These bills on labor issues passed the Colorado Legislature in 2025
Colorado's 2025 legislative session exposed some sharp fault lines within the Democratic Party when it comes to labor issues.
Though Democrats hold solid majorities in both the state Senate and the House of Representatives, measures backed by progressive lawmakers to protect workers from extreme heat and to prohibit the use of surveillance-based algorithms to set wages were among the bills that died in the face of opposition from moderates.
The session's biggest priority for labor groups, a bill aimed at making it easier for workers to unionize, made it through both chambers of the Legislature but is expected to be vetoed by Democratic Gov. Jared Polis at the behest of business groups. The party's progressive and moderate wings clashed over several other proposals, including a bitter fight over changes to tipped minimum wage laws.
Here are the major labor bills lawmakers enacted before adjourning their regular legislative session on May 7.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Senate Bill 25-5 would repeal the state's Labor Peace Act, a 1943 law that erected a unique obstacle to workers seeking to form a union in Colorado.
Under the law, unionizing workers, after winning a simple majority vote to form a union, must hold a second election and obtain 75% approval to negotiate so-called union security — a requirement that all represented workers pay dues, even if they don't support the union. The Labor Peace Act is effectively a modified version of the so-called 'right to work' rules enacted by many conservative states.
Democratic majorities in the Legislature approved SB-5, dubbed the Worker Protection Act. But Polis said earlier this year that he would only sign the bill if it met the approval of business groups like the Colorado Chamber of Commerce. When talks between the two sides stalled, lawmakers passed SB-5 anyway.
Polis has indicated he will veto the bill. He has until June 6 to do so. Labor leaders have vowed to revive the Worker Protection Act next year.
As originally introduced, House Bill 25-1208 would have meant steep wage cuts for tipped workers in Denver and Boulder, forcing those cities to dramatically increase their 'tip credits' — the dollar amount that employers can subtract from the minimum wage paid to tipped workers, as long as tips make up the difference.
The bill's sponsors, Denver Democratic Reps. Steven Woodrow and Alex Valdez, pitched the wage cuts as necessary relief for a struggling restaurant industry. But they backed off that plan after intense pushback from labor and progressive groups and a series of long, contentious committee hearings at the Capitol.
Instead, the amended version of HB-1208 would allow, but not require, local governments to increase their tip credits. In theory, a local government could raise the minimum wage for non-tipped employees as high as it wished, while maintaining a tipped minimum wage of $11.79 an hour, the statewide minimum.
Polis has not yet taken action on the bill.
House Bill 25-1001 would make a variety of changes aimed at combating wage theft, including raising the cap on wage-theft claims from $7,500 to $13,000, streamlining the process of adjudicating claims and increasing penalties on employers for repeated and 'willful violations' of the law.
'Colorado workers lose hundreds of millions of dollars per year in wages due to theft from bad-acting employers,' Sen. Chris Kolker, a Centennial Democrat and HB-1001 sponsor, said in a statement on the bill's passage. 'With this legislation, Colorado's labor force would more quickly and easily access their owed wages so they are fairly compensated for the work they do.'
The bill was approved by Democrats on party-line votes in the House and Senate. Polis has yet to take action on the bill.
Senate Bill 25-128 would repeal a provision in state law guaranteeing access by 'key service providers' — including medical personnel, attorneys, legal advocates and clergy — to farmworkers on private agricultural properties during off hours. That protection was passed by Democratic majorities in the Legislature in 2021 as part of a larger piece of legislation known as the Farmworkers Bill of Rights.
Sponsors, including Democratic Sen. Dylan Roberts of Avon and Republican Sen. Byron Pelton of Sterling, said the 'cleanup bill' was needed after a 2021 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that found a similar access provision enacted in California unconstitutional. The bill would leave intact the vast majority of the wide-ranging 2021 farmworkers' rights measure.
Some farmworker advocates opposed SB-128, arguing the law's protections for health care provider access weren't covered by the Supreme Court ruling and should be left in place. The bill passed with bipartisan support, with a handful of progressive Democrats in both chambers opposed. Polis has not yet taken action on it.
Senate Bill 25-83 would extend Colorado's prohibition on 'restrictive employment agreements,' including non-solicitation and non-compete agreements, to cover physicians, dentists and advanced practice nurses.
Those professions would no longer be included in the category of 'highly compensated workers' that are exempted from the non-compete ban under current law. Bipartisan majorities in the Legislature approved SB-83, with a handful of Republicans opposed.
Polis has yet to take action on the bill.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


San Francisco Chronicle
2 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Planned Parenthood closes 5 Northern California clinics, citing Trump budget bill
President Donald Trump's budget cuts to Medicaid have forced Planned Parenthood Mar Monte to shutter five clinics across Northern California and the Central Coast, including one in South San Francisco, the group said Thursday. The GOP-led federal spending bill that Trump signed into law earlier this month eliminated federal Medicaid funding for any type of medical care to organizations that perform abortions. Mar Monte is the largest Planned Parenthood affiliate in the country, with health care centers from Bakersfield, the Bay Area, Stockton and Sacramento. The now-shuttered facilities also include San Mateo, Santa Cruz, Gilroy and Madera. The closures represent the first wave of how the recent federal budget cuts will have real-life consequences for health clinics across the country — particularly for low-income Americans. They are also a crushing blow to a state that set it up to be an abortion haven after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022. In the year after the decision, political leaders in California — led by Gov. Gavin Newsom and the Democratic-controlled Legislature — passed more than a dozen new laws and invested more than $200 million to increase access across the state. Thursday's announcement drives home the extent of the federal government's tremendous power to impact abortion access. Roughly 80% of Mar Monte's patients received Medi-Cal, California's version of Medicaid. Ten million people are expected to lose their health insurance because of nearly $1 trillion in Medicaid cuts over the next decade in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. Meanwhile, the wealthiest Americans will receive a disproportionate share of the tax cuts funded by those cuts, according to the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities. In just one week since Mar Monte stopped billing Medicaid, the Planned Parenthood affiliate with 35 locations said it saw 5,000 patients — amounting to about $1.7 million in care costs it covered without reimbursement — Mar Monte Chief of Staff Andrew Adams told the Chronicle Thursday. 'It's just not sustainable,' said Adams. 'We can't keep our doors open if we continue doing that.' Mar Monte said the funding law also forced it to end services in family medicine, behavioral health and prenatal care. The Planned Parenthood affiliate estimates it will lose $100 million in annual revenue from care that can no longer be reimbursed under the law because they provide abortion care. Americans tend to support abortion rights, according to public polling. A May 2025 Gallup Poll found that 51% of respondents described themselves as 'pro choice' while 43% described themselves as 'pro life.'Of those respondents who said they were 'dissatisfied' with the nation's abortion polices, 42% said they would like to see them made 'less strict' while 14% wanted them to be 'stricter.'
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Who could fill a vacant State College school board seat? One party shares its pick
At least one familiar face will appear on the ballot for a vacant State College school board seat this fall. Jennifer Black, who ran in May's primary election as a cross-filed candidate, will serve as the Democratic nominee for a vacant seat on the State College Area School District's board of directors, the Centre County Democratic Committee announced Thursday. A professional tutor and former Bellefonte teacher, Black will contend for a two-year seat on State College's school board. Black has long said the driving force behind her campaign for a school board seat was the 2024 death by suicide of her daughter, Park Forest Middle School student Abby Smith. Black has advocated for greater mental health resources and transparency within State College's school district, which ordered external reviews examining bullying and suicide prevention and response protocols following Abby's death. 'Jennifer is running to create connections among all members of the SCASD community,' Centre County Democratic Committee chair Margie Swoboda wrote in a statement. 'She wants to ensure that the education of all students remains the focus of the board and that the mental health needs of our students, faculty and staff are being considered and met.' The Centre County Republican Committee has not yet announced its pick for November's special election. A spokesperson said the committee will unveil its pick within the next few weeks. Filling a vacancy State College's school board inherited a vacant seat following the mid-June resignation of Dan Kolbe, who is moving to Chicago with his family. Because he received election to a four-year term in 2023 and served less than half of his elected term, the winner of November's special election will fill a two-year interim term through November 2027. State College's board appointed former Penn State professor and State College borough council member Jesse Barlow to fill Kolbe's vacant seat until November's election. Barlow, who remains on the November ballot for a four-year term on the board, will serve on an interim basis until Election Day. Black was one of seven cross-filed candidates to run in May's primary election for State College's school board. Though she received more than 5,000 total votes, she did not earn a party nomination for a four-year term on the regular November ballot. The Municipal Election is set for Tuesday, Nov. 4. Pennsylvania voters have until Oct. 20 to register to vote in that election and until Oct. 28 to request a mail-in or absentee ballot. Solve the daily Crossword


San Francisco Chronicle
3 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Lawyers from both sides of the aisle decry Trump attacks on judges at California conference
It's time for the legal community to speak up about the increasing threats to judges across the country, a diverse pair of legal scholars said Thursday at the conference of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. 'Lawyers have to stand up to this, stand up for judicial independence," said Paul Clement, who has argued for conservative causes and was the Justice Department's solicitor general under President George W. Bush. Erwin Chemerinsky, the law school dean at UC Berkeley who has argued cases in the Supreme Court in favor of racial diversity and other liberal causes, cited Republican calls to impeach judges who have ruled against President Donald Trump. 'Being a judge now is more important than it's ever been in American history,' Chemerinsky told the audience of hundreds of lawyers and judges at the court's conference in Monterey. 'This is a time when we need judicial courage. We need the lawyers to be courageous too.' And in a reference to Trump's apparent disregard of judges' orders to stop sending immigrants, some of them with legal status, to prisons in Latin America, Chemerinsky said, 'If any president can violate court orders, can lock any of us up, the word for that is dictatorship.' Clement, as a Justice Department lawyer, argued before the Supreme Court, unsuccessfully, to try to overturn President Barack Obama's national health insurance law, the Affordable Care Act, and in defense of a law banning federal benefits for same-sex married couples. As a private attorney, he was on the winning side of last year's ruling allowing judges to decide the meaning of contested federal regulations, overturning a 1984 decision that required courts to accept an agency's interpretation when the meaning of a law was unclear. 'I'm a big believer in executive power,' Clement told the conference. But 'if you have an administration that is trying to push the limits … you're in a period of extraordinary tension.' He criticized Trump's Justice Department for prosecuting a federal judge in Wisconsin who directed an undocumented immigrant to the back door of her courtroom when federal immigration agents were looking for him, and for recent statements by Attorney General Pam Bondi denouncing 'unelected' federal judges who have frustrated the administration's program. It's time to 'turn down the volume,' Clement said. They spoke three days after the latest Republican proposal to break up the 9th Circuit, the nation's largest federal appeals court. The court hears appeals of federal cases from California, eight other Western states and the territories of Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands. Its rulings are binding on federal judges in all of those states, including conservative dominions such as Idaho and Montana, and it has a 16-13 majority of judges appointed by Democratic presidents. The legislation by two Idaho Republicans, Sens. Mike Crapo and Jim Risch, would leave California, Hawaii and Guam in the 9th Circuit and create a new 12th Circuit court for the other states. It is the 60th such bill introduced since 1985, and would appear to have little chance of overcoming a Democratic filibuster in the Senate. The measure, Risch said in a statement, 'would split and modernize the 9th Circuit, allowing for more manageable caseloads and justice that aligns with the values of Idaho.'