathryn Marshall. Marshall confirmed the recording National Post has is an authentic portion of a longer disciplinary meeting between Dhanraj and CBC officials. CBC did not dispute the disciplinary meeting or recording. The CBC manager speaking in the recording is identified as Andree Lau, senior director of digital publishing and streaming. Lau's LinkedIn page describes her job as overseeing the strategic and editorial direction of CBC News Network as well as other CBC news properties. In the recording she appears to equate a CBC journalist reporting something critical about the CBC with a potential breach of journalistic conflict of interest ethics, on the grounds that a CBC journalist has a personal stake in the broadcaster's success. The recording excerpt begins with Dhanraj explaining the circumstances of his post about Tait. 'The new budget funding was publicly put out in the budget on Tuesday. It was widely reported on, by not only CBC but other broadcasters. There is nothing in the tweet that is insider information,' Dhanraj says. Lau replies: 'With exception of a unionized employee criticizing their employer; that is an employee who has a personal stake in the matter whose job is part of it…. The issue is, you know, does this post meet the standards of integrity, does it meet the conflict of interest under code of conduct.' Dhanraj says: 'I firmly stand by the fact that it does.' Asks Lau: 'Do you understand the concern with this post as it relates to the principle of integrity?' Dhanraj: 'No, I really don't. I don't, and again, Andree, I find it problematic that we are in a meeting where we are discussing something that is in the interests of the corporation. So, I, I'm not seeing the separation right now between the journalism and the interest of the corporation. I see how it would be in the interest of the corporation for this tweet not to be out, but I don't see how, journalistically, it's not sound…' An unidentified union representative then asks for context on how the appearance request to Tait came about. 'I didn't watch the show that night,' he says. 'We had an editorial discussion,' Dhanraj says, 'as to whether or not now was the correct time, since there was a development, a significant development with the release of the federal budget and the new money, to put a request in for Catherine Tait. We had been discussing putting a request in for some time and we thought there was a news hook to it because of the new development….' I find it problematic that we are in a meeting where we are discussing something that is in the interests of the corporation Lau: '… What is your understanding of the protocol and considerations when CBC journalists are covering the CBC?' 'It, it's the J.S.P. statement again,' Dhanraj says, likely referencing CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices. 'Clear editorial separation,' Lau says. Dhanraj: 'So those who have the interest of the corporation should not be influencing reporters.' Lau: 'Yes.' Dhanraj: 'And if that is happening, well, that kind of goes against some core fundamentals of the public broadcaster.' Lau then says there are other aspects of the JSP involved. In a sentence in which some words are unclear on the recording, she says 'the principle of integrity and the perception of who has a stake in the matter,' finishing with 'perceived impartiality because, as I mentioned, you are an employee, and you are criticizing your employer.' The Post does not have a recording of the entire meeting. Chuck Thompson, CBC's head of public affairs, said the meeting was about more than just Dhanraj's social media post, for which Dhanraj was 'never formally disciplined for.' 'The discussions in April with Mr. Dhanraj were about a range of issues outside the tweet; there was a particular emphasis on CBC News policies about conflicts of interest, violations of journalistic standards and protocols on how we report on ourselves. 'Mr. Dhanraj violated these policies and was asked about them by his manager with his union representative present. He also secretly recorded the meeting after agreeing not to,' Thompson said. Lau could not be reached for comment prior to publication. An email sent to her on Friday was returned with an automated out of office message; a detailed message to her cell phone was not responded to. A CBC official had said they would alert Lau to the Post's request. Marshall, Dhanraj's lawyer, said what is heard in the recording is 'disturbing.' 'It shows that Travis was intimidated for simply doing his job as a journalist. He was hauled into a meeting with human resources, his boss, and the union. The purpose of the meeting, I think, was to intimidate him, scare him and pressure him, making it clear to him that he's not to do that, that he is not to post anything or say anything as a journalist that could be embarrassing to the public broadcaster,' Marshall said. 'This is deeply concerning. I think it demonstrates that CBC, in that moment, was far more interested in preserving its own reputation than allowing their journalists to do their jobs.' 'It shows that the CBC corporation has a disturbing level of control over their journalists and is involved in the types of stories that the journalists are covering or not covering. I think that speaks to significant concerns of bias and a lack of objectivity within the corporation.' Thompson said late Friday that Dhanraj is still a CBC employee although currently on leave. Marshall said CBC has still not accepted Dhanraj's resignation despite him voicing his clear intent and, in fact, are still paying him. 'I want to be very clear: The CBC doesn't get to hold him hostage. This is a free country. He's allowed to resign.' Marshall said Dhanraj is pressing a human rights lawsuit against CBC over his departure. • Email: ahumphreys@ | X: AD_Humphreys Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here .
Edmonton Journal
4 hours ago
- Edmonton Journal
EXCLUSIVE: Leaked audio of CBC disciplinary meeting with former TV host Travis Dhanraj
A leaked audio recording of an internal CBC disciplinary meeting for a national news anchor reveals the public broadcaster's tension over its policies on journalistic standards and freedom clashing with protecting its corporate image. Article content Travis Dhanraj, once the host of a CBC television news show called Canada Tonight with Travis Dhanraj, resigned earlier this month with fiery letters accusing the CBC of 'tokenism masquerading as diversity, problematic political coverage protocols, and the erosion of editorial independence.' Article content Article content His letters, one to CBC leadership and another to CBC colleagues, were made public and created controversy, including over perceived political imbalance in news coverage at the publicly funded broadcaster. Last week, Conservative Members of Parliament called for a public hearing into Dhanraj's 'damning allegations' on workplace culture and biased reporting. Article content Article content More than a year before his still reverberating resignation, however, a disciplinary meeting for Dhanraj was convened by CBC shortly after he made a social media post on April 19, 2024. His post on X said: 'At a time when the public broadcaster is under increasing scrutiny and when transparency is needed.' CBC's president Catherine Tait had been asked to appear on his show. 'We wanted to discuss new budget funding, what it means for jobs & the corporation's strategic priorities ahead. Our request was declined. This is unfortunate.' Article content At a time when the public broadcaster is under increasing scrutiny and when transparency is needed, #CanadaTonight requested an intvu w/ @PresidentCBCRC Catherine Tait. We wanted to discuss new budget funding, what it means for jobs & the corporation's strategic priorities ahead.… — Travis Dhanraj (@Travisdhanraj) April 19, 2024 Article content Article content The disciplinary meeting preceded his removal from on-air duties for the CBC News Network show that bore his name. Article content Article content Dhanraj declined to comment on the recording or the meeting, referring questions to his lawyer, Kathryn Marshall. Marshall confirmed the recording National Post has is an authentic portion of a longer disciplinary meeting between Dhanraj and CBC officials. Article content The CBC manager speaking in the recording is identified as Andree Lau, senior director of digital publishing and streaming. Lau's LinkedIn page describes her job as overseeing the strategic and editorial direction of CBC News Network as well as other CBC news properties. Article content In the recording she appears to equate a CBC journalist reporting something critical about the CBC with a potential breach of journalistic conflict of interest ethics, on the grounds that a CBC journalist has a personal stake in the broadcaster's success.
