Mass. lawmakers say they are on precipice of outlawing mandatory tenant-paid broker's fees in $61 billion budget
'We wanted to . . . minimize anything that happens, especially down in DC,' the Westport Democrat said. 'We still don't know what's going to happen down there.'
Advertisement
The $61 billion plan, which needs final legislative approval before going to Governor Maura Healey, would come in $1 billion under what
Legislative leaders said they cut $300 million in what they had originally planned to spend on MassHealth, the state's Medicaid program, and stripped out administrative costs. They also said they slimmed down some local earmarks, or funding for projects in individual districts.
Advertisement
In doing so, they also rewrote its plan so that $450 million in money they plan to dedicate to local school districts will now be funded by money generated by the so-called millionaires tax. The agreement would now commit to spending $2.4 billion from that pot of revenue, a nearly $500 million jump from what they initially agreed to and more than $1 billion above what they budgeted for this fiscal year.
The money generated by the surtax has repeatedly blown past state projections, with nearly
State Representative Aaron Michlewitz, the House's budget chair, said legislative leaders felt they could 'be a little more aggressive with our approach' in using surtax funding given how much it's raised.
'Taking the term from Washington, this was actually the real
Earlier this month, Healey signed a
Rodrigues pointed to the bill as a sign that the Legislature is investing in the T, which would get $470 million in what lawmakers called 'direct investment.'
'We are very comfortable and confident that the amount of money that we invested in the MBTA will allow them to continue on the path they've been on in improving,' he said.
Advertisement
The sweeping plan announced Sunday also includes several major policy changes. It would effectively ban charging tenants mandatory broker's fees —
The measure that would outlaw mandatory tenant-paid broker's fees is years in the making. The charges typically amount to a month's rent and have become a virtual rarity elsewhere. After
Healey already
The budget also would mandate that regional transit authorities provide fare-free service, while giving them $209 million in funding to make it a reality.
The compromise budget also left out pieces of policy proposed by both chambers. The Senate, for example, attached a rider to its budget plan that would give local officials, not lawmakers on Beacon Hill, the power to determine the number of liquor licenses distributed in their city or town. It didn't make the cut. Neither did a proposal to pause admissions reforms at vocational and technical schools.
State policymakers are trying to budget at a time of upheaval in Washington, where Republican leaders are pushing sprawling legislation through the US Senate that could
Advertisement
The state has been
That could create some headaches in the weeks ahead, including a potential budget gap policymakers will need to decide how to fill. The Massachusetts Taxpayers Foundation, a business-backed budget watchdog, said last week that tax revenue may come in at least $600 million below what state officials had initially projected for the fiscal year that starts Tuesday.
That projection didn't even account for potential impacts of the Trump administration's trade policies or the chance of an economic downturn, which the foundation
House Speaker Ron Mariano and Senate President Karen E. Spilka said in a joint statement that the plan would 'make Massachusetts more affordable, and will protect our most vulnerable residents.'
'As President Trump and Congressional Republicans continue to pursue devastating cuts to programs that millions of Americans rely on, we recognize the heightened importance of passing a fiscally responsible budget that invests in the areas that we value most,' the Democrats said.
Advertisement
Sunday's announcement marked a bit of relatively speedy deal-making for lawmakers. Should they whisk the agreement to Healey's desk on Monday as expected, it would be the first time since 2016 that they passed a budget deal before the start of the fiscal year.
Still, Healey has 10 days to decide whether to sign, veto, or amend parts of the plan. That makes likely this the 15 straight year the state will begin the year
'She still has the opportunity to put some of her fingerprints on the budget, and we would never deny her that opportunity,' Rodrigues said of Healey.
Samantha J. Gross can be reached at
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump wins again as ‘big beautiful bill' passes the Senate. What are the lessons for the Democrats?
Donald Trump is continuing his run of political wins after his keynote legislation, nicknamed the 'big beautiful bill', squeaked through the Senate. While the bill, which includes major cuts in tax and government spending, must now go back to the House of Representatives for another vote, passing the upper house is highly significant. Trump lost the support of just three Republican senators, and with the help of a tie-breaking vote from Vice-President J.D. Vance managed to push the bill forward. Democrats, the minority in both the House and Senate, have been unable to do anything but sit by and watch as Trump claims victory after victory. These include progress in his attempt to end birthright citizenship, the claimed destruction of significant Iranian nuclear sites (yet to be independently verified) and the convincing of Nato member states to increase defence spending to 5% of their GDP. Trump may even be getting closer to a peace deal between Israel and Hamas. And now the Democrats have failed in their desperate attempts to stop this bill. In the Senate, it was felt that there could be enough Republican senators concerned about cuts to Medicaid (the US system that provides essential healthcare to those on low incomes), the closure or reduction of services at rural hospitals, and the increase in national debt to potentially hinder the bill's progress. However, Democrats were unable to do anything apart from delaying the voting process, and the bill is progressing with some changes but not enough to be severely weakened. It had seemed likely that the Democrats could work with the Maga-focused Freedom Caucus group of representatives, whose members include Marjorie Taylor Greene, in the early stages in the House to stop its initial passage. But Speaker Mike Johnson managed to calm most of their fears about the rise in the deficit to get the bill through the House. The lack of effective opposition from the Democrats reflects their congressional standing. The Republicans control the Senate 53-47, and they also have a majority of 220-212 in the House, with three vacancies. While Democrat numbers in Congress is the primary issue in opposing this bill, their future congressional power will rely on strong leadership within the party and, more importantly, a clear set of policies with appeal that can attract more support at the ballot boxes. Failure to address this will probably allow Republicans to dominate Congress and shape American domestic and foreign policy any way they wish for longer. While Democrat Hakeem Jeffries has been a diligent minority leader in the House, he has attempted to operate as an obstacle to Republican policies with little success, rather than reaching across the political divide to create a consensus with dissenting Republicans. Outside of Congress, California governor Gavin Newsom, widely touted as a potential candidate for the next presidential election, has offered some resistance to the Trump administration, particularly over Trump's assumption of national command over the state-controlled National Guard to deal with protests in California against the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency. However, Newsom's reputation is still relatively regional, although it is on the rise. There will be jostling over the next couple of years for the Democratic presidential nomination, and this will have an impact on the platform that the party runs on. Party members and those voting for the next presidential nominee will need to decide whether to continue with the mainly centrist position that the party has adopted since the 1990s or adopt something more left-wing. A more radical candidate, such as New York representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, might offer a substantially different proposal that could seem attractive to Democratic voters and those Trump supporters who may feel dissatisfied with the current Republican administration. However, democratic socialist Zohran Mamdani, recently selected as the Democratic nominee for the New York mayoral election, has already been vilified by some in the Republican party. Concerns about such a supposedly 'radical' candidate may concern many voters in red states in middle America. However, getting elected is one thing but implementing progressive, left-leaning policies is another thing entirely. They also need to deliver solutions to major issues, such as crime, at all levels, to show their abilities to solve problems. It is not just the policies that matter for the Democrats, but who they want to represent. Last year's election suggested that the Democrats had been ousted as the representatives of the working class. Some significant labour unions, a foundation of Democratic support for the majority of the 20th century, failed to endorse Kamala Harris. Mamdani's success in New York stemmed from the mobilisation of a grassroots campaign that used social media effectively. It targeted young working-class voters disenchanted with the Democratic party. He also resonated with voters in areas that had seen an increase in Republican voters in the 2024 election. All this may offer some lessons to the Democrats. They need to reassess their policies, their image and their tactics, and show Americans that they can solve the problems that the public sees as most important, including the high cost of living. While they can expect to gain seats in the House in next year's midterms, they need to look for a leader and policies that will capture the public's hearts. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article. Dafydd Townley does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.


Newsweek
11 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Musk Suffers New Blow as Tesla Sales Drop for Second Quarter
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Elon Musk's Tesla reported another decline in deliveries in the second quarter, deepening the electric vehicle company's slump after a slower start to the year. Newsweek reached out to Tesla's press team via email for comment. Why It Matters Musk, once a vocal supporter and informal adviser to President Donald Trump, has stepped away from his government role leading the cost-cutting Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) and returned to focus on his companies, including Tesla. Musk and Trump's public split and fallout included character jabs as well as policy disagreements, including Trump's prized "big, beautiful" bill, which seeks to make the 2017 tax cuts permanent while cutting Medicaid funding and ending electric vehicle tax credits. Musk enjoys numerous lucrative contracts with the government across companies, including SpaceX, which Trump has threatened to revoke. The drop in sales and deliveries may signal an extended consumer backlash against the Tesla brand. Protests and vandalism targeting Tesla, which began in response to Musk's time in the Trump administration, have continued since his departure. What To Know On Wednesday, Tesla reported its second-quarter production and delivery figures, producing 410,244 vehicles, primarily Model 3 and Model Y cars, and delivering 384,122. Deliveries are considered a proxy for sales. The figures are about 14 percent lower than in the second quarter of 2024, when Tesla produced 410,831 vehicles and delivered 443,956. The second-quarter findings are also lower than those of the first quarter of 2025, which reported 362,615 vehicles produced and 336,681 deliveries, representing a decline of approximately 13 percent from the first quarter of 2024. The first-quarter slump coincided with Musk's formal affiliation with the president and his appointment to the DOGE position. A Tesla car recharges at a Tesla charging station in Charlotte, North Carolina, on June 24, 2017. A Tesla car recharges at a Tesla charging station in Charlotte, North Carolina, on June 24, 2017. AP Photo/Chuck Burton This quarter, production and deliveries increased from the first quarter but remained below the levels of a year earlier. The numbers represent a longer three-year decline in sales. In Europe, Tesla sales have dropped notably, with the company selling 8,729 vehicles in the European Union last month, a 40.5 percent decrease from the 14,682 sold in May 2024, according to data released on Wednesday by the European Automobile Manufacturers Association. Musk has also been pursuing a political agenda in Europe, with recent interventions in the German election and British politics. The electric vehicle market has become increasingly saturated since Tesla's inception, with numerous other manufacturers now producing hybrid electric cars, including BYD, BMW, Volkswagen, and others. In addition to its fleet, Tesla is also focusing on its robotaxi, self-driving service. What People Are Saying Tesla CEO Elon Musk, during a conference call in April, said he was "extremely optimistic about the future of the company," which will be "fundamentally based on large-scale autonomous cars and large-scale—being large volume—vast numbers of autonomous humanoid robots." Musk continued: "The value of a company that makes truly useful autonomous humanoid robots and autonomous useful vehicles at scale, at low cost—which is what Tesla is going to do—is staggering. I continue to believe that Tesla, with excellent execution, will be the most valuable company in the world by far." President Donald Trump told reporters Wednesday: "We might have to put DOGE on Elon," adding that "DOGE is the monster that might have to go back and eat Elon." What Happens Next Tesla remains one of the largest suppliers of electric vehicles in the world, but competitors have taken note of the disappointing numbers and are likely to move to secure a greater market share. On Tuesday, Trump noted that he will "have to take a look" into deporting Musk, who was born in South Africa and became a naturalized United States citizen more than two decades ago.


The Hill
11 minutes ago
- The Hill
House Democrats demand closure of ‘Alligator Alcatraz'
House Democrats are calling for the closure of Florida's new migrant detention facility on a remote site nestled in the Everglades dubbed 'Alligator Alcatraz,' citing it as an example of what they argue is the Trump administration's 'shameful, dehumanizing approach to immigration.' Democratic Reps. Janelle Bynum (Ore.) and Maxwell Frost (Fla.) led a group of 24 Democrats in sending a letter to Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and Acting Director of the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Todd Lyons on Wednesday. The letter includes signatures from Reps. Pramila Jayapal (Wash.), Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (N.Y.), Rashida Tlaib (Mich.) and Eric Swalwell (Calif.), among others. The Democratic lawmakers panned the facility as a 'cruel and inhumane stunt.' The administration used money from the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Shelter and Services Program to build the facility, which is projected to cost about $450 million a year. 'This kind of cruel rhetoric and deliberate endangerment further exemplifies the administration's shameful, dehumanizing approach to immigration – an approach rooted in anti-immigrant hostility that is morally indefensible and in clear violation of fundamental human rights,' the members wrote in the letter. They said migrants detained there while awaiting deportation will be kept in tents 'with inadequate sanitation facilities' facing conditions including 'exposure to deadly pathogens, constant threats from unpredictable flooding and extreme weather events, and daily temperatures averaging 90 degrees, with a heat index often over 100 degrees Fahrenheit.' 'Erecting tents in the blazing Everglades sun, during hurricane season no less, and call it immigration enforcement is nothing short of disgusting and cruel. Donald Trump and his Administration don't care if migrant men, women, and children live or die – they only care about cruelty and spectacle,' Frost said in a statement. The group is demanding clarity on the funding and conditions at the facility and 'a commitment to humane treatment for all detainees at all detention facilities.' Trump toured the site Tuesday to mark its opening, touting the facility alongside Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem. The facility was built through a partnership with state and federal resources to bolster Trump's immigration crackdown and features soft-sided units outfitted with chain-link cells that have been built to house hundreds of detainees. 'It's known as 'Alligator Alcatraz,' which is very appropriate, because I looked outside and it's not a place I want to go hiking anytime soon,' Trump said while at the facility. 'We're surrounded by miles of treacherous swampland and the only way out is, really, deportation.'